Massive Election Fraud Uncovered -- Guess Which Party It Would Have Helped?
Finally, a truly massive amount of election fraud has been uncovered! You'd think all of the blind adherents to Donald Trump's Big Lie conspiracy theory would be overjoyed, but that's likely not going to be the case. Because -- as has indeed happened repeatedly in the recent past -- the exposed fraud was intended to benefit Republicans. Strange how this all seems more and more like just a massive case of projection, eh?
The fraud at hand didn't involve actual votes or actual ballots, this time. It involved signatures on petitions for candidates. But unlike most of the GOP fraud that has been exposed in the past year or so, this one was a concerted effort and involved tens of thousands of signatures -- not a ballot here and a ballot there, filled out in some recently-dead relative's name, in an attempt to boost Donald Trump's vote. Here is the story, as Salon reports:
Former Detroit Police Chief James Craig, the leading Republican running for governor, is ineligible to appear on the primary ballot after failing to submit enough legitimate signatures, the state Bureau of Elections said in a report on Monday.
The report comes after Democrats and other candidates alleged "extensive evidence of fraud and forgery" by Craig and fellow Republican hopeful Perry Johnson, a deep-pocketed businessman and self-described "qualify guru." The Bureau of Elections identified "36 petition circulators who submitted fraudulent petition sheets consisting entirely of invalid signatures." The bureau said criminal investigations and charges against certain circulators are possible.
The bureau's report said that all of the petition sheets submitted by the circulators "displayed suspicious patterns indicative of fraud" and did not match any signatures in the state's database. The agency estimated that these circulators submitted "at least 68,000 invalid signatures" across 10 sets of nominating contests.
"Although it is typical for staff to encounter some signatures of dubious authenticity scattered within nominating petitions, the Bureau is unaware of another election cycle in which this many circulators submitted such a substantial volume of fraudulent petition seats," the report said.
For those Americans who have never had to dodge clipboard-wielding professional signature-gatherers patrolling the approaches to their local grocery store, in many places candidates and/or ballot measures cannot qualify for the ballot unless they show some small percentage of the electorate is willing to sign a piece of paper essentially saying (at the very least): "this person/issue deserves to be on the ballot." A signature for a candidate or referendum issue is not the same as voting for them -- a voter who signs a petition for one is in no way obligated or required to vote for the person or initiative on the actual ballot in the actual election.
Collecting tens (sometimes hundreds) of thousands of voters' signatures is a big job, obviously. Backers of a ballot initiative or a candidate's campaign staff almost always farm this job out to the professionals. Service companies who pay people to gather signatures are common -- it is a small and little-noticed industry. When you do stop and talk to one of these signature-gatherers (again, usually in front of the grocery store, but they intelligently hang out in any place with a large public gathering or lots of foot traffic), you'll find that they're actually carrying six or seven clipboards around -- because it is a lot more efficient for the signature-gatherers and the companies who employ them to get you to sign as many of them as possible in one single interaction.
The normal way of paying such people is not by the hour but by the signature. If you can collect ten signatures in an hour, you get the same money as someone who took ten hours to do the same. This almost encourages cheating, since the more signatures you turn in at the end of the day, the more money you get. Such cheating is normally fairly limited -- people might add a few extras to the bottom of their sheet at the end of the day, but not enough to trigger any suspicion. Because of this -- and, to be fair, because of voters actually "signing" the petition with a false name or whatever -- most candidates turn in at least 50 percent over the required number of signatures, to allow for any to be removed during verification.
This, however, is something different. This seems to be the companies themselves paying people to essentially sit around all day filling out bogus signatures, and not even bothering to try to collect any real ones. Or, to put it another way massive and premeditated fraud. Read that statement from the Bureau of Elections again: "36 petition circulators who submitted fraudulent petition sheets consisting entirely of invalid signatures." Entirely. By three dozen of them. Almost 70,000 signatures. In other words, massive fraud.
The candidates themselves claim "that they are the victims of the scheme, not the perpetrators." They might be right about that -- the bureau specifically stated that it didn't believe the candidates were even aware of the fraud. They got scammed, to put it another way. And it could easily have happened to some Democratic candidates (all candidates pay signature-gathering firms to do the job for them). But it didn't.
An astounding five Republicans who had filed for the governor's race have been disqualified due to this scam. That's half the field, and includes the likely frontrunner. That is a huge consequence, obviously. The article provided the details for the case of James Craig:
Craig was widely seen as the odds-on favorite to win the nomination and face Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in November. The bureau found that Craig's campaign turned in over 11,000 invalid signatures, including nearly 10,000 from "fraudulent petition circulators." Less than half of his 21,305 signatures were "facially valid," leaving him short of the 15,000 signatures needed to make the ballot.
As I stated, campaigns like to shoot for 150 percent of the required number -- which in this case would have meant 22,500 signatures turned in. They got close, with 21,305. And the normal and expected invalid signatures (which happen in every race, no matter what, it's worth mentioning) is the difference between "over 11,000" and "nearly 10,000" -- at least a thousand, maybe two. That would be the expected and normal drop, and it wouldn't have disqualified Craig, due to all the extra padding over the required number.
You can bet that this is all going to generate massive lawsuits, if the candidates truly were duped. Criminal penalties might also apply. So the perpetrators aren't going to get off scot-free. But the entire landscape of the Republican governor's race has been altered, and nothing's going to change that. The deadline for turning such signatures in has passed. The disqualified candidates have no real legal way of forcing their way onto the ballot now.
So while it certainly appears that this was a case of a coordinated grift or con job by a group obviously just looking to cash in, it has changed the politics of a major race in the state. And since the only ones affected by this were Republicans, you might think the Republican Party would rise up and denounce this massive election fraud at the tops of their lungs.
But I'm betting they won't. I'm betting that even in Michigan there will be no general outcry or hasty "election integrity" legislation proposed. Because highlighting how badly these GOP candidates got scammed is totally counterproductive to all of the other Republican efforts that they lump into the term "election integrity." So I seriously doubt whether Fox News is going to heavily lean on this -- even though it is truly the first case since 2020 of what can only be called "massive election fraud." But not all massive election fraud is created the same, and the massive election fraud which was perpetrated to aid Republican candidates is not the same thing as the Big Lie Trump is still obsessed with. So it likely won't even be much of a footnote on Fox.
Strange how that works, isn't it?
-- Chris Weigant
Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant
Watching returns come in... GA:
Already won: Abrahms, Warnock, Walker.
Kemp way out front, as expected, easily clearing 50%
Raffensperger also out front, but skating the edge of 50%, could be a runoff there.
Marjorie Three-Names looking like she won't be anywhere near having to go through a runoff (some questioned this, but doesn't look likely)
That's with >20% in, though...
-CW
OK, they called the race for Kemp, no surprise there. And MTG.
Raffensperger still only at 50.7 w/36% in
Big Dem race in TX is way close -- 50.8 Cisneros, 49.2 Cuellar, with 70% in.
-CW
There should be a way of collecting signatures online or through the mail. It wouldn't cost any more and could probably be done with enough security that it wouldn't trigger massive frauds.
It's depressing that Marjorie's constituents would not rather be represented by somebody sane. But I guess if your representative is famous nobody cares whether she's famous for being a white nationalist loony.
maybe it was the jewish space lasers?
fascinating stuff, CW, thank you for the analysis. of course, it would be MUCH better with pie...
nypoet22 -
I mean, I'm sure you've heard this by now, right?
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-pies-michael-cohen_n_628c267de4b0415d4d7b5ffe
:-)
-CW
CW [7]
Which immediately reminded me of the old 70's kid film Bugsy Malone, pies being old hardware and the situation with Trump needs a splurge gun! A whole lot of splurge guns, like the final scene...
Bashi -
Hoo boy, that takes me back. Wasn't there a kid in that that went on to much bigger things? I forget... total kid/Chicago gangsters mashup, what a weird movie...
(TX-28 turning into a real nail-biter... Cuellar ahead but just barely...)
-CW
Strange how that works, isn't it?
Not at all -- if you subscribe to the belief that right-wing folk live in a parallel universe where they don't much hear about this stuff. Like those who think Mueller exonerated Trump, for example.
[7]
CW and poet, the irony here is simply priceless. You'd never be able to make this stuff up. ;D
Now that Trump has Secret Service protection* it might be difficult to get close enough to him nowadays...
Too bad, I'd like to add that pie sacrifice action to my bucket list. (Hint: peeing on Reagan's grave to express my dissatisfaction over the harm he did to America just might be worth a little jail time...) Ahem.
*Until he goes to prison, that is. After that, who knows? All of this is unprecedented, unknown territory.. It seems we've in a New Frontier. (4:44, and delightful. )
Would I have to shout TAKE THE VACCINE! as I hurled an otherwise perfectly good pie at Trump?
(sound of MtnCaddy, cracking himself up)
Wasn't there a kid in that that went on to much bigger things?
Scott Baio. Jodie Foster had just finished Taxi Driver.
Bashi -
Aha! Thought so...
MtnCaddy -
I heard a long time ago that most pies-in-the-face in Hollywood (or elsewhere) aren't actually pies. They're like a pie plate full of shaving cream. Don't know who came up with that... maybe it just photographs well or something, but just had to toss that out there...
I mean, personally, I'd much rather get a lemon meringue in the face than a bunch of shaving cream... I mean, I'm just sayin'....
:-)
-CW
TX Dem race down to >180 votes... looks like a recount is going to happen...
-CW
Hey Michale! Your preferred candidate in the Georgia Secretary of State Republican Primary won. And Governor Kemp, too.
No doubt.. Any fruit pie in the face has to beat shaving creme -- ya probably save a little on the carbon footprint thing with plant based, as well.
Dunno about lemon meringue -- might be a bit too citrusy for the eyes. Pecan pie might also be tough on the eyeballs...
Boston Cream Pie!
Final answer.
Heh.
Finally, a truly massive amount of election fraud has been uncovered! You'd think all of the blind adherents to Donald Trump's Big Lie conspiracy theory would be overjoyed,
I find it hilarious how ya'all go on and on about President Trump's "BIG LIE" but ignore Stacey Abrams' BIG LIE..
Hypocrisy much??? :eyeroll:
Hypocrisy. It's not a bug in Democrat Programming. It's a feature.
Liz,
The only one who is shouting about being happy about abortions around here is YOU, Michale. So, enough already!
As I have PROVEN with facts, it's Democrats who are being happy about their abortions.
https://www.lifenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/proabortion58.png
Did you know that Democrats have TIK TOK parties where they CELEBRATE their baby killing???
Discover short videos related to Abortion Party on TikTok. Watch popular content from the following creators: Azja is FABULOUS(@azja.the.fabulous), Azja is FABULOUS(@azja.the.fabulous), mari(@amarishani), The Young Turks(@theyoungturks), ?? Iboy_josh ????(@iamjosh_simp) . Explore the latest videos from hashtags: #abortion, #abortions, #abortabortion, #abortionpositive .
61 Likes, 16 Comments. TikTok video from Azja is FABULOUS (@azja.the.fabulous): "Getting my friend a cake that says “congrats on your abortion“ for her reverse baby shower/abortion party tomorrow.? #abortion #prochoice #cake". Stuck In The Middle.
Getting my friend a cake that says “congrats on your abortion“ for her reverse baby shower/abortion party tomorrow.? #abortion #prochoice #cake
They even have DIY Baby Killing Videos!!!
TikTok video from mari (@amarishani): "#ColorCustomizer jus to be safe ?????". me looking up diy abortions at the party . gang gang gangg.
These are YOUR Democrats...
How utterly sick and despicable is that!!???
Democrats CELEBRATING their baby killings!!!
I see. Well, let's work on it and see how best to improve the situation ... could you prep on Saturday? ... or maybe Saturday should be the night for music??
Seems to me that Friday Nights would be the best time for it.. Fri Nights is already associated with Party Night anyways..
MC,
So, can we lay to rest your claim that Democrats don't "celebrate" and "shout out their baby killing???
Because, as I have proven with FACTS beyond ANY doubt..
Democrats DO celebrate their baby killing.. They are happy and giddy about it and want to share their baby killing happiness with the world..
The Democrat Party...
The Casey Anthony Party...
:eyeroll:
Moving on...
Sad news from Texas..
Of course, Democrats didn't even let those poor children's bodies get cold before they politicized the tragedy...
Biden demands gun control following Uvalde, Texas elementary school shooting
Harris calls for action after Texas elementary school shooting
Uvalde, Texas school shooting: Democrats demand gun control, curse Republicans: 'F--- your prayers'
Well, Democrats are simply follow Odumbo's advice.
"We MUST politicize these tragedies"
-Barack Hussein Odumbo
How Democrats can sleep at night is simply mind-boggling to the rational patriotic American..
From the Left Wing rag, Washington Post via Left Wing corporation MSN..
When you have someone like Biden who is CONSTANTLY having his comments walked back by his handlers, it's clear to ANYONE not enslaved by Party that Biden is NOT in charge in his administration..
Bashi,
There is a third option. He is here to argue and using left wing sources is counter productive to that goal...
Which is OBVIOUSLY not factually accurate as I use plenty of Left Wing sources.. :D
So, yer wrong again.. :D
But I still like ya.. :D
President Joe Biden Demands Congress Act After "Another Elementary School" Massacre
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/president-joe-biden-demands-congress-act-after-another-elementary-school-massacre/ar-AAXGoHj
As I am wont to do when Democrats get apoplectic after a mass shooting tragedy...
I'll ask a simple question..
Give me a gun law that A> is allowable under the 2nd Amendment and B> will actually prevent or help prevent these mass shootings...
You can't.. NO ONE can..
Because any law that is possible under those 2 criteria has ALREADY BEEN PASSED..
The ONLY laws that Democrats/Gun Hating Morons can come up with are nothing but WOULDN'T IT BE NICE laws..
Laws that do NOTHING to stop these mass shootings, but just make Democrats feel good about doing SOMETHING... ANYTHING to further their anti-gun agenda..
And if Democrats can't use a mass shooting tragedy to further their anti-gun hysteria...
Using Tragedy for Racial Propaganda
After the horror in Buffalo, President Biden and others peddle an entirely false charge: that whites are the biggest source of hate crime and interracial violence in the US.
https://www.city-journal.org/using-the-buffalo-tragedy-for-racial-propaganda
Democrats will use a mass shooting tragedy to further their RACIST agenda.. :eyeroll:
Again, this begs the question..
How do Democrats SLEEP at night!?? It's mind-boggling..
“What are we doing? What are we doing? Why do you spend all this time running for the United States Senate, why do you go through all the hassle of getting this job, of putting yourself into a position of authority, if your answer as this slaughter increases, as our kids run for their lives, we do nothing? What are we doing? Why are you here, if not to solve a problem as existential as this?”
-Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT)
What CAN you do, Senator??
Seriously.. What can you do about it??
GIVE ME A LAW that ya'all can pass that is allowable under the 2nd Amendment and that will actually prevent or help prevent these mass shootings.
Don't just sit their and whine and bitch about your impotence..
COME UP WITH SOMETHING!
You CAN'T because there is no such law that hasn't already been passed..
One thing that MIGHT help those coping with the aftermath is:
DON'T FRAKIN' POLITICIZE THESE TRAGEDIES!!!
Moron...
And do you know WHY those efforts failed??
Because there is no appetite in America for WOULDN'T IT BE NICE LAWS... Laws that do absolutely NOTHING to prevent or help prevent these shootings, but rather just makes Democrats happy they pushed their anti-gun agenda..
The *ONLY* laws that MIGHT help are MENTAL HEALTH laws.. But Democrats refuse to go down that road because of PRIVACY!!
Ironically enough, it's that same PRIVACY that drives Democrats baby killing efforts..
Maybe a LITTLE less PRIVACY concern and a little more concern for the victims of these mass shootings, eh Democrats?? :epic eyeroll:
Liz,
What was it you said a bit ago about "privacy"..???
Ah yes..
Is the right to privacy a right that is retained by the people?
Is a person's privacy more important than the 19 lives that were snuffed out yesterday???
For me, personally?? Hell no.. My right to privacy is NOT greater than the loss of a single innocent life.. If cops have to tap my phone to save some innocent life, GO FOR IT..
If authorities have to dig into my medical and mental health history to prevent a mass shooting, I will gladly turn over that right...
The reason these mass shootings continue to happen is because DEMOCRATS think that personal privacy is MORE IMPORTANT than stopping these mass shootings.
If you people REALLY want a law that will stop these mass shootings before they even get started....
Tell your Democrats to ease up on their hysterical adherence to the old out-dated idea that personal privacy is sacrosanct..
Not a SINGLE PERSON's personal privacy is worth the lives of those 19 people that were killed yesterday...
There...
NOW ya'all have a law that is compatible with the 2nd Amendment and will actually stop these mass shootings..
But, of course, this law will violate Democrat Party ideology...
So, it won't be considered..
And Democrats will continue to politicize these tragedies to further their own gun-hate ideology..
“I am sick and tired. We can have an impact on this carnage. I spent my career as a senator and a vice president working to pass commonsense gun laws. We can’t prevent every tragedy, but we know they work.”
-Joe Biden
All "common sense" gun laws that are allowable under the 2nd that CAN be passed HAVE been passed..
NONE of the laws proposed by Democrats today will have ANY effect on mass shootings...
It's time to ignore the tool being used in these massacres and concentrate what EVERY ONE of these tragedies has in common..
The common factor is NOT the tool being used.. Sometimes the tool is a vehicle.. Sometimes the tool is fire... The tool used is varied..
But the ONE factor that is NOT varied, that is the DECIDING factor in each and every one of these mass murder incidents..
Mental health..
THAT is the one factor that addresses *ALL* of these incidents..
But Democrats won't even CONSIDER that factor..
So, as the FACTS clearly show, Democrats are not really interested in actually preventing these massacres..
Democrats just want to push their anti-gun agenda..
Once again.. Just the facts...
If Democrats won't forgo their slave-ish adherence to privacy, there is another way to prevent these school shootings..
A mass influx of armed personnel..
The ONLY thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun...
Arm teachers.. Arm office personnel... More police officers in schools.
But, of course, Democrats have been pushing JUST the opposite..
Because of Democrats and their DEFUND, DEMORALIZE, DEMONIZE THE POLICE policies, Democrats have been pulling LEOs *OUT* of schools for years now..
One has to wonder if there was an LEO as an SRO at the elementary school in Uvalde Texas but Democrats pulled them out...
There ya have it..
TWO very good, very sound and above all else VERY EFFECTIVE plans that will actually prevent these mass shootings..
But Democrats MUST have their anti-gun agenda front and center..
So, Democrats will ignore these very effective ideas...
Matthew McConaughey calls for action after deadly elementary school shooting in his Texas hometown
Actor Matthew McConaughey was born in Uvalde, Texas, in 1969, and his mother was a teacher at a school a mile away from Robb Elementary where Tuesday's mass shooting happened
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/matthew-mcconaughey-school-shooting-texas-hometown
Yes.. Action MUST be taken..
But the ONLY action to be taken that will actually prevent these school shootings is mental health action..
But we all know that Democrats refuse to take such actions..
Because Democrats believe that personal privacy is more important than the lives of all the hundreds/thousands of mass shooting victims over the years..
And so the mass shootings will continue..
:^/
But, we all know Democrats' track record on dealing with mental heath sicknesses...
Democrats would rather VALIDATE mental health problems, rather than CURE them..
So that also could explain Democrat reluctance to support mental health laws that will actually PREVENT these mass shooting incidents..
:^/
"It's these little children, the most vulnerable, innocent beings on earth being slaughtered. You know, the only place Hannity, Dan and I diverge is.. how can you buy an assault weapon on your 18th birthday when you cannot buy a beer?"
-Geraldo Riveria
OK, Mr Riveria...
Ignoring the FACT that there is no such thing as an "assault rifle" in firearm nomenclature.. The term is a media/political construct that has NO BEARING in reality...
Ignoring that fact... I'll be your huckleberry..
https://mfccfl.us/AssaultRifle.jpg
Which is the "assault rifle" that an 18 year old should not be allowed to buy???
I mean, an 18 year old.. AN ADULT.. should be allowed to buy a hunting rifle, right??
So, which of the above pictured rifles should an 18 yr be banned from buying??
But ya know what???
***ALL*** of those rifles are the EXACT SAME RIFLE...
A Mini Ruger 14 which is nothing more than a hunting rifle..
THIS is the EXACT problem with Democrats and their anti-gun hysteria..
It's based SOLELY on hysterical fear mongering and not a LICK of fact!!
Want more facts??
More people in the US are killed every year with fists and knives and blunt objects than are killed with "assault rifles"...
Maybe Democrats should get hysterical about "assault fists" and "assault knives" and "assault blunt objects" and move to ban those "assault" items, eh??
:epic eyeroll:
There is NOTHING of facts or reality in the Democrats' hysterical anti-gun agenda...
It's SOLELY about hysterical fear mongering and nothing else..
JL,
Taking a break from all the politicizing (Democrats politicizing mass shooting tragedies and me politicizing Democrats' politicizing) let's talk Trek...
Were you somewhat surprised by the views of WORLD WAR III depicted in SNW's first episode??
I mean, they pretty much nuked every big city, eh??
And, then it occurred to me..
When we have seen Earth in Star Trek's time, the majority of what we have seen is San Francisco only.. Sure, Picard showed us Okinawa (which was a nice touch, as that was where I met my lovely wife.. :D).... DS9 showed us a bit of New Orleans....
But by and large, all we have seen is San Francisco..
One is left to wonder if the rest of the US, nay the world, is a nuclear wasteland in the 23rd/24th century...
OK Back to politization...
Lemme ask ya'all this..
We have a guy who was obviously mentally whacked and criminally oriented..
Does ANYONE here HONESTLY believe that this obviously whacked criminal would be saying, "I want to go shoot up a school. But, darn it all, the law says I can't have an assault rifle. Oh well, I guess I'll just go watch TV instead."
Where is the logic in such an assumption??
Someone who wants to commit mass murder will find a way...
Depriving the entire country of their Constitutional rights in HOPES that it will prevent these mass murder incidents is moronic..
In Australia in the 20 years prior to the Port Arthur shooting that led to the AUS gun ban, 74 people were killed in mass murder incidents..
In the 20 years AFTER the AUS gun ban, 79 people were killed in mass murder incidents..
Obviously the gun ban didn't stop the mass murder incidents.. It simply lead to mass murderers using a different tool.
Who could have POSSIBLY predicted this!!???
:eyeroll:
Only ANYONE with more than 2 brain cells to rub together..
We could go back to talking about Democrat baby killing AKA abortion if ya'all want??
Funny how ya'all the REPUBLICAN with three names..
Yet it was DEMOCRATS who made the 3 name thing mainstream...
Ketanji Jackson Brown for example...
Hypocrisy. It's not a bug in Democrat programming. It's a feature.
:eyeroll:
Funny how the commentary IGNORES the fact that it was likely Democrat operatives who actually PERPETRATED the fraud....
Typical.. :eyeroll:
What can stop a bad guy with a gun???
A good guy with a gun...
"We Have To Have The Courage To Take Action To Ensure This Never Happens Again"
-Kamala 'Headboard' Harris
Except when it comes to actually DOING something that will prevent these mass shootings.. :eyeroll:
Analysis: Grief. Horror. Inaction. Texas mass shootings follow a numbing script
We know what comes next. Another scar hardens on the state’s collective psyche, but little is done to prevent the next one.
https://www.texastribune.org/2022/05/24/texas-mass-shooting-uvalde/
Of course, nothing is done..
Do ya'all HONESTLY believe that Democrats want to lose one of their favorite talking points!!??
If you do, I have some swampland in FL I wanna sell you...
:eyeroll:
OK.. So no one wants to talk about Democrat baby killing..
No one wants to talk about Democrats failed attempts to ban guns..
I am sensing a pattern here..
No one wants to talk about Democrat EPIC FAILURES.. :D
Texas mass shooting: Uvalde school district had security measures in place prior to tragedy
At least 18 students and two adults have died in the shooting at Robb Elementary in Uvalde, Texas
https://www.foxnews.com/us/texas-mass-shooting-school-district-security-measures
No Battle Plan Survives Contact With The Enemy
-Old Military Adage
You don't fight a junkyard dog with ASPCA rules. What you do is you take the leash off your bigger, meaner dog.
-Senator, UNDER SEIGE
And we'll take a break at an even 50.. :D
School districts nationwide ramp up security following Uvalde, Texas shooting
Uvalde, Texas shooting response: School districts nationwide ramp up security
Officials are taking extra precautions following the deadly school shooting
https://www.foxnews.com/us/uvalde-texas-shooting-school-districts-nationwide-security
The VERY FIRST thing that needs to be done is to get LEOs BACK into schools after Democrats pulled them out of schools all over the country..
Good call, Democrats.. :eyeroll:
I see where Trump went down in flames in GA, same as he did in Idaho. Lets hope that Republicans finally wisw up and dump the asshole forever. I'll never undersand how he EVER evn got nominated, much less elected.
CRS,
I'll never undersand how he EVER evn got nominated, much less elected.
That's easy..
REAL Americans were sick and tired of politics as usual..
[21]
I find it hilarious how ya'all go on and on about President Trump's "BIG LIE" but ignore Stacey Abrams' BIG LIE..
Hypocrisy much??? :eyeroll:
Oh? Um, Stacey Abram's BIG LIE was what, exactly?
[23]
Seems to me that Friday Nights would be the best time for it.. Fri Nights is already associated with Party Night anyways..
I agree. Sunday nights generally don't work for me. Celebrating another weekend in Paradise with my Weigantia crew would be fun!
I mean, look at the facts...
Look at all the good President Trump accomplished for America and Americans..
Imagine what we could have accomplished if President Trump hadn't (SUCCESSFULLY) beat back the 24/7/365 persecution from Democrats and Trump/America haters, eh??
We would have cured cancer and had a Mars colony!!!
[24]
MC,
So, can we lay to rest your claim that Democrats don't "celebrate" and "shout out their baby killing???
Because, as I have proven with FACTS beyond ANY doubt..
Democrats DO celebrate their baby killing.. They are happy and giddy about it and want to share their baby killing happiness with the world..
The Democrat Party...
The Casey Anthony Party...
:eyeroll:
No. You'd have to make the case for doing so and you have NOT.
MC,
Oh? Um, Stacey Abram's BIG LIE was what, exactly?
Abrams claims she actually won the 2018 Governor election in GA..
She STILL hasn't conceded her 2018 loss...
Funny how ya'all ignore Abram's BIG LIE claims, eh?
Hypocrisy.. It's not a bug in Democrat programming... It's a feature..
MC,
No. You'd have to make the case for doing so and you have NOT.
So, yer just going to ignore all the facts of Democrats celebrating their abortions and all the TikTok parties of Democrats having cake and ice cream at their baby killing parties..
If yer not going to accept the FACTS, why do you bother asking the question??
[21] 0132
***
[51] 0606
Thirty one posts. Four and a half hours. Just sayin'
@m
I'll look it over later if'n I get the chance.
Thirty one posts. Four and a half hours. Just sayin'
Yea, I am kinda lagging this morning..
I apologize..
I'll pick up the pace.. :D
I have been doing some posts over at RCP, so I haven't been able to devote my time exclusive here..
Apologies.. I'll do better. :D
Michale,
Friday nights, eh?
Why doesn't that surprise me?
Friday nights are Chris's big night. I know you know that. I also know that you don't care.
I do care. So, no, it won't be on Friday nights. You alone rain on that parade and you don't really care for music, do you, anyways. So ...
Liz,
I can assure you I am not that Machiavellian.. :D
I was solely thinking of your music thingy and had no other consideration..
How utterly sick and despicable is that!!???
Democrats CELEBRATING their baby killings!!!
Just as despicable as referring to embryos and fetuses as babies in order to appeal to emotion...
@m,
Yeah it did seem like ww3 hit harder on the east coast
Just as despicable as referring to embryos and fetuses as babies in order to appeal to emotion...
I refer to the babies as babies because SCIENCE says they are babies..
Don't blame me that Democrats adhere to the serial killer rule of dehumanizing their victims..
Yeah it did seem like ww3 hit harder on the east coast
I read the EUGENICS WAR series and it didn't seem to be all that..
But Pike linked the Eugenics War and WWIII as the same conflict, so there is that..
But it seemed to me with the devastation of those wars in the 21st century that was indicated n Ep 1 of SNW, that the Trek universe could not have evolved so fast..
Millions from Biden's COVID relief bill went to museum, university programs pushing social, climate justice
$50K in American Rescue Plan funds awarded to Northern Mariana Islands nonprofit to 'teach Indigenous canoe-building'
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-covid-relief-millions-climate-social-justice
If only those millions of $$$ went to school security..
But Democrats care more for social justice boondoggles.. :eyeroll:
Border Patrol special unit takes out school shooter..
Democrats accuse Border Patrol agents of whipping illegal immigrants..
We know what side Democrats are on.. :eyeroll:
Minneapolis marks 2 years since George Floyd's murder
Later in the week, a festival and concert will take place at the intersection along with a gathering of families whose loved ones have died at the hands of police.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/minneapolis-2-years-george-floyd-murder
Democrats honoring a woman beater and a thug....
Typical....
Tom Homan on special Border Patrol unit taking down Texas school shooter: 'These are American heroes'
BORTAC agent credited with killing suspected school shooter, Salvador Ramos, in Uvalde elementary school
https://www.foxnews.com/media/homan-border-patrol-stopping-texas-school-shooter
And Democrat so-called "leaders" STILL have not retracted their bullshit claims that Border Patrol agents were whipping illegal immigrants..
Democrats.. :eyeroll:
The issue is whipped cream, not whipped immigrants.
No the issue is that Democrats make bullshit false accusations against our LEOs and never retract them...
How can ya'all support people like that???
Mayorkas praises Border Patrol for response to Uvalde shooting, says heroism 'saved lives'
An agent with BORTAC is believed to have shot and killed the Uvalde gunman
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mayorkas-border-patrol-uvalde-shooting-response-saved-lives
Isn't he the same scumbag who accused these "heroes" of whipping illegal immigrants??
:eyeroll:
At the beginning of the day I asked someone.. ANYONE.. to give me a law that would be allowable under the 2nd Amendment and would actually prevent or help prevent these mass shootings..
Here we are some 60-70 comments later and not a SINGLE person has been able to step up..
Funny how that is, eh? :^/
If there were a national directory of licensed firearms then police could cross-check it with family mental health issues.
Are you sure everyone didn't just scroll past? I never saw the post...
But to answer your question:
Start a national militia. If you own a gun, you must register with the militia. Every two years starting with the month you purchase your first gun you are required to show up for a drill session which would really be an overview of the command structure, where to go if the militia is called up and how the whole thing works. Otherwise it would be shooting contests, gun safety classes and just a chance to interact with everyone else in the broader community that owns a gun.
The requirement to actually do something would get rid of all the causal gun owners who own guns but never use or practice with them (or probably even clean them). It would also get people out of their bubbles and realize that Americans of all races, genders and whatever other filters keep them separated all own guns. And finally, hopefully instill a certain level of seriousness about guns. I personally don't think guns are the problem, but current American gun culture that treats guns like a mixture of talisman of worship and toys...
Also, mental health would certainly be improved by unrestricted access to pie.
Bashi,
So, forced military service to exercise a constitutional right??
So, let's enforce "militias" for those who want to exercise their 1st Amendment rights to post on the internet..
Epic fail..
If there were a national directory of licensed firearms then police could cross-check it with family mental health issues.
How, exactly would that work??
Democrats would have to forgo their PRIVACY hysteria to allow LEOs to cross reference gun registry with mental health registry that would ALSO have to be created...
No go...
So, get Democrats to create a national Mental Health Registry that INCLUDES gender bending sickness and make sure LEOs have access to it.
THEN we can talk about a national gun registry..
Mmmm kay??
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State...
A weekend every couple years is hardly forced military service and it follows the oft ignored first half of the amendment in question.
WHY should a national mental health registry include gender bending sickness??
http://mfccfl.us/genderbender.png
It's self evident...
another idea, have gun licenses for people 18-22 be contingent on successful completion of a gun safety course, with physical and mental health screening - just like they do with driver licenses/permits.
What's your solution?
Teachers with guns has not worked. The good guy with a gun has not shown up. The closest police did and dealt with the situation. All in gun happy Texas which should have been a showcase of your previous ideas.
Gun owners and the politicians who support them need to take some responsibility and deal with the current state of gun culture. If the left want's to take your guns away (they don't but that is the political rallying cry) the response should not be lets all buy even more guns and make sure those who don't want to carry guns carry them anyway...
@m[90],
again, non-binary gender is not in and of itself a mental illness. objectively, it doesn't necessarily interfere with the ability to live a healthy and productive life. just because something seems "self-evident" to one person, doesn't necessarily make it so.
JL
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State...
Except that the SCOTUS has ruled that THAT part of the 2nd is PREFATORY.. Which means it's simply explanatory and not a requirement..
Being that self defense and defense of the innocent is an inalienable human right, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed..
According to the SCOTUS, THAT has the same exact meaning as the current 2nd..
It provides a PREFATORY (IE example) of why the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed..
again, non-binary gender is not in and of itself a mental illness. objectively,
Not according to SCIENCE..
See Gender Dysphoria
it doesn't necessarily interfere with the ability to live a healthy and productive life.
And yet, HOW high is the suicide rate amongst those suffering from Gender Dysphoria???
What's your solution?
I have already posted TWO solutions..
Open up mental health records to LEOs...
Flood schools with armed and trained troops...
BOTH will be effective in combating school shootings..
another idea, have gun licenses for people 18-22 be contingent on successful completion of a gun safety course, with physical and mental health screening - just like they do with driver licenses/permits.
So, a permit and a test to exercise a constitutional right??
How about tests and registrations and insurance to post on the Internet...
Except that the SCOTUS has ruled that THAT part of the 2nd is PREFATORY.. Which means it's simply explanatory and not a requirement..
and the same court may overturn Roe vs Wade...
Things change.
again, non-binary gender is not in and of itself a mental illness. objectively,
Tell that to the people who just lost their children in Uvalde Texas..
http://mfccfl.us/genderbender.png
Here is the Mayo Clinic's page for gender dysphoria. Diagnosis and treatment is linked to at the bottom of the page. Doesn't match your alleged "science" at all...
Michale [99]
Politicizing this tragedy? That picture has already been debunked...
Here is the Mayo Clinic's page for gender dysphoria. Diagnosis and treatment is linked to at the bottom of the page. Doesn't match your alleged "science" at all...
That's Democrat activism disguised as science..
Politicizing this tragedy? That picture has already been debunked...
I'll be happy to consider it if you can PROVE it..
Thank God!
Betty Bowers (America's Best Christian) explains how God is PRO-CHOICE! (6:39 includes Bible citations!)
Glory!
Politicizing this tragedy?
Nope.. I am politicizing Democrats politicizing the tragedy..
MC,
Thank God!
Betty Bowers (America's Best Christian) explains how God is PRO-CHOICE! (6:39 includes Bible citations!)
Glory!
Bringing god into the argument LOSES the case for ya, MC... :^/
and the same court may overturn Roe vs Wade...
Things change.
Then, when you can change the SCOTUS ruling, you will have an argument..
Until then, you don't..
Simple as that..
Open up mental health records to LEOs...
For many of these shooters, they don't have mental health records. And how do you prevent abuse of access to these records?
Flood schools with armed and trained troops...
The militarization of schools is not the answer. Plus, how are you going to pay for it? Raise taxes?
That's Democrat activism disguised as science..
The Mayo Clinic? I don't think so...
For many of these shooters, they don't have mental health records.
Not factually accurate..
And how do you prevent abuse of access to these records?
Any abuse of access pales in comparison to the loss of life..
But thank you for proving my point for me..
Democrats will hide behind privacy issues..
Guess they don't really care for the Uvalde victims after all...
The militarization of schools is not the answer.
Assumes facts not in evidence..
Plus, how are you going to pay for it? Raise taxes?
NOW yer worried about MONEY!!
I guess that shows how important preventing these school shootings is to Democrats.. :^/
I'll be happy to consider it if you can PROVE it..
https://api.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/may/25/facebook-posts/no-these-photos-person-wearing-skirt-arent-uvalde-/
The main page also debunks he was an illegal alien...
[66]
Which is why there should be no candidates on the ballot.
The ballot should just list the office and the voter writes in the name of the candidate. Voting machines could have a spell check function with a list of all candidates that have filed to run for the office to help citizens spell the name correctly.
Now that's an interesting idea.
Not the rest of your usual delusional post. Just
...that.
https://api.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/may/25/facebook-posts/no-these-photos-person-wearing-skirt-arent-uvalde-/
The main page also debunks he was an illegal alien...
Politifact??
I asked for PROOF..
Not a Left Wing rag site...
No Go 31
But I looked at your "proof" anyways, Bashi..
It doesn't even show the photo I posted..
So, epic fail...
Not factually accurate..
Your use of this line is what is usually "Not factually accurate"...
Any abuse of access pales in comparison to the loss of life..
Does it? Your use of "loss of life" seems politically motivated and highly selective...
NOW yer worried about MONEY!!
So, you don't have a plan...
Not a Left Wing rag site...
Read it and tell me what wrong with it. Or stop posting foxnews, NY post, breitbart, inquirer and all the numerous right wing rags you seem to love. Or just admit you are a hypocrite...
[85]
The issue is whipped cream, not whipped immigrants.
Indeed. Brother Michale inhabits a strange parallel alternative universe. A universe where this is even newsworthy.
Fear, Faith, Firearms and Facism. Sign me up!
It doesn't even show the photo I posted..
Do you have proof it is also not made up? Otherwise it its also an epic fail...
The politifact page also had this at the bottom which you evidently did not read:
We separately looked into claims that Ramos is transgender and found no evidence to corroborate them.
So, why are you trying to connect the shooter with the trans community if not for politicizing this tragedy to your own ends?
It was [78] poet. But you already knew that.
[82]
Here we are some 60-70 comments later and not a SINGLE person has been able to step up..
Funny how that is, eh? :^/
To be frank no, nt funny but rather, what, juvenile? More like needlessly annoying.
Respectfully, I'd feel pretty silly asserting that it's anybody's job to respond to even one of my comments. SILENCE MEANS ASSENT is beneath you, Michale. C'mon, man!
ESPECIALLY considering that 63 of the comments starting at number [21] are yours. That's out of 97.
Why so much? And why so repetitive?*yeesh*
Go think it over, Michale.
Shirley you can rep the right-wing side waaay better than that, no?
K, Bashi.
I've trying to reach the dude for some weeks now. Trying to see if he's interested in refining my views or not. Wondering what he considers owning the Libs to be.
We'll see how he responds.
Bashi,
Your use of this line is what is usually "Not factually accurate"...
Any facts to support your claim??
No??
Of course not..
Does it? Your use of "loss of life" seems politically motivated and highly selective...
Says the guy who supports Democrats who politicize these tragedies..
So, you don't have a plan...
I already posted TWO plans..
That DON'T involve gutting Constitutional rights..
Read it and tell me what wrong with it.
I already have.. It doesn't report on the picture that I posted..
Do you have proof it is also not made up?
Your the one who claims it is false.. The impetus is on YOU to provide facts that it's false..
Sans those facts, the picture stands as valid..
MC,
So, you have no suggestions to prevent school shootings??
All you had to do was say so..
The larger problem aren't these high profile mass shootings. The bigger problem, which Biden ignores, is that across the whole country the homicide rate skyrocketed starting at the end of May 2020, right after the Floyd protests started. 2021 was the highest single year increase in our nations history and 2022 so far looks to be similar.
Time to admit that the protests, which Democrats fully embraced, were a major failure that destroyed the very communities they were trying to support. And to add so much irony to this - the gunman in this case was stopped by a border patrol agent, the same guys that the left has been vilifying and calling evil for years.
Bashi,
So, why are you trying to connect the shooter with the trans community if not for politicizing this tragedy to your own ends?
Do you have ANY facts besides Left Wing rag's claim that says that Ramos was not trans???
No??
OK, then.. I accept your concession..
Or maybe he was just a cross dresser..
Regardless, it's obvious he had some mental issues...
That much is definitive...
Any facts to support your claim??
No??
Of course not..
And yet you dismissed my argument without any back up...rules for me but not for thee?
Your the one who claims it is false.. The impetus is on YOU to provide facts that it's false..
I did, post [119].
So, you don't have a plan...
I already posted TWO plans..
Now you are just being dumb. That was obviously about funding the plan you posted...
MC
I've trying to reach the dude for some weeks now. Trying to see if he's interested in refining my views or not. Wondering what he considers owning the Libs to be.
I am only interested in giving you the FACTS..
If you choose to refine your views or not, that is totally and completely up to you..
It makes me no never mind...
Do you have ANY facts besides Left Wing rag's claim that says that Ramos was not trans???
Do you have any facts other than a random picture without context?
OK, then.. I accept your concession..
Sorry, no beer for you...
And yet you dismissed my argument without any back up...rules for me but not for thee?
Because your argument consists SOLELY of a Left Wing rag that has NOTHING to do with the photo I posted..
I did, post [119].
You posted comments from a Left Wing rag that had nothing to do with the photo I posted..
Epic fail..
Now you are just being dumb. That was obviously about funding the plan you posted...
I didn't post any funding plan..
I posted TWO plans to prevent school shootings.
You posted nothing but Constitutional violations that have nothing to do with the question I posed..
Sorry, no beer for you...
And yet, I have a cold one in my hand right now..
So, once again, the FACTS prove you wrong.. :D
Because your argument consists SOLELY of a Left Wing rag that has NOTHING to do with the photo I posted..
Other than: We separately looked into claims that Ramos is transgender and found no evidence to corroborate them.
I didn't post any funding plan..
Exactly. Try reading sometime...
You posted nothing but Constitutional violations that have nothing to do with the question I posed..
Considering how often you post about abortion, I would think it would be up you alley, or is this more rules for me but not for thee?
Democrats use Uvalde shooting to demand Senate pass HR 8, which would not have prevented tragedy
Uvalde shooter legally bought firearms from licensed dealer, ATF says
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrats-uvalde-shooting-senate-hr-8-background-check
Once again, Democrats use tragedies to push WOULDN'T IT BE NICE anti gun laws that will do NOTHING to stop mass shootings..
Typical...
Considering how often you post about abortion, I would think it would be up you alley, or is this more rules for me but not for thee?
Once again, I accept your concession.. :D
Other than: We separately looked into claims that Ramos is transgender and found no evidence to corroborate them.
So, a Left Wing rag made a claim COMPLETELY UNSUBSTANTIATED by any facts whatsoever..
Of course, YOU accept it as gospel.. :eyeroll:
Once again, Democrats use tragedies to push WOULDN'T IT BE NICE anti gun laws that will do NOTHING to stop mass shootings..
Democrats? It was Texas Republicans that dropped the age to 18 last year...
Once again, I accept your concession.. :D
Uh...why? So you admit rules for the rest of us but not for you? Seems a bit silly...
Democrats? It was Texas Republicans that dropped the age to 18 last year...
Which has NOTHING to do with what I posted..
It's DEMOCRATS in the Senate who are pushing the law using Uvalde as an excuse.. A law that would NOT have prevented Uvalde..
Do try and keep up... Are you OK??? You seem off your game...
So, a Left Wing rag made a claim COMPLETELY UNSUBSTANTIATED by any facts whatsoever..
Just like you in posting the picture without context...
There is nothing wrong with allowing a LEGAL adult to purchase a hunting rifle..
Granted, this scumbag was trans, so it's obvious he had mental issues..
But being trans is not something a gun dealer can ask a person..
Damn Democrats..
Just like you in posting the picture without context...
The context is readily apparent to those who are not enslaved by Party ideology..
It shows the scumbag shooter both as he is and how he looks in his trans getup...
No context needed..
Which has NOTHING to do with what I posted..
The shooter bought the guns on his 18th birthday. He would not have been able to do so if Texas Republicans had not changed the law from 21 which they passed last year.
Do try and keep up... Are you OK??? You seem off your game...
The shooter bought the guns on his 18th birthday. He would not have been able to do so if Texas Republicans had not changed the law from 21 which they passed last year.
Which has NOTHING to do with ANYTHING I posted..
The trans scumbag was an adult.. Why shouldn't he be allowed to purchase hunting rifles??
Unless you agree with me that the scumbag WAS trans and that trans = mental health problems and, as such, should NOT be allowed to purchase guns..
Is that what you are saying, Bashi??
Do try and keep up... Are you OK??? You seem off your game...
Ahhh the old.. I KNOW YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I rebuttal..
You are DEFINITELY off your game..
"Maybe YOU should drink a little.."
-Tom Cruise, A FEW GOOD MEN
It shows the scumbag shooter both as he is and how he looks in his trans getup...
Does it? Or is the right wing going through every photo that vaguely looks like the guy in order to politicize the tragedy by trying to the trans community? Like they already have multiple times...
Even your favorite Proud Boy reporter disagrees....
Texas school shooting: Beto O’Rourke ripped for interrupting Gov. Abbott's update
Beto O'Rourke's actions were disrespectful to the victims and families of the Texas school shooting, Lt. Chris Olivarez said on 'The Story'
https://www.foxnews.com/media/texas-beto-orourke-gov-abbott-uvalde-school-shooting
Of course.. Democrats just HAVE to politicize these tragedies..
Well, it's what Odumbo commanded..
"We MUST politicize these tragedies"
-Barack Hussein Odumbo
"We MUST politicize these tragedies"
And you have taken it to heart...
Does it? Or is the right wing going through every photo that vaguely looks like the guy in order to politicize the tragedy by trying to the trans community? Like they already have multiple times...
If you have ANY facts to support this... Not the opinion of a Left Wing rag, but a documented FACT...
"I'm all ears"
-Ross Perot, 1992 Presidential Debates
And you have taken it to heart...
I have taken to heart politicizing Democrats politicizing these tragedies..
Yes I have.. Abso-frakin'-loutly...
If you have ANY facts to support this... Not the opinion of a Left Wing rag, but a documented FACT...
See previous post from politifact where they have and link to a few versions of photos trying to tie this guy to the trans community...
I have taken to heart politicizing Democrats politicizing these tragedies..
And heaping a ton of extra politicizing on yourself...
See previous post from politifact where they have and link to a few versions of photos trying to tie this guy to the trans community..
And yet, PolitiFraked only gave their opinion and the photos they showed do NOT include the photo that I posted.. So again.. EPIC FAIL...
And heaping a ton of extra politicizing on yourself...
Yes, I have politicized Democrats politicizing these tragedies quite effectively..
Thank you for noticing.. :D
You asked for "ANY" "FACT". That page has two different pictures that were not that guy. It backs up "Like they already have multiple times..."
Part of my post has been backed up as you did not specify which part, and you asked for "any" fact. I have met your conditions...
I have posted an updated picture of the Uvalde scumbag..
http://mfccfl.us/genderbender.jpg
No question that they are the same person..
You have no facts Bashi to support the claim that this scumbag wasn't trans..
I have now two different photos that PROVE that he is trans... Or at least a cross dresser..
Either way, it DEFINITIVE that this scumbag had mental health issues..
You can argue against that til the cows come home..
But facts are facts...
And yet, PolitiFraked only gave their opinion and the photos they showed do NOT include the photo that I posted.. So again.. EPIC FAIL...
We separately looked into claims that Ramos is transgender and found no evidence to corroborate them. is more than an opinion.
Do they know of your photo? Where is it posted? Did you photoshop it? Some reason you are hiding the context?
But facts are facts...
and you have none...
And ANOTHER photo of the Uvalde scumbag..
http://mfccfl.us/genderbender2.jpg
The facts are overwhelming and conclusive..
The facts are overwhelming and conclusive..
Then post them. Why are you hiding the context if it is not totally made up?
It could just as easily be some random cross dresser and you are just posting more pictures from their profile...
I have posted 3 different photos that prove CONCLUSIVELY that the Uvalde was either trans or a cross dresser....
If you can't accept the facts, that's on you...
The photos that I posted came from here..
https://heavy.com/news/salvador-ramos/
Like I said.. You don't WANT to know the facts because it upsets your Democrat Party slavery...
I have posted 3 different photos that prove CONCLUSIVELY that the Uvalde was either trans or a cross dresser....
Then post the context. Where are they from? And why are you trying to hide it?
Finally. I'll check out the link when I get back from the kids sports...
There are none so blind as those who will not see
:eyeroll:
Fair enough...
See?? Democrats don't even want to CONSIDER any other aspect then being ANTI GUN...
Democrats REFUSE to even CONSIDER any plan other than taking out a Constitutional RIGHT...
That shows how interested in actual SOLUTIONS Democrats are..
Namely NOT AT ALL.. :^/
Whoopi Goldberg says if women can’t have abortions 'we’re going to come for’ guns, ‘get ready to give them up’
Fine, Whoopi... You try and make good on your threat..
I'll be happy to give you my guns... One bullet at a time... :^/
According to Reyes {scumbag's mother), {scumbag} slept on a mattress in a front room at his grandparents’ house after an argument with his mother.
If you look at the pictures I posted, there is a mattress on the floor in what looks like a front room..
I'de say the facts are conclusive..
OK Well, it's that time again..
My time belongs to my lovely wife now..
See ya'all in the AM..
I glanced at that site before I left. Looks like they deleted the trans stuff? Check it out. Also, your second and third posting of the picture: the B&W photo in [159] looks like it might be a heavily photoshopped version of the B&W in post [163]. I could be wrong, but I'm getting an uncanny valley vibe off the two photos. The angle of the face matches a bit too perfectly...