ChrisWeigant.com

Please support ChrisWeigant.com this
holiday season!

Next Up: Georgia And Texas

[ Posted Monday, May 23rd, 2022 – 16:37 UTC ]

As we continue to wend our way through primary season, we now turn to the two states with the most interesting races to be decided tomorrow: Texas and Georgia. Georgia is more interesting on the Republican side, while there's one Texas race that Democrats will be closely watching.

 

Georgia

The two big reasons why Georgia is so interesting are that there are multiple races to watch, and Donald Trump cares more about the outcome here than perhaps in any other state in the country (with the possible exception of Liz Cheney's bid for re-election in Wyoming).

Some of the races won't get truly interesting until the general election, since Georgia has now joined the ranks of the purple states. Well... maybe. That's the big unanswered question: was the last election -- when Georgia sent two Democrats to the Senate -- just a fluke? Or was it a harbinger of a stronger Democratic presence in the state that will endure past 2020? Nobody really knows, at this point.

One of those Democrats is Senator Raphael Warnock, who will be defending his seat in November (since he won it in a special election -- it wasn't for a 6-year term). He will likely have to face former football star Herschel Walker, who has been leading the GOP polling by a wide margin. Walker has a lot of ugly baggage, but none of it is likely to stop him from winning tomorrow. He's been accused of violent threats and behavior by his ex-wife, he has written about struggling with mental illness (multiple personality disorder), he has blatantly lied about his past (such as claiming he graduated at the top of his class from the University of Georgia when the truth is he never actually graduated at all), he has exaggerated his success in the business world, and he was a paid spokesman for a for-profit business (that he tried to pass off as him founding a non-profit) that now stands accused of scamming or ripping off the federal government for payments for mental health treatments for veterans. When you read all that, you are left with one clear impression: Donald Trump must love this guy!

Snark aside, though, Walker is waltzing to victory in the Republican primary and will likely easily carry the day tomorrow. Since he is Black, perhaps Republicans feel he would have the best chance to take on Warnock, who is also Black. But it remains to be seen whether Walker will be able to split the Black vote in Georgia all that much. And while he has mostly had a cakewalk of a primary campaign -- insulated from any interviews outside of the right-wing media echo chamber, and refusing to take part in debates -- you can bet that the Warnock campaign already has a few ads ready to run which will inform Georgia voters about all of Walker's shortcomings as a potential senator (and human being).

The Georgia GOP race that is generating the most national interest is also likely to be a runaway tomorrow -- but will also be very interesting to watch in November. This one is personal, for Trump. And he's going to lose. The incumbent, Governor Brian Kemp, earned Trump's wrath when he refused to somehow magically (and illegally) steal the presidential election for Trump in 2020. It's pretty easy to see that Trump has hated Kemp with a passion ever since. Trump is not only behind Kemp's challenger David Perdue, but the way Perdue tells it, Trump was the one who convinced him to run in the first place. Trump has even done something he has noticeably refused to do for all the other candidates he has endorsed -- put some money into the effort. Team Trump has spent a few million dollars on the race, making it the only race he truly has invested in so far during the primary cycle.

But, like I said, Perdue is going to lose. The only real question is by how much. If Kemp tops 50 percent of the primary vote, he will avoid a runoff and win the nomination outright. Right now, he's polling at 60 percent or better, so that is looking eminently possible. Trump's personal hatred of Kemp is proving to be completely ineffective in this purple state, which will be the biggest headline of the night tomorrow.

On the Democratic side of this race, Stacey Abrams is poised to win the nomination, which will set up a return match between her and Kemp. The last time they faced each other in a governor's race, Kemp won by less than two percent. This time, things may be different, since Abrams has been devoting her life ever since to getting more Democrats registered in the state -- which paid off handsomely in the two Senate race upsets. This all makes this race perhaps the most interesting governor's race for November (although the Pennsylvania race will be a close second).

Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is another Georgia Republican who earned Trump's wrath when he not only refused to "find 11,780 votes" to steal the state's election for him, but also because Raffensperger recorded the phone call (which many have noted resembles a mob boss giving orders to his henchmen) and leaked it to the public. This race is closer, with challenger Jody Hice neck-and-neck with Raffensperger in the polling. This will likely lead to a runoff election, since neither candidate is polling near the 50 percent mark.

Also up tomorrow night is incumbent Attorney General Chris Carr, who faces another Big Lie adherent angry about the fact that Georgia officials didn't just hand the state's electoral votes to Trump. Carr seems in pretty good shape in the polling, though he may fail to avoid a runoff election as well.

Trump may lose all three of these races tomorrow night, but he'll (of course) be out there bragging about the win for Herschel Walker. Trump's running tally of wins and losses from his endorsements in truly competitive races is a lot worse than he'll admit, reportedly "seven wins and four losses," which translates to only 64 percent. And at this point, it looks like that record is going to get worse tomorrow night.

 

Texas

Texas is holding their runoff primary election tomorrow, and the one that's got Democrats watching is a progressive attempting to successfully primary a sitting incumbent. Jessica Cisneros is not only in a runoff with Representative Henry Cuellar, it's also a rematch. Cisneros tried to beat him two years ago and got within four points of victory. This time around, the race was even tighter in the initial contest, with Cuellar only beating Cisneros by 1.5 points (there was a third candidate who drew off 4.7 percent of the vote, which was enough to send the race to tomorrow's runoff).

Originally a classic progressive-versus-conservative Democratic fight, with Cisneros endorsed by Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, this race has quickly become somewhat of a referendum on abortion rights. Cuellar was one of only two Democrats (Senator Joe Manchin was the other) to vote against the Women's Health Protection Act, which would have codified abortion rights into federal law. So it's really seen now as an anti-abortion Democratic incumbent trying to fend off a challenge from a decidedly pro-choice upstart.

Also confusing things is the fact that Cuellar's house was recently raided by the F.B.I., who are looking into allegations of improper influence from Azerbaijan. Cuellar hasn't been accused of a crime yet, but there is a grand jury examining things, and having your house raided by the F.B.I. can never really be seen as a campaign asset for any politician.

No matter what the outcome of this race, though, the district may end up being a lost cause for Democrats. The district -- which includes a huge border with Mexico in southern Texas -- got redrawn during redistricting to add more Republican voters to it, which is worrisome for whichever Democrat wins tomorrow night.

If the Democrat who wins tomorrow loses in November, the other Democratic faction is going to say "we told you so," most likely. If Cuellar becomes the nominee and loses, then progressives will decry corporate conservatives within the party, but if Cisneros becomes the standard-bearer but then loses, then establishment Democrats will trot out the warning that progressives can't win general elections -- and caution that it's best to play it safe and run moderates instead. Of course, if either of them actually wins in November, then their faction will claim vindication and use it as a rallying cry for others like them to run for office in the future.

There are other races to watch tomorrow night (a total of four states will be voting), but these are the ones that will likely generate the most buzz from the pundits.

-- Chris Weigant

 

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant

 

100 Comments on “Next Up: Georgia And Texas”

  1. [1] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    Forget the big LIE adherents and focus on the big PIE adherents. Georgia peach pie is yummy!

  2. [2] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    Key Lime, if you must pie.

  3. [3] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    MtnCaddy-

    I ran across this travel log of war torn Ukraine and thought it interesting:

    https://mattlakeman.org/2022/05/15/notes-on-ukraine/

  4. [4] 
    Michale wrote:

    Bashi,

    Face reality, Michale..abortion is not baby killing no matter how many times you repeat it...

    Face reality, Bashi.. It doesn't matter how you Democrats define baby killing or baby..

    No matter how many times you repeat it, Roe V Wade will be thrown on the trash heap of history..

  5. [5] 
    Michale wrote:

    Liz,

    What about contraception?

    Are you against the pill and other methods of contraception?

    Not in the slightest..

    Does making love mean making babies or giving pleasure?

    Why can't it be both??

    Now that I have answered your questions, would you do me the honor of answering a couple of mine??

    Is there any moral or ethical difference between killing a baby 1 week before birth and killing a baby 1 week after birth?

    Do you believe that baby killing AKA abortion should be unrestricted and be allowed right up to the moment of birth??

  6. [6] 
    Michale wrote:

    but for all intents and purposes a person of unusual gender has absolutely no infirmity or impairment.

    Really?? So, a person who is born in the wrong gender has NO psychological or psychiatric impairment??

    I am betting that THAT claim would be news to those who suffer from this mental health issue, eh??

  7. [7] 
    Michale wrote:

    The Big Lie??

    Ah yea, that's Stacey Abrams claim that she actually won the LAST Gubernatorial election in Georgia..

    Funny how no one here wants to talk about THAT "Big Lie".. Still suffering from PTDS, eh? :^/

  8. [8] 
    Michale wrote:

    Looks like voter integrity laws have absolutely NO IMPACT on voter turnout, eh?? :D

    As a matter of fact, Voter Integrity Laws appear to FOSTER and INCREASE voter turnout..

    Who coulda thunked it, eh?? :D

  9. [9] 
    Michale wrote:

    Georgia voting shattering turnout records after MSNBC, CNN, others ran with 'Jim Crow' accusations

    Georgia's Election Integrity Act faced blowback from Democrats, including President Biden
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/georgia-voting-law-media-jim-crow-accusations

    Once again, Democrats were WRONG... :D

  10. [10] 
    Michale wrote:

    Bashi,

    Business is not about being fair, it's about contracts which Elon signed.

    BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHA

    So, Twitter inflated the value of it's assets to leverage a better deal..

    And you are perfectly FINE with that because business is NOT about being fair..

    Yet, President Trump is accused of the EXACT same thing, inflating the value of his assets to leverage a better deal, and YOU want to see President Trump prosecuted.

    Hypocrisy much, Bashi?? :D

    "The hypocrisy is strong with this one.."

  11. [11] 
    Michale wrote:

    It's funny..

    During the Democrat Golden Boy Mueller's investigation, Democrats simply could not shut up about their Russia Collusion Delusion..

    Hillary Factor: Evidence now shows false Russia collusion story began and ended with Clinton

    Sussmann trial testimony confirms earlier CIA, FBI evidence that Hillary Clinton approved dirtying up Trump with unproven Russia allegations.
    https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/hillary-factor-evidence-now-shows-russia-collusion-lie

    Now that Democrats are on the hot seat, no one wants to talk about it..

    "Gee!! I wonder why that is!!!"
    -Kevin Spacey, THE NEGOTIATOR

    :D

  12. [12] 
    Michale wrote:

    In an era where the hunt for disinformation has become a political obsession, Hillary Clinton has mostly escaped having to answer what role she played in spreading the false Russia collusion narrative that gripped America for nearly three years.

    On Friday, that dodge ended with a most unlikely witness: her former campaign manager Robby Mook, who was supposed to be a witness helping the defense of her former campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann on a charge of lying to the FBI.

    Instead, under cross-examination by Special Counsel John Durham's team, Mook was forced to concede two extraordinary facts.

    First, the Clinton campaign wasn't "totally confident" about the accuracy of computer data suggesting Donald Trump had a secret communications channel to the Kremlin via Russia's Alfa Bank.

    And second, Hillary Clinton herself personally approved spreading the story to the news media, despite the concerns about its accuracy.

    Since Democrats like House Investigation Committees so much I am sure that, come January, Democrats will be ALL IN about investigating Hillary and her Russia Collusion Delusion con..

    Right??? :D

  13. [13] 
    Michale wrote:

    Slowly over six years, the Russia collusion story has been exposed for what it was: a three-legged political dirty trick in which highly credible figures with deep law enforcement, intelligence and news media ties were paid by the Clinton campaign to flood the FBI, the CIA and the public with unproven allegations that Trump was secretly colluding with Russia to steal the election from Clinton.

    The first leg of the collusion narrative was run by the former British spy Christopher Steele, who used his MI6 credentials and his prior ties to the FBI and high-ranking DOJ official Bruce Ohr to walk in his infamous dossier to U.S. law enforcement and intelligence in the summer of 2016. The FBI ultimately concluded Steele's dossier was riddled with Russian disinformation and disproved evidence.

    The second leg was Sussmann, who crafted information from computer experts supporting Clinton into the tale of the Alfa Bank server back door. That narrative was flagged by Sussmann's team as unlikely even before he pitched it to the FBI, according to the indictment, and the theory was ultimately dismissed by the FBI and Russia Special Counsel Robert Mueller. "It wasn't true," Mueller testified to Congress in 2019.

    The third leg of the dirty trick consisted of the efforts of federal bureaucrats inside the FBI, State Department and intelligence community — many of whom disliked Trump — who managed to deceive the FISA court, the Congress and the American public, often by using leaks to news media outlets to sustain a collusion story that had fallen apart within weeks of Steele's first approach.

    Hillary didn't deserve to win in 2016..

    And, with all the good that President Trump did in his 4 years in office, just imagine what this country could have accomplished if Democrats and Trump/America hating Republicans hadn't persecuted the President so hysterically with their Russia Collusion delusion..

    :eyeroll:

  14. [14] 
    Michale wrote:

    Biden Says He Would Get Involved Militarily to Defend Taiwan; White House Says 'No Change' in Policy

    (CNSNews.com) – President Biden said on Monday that he would be willing for the United States to get involved militarily should China invade Taiwan, adding that “that’s a commitment we made.”

    And as it has done so many times before, a White House official later corrected him, saying "our policy has not changed."

    During a joint press conference in Tokyo with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, a reporter said to the president, “You didn’t want to get involved in the Ukraine conflict militarily, for obvious reasons. Are you willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan, if it comes to that?”

    “Yes,” Biden replied.

    “That’s a commitment we made,” he continued. “That’s a commitment we made.”
    https://www.cnsnews.com/article/international/patrick-goodenough/biden-says-he-would-get-involved-militarily-defend-taiwan

    Again, the question MUST be asked..

    Who is calling the shots in the Biden Administration??

  15. [15] 
    Michale wrote:

    President Biden seems to praise high gas prices as 'incredible transition' Americans must go through
    The record-high national average for a gallon of regular gas is $4.56, and is much higher in some states

    President Biden said that the country is going through an "incredible transition" away from fossil fuels via the high gas prices being experienced nationwide.

    Biden made the statement on gas prices during a joint press conference with Japan Prime Minister Fumio Kishida on Monday.

    "Here’s the situation. And when it comes to the gas prices, we’re going through an incredible transition that is taking place that, God willing, when it’s over, we’ll be stronger and the world will be stronger and less reliant on fossil fuels when this is over," Biden said, seeming to justify or praise those sky-high prices Americans face at the pump.

    Biden's comments come amid a stretch of record-high gas prices which the American Automobile Association says is "unprecedented."
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/president-biden-incredible-transition-high-gas-prices

    So, according to Biden, sky high gas prices are a GOOD thing!!??

    One has to wonder if Biden will feel the same way after the November Uber Nuclear Biblical Shellacking of Democrats.. :D

    I kinda get the feeling sky high gas prices WON'T be a good thing then, eh? :D

  16. [16] 
    Michale wrote:

    "They’re saying the quiet part out loud now. They’re causing you pain at the pump because it’s all part of their radical agenda."
    -Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La

    :eyeroll:

  17. [17] 
    Michale wrote:

    San Francisco Mayor London Breed, police groups opt out of Pride parade over uniform ban

    San Francisco Pride parade organizers said seeing the officers in uniform could be uncomfortable for community members who have had negative encounters with law enforcement
    https://www.foxnews.com/us/san-francisco-london-breed-police-pride-parade

    Looks like gay San Francisco cops are being forced back into the closet when it comes to being police officers.

    So much for "tolerance" in the gay community...

    Kudos to San Francisco mayor Breed for not going along with the cop-hate of the Democrat Party.. :^/

  18. [18] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Michale,

    Is there any moral or ethical difference between killing a baby 1 week before birth and killing a baby 1 week after birth? Do you believe that baby killing AKA abortion should be unrestricted and be allowed right up to the moment of birth??

    Do you take me for an idiot?

  19. [19] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    michale,

    Of course, it can be both. But, since you are all for contraception, then you believe it doesn't have to be both, right?

    No one is having abortions one week before birth so stop with the asinine analogies.

  20. [20] 
    Michale wrote:

    No one is having abortions one week before birth so stop with the asinine analogies.

    And yet, that is EXACTLY the right that Democrats are fighting for..

    Can I assume that you are against unrestricted baby killing then??

    That you DO, like myself, JL and Bashi, support baby killing restrictions??

    Of course, it can be both. But, since you are all for contraception, then you believe it doesn't have to be both, right?

    I never said I was "all for" contraception..

    I don't have a problem with it one way or the other..

    Can you say the same about Baby Killing?? AKA Abortion??

  21. [21] 
    Michale wrote:

    Do you take me for an idiot?

    You know me well enough to know the answer to that question.. :D

  22. [22] 
    Michale wrote:

    Liz,

    Data on late-term abortions in the United States

    In early 2019 several states enacted or proposed legislative changes to expand late-term abortions, renewing attention on this practice in the United States. Discussion of such policies has included some confusion regarding data bearing on the subject, due in part to misleading claims by the abortion lobby. What follows is a review of the best available data on such abortions, addressing nationwide incidence, variation over time and between states, and reasons for such abortions. Note that many of these topics have previously been well addressed by various publications of the Charlotte Lozier Institute, e.g. Prentice et al. (2019).

    Based on information reported by Arizona, Florida, and Utah, probably 30-80% of late-term abortions are "elective" (non-health related), 20-60% are in cases of fetal health issues, and only 3-10% are in cases of maternal health.
    https://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/late_term_abortion_usa.html

    "OK, let's brass some tacks here."
    -Metatron, SUPRENATURAL

    I am assuming that you DON'T support unlimited elective baby killing..

    Given this assumption, when do you support where baby killing AKA abortion being allowed/disallowed..

    JL indicates "viability" which is roughly 22 weeks...

    Bashi likes to be ambiguous because he knows I will call him on any definitive answer later..

    I think that once a heartbeat is established elective baby killing should be outlawed..

    Where's your line??

  23. [23] 
    Michale wrote:

    JL,

    How were you with the 3rd episode of STRANGE NEW WORLDS??

    I was like 'meh'..

    Not a fan of "A SICKNESS INCAPACITATES THE ENTIRE CREW" story lines... But the revelations about Una were pretty interesting.. :D

    I haven't seen anything that compares to the 1st episode, but I am sure we'll see some good ones down the line.. :D

  24. [24] 
    Michale wrote:

    Ya'all's claim that 3rd trimester abortions never occur..

    OK, fine...

    Then NO ONE is losing any rights so ya'all shouldn't mind a law that prevents it....

    Right???

  25. [25] 
    Michale wrote:

    US Spirals Toward Lawless Carnage; BLM and Woke Corporations Silent
    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2022/05/24/us_spirals_toward_lawless_carnage_blm_and_woke_corporations_silent___147638.html

    Who could have POSSIBLY predicted that Democrats and their DEFUND, DEMORALIZE, DEMONIZE THE POLICE policies would lead to a huge uptick in crime??

    Oh... wait.. :D

  26. [26] 
    Michale wrote:

    Until Democrats can actually address black on black crime, Democrats claims of "Black Lives Matter" is nothing more than a hollow and virtue-less political position...

  27. [27] 
    Michale wrote:

    I Refuse to Stand By While My Students Are Indoctrinated

    Children are afraid to challenge the repressive ideology that rules our school. That’s why I am.

    I am a teacher at Grace Church High School in Manhattan. Ten years ago, I changed careers when I discovered how rewarding it is to help young people explore the truth and beauty of mathematics. I love my work.

    As a teacher, my first obligation is to my students. But right now, my school is asking me to embrace “antiracism” training and pedagogy that I believe is deeply harmful to them and to any person who seeks to nurture the virtues of curiosity, empathy and understanding.

    “Antiracist” training sounds righteous, but it is the opposite of truth in advertising. It requires teachers like myself to treat students differently on the basis of race. Furthermore, in order to maintain a united front for our students, teachers at Grace are directed to confine our doubts about this pedagogical framework to conversations with an in-house “Office of Community Engagement” for whom every significant objection leads to a foregone conclusion. Any doubting students are likewise “challenged” to reframe their views to conform to this orthodoxy.

    I know that by attaching my name to this I’m risking not only my current job but my career as an educator, since most schools, both public and private, are now captive to this backward ideology. But witnessing the harmful impact it has on children, I can’t stay silent.
    https://bariweiss.substack.com/p/i-refuse-to-stand-by-while-my-students?s=w

    Now THIS is a good teacher..

    A teacher who ignores pedantic Democrat ideology and does what is best for STUDENTS...

    THIS is the kind of teacher we need in our schools..

  28. [28] 
    Michale wrote:

    My school, like so many others, induces students via shame and sophistry to identify primarily with their race before their individual identities are fully formed. Students are pressured to conform their opinions to those broadly associated with their race and gender and to minimize or dismiss individual experiences that don’t match those assumptions. The morally compromised status of “oppressor” is assigned to one group of students based on their immutable characteristics. In the meantime, dependency, resentment and moral superiority are cultivated in students considered “oppressed.”

    All of this is done in the name of “equity,” but it is the opposite of fair. In reality, all of this reinforces the worst impulses we have as human beings: our tendency toward tribalism and sectarianism that a truly liberal education is meant to transcend.

    Recently, I raised questions about this ideology at a mandatory, whites-only student and faculty Zoom meeting. (Such racially segregated sessions are now commonplace at my school.) It was a bait-and-switch “self-care” seminar that labelled “objectivity,” “individualism,” “fear of open conflict,” and even “a right to comfort” as characteristics of white supremacy. I doubted that these human attributes — many of them virtues reframed as vices — should be racialized in this way. In the Zoom chat, I also questioned whether one must define oneself in terms of a racial identity at all. My goal was to model for students that they should feel safe to question ideological assertions if they felt moved to do so.

    WOW....

    Mandatory indoctrination sessions TOTALLY based on race..

    THIS is what Democrats are fighting for.. :eyeroll:

  29. [29] 
    Michale wrote:

    Every student at the school must also sign a “Student Life Agreement,” which requires them to aver that “the world as we understand it can be hard and extremely biased,” that they commit to “recognize and acknowledge their biases when we come to school, and interrupt those biases,” and accept that they will be “held accountable should they fall short of the agreement.” A recent faculty email chain received enthusiastic support for recommending that we “‘officially’ flag students” who appear “resistant” to the “culture we are trying to establish.”

    So, Democrat educators want to blacklist students who don't conform to Democrat orthodoxy..

    Again, I ask..

    HOW can any SANE person defend such gestapo tactics???

  30. [30] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Michale,

    Why do you keep asking the same stupid question, over and over again?

  31. [31] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Your stupid endless questions make this a very boring place.

  32. [32] 
    Michale wrote:

    One current student paid me a visit a few weeks ago. He tapped faintly on my office door, anxiously looking both ways before entering. He said he had come to offer me words of support for speaking up at the meeting.

    I thanked him for his comments, but asked him why he seemed so nervous. He told me he was worried that a particular teacher might notice this visit and “it would mean that I would get in trouble.” He reported to me that this teacher once gave him a lengthy “talking to” for voicing a conservative opinion in class. He then remembered with a sigh of relief that this teacher was absent that day. I looked him in the eyes. I told him he was a brave young man for coming to see me, and that he should be proud of that.

    Then I sent him on his way. And I resolved to write this piece.

    This is what Democrat indoctrination breeds.. Students so afraid of having an independent thought that they have to hide their true identity..

    Again, how can ANY sane person defend such blatant indoctrination tactics??? :eyeroll:

  33. [33] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Do you spend all of your free time finding these nonsense articles, Michale?

    I have a suggestion for better use of your valuable spare time! :)

  34. [34] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    My suggestion would make this place less boring ...

  35. [35] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    ... of course, it would make it x rated, too but, what are you going to do?

  36. [36] 
    Michale wrote:

    Why do you keep asking the same stupid question, over and over again?

    Because hope springs eternal that you will finally answer one of them. :D

    The fact that you react so harshly (stupid?? Seriously??) pretty much answers my question..

    There are no STUPID questions..

    Only those people so indoctrinated and enslaved by political ideology that they cannot see the facts staring them in the face..

    :D

  37. [37] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Oh, there are plenty of stupid questions, alrught.

  38. [38] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    You think we are all stupid but, we are not.

  39. [39] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Only those people so indoctrinated and enslaved by political ideology that they cannot see the facts staring them in the face..

    I call projection!

  40. [40] 
    Michale wrote:

    No, not stupid..

    Just ill informed and ignorant due to Party slavery..

    Which is why you have me here.. :D To make sure ya'all are grounded in reality and know the facts..

    Far from boring, it makes it real exciting around here.. :D

    But I get it.. Democrats are so badly screwing things up that ya have to cap on the messenger..

    'S okay... I understand and forgive ya'all.. :D

  41. [41] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    There are many things that make this place boring.

  42. [42] 
    Michale wrote:

    OK You don't want to talk about baby killing.. Fair enough.

    Let's talk about how Biden's handlers are constantly having to walk back Biden's statements..

    Why do you think that is constantly happening??

  43. [43] 
    Michale wrote:

    There are many things that make this place boring.

    Agreed..

    And the inability or unwillingness of Weigantians to defend Democrat missteps and screw-ups top the list.. :D

  44. [44] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    And, you, Don, are responsible for a fair amount of what makes this place so boring, so ...

  45. [45] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    wish is could say it's been a fun morning here. i'm off to have some real fun.

  46. [46] 
    Michale wrote:

    OK Fine.. Let's talk about the Democrats DISASTEROUS attempts to create a MINISTRY OF TRUTH to counter that they are losing their #1 propaganda outlet, TWITTER...

    Good Riddance To the Disinformation Board
    https://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2022/05/24/good_riddance_to_the_disinformation_board_833660.html

    Shirley, that is a topic that is interesting to ya'all :D

  47. [47] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @m,

    I agree, episode 3 seemed a bit meh, but i do like the ending where we find out what's in the medical transporter buffer.

    @liz,
    Boring is what boring does. When life gives you lemons, make lemon meringue pie!

  48. [48] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @liz,

    for the record, i LOVE music.

  49. [49] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @m,

    having read the article, i tend to agree with mr. rossi - maybe his comments to his students were right and maybe they were wrong, but we need children to see the value of openly expressing opinions, not try to silence people with whom we disagree.

    (i just wish you felt the same about opinions on gender norms.)

    JL

  50. [50] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Don,

    How am I responsible for other commenters trolling, lying and dodging and CW ignoring me when I offer rational discussion?

    Oh, you're not responsible for that.

    But, you are distinctly responsible for the endlessly repetitive and often vulgar comments throughout these threads. So, there's that. Reading just one of your posts is like reading a million of them. So, there's that on top of that. And, you don't really care for music. And, that right there takes the pie.

    Be responsible for all that you do and say!

  51. [51] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    joshua,

    How do we increase participation on Sunday nights by all of our fellow music lovers?

  52. [52] 
    Michale wrote:

    having read the article, i tend to agree with mr. rossi - maybe his comments to his students were right and maybe they were wrong, but we need children to see the value of openly expressing opinions, not try to silence people with whom we disagree.

    Couldn't agree more..

    (i just wish you felt the same about opinions on gender norms.)

    Differing opinions are fine..

    But I am talking about SCIENCE..

    And the SCIENCE says that if you are born a male and you feel like you are a female, feel like you are an alien non binary gender or feel like you are a rutabaga, then THAT is a mental health sickness and it needs to be TREATED..

    Not validated...

  53. [53] 
    Michale wrote:

    I agree, episode 3 seemed a bit meh, but i do like the ending where we find out what's in the medical transporter buffer.

    That was pretty kewl... Kudos to the writers for an innovative story line.. :D

  54. [54] 
    Michale wrote:

    How do we increase participation on Sunday nights by all of our fellow music lovers?

    Start it Sunday morning.. :D

  55. [55] 
    Michale wrote:

    Biden's confusing Taiwan-China remarks deal a blow to his credibility

    A cryptic pledge to militarily protect Taiwan from China showcases a tendency to speak recklessly.

    President Joe Biden turned heads on Monday when he pledged that the U.S. would militarily intervene against China if it invaded Taiwan, and signaled that his commitment to the island was stronger than to Ukraine. The confrontational statement marked a sharp departure from the U.S. policy of “strategic ambiguity” on Taiwan that has prevailed for decades.

    But shortly after his remarks, Biden’s administration downplayed the statement, saying that the president had in fact not meant to signal a policy change, and that the usual U.S. posture on Taiwan remained intact.

    Biden is marring the credibility of his own speech.

    It’s becoming a familiar pattern: Biden makes a bold statement expressing a new degree of readiness for war with a rival or adversary like China or Russia, and then his own staff walks it back. It’s also becoming a troubling pattern — while domestic audiences can laugh off Biden’s gaffes and missteps, there is no guarantee foreign powers will give him the benefit of the doubt. Biden is marring the credibility of his own speech, and potentially unwittingly causing the U.S.’s opponents to come to the conclusion that the U.S. is more inclined toward war than it is.
    https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/why-biden-s-taiwan-china-comments-are-troubling-n1295641

    The facts that Biden is simply a figurehead are piling up...

  56. [56] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    And the SCIENCE says that if you are born a male and you feel like you are a female, feel like you are an alien non binary gender or feel like you are a rutabaga, then THAT is a mental health sickness and it needs to be TREATED..

    Not validated...

    And just what "SCIENCE" are you referring to?

  57. [57] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Michale,

    And you would be capable of refraining from any political commentary for a whole day? Right.

  58. [58] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    [61]

    The facts that Biden is simply a figurehead are piling up...

    Au contraire! The point of Foreign Intelligence is to determine what the enemies intent is.

    Joe goes off script all the time but I'm sure this was no accident.

    Say that you're China and you want to invade Taiwan. Whether or not the US defends Taiwan will make all the difference in the world, no?

    So now China doesn't know the answer to that question... and it's less likely to want to find out the hard way.

    For the record, your Cheetogod never displayed even a fraction of that sophistication. Too busy kissing Dictators asses.

  59. [59] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    Michale,

    Kudos to you for the changes in your posting practices. I appreciate the blockquote instead of all boldified as it doesn't convey shouting.

    Just because I don't comment on what you post doesn't mean I doesn't mean I don't try to plow through as much of it as I can.

  60. [60] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    Michale a few columns back you stated that you mostly get your info from leftwing sites.

    This is difficult to believe for two reasons:

    First, you never link to any of those leftwing sites but rather entirely from right-wing sites.

    Second, if you're actually reviewing leftwing sites why hasn't any of that leftwing wisdom rubbed off on you?

    (thinking)

    Or maybe you used to be even more right-wing and you're slowly...VERY slowly... coming around. Dunno.

  61. [61] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    There is a third option. He is here to argue and using left wing sources is counter productive to that goal...

  62. [62] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    You've also said you used to be on the sidelines regarding abortion but that,

    If only Democrats had been satisfied with SAFE, LEGAL, RARE....

    But, due to Democrat overreach in #SHOUTOUT their infanticide and #CELEBRATE their baby killing, they are now suffering the backlash of having RvW thrown on the trash heap of history where it belongs..

    Democrats.. Their own worst enemies..

    So it's clear that your objection to abortion is not "moral" at all but rather is (another) case of if the Democrats are for it I'm against it.

  63. [63] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    I'm a Democrat and I missed the part about Dems celebrating access to abortion beyond correctly stating that freedom of religion means freedom from other people's religion.

  64. [64] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    [67]

    Of course, I cannot believe otherwise. My question remains:

    Is Michale here to both dispense knowledge to shape other's opinions as well as to allow other's knowledge to influence his opinion? In other words, it's he commenting in good faith or is he only interested in "owning the Libs."

  65. [65] 
    Michale wrote:

    Liz,

    And you would be capable of refraining from any political commentary for a whole day? Right.

    Touche' :D

  66. [66] 
    Michale wrote:

    MC

    I'm a Democrat and I missed the part about Dems celebrating access to abortion beyond

    Then you weren't paying attention..

    I have already posted the #CELEBRATE your abortion and #SHOUT OUT your baby killing links...

    But I have no problem doing it again.. :D

    There is even a WEB SITE devoted to bragging about baby killing..

    https://shoutyourabortion.com/

  67. [67] 
    Michale wrote:

    #ShoutYourAbortion is a social media campaign where people share their abortion experiences online without “sadness, shame or regret” for the purpose of “destigmatization, normalization, and putting an end to shame." Tens of thousands of people worldwide have shared their abortion experiences online using the hashtag # ..
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ShoutYourAbortion#:~:text=%23ShoutYourAbortion%20is%20a%20social%20media,experiences%20online%20using%20the%20hashtag%20%23

    Do you need further examples??

  68. [68] 
    Michale wrote:

    MC,

    This is difficult to believe for two reasons:

    I suppose comment #60 escaped your attention, eh?? :D

    But tell ya what.

    Every time I post a comment that has a Left Wing source, I will make sure I point it out for ya..

    Fair deal?? :D

  69. [69] 
    Michale wrote:

    MC,

    In other words, it's he commenting in good faith or is he only interested in "owning the Libs."

    I am ALWAYS commenting in good faith...

    And I very much enjoy owning the libs..

    Neither is mutually exclusive.. :D

  70. [70] 
    Michale wrote:

    Biden’s Latest Taiwan Gaffe Stokes Tensions With Beijing
    https://www.msn.com/en-xl/northamerica/top-stories/biden-s-latest-taiwan-gaffe-stokes-tensions-with-beijing/ar-AAXE0lP

    Yea.. Cuz THAT'S what we want to do.. Stoke tensions with a nuclear armed super power.. :eyeroll:

    MC.. Note that this is a LEFT WING source of a LEFT WING article.. MSN and Bloomberg..

  71. [71] 
    Michale wrote:

    Democrats trying to figure out how to get rid of Biden..

    There Has to Be a Backup Plan. There’s a Backup Plan, Right?
    Inside the 2024 soul-searching that’s happening in every corner of the Democratic Party.

    https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/05/biden-2024-democrats-search-for-alternative.html

    Note that this is from NY MAG, a decidedly Left Wing rag...

  72. [72] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    [76]

    Yea.. Cuz THAT'S what we want to do.. Stoke tensions with a nuclear armed super power.. :eyeroll:

    MC.. Note that this is a LEFT WING source of a LEFT WING article.. MSN and Bloomberg..

    Nothingburger.

    For the record,

    1- China has nukes but most of them are shorter range.

    2- Nobody wins if we destroy civilization so the Chinese are no more likely to use their nukes as is Putin or Joe.

    3- China has the fastest aging population in human history. One child policy means that there are simply not enough working Chinese left to support the largely non-productive elderly.

    4- This means that soon the Chinese will not be able to hold up to their end of the you let us run things and everybody's standard of living will go up bargain. They won't be able to afford either guns or butter.

    5- Analysts that I respect think that things are becoming so dire that China will implode in the next handful of years.

  73. [73] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    [74]

    Every time I post a comment that has a Left Wing source, I will make sure I point it out for ya..

    Fair deal?? :D

    No need.
    I can read.

  74. [74] 
    Michale wrote:

    Were those the same analysts who said Putin wouldn't invade?? :D

    I would find some new analysts if I were you.. :D

    The simple fact is Biden is senile.. His comments have to be walked back by his handlers CONSTANTLY...

    This is documented FACT..

    Now maybe YOU think it's a good thing to have a dementia senility ridden POTUS, but I do not..

  75. [75] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    [72]

    Then you weren't paying attention..

    I have already posted the #CELEBRATE your abortion and #SHOUT OUT your baby killing links...

    But I have no problem doing it again.. :D

    There is even a WEB SITE devoted to bragging about baby killing..

    Shout Your Abortion

    Okay, did you look at this site? Where is there any mention of the Dems or the Repugs? This is a pro-choice (that is to say a pro-freedom/anti-big government) advocacy group. Big whoopie.

  76. [76] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    [80]

    Were those the same analysts who said Putin wouldn't invade?? :D

    I would find some new analysts if I were you.. :D

    The simple fact is Biden is senile.. His comments have to be walked back by his handlers CONSTANTLY...

    This is documented FACT..

    Now maybe YOU think it's a good thing to have a dementia senility ridden POTUS, but I do not..

    Dunno what they said pre-invasion. I know that I said no way Putin does something this stupid... and I was wrong.

    I don't feel bad because Putin fucked up. His folly has already strengthened NATO'S unity (undoing Trump's damage,) and expanded NATO, trashed Russia beyond recovery and will result in his assassination.

    You can believe whatever you want about Joe. Your Cheetogod sucked so bad he motivated 81 million Americans to vote, You're fired!

    THE Dems could have beaten Trump running Hunter Biden's tunafish sandwich against him.

  77. [77] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    There is even a WEB SITE devoted to bragging about baby killing..

    You do realize that the actual ShoutYourAbortion website is counter to your description? I did not read a single account of baby killing. On the other hand it is very melancholy and looks to be an accurate cross section of how women feel about their abortions and why they got them. From sadness, to relief, to happiness to all three at once. But mostly sadness and relief. Trying to pawn the site off as bragging and celebratory is highly inaccurate.

  78. [78] 
    Michale wrote:

    Bashi,

    Of course that's what you would say..

    But then there is the FACT of Democrat women like Alyssa Milano et al BRAGGING about their baby killing.

    So, of course you would characterize it your way because yer Democrat..

    But the facts are STILL the facts..

    And RvW is being tossed on the scrap heap of history.. :D

  79. [79] 
    Michale wrote:

    MC

    SHOUT YOUR ABORTION

    That says it all..

    I get it.. You were caught being wrong about Democrats not celebrating their abortions..

    It's OK.. I won't hold it against you.. :D

  80. [80] 
    Michale wrote:
  81. [81] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    [77]

    Democrats trying to figure out how to get rid of Biden..

    There Has to Be a Backup Plan. There’s a Backup Plan, Right?

    Inside the 2024 soul-searching that’s happening in every corner of the Democratic Party.

    Note that this is from NY MAG, a decidedly Left Wing rag...

    Big whoopee. Yes, it appears to be left leaning publication but one magazine article is not representative of the entire Democratic Party.

    One thing I've noticed is that you often paint Dems with an overly broad brush, e.g. Defund the Police.

    The equivalent would be me insisting Jews! Will not! Replace us! represents you and your Party.

  82. [82] 
    Michale wrote:

    Why I Celebrate My Abortion on Mother’s Day
    May 3, 2021, 8:25am Paige Alexandria

    Mother's Day or not, society will always "celebrate" my decision to continue a pregnancy. My decision to have an abortion? Not so much.
    https://rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2021/05/03/why-i-celebrate-my-abortion-on-mothers-day/

    The facts are piling up, MC...

  83. [83] 
    Michale wrote:

    Let's celebrate your abortion!

    There’s a new marketing tool for abortion supporters, enablers and the industry they support: “Let’s celebrate abortion!”

    Oprah Winfrey recently joined the marketing campaign when she featured in her O magazine a first-person story by Amelia Bonow who began the #ShoutYourAbortion movement.
    https://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byrnes-barbershop/2018/08/lets-celebrate-your-abortion/

  84. [84] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    [85]

    MC

    SHOUT YOUR ABORTION

    That says it all..

    I get it.. You were caught being wrong about Democrats not celebrating their abortions..

    It's OK.. I won't hold it against you.. :D

    Reread my response. Democrats are not mentioned. Apology accepted.

  85. [85] 
    Michale wrote:

    ‘It’s Aborted’: Woman Celebrates Her Abortion With Cake And Party, Brags On Twitter
    https://www.dailywire.com/news/its-aborted-woman-celebrates-her-abortion-with-cake-and-party-brags-on-twitter

    I could go on and on with links about Democrats CELEBRATING their baby killing..

    Just let me know when you have seen enough facts..

  86. [86] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    Catch ya later, Dawg:D

  87. [87] 
    Michale wrote:

    Out-of-touch pro-abortion advocates “celebrate” abortion
    https://www.liveaction.org/news/touch-pro-abortion-advocates-celebrate-abortion/

    "I can do this all day..."
    -Captain America

  88. [88] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Of course that's what you would say..

    So, you haven't visited the site you posted?

  89. [89] 
    Michale wrote:

    They even have ABORTION PARTIES on tiktok...

    Discover short videos related to Abortion Party on TikTok. Watch popular content from the following creators: Azja is FABULOUS(@azja.the.fabulous), Azja is FABULOUS(@azja.the.fabulous), mari(@amarishani), The Young Turks(@theyoungturks), ?? Iboy_josh ????(@iamjosh_simp) . Explore the latest videos from hashtags: #abortion, #abortions, #abortabortion, #abortionpositive .
    19.4K
    iamjosh_simp
    ?? Iboy_josh ????
    135.3K views

    19.4K Likes, 912 Comments. TikTok video from ?? Iboy_josh ???? (@iamjosh_simp). Girls in 2050 will be like: | "Natasha are you going to Precious’s abortion party next week? ????????. Victoire.
    Victoire
    61
    azja.the.fabulous
    Azja is FABULOUS
    1388 views

    61 Likes, 16 Comments. TikTok video from Azja is FABULOUS (@azja.the.fabulous): "Getting my friend a cake that says “congrats on your abortion“ for her reverse baby shower/abortion party tomorrow.? #abortion #prochoice #cake". Stuck In The Middle.
    Getting my friend a cake that says “congrats on your abortion“ for her reverse baby shower/abortion party tomorrow.? #abortion #prochoice #cake
    Stuck In The Middle
    322
    amarishani
    mari
    4146 views

    322 Likes, 18 Comments. TikTok video from mari (@amarishani): "#ColorCustomizer jus to be safe ?????". me looking up diy abortions at the party . gang gang gangg.
    #ColorCustomizer jus to be safe ?????
    gang gang gangg
    15
    azja.the.fabulous
    Azja is FABULOUS
    532 views

    TikTok video from Azja is FABULOUS (@azja.the.fabulous): "Baby’s first abortion party.? #prochoice #abortion #party #celebrate". Figure It Out.
    Baby’s first abortion party.? #prochoice #abortion #party #celebrate
    https://www.tiktok.com/discover/Abortion-Party?lang=en

  90. [90] 
    Michale wrote:

    Abortion Activists Will Host “Shout Your Abortion” Party to Celebrate Their Abortions
    https://www.lifenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/proabortion58.png

    So much for the claim that Democrats aren't BRAGGING about their abortions..

    Each one of those links has the FACTS about that..

  91. [91] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @m,

    there's a big difference between being happy about something and not being ashamed. and as to your earlier question:

    So, a person who is born in the wrong gender has NO psychological or psychiatric impairment??

    correct. it's a failure of our society to account for the full range of human diversity, not a failure of the individual's mind to cope with their genitals.

    @liz,
    maybe the best thing to do is re-imagine sundays, so instead of the expectation that it'll be all music and no politics starting in the evening, to include music the whole day, with LESS politics.

    JL

  92. [92] 
    Michale wrote:

    There are a whole slew of books from Democrat women CELEBRATING and BRAGGING about their baby killings..

    This is ya'all's Democrat Party today..

    Ya'all must be so proud... :^/

  93. [93] 
    Michale wrote:

    JL,

    there's a big difference between being happy about something and not being ashamed. and as to your earlier question

    https://www.lifenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/proabortion58.png

    And I was talking about women who are HAPPY about their abortions..

    They even have TIKTOK parties CELEBRATING their abortions..

    So, yea.. They are damn happy about killing their babies..

  94. [94] 
    Michale wrote:

    That woman above said her abortion was "fabulous" and she had a big smile on her face about it.

    So, yea... These monsters are HAPPY about their baby killing..

  95. [95] 
    Michale wrote:

    ANYONE who has cake and ice cream to celebrate a baby killing is sick and twisted..

    And THAT is the Democrat Party in the here and now..

    Sick and twisted...

  96. [96] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Each one of those links has the FACTS about that..

    The same picture over and over from an anti-abortion site without context and a search of tiktok...

    Not one of your best rhetorical comebacks...

  97. [97] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Joshua,

    maybe the best thing to do is re-imagine sundays, so instead of the expectation that it'll be all music and no politics starting in the evening, to include music the whole day, with LESS politics.

    I'm sure that idea won't fly.

    I know that trying to stay on left coast time is not working, either. So, I'll just keep starting the evening early. Perhaps, 7pm - midnight, Eastern time and then if our left coast friends wish to continue through to 3am eastern, then that would be great!

    That would mean no political commentary from 7pm to 3am Eastern time, for a full Sunday night of good music ...

    The whole point of this thing is to take a break from political commentary. So, for now, at least, I'm sticking with that initial plan.

  98. [98] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    The only one who is shouting about being happy about abortions around here is YOU, Michale. So, enough already!

  99. [99] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    sunday nights i'm generally prepping lessons for monday, so it's a bit challenging and not so relaxing, music-wise.

  100. [100] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    I see. Well, let's work on it and see how best to improve the situation ... could you prep on Saturday? ... or maybe Saturday should be the night for music??

Comments for this article are closed.