ChrisWeigant.com

Please support ChrisWeigant.com this
holiday season!

Bobby Jindal Becomes 13th GOP Candidate

[ Posted Wednesday, June 24th, 2015 – 16:30 UTC ]

Bobby Jindal, the governor of Louisiana, just became the 13th Republican candidate for president. Whether this will prove to be lucky or unlucky remains to be seen. Even though the field is already incredibly crowded, Jindal will not be the last Republican to announce -- there are at least two other contenders who will likely jump in (Scott Walker and Chris Christie), with the possibility of a few more longshot candidates as well. The more crowded the field gets, the harder it is going to be for any one of them to stand out, which is precisely Jindal's main problem.

It's hard, after all, to differentiate yourself when there are so many other candidates who are so similar. Jindal's going to be looking for the evangelical vote, but Mike Huckabee may have more luck. Jindal's the first Indian-American to make a presidential bid, but there are two other children of immigrants running (Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio), who might pull in a larger share of the electorate due to being Latino. And there are plenty of other state governors running, some with much more successful state economies to brag about. So it's going to be extremely hard for Jindal to be seen as unique among all the other diverse candidates.

Piyush "Bobby" Jindal (Bobby is a childhood nickname, not his legal name) was born to parents who had immigrated from India while his mother was four months pregnant. Bobby has immersed himself in America in true melting-pot fashion, from his southern drawl to the nickname he took from The Brady Bunch. Jindal converted to Christianity while a young man, and is now a Catholic. His academic career is impressive on paper, as is his political career. Although fairly young, he's been both a member of the House of Representatives and a twice-elected governor (he also lost several elections before his political career began to take off). All of which looks good for anyone applying for the job of president.

But Jindal's time might have passed -- if it ever even existed. He's not as fresh a face on the political scene as he once was, and he may have lost any chance he had with his first foray onto the national stage -- a disastrous response in 2009 to President Obama's first address to a joint session of Congress (it technically wasn't a "State Of The Union" speech). Jindal's speech was roundly panned from both sides of the aisle, and a New York Times column labelled it the "Howdy Doody-meets-Mister Rogers response," which pretty much sums it up. But even in the category of "disastrous Obama speech responses," Jindal will have to compete with Marco Rubio's infamous sip from a tiny bottle of water.

Jindal does have a few interesting things in his background, but they're not all that potent on a national political stage. He actually delivered his third child himself, at home, which I don't think any of the other candidates can claim. He also participated in a sort of amateur, non-sanctioned exorcism while in college as well, but I really doubt he'll be bringing that one up while campaigning.

Jindal had one moment of clarity after the Republican Party's disastrous showing in the 2012 elections, when he begged other Republicans to "stop being the stupid party." This was mostly in response to the "legitimate rape" type of comments several Republican senatorial candidates had made during the election cycle, but since that time Jindal has fervently worked to win over as much of the Republican base as possible, by tacking as hard to the right as he knows how. This includes such things as trying to get evolution and "intelligent design" taught in Louisiana schools. Jindal also notably tried (and failed miserably) to take his anti-immigrant show on the road, informing Britain that there were "no-go zones" of Muslims in their country -- much to the astonishment of the people who actually live there.

Jindal ushered in massive tax cuts in Louisiana, and the state's budget is in crisis because of his refusal to backtrack one inch on taxes. Jindal is not only a devout Christian, he's also a devout Norquistian -- a worshipper at the shrine of Grover Norquist and his "no taxes, ever" pledge. Jindal's current contortions on taxes are downright insane -- he's trying to tax university students and then refund the same amount to them, all so he can raise a separate tax without getting Grover Norquist mad at him. This plan is so loopy he's lost support from members of his own party in the legislature. This has resulted in Jindal moving in a short period of time from the position of winning a landslide re-election to now polling lower in his home state than President Obama (which is really saying something, for a deep South state).

Jindal also lost his bid to get Louisiana's legislature to pass a "turn away the gays" law, even after Indiana and Arkansas had to back down from their own efforts. Jindal then did what most Republicans complain about when President Obama does the same thing -- he issued an executive order that completely bypassed the legislature. Look for this to be brought up by his Republican opponents. Jindal's past support of the Common Core educational standards could hurt him in the primary season, as well.

That, however, will only happen if his Republican contenders even bother to notice him. Jindal is polling so low it's barely measurable in the national polls right now. Even if he gets a bump in the polls from his campaign announcement, he's got a long way to go to even get into the top ten contenders. Jindal quite obviously has been dreaming about a run for the presidency for quite some time now, but the Republican Party's base has apparently moved on to fresher faces on the scene. It'll be hard for Jindal, at this point, to even make the cut for the debate stages. Of course, if he does make it to a televised debate and somehow puts in a forceful performance, the headline the next day will be pretty easy to write: "When Piyush Comes To Shove."

At this point, however, Bobby Jindal looks like the longest of longshots to even win the Republican nomination. He's not exactly a vanity candidate -- he is a state governor, after all -- but the best he can probably hope for at this point is to get a cushy job at Fox News at some future date. Even in the running for the vice-presidential slot on someone else's ticket, Jindal likely won't be anyone's first choice. After all, if a Republican presidential nominee decides to pick a governor from the South who is Indian-American, Nikki Haley may be a much more intriguing choice.

Bobby Jindal has been preparing to run for president for a long time. However, his best chance might have come and gone in 2012. In the 2016 race, Jindal seems destined to be just another candidate far back in the running, who will eventually run out of money and leave the race fairly early. And that was all true before he decided to become the unlucky 13th entrant into the Republican race.

-- Chris Weigant

 

Cross-posted at The Huffington Post

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant

 

23 Comments on “Bobby Jindal Becomes 13th GOP Candidate”

  1. [1] 
    John From Censornati wrote:

    "In the 2016 race, Jindal seems destined to be just another candidate far back in the running"

    That's a shame. Apparently, some of the people that India sends aren't bad. He might be the one who could cut into the Dem advantage on immigration if he did a better job of highlighting his anchor baby to governor story. Instead, history will sort of remember him as the answer to a trivia question - one of the fake candidates who finished behind The Donald's Make America Fake Again campaign.

  2. [2] 
    Chris Weigant wrote:

    John From Censornati -

    You know, I've been thinking about adding a line to one of these articles saying "when we look back from the perspective of history, the 2016 GOP primary race will probably be known as 'that time when EVERYone ran.'"

    :-)

    -CW

  3. [3] 
    Michale wrote:

    Once again, the GOP takes the Democrat Party to school on the subject of DIVERSITY :D

    Ya'all just GOT to appreciate the irony... :D

    Michale

  4. [4] 
    akadjian wrote:

    I think the entire GOP party is running.

    I'm rooting for "The Donald".

    I think it's great that Jindal is running. It's a chance for every media outlet in America to talk about how he destroyed the Louisiana economy.

    Walker's time in the spotlight is over. Chicago Tribune just ran a piece about his corrupt jobs agency (also known as Scott Walker's personal handout corporation).

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-scott-walker-jobs-agency-20150619-story.html

    Looking more like Rubio/Bush. I think John Kasich will make a surprise come-from-behind appearance before it's through too.

    -David

  5. [5] 
    TheStig wrote:

    Jindal. It's time for a Dewars. I think that's his slogan. I see where they're going, but personally, I would require at least four more shots, in quick succession, to take him seriously. It would wear off by morning. Less popular than Obama in Louisiana? Is that mathematically possible?

    CW- 2016, the year nobodies ran. I think another snark exemption is called for.

    Oh, by the by, HuffPo is headlining that O'Care made it past the Supremes.

  6. [6] 
    Michale wrote:
  7. [7] 
    TheStig wrote:

    Akadjian - 4

    " I think the entire GOP party is running."

    It's a Republican fun run. Most participants don't expect to win or even place. Exercise and a t-shirts are the goals. Spurred on by family and well wishers shouting "you're all winners!" Sponsored by Fox News, ALEC and the Chamber of Commerce.

  8. [8] 
    TheStig wrote:

    Justice Scalia's ill tempered dissent will henceforth be known to students of the law as the Feck, Arse and Drink Doctrine.

  9. [9] 
    Michale wrote:

    Mock the GOP all ya want..

    But you can deny that the GOP has diversity and the Democrat Party is the Party of old white people...

    Apparently, THAT is a bad thing when it's on the Right side of the aisle.... :^/

    Michale

  10. [10] 
    Michale wrote:

    But you can deny that the GOP has diversity and the Democrat Party is the Party of old white people...

    Grrrrrr

    But you can NOT deny that the GOP has diversity and the Democrat Party is the Party of old white people...

    Michale

  11. [11] 
    Michale wrote:

    Looking more like Rubio/Bush. I think John Kasich will make a surprise come-from-behind appearance before it's through too.

    It's going to be Walker...

    Michale

  12. [12] 
    Chris Weigant wrote:

    TheStig [8] -

    Oooo! A "Father Ted" reference! You win my comment of the day award!

    :-)

    When in Ireland, I got a T-shirt with the image of Father Jack and "DRINK!" on it...

    -CW

  13. [13] 
    TheStig wrote:

    M-9,10

    But you can NOT deny that the GOP has diversity and the Democrat Party is the Party of old white people..

    Among presidential aspirants without a change in Hell of winning the nomination, let alone winning the Presidency, I take your point. But in terms of current office holders, your assertion is bogus.

    The current POTUS is a minority, and he's a Democrat.

    A bumper crop of minorities in the House O' Reps, but wait a tick, virtually none have an R after their name.

    The Senate. Well it's still a white male club. Of the 20 women, 6 are Republicans. Of the 3 black senators, one is tagged R.

    If we are counting coup, how many political wannabes equal somebody who wins actual power?

  14. [14] 
    Michale wrote:

    We're talking exclusively the POTUS election of 2016...

    In THAT regard, the GOP is the Diversity Party and the Democrat Party is the Party of Old White People...

    Yes or no??

    "Can you explain it, Captain? Yes or No.."
    -Ardra, STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION, Devil's Due

    :D

    Michale

  15. [15] 
    Chris Weigant wrote:

    OK, color me disappointed.

    Nobody liked "When Piyush Comes To Shove"??

    Hey, I thought it was funny...

    :-)

    -CW

  16. [16] 
    Michale wrote:

    We're talking exclusively the POTUS election of 2016...

    In THAT regard, the GOP is the Diversity Party and the Democrat Party is the Party of Old White People...

    Yes or no??

    "Can you explain it, Captain? Yes or No.."
    -Ardra, STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION, Devil's Due

    :D

    I know you already acknowledged what I said was factual..

    I just couldn't resist the opportunity to throw in an ATQ... :D

    Michale

  17. [17] 
    Michale wrote:

    OK, color me disappointed.

    Nobody liked "When Piyush Comes To Shove"?

    Hey, I thought it was funny...

    :-)

    Yer simply a man before your time.. :D

    I actually missed it the first time around..

    Michale

  18. [18] 
    TheStig wrote:

    M - 16

    Let's see, there are 4 formal Democratic contenders for the nomination.

    Clinton is a woman (Why...won't...this...wig...come off???!!!)
    Sanders is a Jew

    O'Malley and Chafee are old white guys.

    Score Dem diversity at 50%

    Formally announced Republicans.

    Carson, black
    Jindal, Indian descent
    Cruz and Rubio, Cuban descent
    Fiorina, woman

    Bush, Graham, Huckabee, Pataki, Paul and Santorum are clearly old white guys.

    Trump and Perry seem to fall within what is considered "normal" intellectual capability, so I score them as OWG as well.

    Score GOP diversity as 4/12 = 33%

    Even if you accept Trump and Perry as diverse by virtue of being somewhat intellectually challenged, it's a tie!

    What was your point again? :-)

  19. [19] 
    TheStig wrote:

    CW-

    When Piyush comes to shove was very good indeed. If they ever make a documentary movie about Jindal, that would be an awesome title. You might want to grab the web domain.

  20. [20] 
    Michale wrote:

    TS,

    I just LOVE how you split hairs based on your political ideology...

    But, I am willing to wager a million quatloos that, if it was the Demcorat Party that had all the diversity and the GOP had just a handful of old white people, you would be making the EXACT same argument I am making. :D

    That's the nice thing about not being a Party slave... :D

    Michale

  21. [21] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    That's the nice thing about not being a Party slave... :D

    Is there any real difference between a party slave and an ideological slave?

  22. [22] 
    Michale wrote:

    Is there any real difference between a party slave and an ideological slave?

    Is there any difference between Party and Ideology??

    Michale

  23. [23] 
    akadjian wrote:

    It's going to be Walker.

    My fingers are crossed. Would love to have a national conversation about how he destroyed Wisconsin.

    It's a Republican fun run. Most participants don't expect to win or even place.

    Buahahahahah!

Comments for this article are closed.