I've written about this subject before, where I used the phrase: "Be careful what you wish for" in the opening paragraph, so I thought I'd just use it as today's headline. Previously, I had written about an effort in the Senate to introduce a bill that would remove the ability of federal judges below the level of the Supreme Court to issue nationwide (or "universal") injunctions which banned government behavior while a case was being litigated. Here's how Republican Senator Josh Hawley explained the need for the bill he intended to introduce:

What needs to happen is one of two things: Either the Supreme Court needs to intervene and make clear there's only one court that can issue rules for the whole country, that's the Supreme Court, that's why we only have one of them. [O]r, if they won't do that, Congress needs to legislate and make clear that district courts do not have the ability to issue these kinds of injunctions.

Today, the issue was indeed argued before the Supreme Court. And the conservatives on the court seemed open to perhaps limiting or removing the ability of lower-court judges to issue such universal injunctions. To which I again say: Be careful what you wish for.

Continue Reading »

Will Democrats have an opening to pick up a Senate seat next year... in Texas? Personally, I have to remain skeptical, since Texas has long been the source of perennial disappointment for Democrats who have the dream of "flipping Texas blue." It's an enticing dream, to be sure, because Texas would be incredibly pivotal in electing a Democrat back into the White House. Flipping Texas blue in the Electoral College would make it practically impossible for a Republican to put together the 270 votes needed to become president. But flipping it blue even in a Senate race (or a governor's race, for that matter) has not happened yet, despite several exciting campaigns and lots of money donated to the cause. After all, even Ted Cruz -- one of the most-disliked senators around -- managed to win re-election. So it's a stretch, at best, to imagine John Cornyn being defeated by a Democrat next year.

But the dynamics of the race could actually give Democrats an opening, as Politico points out today. Here's how things are shaping up:

Continue Reading »

There are plenty of things wrong with the proffered gift (to Donald Trump from the rulers of Qatar) of a luxury 747 airplane to serve as a sort of interim Air Force One. For starters, Qatar has "historically been a funder of terrorism at a very high level." For another, it's one of many Middle Eastern countries "that horribly abuse women and L.G.B.T. citizens" -- a country that "oppress[es] women, gays and people of different faiths." You could get even more specific: "You talk about women and women's rights? So these are people that push gays off buildings. These are people that kill women and treat women horribly. And yet you take their money." These complaints merely scratch the surface of the wrongness of accepting this plane, but they are relevant because they are all quotes from Donald Trump himself, castigating Hillary Clinton for accepting contributions to the Clinton Foundation from Qatar and other Middle Eastern countries.

That was then, this is now. Now, it is just fine with Trump that Qatar is offering him a $400 million airplane for his own use, which will be transferred to his presidential library after he leaves office. Then there would be nothing to stop him from then having his library just give him the plane as a personal gift for him to use, or he could just park it inside his library, so it could be just as big a draw as the former Air Force One in Ronald Reagan's presidential library.

Continue Reading »

What would you think if an arsonist set fire to your house, waited until the flames were causing major damage, and then rushed in and put (most of) the fire out? Would you thank the arsonist for saving your house, or would you be angry with him for starting the fire in the first place? Would you look around your home, now drenched in water and with some spots still smoldering and burning, and be thankful? Probably not.

Continue Reading »

If you'll check a historic calendar (which is easy enough to do), you will clearly see that there are three possible days which could validly be celebrated as marking the end of World War II. They are: August 14th, August 15th, or September 2nd. The initial announcement of the surrender of Japan was made on August 14th, in Japan. Due to the nature of time zones, this happened when it was August 15th in America already. Then the formal surrender, which happened on the deck of the battleship U.S.S. Missouri, was signed on September 2nd. The president at the time, Harry Truman, announced the United States would celebrate what was known as "V-J Day" (for "Victory over Japan Day") on September 2nd. So that would be the most likely day you'd expect any subsequent American president to announce as a new semi-holiday, since it was when World War II actually officially ended. But you'd be wrong.

This week, Donald Trump announced that May 8th would be celebrated as "Victory Day for World War II." His proclamation does not even mention how the war continued in the Pacific for months afterwards. May 8th was "V-E Day" (Victory in Europe Day), when Germany surrendered, but it would take dropping two atomic bombs on Japan before the war was truly over. Which Trump has apparently never heard of, or something. As always, with Trump it's hard to tell what he doesn't remember from school versus what he never managed to learn in the first place.

Continue Reading »

Republicans in Congress are at the "rubber meets the road" phase of constructing their new budget, where they have to put actual numbers down on paper and add them all up. The next few weeks are going to be a dizzying frenzy of dealmaking and adjustments, as differing priorities are weighed against each other. But at the heart of their plans is a big "tax cut." I put that in scare quotes because the American taxpaying public is probably not going to see it in quite the same way as the Republicans do. The public, in fact, is going to be left wondering: "Tax cut? What tax cut? I don't see a tax cut anywhere!" Which could make the whole thing a hard sell, politically.

Continue Reading »

A legal fight in North Carolina over the 2024 election held for a seat on the state's supreme court is now officially over. After a recent ruling from a federal judge which would have shut down the effort to overturn an election (which was verified by two separate recounts), the Republican who tried to do so is now waving the white flag of surrender, saying: "I will not appeal the court's decision." This brings to an end a very dangerous legal fight that could have had implications for democracy not only in North Carolina but (had it been appealed all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court) elsewhere in America as well. In the end, a federal judge (appointed by Donald Trump, no less) upheld democracy in the face of a Republican attack on how elections are determined.

The winner of the election -- by only 734 votes, out of more than 5.5 million cast -- will now be certified. This will not change anything, since Justice Allison Riggs was running for re-election to the state's high court. The balance of power on the court was never in doubt, because Riggs is one of only two Democrats, while the Republicans hold five seats. But the principle was important nonetheless.

Continue Reading »

There was some good news today for all Americans who cherish the United States Constitution. Interim U.S. Attorney for D.C. Ed Martin's nomination to be permanently confirmed for the job is in trouble. Senator Thom Tillis -- a Republican who will be facing a tough re-election fight next year in North Carolina -- has announced he will not support Martin's nomination in the Judiciary Committee. So Martin's confirmation won't even make it out of the Senate committee responsible for vetting candidates. Since no Democrat is going to vote for him, it leaves Martin with only 11 votes for and 11 against -- which is not enough to make it out of the committee.

This, as I said, is good news, because Martin is one of the more odious of any of Trump's nominees. He was on the Capitol grounds on January 6th, is a full-blown election denier, and has fired many federal prosecutors for the sin of prosecuting the crimes that were committed that day (earlier, he called such prosecutors "terrorists"). He has defended January 6th rioters who have espoused Nazi views. And that's just for starters.

Continue Reading »

Yesterday, the NBC show Meet The Press aired an interview that host Kristen Welker had held with Donald Trump two days earlier. It generated a lot of news, since it's one of the few interviews he has given as president to a news organization that doesn't inhabit the rightwing echo chamber. It generated a lot of headline quotes, including Trump answering: "I don't know" to the question: "Don't you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States as president?"

The other big headline-generators were his responses on the economy. Trump responded in classic Trump fashion (which should surprise exactly no one) when asked whether we were now in "the Trump economy" or not: "I think the good parts are the Trump economy and the bad parts are the Biden economy." Because of course that's what he thinks. When asked if it was "okay in the short term to have a recession," Trump answered: "Yeah. Everything's okay."

But there were other things Trump said that deserved to get a lot more attention than they have. Trump's answers on the economy -- specifically, whether his 145 percent tariffs on China are hurting consumers or any businesses (especially small businesses) in the United States -- seemed pretty newsworthy, since Trump's answer was essentially: "I don't care."

Continue Reading »

Donald Trump hit two milestones this past week: his first 100 days in office, and his first quarter of negative G.D.P. growth. True to form, he celebrated the first of these with a rally, while blaming the second on Joe Biden. He even tried to front-load any bad economic news in the second quarter as Biden's fault too. Oh, and for good measure, Trump expressed a desire to become the next pope. Which would probably be fine with plenty of Americans -- as long as he quits his current job in order to do so.

Of course, nobody's really buying Trump's economic blame-shifting, since it's pretty obvious that he is the sole reason why the American economy is stumbling. The trade war he started with the entire rest of the world (except Russia, of course) continues to be a big drag on the economy, and the fallout has really only just begun. Trump had to walk back part of his tariffs on automobiles (which he announced at his Michigan rally this week), but he shows no signs of backing down in his pissing match with China.

Continue Reading »