ChrisWeigant.com

The House January 6th Select Committee Hearings [Episode 9]

[ Posted Thursday, October 13th, 2022 – 16:47 UTC ]

The House Select Committee investigating January 6th presented the ninth in their series of televised hearings today, although (as we were informed at the start by Chair Bennie Thompson) this was not technically a hearing, but rather a business meeting for the committee. The reason for this change became evident at the end, when the committee voted publicly and unanimously to subpoena the testimony of Donald John Trump.

That was certainly a blockbuster or a bombshell (take your pick of explosive metaphors), and it is to the committee's credit that they kept it under wraps until today.

Today's hearing was billed as the culmination of the committee's entire presentation to the public. As always, they have left the door open to hold future public hearings, but the expectation is that this will be the final one. At the very least, there are no more hearings scheduled before the midterm elections -- which will determine the future of the committee itself. If the Republicans manage to take back control of the House, then one of their first orders of business is going to be to disband the committee.

Knowing this, the committee is preparing a final report, which will likely be issued somewhere between Thanksgiving and Christmas. Their initial intent was to provide some sort of draft report before the election happened, but that is now not going to happen.

So today was it, really, barring any unforeseen evidence suddenly coming to light.

 

Public Hearings of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol [Episode 9]

Today's hearing started rather slow and it took over an hour before they even really start charting any new territory in any meaningful way. Perhaps the committee is a bit rusty, since the last of these hearings was held before the August congressional break, almost three months ago. Or perhaps they felt that people needed a summary refresher course in what they've already laid out.

Today's hearing also felt a lot more like a traditional congressional committee hearing, at least in format. Rather than choosing only one or two of the committee members to make the presentation, all nine got a chance to speak at length. This took up almost all the time of the hearing, although the chair kept referring to each segment as "opening remarks." Also today there were no live witnesses at all, just video clips of (mostly) previously-seen testimony from Trump insiders.

Today's hearing was focused almost solely on Donald Trump. It was, in a word, very prosecutorial. The opening recap wasn't so much about everything the committee has learned and uncovered as everything they now know about Trump. This all had a purpose -- to show what Trump knew, what he believed, and that the plan for January 6th itself was entirely premeditated. It wasn't some spontaneous thing that happened, it was the culmination of a lot of planning beforehand. Planning which took place even before Election Day, in fact. Trump was always going to declare himself victor, no matter what the voters had to say about it. From that point on, Trump grasped at any straw which might somehow magically keep him in power, and the January 6th plot was merely the last straw available. But it was all planned in advance, each and every step of the way.

Trump knew he had lost. That was the other theme laid out in the early presentation. Everyone within his government and his campaign told him so, and on occasion he would even admit the truth. All the lawsuits went against him, since there just was no evidence of any fraud large enough to have made a difference in even a single state. And yet, even knowing all this, Trump still stoked the rage of his followers -- and indeed, continues to do so even to this day. It makes him lots of money, after all, so why should he stop?

The committee walked everyone through the story once again, beginning before the election and ranging over the night of the election, the post-election lawsuits, the fake electors scheme, and the last-ditch effort to stop Congress from certifying the election results on January 6th. Each piece was individually presented, with Trump at the center of everything that took place.

Even while Trump was doing all this, proof was presented that he knew he was going to have to leave office on January 20th. He signed a reckless order to the Pentagon for them to pull all American troops out of Somalia and Afghanistan "by January 15th." The generals somehow (it was not specified) managed to ignore this rash and very political order, but the point was that Trump never would have given it if he thought he truly was going to stay in power.

Trump's rage was referenced multiple times, the first manifesting itself as his reaction to the Supreme Court ruling against his bogus election fraud case. This (and other incidents) were fleshed out in a lot more detail, due to the committee finally getting "over one million" communications from the Secret Service from this time period. The text messages are gone forever, but plenty of other types of message do remain and were made available.

The Secret Service did not exactly shine in today's hearing. It was revealed that they actually were warned in advance that there would be armed rioters present, and that the Capitol was definitely the target of the planned attack. They knew this much earlier than had been previously admitted. These threats were specific ("Their plan is to literally kill people. Please please take this tip seriously and investigate further.") and very numerous, and the Secret Service and others in federal law enforcement were indeed tipped off about them beforehand. Astonishingly, even though they knew of this threat, there was still no plan for what to do about it on January 6th. There was no "worst-case scenario," there were no contingency plans at all, they just essentially stood by and allowed it to happen to the police forces who were assigned to guard the Capitol. The National Guard wasn't held in reserve, there just were no planning done at all for what would happen if things threatened to get out of control.

Both the Secret Service and Trump himself knew on January 6th that there was a huge crowd who didn't want to go through metal detectors in order to watch Trump's speech. Trump didn't care that they were likely armed, he begged the Secret Service to just turn off the metal detectors and let them in anyway.

The Secret Service did not do so, and they also prevented Trump from making good on his wish (and promise, in his speech) to walk down to the Capitol with the mob, and got quite irate when told he couldn't do so. Those are about the only two good things that can be said for the Secret Service on that fateful day. It was insinuated today that some people (the Secret Service was not directly named, but implied) have probably lied to the committee under oath, and that the committee would be dealing with that in due course.

But back to Trump. Donald Trump knew all his claims of fraud were false. He was told so, by many people, on many different occasions. He didn't care. He knew claiming specific instances of fraud whipped up the crowds, so he just went right on making these specious claims, even after they were all proven to be false -- to him personally, by multiple advisors. He also leaned on state officials to break their oaths of office and just somehow magically hand the election to him. He knew about the plan to present "fake electors" on January 6th, although this never actually took place due to Mike Pence actually upholding his oath to the U.S. Constitution.

The White House was informed that the Capitol had been breached before Trump even made it back there from the rally. When Trump was informed of this fact, he withdrew into the dining room and watched it all on television for the next two hours and 40 minutes. Plenty of people visited him while he was watching the attack unfold live (on Fox News, one assumes), and they all begged him to issue a public statement calling off the rioters and telling them to go home.

Trump refused to do so. He also, as the committee detailed in an earlier hearing, refused to lift a finger to do anything at all to defend the building and all the congressmen trapped inside. He did not call the Pentagon, he did not call his attorney general, he did not call the National Guard, he didn't call anybody with the authority to send in additional forces to defend and protect the United States Capitol. Instead, he did nothing. He watched television.

At one point, Trump actually made things worse, by directing the crowd's anger at his own vice president, Mike Pence. He not only instigated the riot, he further incited it even after it had begun. One can only imagine what he would have done or said if he had been allowed to walk down to the Capitol with his mob. Maybe he would have led the chants of "Hang Mike Pence!" -- it is certainly possible to picture him doing so.

The biggest new video evidence of the day showed that while Trump was sitting on his hands, others were desperately trying to get some troops to the Capitol. Behind-the-scenes footage from the secure locations where the congressional leaders had been taken was shown, and we all got to see Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, Steve Scalise, John Thune, and others from both parties absolutely begging for the cavalry to be sent in. They phoned the Pentagon, the Department of Justice, the governors of Maryland and Virginia, the vice president, and anyone else they could think of who might be able to get the ball rolling.

In essence, they did Trump's job for him that day. Because all they got from the White House was a gigantic dereliction of duty.

The most jarring clips came from Nancy Pelosi. At one point, when informed that the House was actually in session, but that they were being instructed to don gas masks on the House floor, she muttered: "Can you believe this?" This summed up most Americans' feelings of disbelief that day, that things could have reached this point.

Here is Pelosi on the phone, trying to figure out if Congress will be able to reconvene any time soon, so they could finish their constitutional duty of certifying the presidential election:

What we are being told very directly it's going to take days for the Capitol to be okay again. We've gotten a very bad report about the condition of the House floor. There's defecation and all that kind of thing as well. I don't think that that's hard to clean up but I do think it is more from a security standpoint of making sure that everybody is out of the building and how long will that take. I just got off [the phone] with the Vice President, but what we left the conversation with, 'cause he said he had the impression from Mitch [McConnell] that Mitch wants to get everybody back to do it there. I said that, well, we're getting a counterpoint that it could time to clean up the poo-poo that they're making all over the, literally and figuratively, in the Capitol. And that it may take days to get back.

It didn't, in the end. After reinforcements did finally arrive and the building cleared, Mike Pence informed Pelosi that the building would be ready "in an hour," and Congress was indeed able to reconvene and complete its duty.

The clips with the congressional leaders were the centerpiece of today's presentation. The rest of the hearing was really intended to build up to them. There were smaller revelations here and there -- new video testimony from some of the key players -- but for the most part it was all a review of previously-presented information. The buildup to the new clips had the flavor of a class during the first week back at school, when the kids are all reminded of everything they've managed to forget over the summer.

Structuring the final hearing in this fashion left a lot of unanswered questions, of course. No testimony appeared from Ginni Thomas, or from cabinet-level people who reportedly discussed invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office before January 20th. There was no further examination of the breakdown in communications and orders and planning at the Pentagon (the complete absence of the D.C. National Guard, for instance). There was no deeper dive into the financing of the January 6th rally or the connection to the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers. Assumably, this will all be covered in the report, but the report won't be out until after the midterms.

Instead of covering any of this new ground, the Select Committee essentially laid out an indictment of Donald Trump, from beginning to end. They finished today's meeting by concluding that they needed to hear from Trump himself. Liz Cheney stepped in to make a formal motion to issue a subpoena for Trump's testimony, the clerk read the motion in full, and the committee immediately voted on it.

The vote was unanimous, with each committee member answering "Aye" when asked whether the committee should issue a subpoena to Trump.

This was the big finale, and the hearing ended immediately thereafter.

 

Conclusions

As television, today's hearing was not as dramatic as the previous hearings have been, even with its big finish at the end. It was mostly just a review of ground they've already covered, presented as a narrative solely centered around one individual. It all built up to the bombshell of subpoenaing Trump.

The committee, of course, has no power to indict or to try any crime. Making a formal criminal referral to the Justice Department would be a largely meaningless thing to do, since they are already diligently looking into it all. It would have no effect except maybe to say: "Please keep doing what you are already doing," in essence.

The committee itself may turn into a pumpkin in January, if the Republicans take back control of the House. There will be no time for extended litigation if Donald Trump decides to fight the subpoena. Even if the Democrats do manage to hang onto power, Trump might just fight the subpoena for so long (filing time-consuming ridiculous motions and appeals all the while) that the legal battle wouldn't even be concluded after two more years.

The subpoena itself is symbolic, for the most part. As both Bennie Thomas and Liz Cheney stated, they feel that the American public deserves to hear from the man at the center of it all what happened on January 6th and everything that led up to it. They feel that accountability demands Trump tell his side of the story. Even while knowing it'll likely never actually happen.

This entire exercise has a political symbolism to it, but it is also a huge taunt to Trump himself. Trump knows full well that if he did show up to testify, it would send the television ratings through the roof. And he loves to be the star of his own show (or anyone else's). And he has had to get used to reaching a smaller and smaller audience with his online ranting. So who knows, maybe he'd be tempted?

Which brings us to this tantalizing report to end on, which appeared soon after the hearing concluded. This was posted by the best Trump reporter around, Maggie Haberman from the New York Times, who obviously has some inside sources:

Since it became public that the House select committee planned to subpoena Trump for his testimony, the former president has been telling aides he favors doing so, so long as he gets to do so live, according to a person familiar with his discussions. However, it is unclear whether the committee would accept such a demand.

With Trump, one just never knows what he'll do next. It would be fascinating to see him take this bait. And if he's really determined, perhaps none of his advisors or aides can talk him out of it. So maybe this won't be the last of the Select Committee's televised hearings?

Stay tuned....

-- Chris Weigant

 

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant

 

114 Comments on “The House January 6th Select Committee Hearings [Episode 9]”

  1. [1] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    No, I can't see this being the very last public hearing. And after a bunch of hemming and hawing I can see Trump taking the bait. His ego may not let him resist -- must see TV, indeed!

  2. [2] 
    Michale wrote:

    FPC,

    Funny, not a single Democrat here has ever threatened to file a false police report against an officer

    I call bullshit on THAT claim.. Democrats file false police reports against officers ALL THE TIME..

    You threatened to file a false police report that could have damaged the career of the officer

    Since that officer doesn't really exist except in your imagination.. No harm, no foul.. :D

    all because your dishonesty got exposed.

    Yes, that is STILL your claim.. And yet, you STILL have absolutely NO FACTS to back up your claim.

    Why is that??

    You are the very last person to ever get to claim others are anti-police!

    Sorry, son.. But my 30 years in Public Safety makes me the PERFECT person to point out how you and your Democrats are the Hate Cops Party..

    The facts PROVE it beyond ANY doubt..

    As to the rest.. blaaa blaaa blaaa blaaa

    Once again, you have absolutely NO FACTS to back up ANY of your claims..

    Why is that, Russ??

    And I point out you completely IGNORE the facts that PROVE you and your fellow Democrats are the HATE COPS Party..

    Why don't you address THOSE facts instead of going off with beet red hysteria over bullshit that has already been PROVEN to be false..

    My military and LEO bona fides have already been WELL ESTABLISHED..

    Both by the late CW and by our own MtnCaddy..

    So, if YOU want to call THEM fools and liars, you be my guest..

    That would be your normal MO.. Spewing BS without ANY facts to back it up..

  3. [3] 
    Michale wrote:

    Bashi,

    I only bring up taxi drivers as they are the most killed by other people per capita.

    Bullshit... You are so full of shit, Bash yer eyes are brown..

    The number one job where most workers are murdered is Police Officers..

    Taxi Drivers rate #4 on that list..

    https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/kyn_5oyB_pxV4kke8vApa_kxMPY=/0x0:1866x2629/920x0/filters:focal(0x0:1866x2629):format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2495522/death_chart-04.0.png

    But I understand why you want to denigrate cops and pooh pooh away their contribution to society..

    You are part of the COP HATE Party... Just like Russ.. :eyeroll:

    If danger is a pedestal to which to judge people's work, why don't you see parades for fallen loggers?

    Because 'danger' isn't the pedestal me and my fellow LEOs are on, ya dolt.. :eyeroll:

    It's the fact that they put our lives on the line daily so YOU can sit safe and comfy in your easy chair and denigrate their service to their communities..

    Asshole... :eyeroll:

    Thank you for proving beyond ANY doubt that the Democrat Party is the COP HATE Party and that you are a willing and enthusiastic member of the COP HATE PARTY...

    You and Russ.. Cop haters til the day ya'all die.. :eyeroll:

  4. [4] 
    Michale wrote:

    Bash...

    I only bring up taxi drivers as they are the most killed by other people per capita.

    I see where you got your bullshit data from..

    From a paper from TWO DECADES AGO!!!!

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Either ya tried to sneak an ancient irrelevant paper by us as fact... Or you were too stoopid to notice that your claim is over TWO DECADES OLD and is not relevant to the here and now..

    Which is it, Bash??? :eyeroll:

    The most current info is 2018 and it's more current than the list I posted above..

    And "motor vehicle operators" (includes a LOT more than just Taxi Drivers Duhhh) is 9th on the Top Ten List Of Profession With Most Murders Per Capita..

    LEOs are 2nd on that list...

    Here's a hint for you.. Next time actually DO SOME RESEARCH and not just accept the first GOOGLE 'Featured Snippet' blurb you see at the top of the SEARCH page..

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    I said it before and I'll say it again...

    You really have fallen very far down the rabbit hole, Bash... You weren't always THIS easy to intellectually slap down.. :D

  5. [5] 
    Michale wrote:

    Bash..

    "Don't cross brains with Spock. He'll cut you to pieces every time.."
    -Ensign Sulu, STAR TREK

    :D

  6. [6] 
    Michale wrote:

    OK Now that I have taken care of old business and dispatched the Moron Twins, Russ and Bash...

    Let's address today's commentary..

    Another episode of Hollywood fizzle, The Cardassian Court...

    As I posted yesterday, "Surprises" and "Bombshells" were once again promised.

    And, ONCE AGAIN, the moron Democrats and Trump/America haters **FAILED** to deliver...

    Of course Dead CongressCritter* walking and talking Liz Cheney took the podium and whined and cried how President Trump had bitch-slapped her down.. HARD..

    Poor Liz.. The people of Wyoming said to Cheney... "YOUR FIRED!!!"

    So, of course Liz is completely useless these days..

    Since it became public that the House select committee planned to subpoena Trump for his testimony, the former president has been telling aides he favors doing so, so long as he gets to do so live, according to a person familiar with his discussions. However, it is unclear whether the committee would accept such a demand.

    And WHY won't the committee accept such a demand??

    Because they are PETRIFIED at what President Trump will say.. Show ALL the facts that PROVE that it's Pelosi and Schumer and Democrats who are at fault for the 6 Jan riot..

    Because they KNOW that President Trump will wipe the floor with the committee..

    THAT is why the Cardassian Court won't air President Trump's testimony live..

    Jean Luc, you see?? The 6JC is EXACTLY like a Cardassian Court... They want to control things so ONLY their "truth" gets out..

    Democrats and their Cardassian Court are deathly afraid of the FACTS getting out.. Which will prove beyond ANY doubt that their "truth" is nothing but utter bullshit..

  7. [7] 
    Michale wrote:

    * By "Dead CongressCritter Walking And Talking" I am, of course, referring to the FACT that Liz Cheney has been FIRED from her job...

    Liz Cheney was FIRED because she refused to represent the people who put her in office..

    Cheney was FIRED because she put her own selfish Trump/America hate before the welfare of the people she worked for..

    Liz Cheney is a scumbag of the highest order and she DESERVED to be fired...

    But...

    But I have to give credit where credit is due..

    Liz Cheney DID provide the circumstance where Democrats PROVED beyond ANY doubt that there is VERY GOOD REASON that the Democrat Party = the Hypocrisy Party..

    Seeing Democrats bend the knee and kiss the ring of Dick 'Darth' Cheney and grovel and beg at Darth's feet??

    PRICELESS!!! LOVED IT!!!

    That's your Democrat Party, people.. Aren't ya'all ashamed??

    Ya'all SHOULD be...

  8. [8] 
    Michale wrote:

    OK, now that I have done my due diligence, let's take a tour around the news and see what moronic, stoopid and hypocritical things Democrats have done today!! :D

    Raph Warlock proves once again beyond ANY doubt that he is unfit to hold the office he is begging for..

    WATCH: Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock dodges question on abortion limitations

    Warnock told Fox News Digital Democrats should forge ahead with abortion focus ahead of the midterms despite polls showing economy, inflation are voters' top concerns
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/watch-democratic-senator-raphael-warnock-dodges-question-abortion-limitations

    Here's the moron saying that Democrats should run on their BABY KILLING policies... Yunno, the policies that allow Baby Killing right up to kindergarten???

    Even though the people who HIRED Warlock want him to address the explosion of violent crime because of Democrat policies and the economy that Democrats have totally decimated..

    Nooooo.... Warlock wants to talk about how he supports Baby Killing right up to the point of kindergarten...

    Ya'all HONESTLY believe that Warlock will prevail??

    REALLY!!??? :^/

  9. [9] 
    Michale wrote:

    ATLANTA – Democratic Georgia Sen. Raphael Warnock is arguing that his party should continue its focus on abortion as an election issue despite polls consistently showing voters with significantly more concern for the economy and inflation just weeks ahead of the November midterms.

    During a media gaggle following an event celebrating Hispanic Heritage Month, Fox News Digital asked Warnock if Democrats needed to adjust their message to focus more on what was at the forefront of voters minds, as well as if he supported any limitations on abortion, a question he dodged.

    "Listen, we can, and we must focus on the economy and a woman's right to choose at the same time. Those things are not mutually exclusive," Warnock said.

    Baby Killing is way way WAY down on the list of issues that Georgians care about, Warlock...

    And, didja notice how Warlock TOTALLY ignores the violent crime issue.. Warlock CAN'T address it because he KNOWS that it's the Democrat DEFUND, DEMONIZE, DEMORALIZE THE POLICE policies that has CAUSED the huge explosion of violent crime in America..

    NO BAIL... HATE POLICE... PRO-CRIMINAL

    These are ALL Democrat Party positions and policies...

    And Democrats are going to lose their jobs over their support of those Hate America policies..

    This is FACT...

  10. [10] 
    Michale wrote:

    Fox pressed Warnock on the limitation question, asking again if he supported any restrictions on abortions. Warnock pivoted, and said Herschel Walker, his Republican opponent, supported a blanket abortion ban "with no exceptions."

    "I think that the issue that we're dealing with right now is that we have a contrast between somebody who believes in a woman's right to choose, who believes that a patient's room is too small and cramped a space for the woman, her doctor and the United States government, and somebody who wants a nationwide ban with no exceptions," he said.

    You see how Warlock hems and haws and refuses to answer the question.. Because Warlock knows that his support for Baby Killing right up to the point of kindergarten is NOT what Georgians want to hear..

    Warlock is afraid to say what he believes because he KNOWS it will be the final nail in his LUSER campaign coffin..

    Typical Democrat.. Talking out BOTH sides of their asses...

    :eyeroll:

  11. [11] 
    Michale wrote:

    A CBS/YouGov poll released last month showed abortion falling into seventh place as an important issue among likely voters nationwide, well behind the economy and inflation, which topped the list.

    A recent Quinnipiac poll of registered voters in Georgia showed inflation was the top concern to both independents (43%) and Republicans (73%). Abortion did, however hold the top spot among Democrats in the poll, but with only 23% saying it was most important to them.

    Another poll taken immediately following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in June showed American adults far more concerned about the economy and inflation than abortion, which fell in fifth place

    The FACTS clearly show that Americans care the most about the shitty economy that Democrats have fraked up and the explosion of violent crime that Democrats have caused with their DEFUND, DEMONIZE, DEMORALIZE THE POLICE and their NO BAIL PRO-CRIMINAL policies..

    But all Democrats want to talk about is Baby Killing right up to the point of kindergarten...

    Democrats PROVE every time they try to change the subject to Baby Killing that they have NOTHING to run on..

    Nothing but their OWN failed policies that has made things 20x worse for Americans..

    The ONLY question that is relevant in 26 days..

    "Are Americans better off today than they were 2 years ago??"

    And the answer to THAT question is a resounding **NO**

    And THAT is ALL the fault of Dementia Biden and his luser incompetent Democrats..

    "These are the facts of the case. And they are undisputed."
    -Captain Smilin' Jack Ross, A FEW GOOD MEN

  12. [12] 
    Michale wrote:

    God I love Fridays!!!! :D

    So much news and facts to impart to my fellow Weigantians®.. :D

    Isn't this fun, people!?? :D

  13. [13] 
    Michale wrote:

    Crime in New York killing city's comeback

    Rising crime numbers show that New York City is becoming less hospitable in multiple ways

    Protecting the safety and freedoms of a citizenry is the first principle of any government, and from that principle derive all other benefits a society confers. Like the freedom to go to a bar and get hammered without getting shot on your way home.

    Freedoms like that are under threat in New York, as worsening street conditions have become a significant drag on the city’s famed nightlife. It’s another downstream effect of rising crime and homelessness – and one which won’t help the city’s looming budget problems.

    The scenario is not restricted to New York – nearly all the nation’s major municipalities are in the same boat. But if our leaders ever hope to return our cities to the beacons of freedom and commerce they once were, recognizing the effect street disorder is having on the critical hospitality sector can no longer be ignored.
    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/crime-in-new-york-killing-citys-comeback

    Jean Luc, I am really concerned for your safety living in the 3rd World shithole that Democrats have created in NYC... Be safe...

    But once again, the Democrat Hate Cops policies and their PRO-CRIMINAL policies have totally decimated the fabric of law and order in our society...

    How ANYONE who is actually a real patriotic American can vote Democrats is one of life's greatest mysteries..

    Democrats CLEARLY hate America.. That's why Dims push these HATE COPS and PRO-CRIMINAL policies...

  14. [14] 
    Michale wrote:

    Recent crime numbers support the notion that the city is becoming less hospitable. New York crime, at this writing, is up 33% overall. But significantly, there’s been a 36% jump in robberies and a 16% jump in felony assaults.

    These are crucial metrics, because robberies and assaults are the crimes most likely to occur on the street, in areas where tourists and others are out and about. Add a relentless stream of emotionally disturbed homeless, and it’s no wonder the city’s going dark early.

    Third world shithole...

    Thanx Democrats.. Ya'all have really did your best to destroy and decimate American society...

    The proof is right there for ALL to see...

  15. [15] 
    Michale wrote:


    END OF WATCH

    Police Officer Truong Thai
    Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Nevada
    End of Watch: Thursday, October 13, 2022


    And remind the few...
    When ill of us they speak..
    That we are all that stands between..
    The monsters and the weak...

  16. [16] 
    Michale wrote:

    I honor LEOs and their service...

    Democrats, including Russ and Bash et al...

    Ya'all denigrate cops at every turn...

    Your Democrats don't DESERVE to be in office, Russ & Bash...

  17. [17] 
    Michale wrote:

    OK OK..

    Ya'all want to talk about the 6 Jan riot...

    OK... Then we ALSO need to talk about more TWENTY TWO YEARS (collectively) of Democrat BLM and AntiFa riots...

    Riots that resulted in at least SEVEN cops being assassinated... 10x times the number of deaths in Democrat BLM and AntiFa riots than the 6 Jan riot..

    1000x more injuries in the Democrat BLM and AntiFa riots than the 6 Jan riot..

    BILLIONS more damage in the Democrat BLM and AntiFa riots than the 6 Jan riot...

    Ya'all get in a tizzy over a SINGLE riot in a SINGLE building at a SINGLE location over the span of a few hours..

    Yet ya'all COMPLETELY IGNORE and won't even ACKNOWLEDGE 22+ years (collectively) of Democrat BLM and AntiFa riots..

    Ya'all claim there is a difference but there is no difference..

    Government Buildings attacked CHECK

    Cops attacked and injured or killed. Democrat BLM and AntiFa had MANY cops killed and THOUSANDS of cops injured... 6 Jan?? ZERO cops killed and a small handful of cops injured.

    So, yea.. I guess ya'all are factually accurate..

    6 Jan IS different than 22 years (collectively) of Democrat BLM and AntiFa riots..

    YOUR Democrat BLM and AntiFa riots were much MUCH worse.. By a HUGE factor..

    The facts are clear...

    Hypocrisy.. It's not a bug in Democrat programming.. It's a feature..

  18. [18] 
    Michale wrote:

    OK Let's talk about our favorite horse-faced Democrat, Occasional Cortex.. :D

    AOC roasted on Twitter after being heckled by anti-war activists at her town hall

    One MSNBC anchor came to the Squad member's defense

    Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., was roasted on Twitter Thursday after she called anti-war protesters "rude" for interrupting her town hall.

    Ocasio-Cortez participated in a sparsely attended town hall in the Bronx, New York, Wednesday when a pair of protesters interrupted the event to protest the congresswoman's support of sending weapons to Ukraine.

    "There will be no neighbors if there’s a nuclear bomb," one protestor said. "You voted to mobilize and send money to Ukrainian Nazis. You’re a coward. You’re a progressive socialist? Where are you against the war mobilization?
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/aoc-roasted-twitter-heckled-anti-war-activists-town-hall

    Awwwwwww poor widdle Occasional Cortex had to deal with a couple "rude" protesters..

    Of course, Occasional Cortex advocates violent riots against cops and against America..

    Whatta hypocrite...

  19. [19] 
    Michale wrote:

    "AOC, 12/2020, on Antifa activists menacing politicians in public: Activists *should* be impolite. "The whole point of protesting is to make ppl uncomfortable."

    AOC, last night, to protesters confronting her for funding Biden's proxy war: I won't answer you! "You're being ruude!"
    -Glenn Greenwald

    Hypocrisy... It's not a bug in Democrat programming.. It's a feature..

    :eyeroll:

  20. [20] 
    Michale wrote:

    "AOC does town hall, barely anyone shows up, and she gets her ass handed to her by a constituent. Progressives have no support other than corporate media and big tech."
    -Dave Rubin

    "I believed in you and you become the very thing your sought to fight against."
    -Occasional Cortex Protester

    The facts are clear, my fellow Weigantians®

    Democrats are going down... :D

  21. [21] 
    Michale wrote:

    Crap.... Reposted for clarity...

    "AOC does town hall, barely anyone shows up, and she gets her ass handed to her by a constituent. Progressives have no support other than corporate media and big tech."
    -Dave Rubin

    "I believed in you and you become the very thing your sought to fight against."
    -Occasional Cortex Protester

    The facts are clear, my fellow Weigantians®

    Democrats are going down... :D

  22. [22] 
    Michale wrote:

    Occasional Cortex is losing her rock-star status.. :D

    "One of the most notable things in this video is that there is almost nobody in the audience. And this is the Democrat Party's biggest star."
    -Matt Walsh

    Americans are waking up and seeing the REAL Democrat Party...

    Cop hating America hating racists..

    That's ya'all's Democrat Party.. The facts prove this beyond ANY doubt...

  23. [23] 
    Michale wrote:

    "The Democrats say an assault on our democracy took place on January 6, 2021, but it actually happened earlier than that: on Oct. 14, 2020, when the New York Post's bombshell story on the Biden crime family was suppressed by the media, the FBI and other powerful interests, which allowed Joe Biden to win the election. The surveys all show if swing state voters had been aware of it, enough votes would have gone to Trump, swinging the election in Trump's favor. Does that sound like an assault on our democracy? Yeah."
    -Jesse Watters

    Yep, yep, yep...

    The fraudulent nature of the 2020 election is PLAIN to see for anyone who A> doesn't hate America and B> has more than 2 brain cells to rub together...

    Between the collusion of Democrats and Big Tech to censor the Hunter Biden laptop and Zuckerberg using almost HALF A BILLION DOLLARS to buy entire election boards and populate them SOLELY with Democrat operatives....

    Well, only an America hating moron would deny the facts of the fraud....

  24. [24] 
    Michale wrote:

    BBBWAHAHHAAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    White House cops to pushing Saudi Arabia to postpone oil cuts until after midterms

    WASHINGTON – The Biden administration admitted Thursday it had asked Saudi Arabia to delay the OPEC+ vote to cut oil production until the cartel’s next meeting – after the midterm elections.

    “We presented Saudi Arabia with analysis to show that there was no market basis to cut production targets, and that they could easily wait for the next OPEC meeting to see how things developed,” National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said in a statement.
    https://nypost.com/2022/10/13/saudis-say-biden-asked-to-hold-oil-production-cut-until-after-midterms/

    BUSTED!!!!!

    White House admits to using foreign policy leverage to influence the coming mid-terms..

    And Dementia Biden and the incompetent Democrats couldn't even do THAT right!!

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  25. [25] 
    Michale wrote:

    The Riyadh-led group of oil producers’ next meeting is scheduled for Dec. 4, according to the OPEC website.

    Kirby also alleged that other OPEC member nations “communicated to us privately that they also disagreed with the Saudi decision, but felt coerced to support Saudi’s direction,”

    In other words, Dementia Biden and the moron Democrats have a lot of support in email..

    :eyeroll:

    You people REALLY need to come to grips with reality..

    Democrats are gonna get CREAMED in 26 days...

  26. [26] 
    Michale wrote:

    Riyadh also rebuffed White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre’s Tuesday assertion that the Oct. 5 action by OPEC+ “align[ed] their energy policy with Russia’s war aims and against the American people.”

    “[T]hese statements … are not based on facts, and …. are based on portraying the OPEC+ decision out of its purely economic context,” the ministry said. “Saudi Arabia affirms that any attempts to distort the facts about the Kingdom’s position regarding the crisis in Ukraine are unfortunate, and will not change the Kingdom’s principled position.”

    Hell, even the SAUDIS are pointing out the Dementia Biden and the Dumbocrats are full of kaa kaa... :D

    I am guessing the Saudis are laughing their asses off at Dementia Biden...

    First Dementia goes hat in hand to bend the knee for more oil.. The OPEC+ cuts production.. :D

    And RIGHT before the mid-terms!! :D

    Ya'all just GOTS ta appreciate the irony, eh?? :D

  27. [27] 
    Michale wrote:

    Trying to get to 30 before I take a break... :D

    The Biden administration has threatened unspecified “consequences” against Saudi Arabia over OPEC+’s action, which came fewer than three months after the president journeyed to the kingdom and fist-bumped Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in what was widely seen as a bid to convince Riyadh to spur production.

    The Wall Street Journal initially reported that Saudi Arabia shrugged off pleas by the Biden administration to push back the production reduction.

    The Saudi Foreign Ministry said the decision by the OPEC+ cartel to reduce production by 2 million barrels per day was made in "a purely economic context."

    “When the House and Senate gets back, they’re going to have to — there’s going to be some consequences for what they’ve done, with Russia,” Biden told CNN’s Jake Tapper in an interview that aired Tuesday night.

    OOOOoooooooooo CONSEQUENCES...

    What "consequences", Dementia Biden??

    Are ya only go down on ONE knee instead of BOTH knees?? That yer idea of "consequences"??? :eyeroll:

  28. [28] 
    Michale wrote:

    Hay MC???

    You said that inflation would be over in time to save the Democrats at the mid-terms??

    Nothing Is Working Against Inflation

    Nothing seems to be working when it comes to inflation. The Consumer Price Index fell to 8.2 percent in September, and while the Labor Department’s gauge of price increases backed off from the generational peak of 9.1 percent it reached in June, the overall news isn’t so comforting. Rent, food, and medical costs — things that make up the bulk of people’s spending — are seemingly unaffected by the Federal Reserve’s campaign to cool the economy with higher interest rates. When markets opened, the Dow Jones Industrial Average immediately tanked, falling 500 points. (By the end of the trading day, the index turned around and rose 827 points, its best day in months, partly on optimism that stock prices had hit a bottom). The message here is that the overall affordability of the economy is getting worse and the latest data is flashing a warning that it may not get better soon.
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/nothing-is-working-against-inflation/ar-AA12UHkB

    Wha?? Wha?? :D

    Looks like ya were WRONG... AGAIN....

    Anytime you want to bury the hatchet and get back to where we can discuss and debate like adults, let me know.. :D

    It probably won't change my posting habits (but then again, it might) but at least you won't have to be afraid to show up.. :D

  29. [29] 
    Michale wrote:

    Some of these numbers show just how stubborn inflation is right now: Groceries are 13 percent higher than they were a year ago; eating out is 8.5 percent higher. Energy costs are about 20 percent more than they were last fall, and that’s factoring in the recent fall in oil prices. And there are other data points that almost certainly understate how much less affordable life has gotten during the last year: According to the CPI, shelter costs have risen 6 percent for the year, which flies in the face of more severe increases reported by the likes of Redfin. (This is because of the wonky way that the Labor Department calculates rent, which is on a lag and relies on how much owners estimate they could rent out their space for rather than what people pay to actually live somewhere.)

    A perfect synopsis of exactly HOW bad Dementia Biden and the Democrats have totally scroo'ed over America and Americans...

    But, then again, that's probably the plan... Screw over America and their Hate America platform is solid.. :^/

  30. [30] 
    Michale wrote:

    Biden's war on American energy will take its toll on Democrats in November

    Biden's anti-energy policies most clearly show in the soaring cost of energy

    President Joe Biden’s war on American energy started the day he took office on Jan. 20, 2021 and hasn’t let up since. Voters pay the price. In the last 12 months, Biden’s policies have pushed prices higher by 8.3 percent; gasoline is up almost 26 percent, and food up 11.4 percent.

    America went from energy dominance under the policies of former President Donald Trump—we even became a net exporter of energy in 2019 for the first time since 1952—to country in which the domestic energy industry is vilified, and federal regulators use their power to hinder energy production. American production of oil is off about 1 million barrels a day since the pre-COVID-19 peak under Trump in late 2019, an eight percent decline.

    To boost the supplies of oil, Biden has engaged in a reckless release of America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve, drawing down this emergency stockpile by about a million barrels a day—the same amount as the shortfall of our domestic production. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is now at its lowest level in more than 40 years, shortly after it was created. This is dangerous.
    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/biden-war-american-energy-take-toll-democrats-november

    As I said above... It's all part of the Democrat Party's HATE America plan...

    “Under {our} plan … electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.”
    -Barack Hussein Odumbo, 2008

    Odumbo laid out the plan that Democrats are enacting now...

    Democrats don't CARE how bad Americans are hurting.. They are gonna implement their Hate America plan no matter how much it hurts everyday Americans..

    "These are the facts of the case. And they are undisputed."
    -Captain Smilin' Jack Ross, A FEW GOOD MEN

  31. [31] 
    Michale wrote:

    Awwww right... 30 comments..

    I'll take a break for ya'all to catch up.. :D

  32. [32] 
    Kick wrote:

    Russ

    Funny, not a single Democrat here has ever threatened to file a false police report against an officer.

    ~ Russ

    *

    I call bullshit on THAT claim.. Democrats file false police reports against officers ALL THE TIME..

    ~ Jussie Smollett of Weigantia -- JSOW (pronounced jay sow) a.k.a. Michale

    Hey, Russ. The illiterate swamp poon needs the word "here" explained to him and requires his nose be rubbed in his own fetid stench:

    I might have to file a complaint with the PD that Russ's husband works for.. Shouldn't be too difficult to ascertain which Department he works for.. Russ has left plenty of clues..

    Yep.. I think a complaint is definitely warranted...

    ~ Michale the Jussie Smollett of Weigantia

    http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/06/18/trumps-very-bad-week/#comment-161280

    *

    JSOW apparently needs his nose rubbed in his own shit in order to learn that's it's himself who actually is the poster here that resembles his own repetitive drivel and spew.

    I can post it for him whenever he requests the FACTS, but I'll first obviously need a volunteer from the group here to extricate Jussie Michale's head out of Donald Trump's fat ass.

  33. [33] 
    Michale wrote:

    Of course, Vick pulls a single statement without ANY context whatsoever...

    Par for the course for a moron like her..

    Here is the entire context..


    As for his work history.... Michale used to claim he was in law enforcement for almost 25 years...but the truth is that IF he was ever in was a LEO, it was maybe for 2.5 years when he was a MP in the military. And based on the background check that was run on him, if he ever was a LEO it is unlikely that he could have been one for long given his record.


    -Russ, http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/06/17/a-non-traditional-idea-for-joe-biden-to-consider/#comment-161273

    And here is my response in it's ENTIRETY.. The part that Vick The Moron doesn't want ya'all to see....

    This just cracks me up!!

    "And based on the background check that was run on him, if he ever was a LEO it is unlikely that he could have been one for long given his record."

    Russ has gotten his ass kicked so many times in this forum he had to run a "background" check on me!!!

    I mean, honestly... WHAT KIND OF TOTAL AND COMPLETE LUSER DOES A BACKGROUND CHECK ON A DEBATE OPPONENT!!!????

    BBBBBBBBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    I have so gotten into Russ's head that he has to take it into real life.. :D

    And, of course, I STILL kick his ass every day and twice on Sunday! :D

    That totally cracks me up that I am so far into his head, he has to run a background check.. I am sure he got his husband to run the check... Which is six different kinds of illegal..

    I might have to file a complaint with the PD that Russ's husband works for.. Shouldn't be too difficult to ascertain which Department he works for.. Russ has left plenty of clues..

    Yep.. I think a complaint is definitely warranted...

    So, basically Russ had his alleged 'husband' use his position as a police officer to run an illegal background check on me. Russ did this because he had been, AND still continues to be, getting his ass kicked intellectually all over Weigantia®..

    Even if Russ' husband exists (which is doubtful) a complaint WOULD have been warranted because Russ used his alleged police contact to run an illegal background check on ME...

    So, even if Russ ACTUALLY had a husband, a complaint against this "husband" for using his position as a police office to run an illegal and unwarranted background check is FULLY and COMPLETELY proper and warranted..

    ANYONE would have filed a complaint against an officer who illegally ran a background check...

    Nice one, Vick.. You walked RIGHT into it!!!!

    BBBBWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    "Thank you for your cooperation."
    -Black Widow, THE AVENGERS

    PERFECTLY PLANNED AND EXECUTED!!!

    BBBBBBWWAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Ohmigods, this is soooo funny!!!

    Hay Vick The Moron.. You would be better off going back to ignoring me.. You obviously can't run with the Alpha Dog....

    BBBBWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  34. [34] 
    Michale wrote:

    Russ,

    I have to ask ya...

    What kind of "husband" (if you even ARE a husband) would compromise his spouse by asking said spouse to use his position as a police officer to run an illegal and unwarranted background check on someone...

    SOLELY because you keep getting yer ass kicked here in Weigantia®

    What kind of 'husband' does that to his spouse???

    A sick and twisted husband, to be sure...

    I have been married to a beautiful woman for over FORTY YEARS!!! I would never even DREAM of compromising her work position by doing something illegal..

    And ESPECIALLY not because I keep getting my ass kicked in an online forum....

    What kind of man does that to their spouse!!!????

    You are obviously not any kind of man, Russ... Hell, someone doing something like that to the person they claim to love ain't even HUMAN...

    Nothing but a sick and twisted troll green with envy and spite...

    THAT much is certain...

    I would pity you if you weren't such an asshole and deserve every amount of scorn and ridicule I can pile on you..

  35. [35] 
    Michale wrote:

    Which leads me to another question..

    What kind of forum is this where illegal "background checks" on commenters by renegade LEOs are allowed and condoned??

    What kind of forum is this where the COMMENTERS of this forum allow and condone such illegal "background checks" with nay a word of protest or condemnation??

    Hmmmmm?????

    "Silence gives assent.."
    -The Democrat Party...

    Think about THAT for a while, people.. :^/

  36. [36] 
    Michale wrote:

    I suppose I should THANK Vick The Moron..

    I had actually forgotten about that incident..

    When Vick The Moron and Russ The Shitty Husband first brought up that quote, I actually felt bad.. I thought to myself that THAT was pretty low for me to do.. I felt bad about it..

    But then Vick The Moron posts it again with the LINK and I said to myself, I said "Self.. Let's check this out.. Let's see what would prompt me to do something apparently so low.."

    So, I followed the link and learned the CONTEXT...

    Then I realized that what I had said was FULLY AND COMPLETELY justified by Russ The Shitty Husband's actions.. That such a complaint to Russ The Shitty Husband's alleged husband would have been COMPLETELY, UTTERLY, UNEQUIVOCALLY, 1000% JUSTIFIED!!

    So, all of the sudden, the bad I felt about it melted away and I felt completely and utterly VINDICATED!!

    It's a great feeling to learn that it was Russ The Shitty Husband's actions that prompted that statement from me and that such an action (had I done it at the time) would have been **COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY JUSTIFIED!!!**

    So, thanx Vick The Moron... You have done me a huge service..

    And thanx to Russ The Shitty Husband for making it possible...

    VINDICATION!!!! THY NAME IS MICHALE!!!!!

    :D

  37. [37] 
    Michale wrote:

    Vick The Moron??

    Where did ya go??? You got real quiet all of the sudden..

    Ahhh I see.. Yer probably trying to recover from the HUGE bitch-slap I just laid you out with...

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    "Don't cross brains with Spock. He will cut you to pieces every time.."
    -Ensign Sulu

    :D

  38. [38] 
    Michale wrote:

    I have been married to a beautiful woman for over FORTY YEARS!!! I would never even DREAM of compromising her work position by doing something illegal..

    Amend that to read:

    I have been married to a beautiful woman for over FORTY YEARS!!! I would never even DREAM of compromising her work position by asking her to do something illegal..

    Yer a sick sick person, Russ The Shitty Husband..

    Seek help...

  39. [39] 
    Michale wrote:

    OK, now that I have completely and utterly dis-credited, decimated and destroyed Vick The Moron and Russ The Shitty Husband....

    Let us get back to politics...

  40. [40] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    7

    * By "Dead CongressCritter Walking And Talking" I am, of course, referring to the FACT that Liz Cheney has been FIRED from her job...

    Dead President Donald Lying and Crying... and also FIRED. Trump can't admit he lost the 2020 election (when he knows damn well he did) because he's too small of a man to admit he's such a loser. He also likes conning and fleecing the gullible rubes who buy into the Big Lie (with no proof whatsoever) and send him their money.

    Liz Cheney was FIRED because she refused to represent the people who put her in office..

    Donald Trump was FIRED because he was a twice impeached pathologically lying sack of shit and Putin cock holster who sucked at his job.

    Cheney was FIRED because she put her own selfish Trump/America hate before the welfare of the people she worked for..

    She put her country before her Party.

    But I have to give credit where credit is due..

    Liz Cheney DID provide the circumstance where Democrats PROVED beyond ANY doubt that there is VERY GOOD REASON that the Democrat Party = the Hypocrisy Party..

    Seeing Democrats bend the knee and kiss the ring of Dick 'Darth' Cheney and grovel and beg at Darth's feet??

    That was -- what? -- one day in Congress. Now imagine what a fool you and your ilk looked like sucking Cheney's ass every day for years and years.

    Now further imagine how stupid you and the GOP cowards with no cojones look with your head firmly jammed up Democrat Donald Trump's ass every day for almost a decade now. He's a con and opportunity, and you and the GOP and MAGA cult rubes are the fools who bought into his total bullshit.

    Liz Cheney (whether I agree with her politically or not) isn't a pathetic coward like McCarthy and all the other right-wing assholes like you owned by Democrat Donald.

    You should probably learn to connect dots to avoid shining a giant klieg light on the way you frequently pathetically resemble your very own repetitive drivel and spew. *laughs*

  41. [41] 
    Kick wrote:

    ^^^ EDIT ^^^

    Now further imagine how stupid you and the GOP cowards with no cojones look with your head firmly jammed up Democrat Donald Trump's ass every day for almost a decade now. He's a con and opportunist, and you and the GOP and MAGA cult rubes are the fools who bought into his total bullshit.

  42. [42] 
    Michale wrote:

    Speaking of morons being dis-credited, decimated and destroyed...

    Alejandro Mayorkas has no shame

    The DHS secretary is clearly the winner of this week’s Best Lying Despot Contest

    Who is the worst cabinet secretary in Joe Biden’s administration?

    I know that the competition is stiff. Ponder, if your stomach can take it, secretary of state Antony Blinken, the stuffed shirt to end all stuffed shirts. Or secretary of defense Lloyd “Stand Down” Austin, the man who, with General Mark “White Rage” Milley, has transformed the US military into a racially obsessed reform school for budding transsexuals. Halloween is coming — and the Biden administration could field the entire team.

    But for this quarter’s top prize must surely go to Alejandro Mayorkas, the man in charge of the Orwellian-named Department of Homeland Security.

    The media screamed that the men on horseback were “whipping” the poor defenseless undocumented future welfare recipients. “Oh, my God, they are being mean to these unarmed potential Democratic voters!” The El Paso Times got the bulletin and reproduced it precisely: “The agent swung his whip menacingly, charging his horse toward the men in the river who were trying to return to an encampment under the international bridge in Del Rio after buying food and water in Ciudad Acuña, Mexico.” Ginning up his parrot imitation, Mayorkas repeated after Jen Psaki (remember her?) and said he found the pictures “horrifying.”

    “Horrifying!”

    The trouble was, however, there were no whips. What might have looked like whips to people innocent of the art of horseback riding were actually reins, items to control horses, not wayward aliens attempting to cross our southern border illegally. (See “Horse lesson for novices.”)

    And here’s the cherry on top: Mayorkas knew that the media narrative was, if I may so put it, horseshit. This just out from Fox News’s Bill Melugin: “Mayorkas was alerted by DHS’s top public affairs official that the ‘whipping’ narrative behind horseback BP photos wasn’t true, but at a WH press conference 2.5 hours later, he didn’t refute that narrative, instead calling the images ‘horrifying.’”
    https://spectatorworld.com/topic/alejandro-mayorkas-shame-biden-whips-border/

    Get that??

    This America hating SCUMBAG **knew for a FACT** that there was no whipping of illegals..

    KNEW IT!!

    And then BLATANTLY lied about it!!!

    Typical America hating Democrat... :^/

  43. [43] 
    Michale wrote:

    Vick The Moron,

    BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    What a lame attempt at saving face...

    But EVERYONE here can recognize it for the lame and useless distraction it tried to be...

    Ya just got yer ASS handed to ya, biatch... :D

    You AND Russ The Shitty Husband...

    You just can't keep up with the Alpha Dog... :D

  44. [44] 
    Michale wrote:

    Biden slammed for claiming 8.2% inflation shows ‘progress:’ ‘What planet is this guy on?’

    President Biden claimed if Republicans win in the midterm elections inflation will get worse

    "Today’s reports, though, show some progress. Overall, inflation was 2% over the last three months. That’s down from 11% over the prior three months. That's progress but a lot of it has resulted from getting the cost of living at the gas pump down, now even in California, by more than $1 nationally," Biden said.
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-slammed-claiming-8-2-inflation-shows-progress-planet-guy

    So, basically Dementia just conceded that, in the last 6 months, inflation rose 13%...

    BBBBWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Even when Dementia Biden tries to toot his own horn, he makes the case for the GOP!!! :D

  45. [45] 
    Michale wrote:

    From Left Wing Rag WaPoop..

    Secret Service knew of Capitol threat more than a week before Jan. 6

    The Secret Service had warnings earlier than previously known that supporters of President Donald Trump were plotting an armed attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, according to records revealed in a congressional hearing Thursday.

    The evidence presented at the hearing adds the Secret Service to a long list of national security agencies who received prescient warnings about the assault protesters planned for Jan. 6, yet failed to respond with urgency or cohesion to prevent the insurrection.
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/secret-service-knew-of-capitol-threat-more-than-a-week-before-jan-6/ar-AA12WjtS

    ALL those agencies KNEW about the planned protest..

    And, because those agencies were staffed by Trump/America haters, they did NOTHING to prepare. The did NOTHING to prevent..

    Because of their Trump/America hate, they let it happen..

  46. [46] 
    Michale wrote:

    Vick The Moron...

    Where did you go??? :D

  47. [47] 
    Michale wrote:

    Crime is on the ballot this year

    Public safety will be a key issue -- if not the issue -- in many governor's races

    Olivia Grace Schultz, a 12-year-old girl, was shot and killed Monday night while helping her mom unload groceries in Milwaukee. It is yet another reminder that public safety is a real issue in Wisconsin. Sadly, Gov. Tony Evers’ failed policies are not working. His Parole Commission released 884 convicted criminals — including 270 murderers and attempted murderers, and 44 child rapists.

    Violent crime is surging to record levels in Wisconsin’s largest city. Mr. Evers supports the goal of reducing the prison population by half. But law-abiding citizens want more violent criminals locked up, not fewer.

    Mr.. Evers’ woke rhetoric is not helping the crisis either. As the local paper in Kenosha declared: “Evers’ statement on Sunday fueled the fire before any rioters got here. His insufficient response has put a Wisconsin city and its residents in danger.” The low- or no-cash bail policies of his lieutenant governor, Mandela Barnes, led to the release of the criminal who ran down six innocent people in the Waukesha Christmas parade
    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/oct/13/crime-is-on-the-ballot-this-year/

    Not only the Governor races..

    ALL Democrats running are on record as supporting the ridiculous Democrat DEFUND, DEMONIZE, DEMORALIZE THE POLICE policies at one point or another...

    EVERY DIM CANDIDATE

    That right there has sealed the fate of the Democrats running..

  48. [48] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    33

    Of course, Vick pulls a single statement without ANY context whatsoever...

    Of course, I quite obviously posted the link where anyone can go read the entire post. You are actually the only moronic commenter here who shits all over the board and posts and reposts the entire contents of other people's articles and comments. On the other hand, the author has requested on multiple occasions that commenters post and link versus shitting all over his comments section. Others understand simple rules; you obviously are retarded and can't stop yourself from shitting all over yourself and others. I trust that other posters here can follow a link and read the contents of the posts of others without having to re-post every single word of your prattling shit.

    Par for the course for a moron like her..

    Said the moron who thinks that someone providing a link to a post is attempting to somehow hide its contents. Idiot. You're the only "board shitter" here who thinks entire posts and articles need to be posted and repeated in their entirety ad nauseam.

    Here is the entire context..

    It's also right there at the link I provided that any fool can follow without any of your repetitive shitting all over the board for no reason like the prattling asshole who can't stop himself.

    And here is my response in it's ENTIRETY.. The part that Vick The Moron doesn't want ya'all to see....

    Yes, I posted the link you just reposted because I was trying to hide it from everybody. Are you seriously this effing stupid? Rhetorical question. You are definitely that stupid.

    So, basically Russ had his alleged 'husband' use his position as a police officer to run an illegal background check on me.

    So, basically your reading comprehension skills (still) suck and you assumed things that Russ never said and invented bullshit that didn't actually happen and then threatened to file a fake police report on a real police officer. Your ignorance regarding lots of police things was showing that day, as any adult can read by following the link I already supplied which leads to the entire exchange wherein you expose yourself (again) for not knowing what is basic... just like Russ said then.

    Russ did this because he had been, AND still continues to be, getting his ass kicked intellectually all over Weigantia®..

    "Yer" not kicking anyone's ass except your own, a massive target for sure since you frequently make a gargantuan ass out of yourself and "yer" too damn dumb to comprehend the depths of your glaring nescience.

    Even if Russ' husband exists (which is doubtful) a complaint WOULD have been warranted because Russ used his alleged police contact to run an illegal background check on ME...

    His husband definitely exists and thank you for proving my point in multiple ways. A real cop would never make an assertion like you did in your post because it's obviously asinine on its face. Russ explains this at the link where we both point at laugh at your ignorance, and you're obviously too damn dumb to know how you just exposed yourself for the fool you were and still are.

    So, even if Russ ACTUALLY had a husband, a complaint against this "husband" for using his position as a police office to run an illegal and unwarranted background check is FULLY and COMPLETELY proper and warranted..

    Asinine on its face considering your posts on this forum that are archived herein. Also ridiculous for obvious reasons. Follow that link and try to learn something. While you're reading, know for a fact that Russ and I were laughing our asses off at your ignorance regarding the subject matter and the fact you actually threatened to file a false police report on a real police officer. How effing stupid is that? Rhetorical. Pretty damn dumb.

    You would be better off going back to ignoring me..

    I think you have me confused with someone else on this forum. I blame your effing ignorance and obvious inability at reading comprehension.

    You obviously can't run with the Alpha Dog....

    You want to talk about your wife? If she even exists.

    So, to recap: You are a board shitting prat and definitely the only asshole here who has ever threatened to file a fake police report on a real police officer that definitely does exist, and that's why you'll always be the hysterically ignorant Jussie Smollett of Weigantia... and all that that implies.

  49. [49] 
    ListenWhenYouHear wrote:

    Kick,

    Hey sweet friend... I thought surely he'd disappeared, but crap always floats to the surface eventually. And look at how worked up he gets when we remind him of his crimes. Such anger from this one!

    Did I ever say that Devon ran his name through their system? No, no I didn't because there was no need to have him run Mr. Whorely. Especially since the tools to get a full background check are available online. But he still threatened to file the false complaint which our local prosecutor thought was such a shock from someone with his background in law enforcement. Oh wait, he lied about that, too.

    Now he's claiming that the agencies where Trump had placed key people into positions of power in the last days of his presidency were actually working against him when they did nothing to stop the insurrectionists from attacking the capital!!!! They let it happen because of their hate for Trump??? Oh, that makes perfect sense...said no one ever. Why would they let the person they hate overthrow our election results and remain in power?

    Wow, I guess this is what desperate looks like when you cannot logically defend the actions of the person you worship.

    Great to see ya and appreciate the assist, as always. Much love to ya!

  50. [50] 
    Michale wrote:

    And, par for the course, Vick The Moron attacks my lovely wife...

    Typical..

    Here is the relevant takeaway from Vick The Moron's And Russ The Shitty Husband's deplorable actions..

    Russ The Shitty Husband had his spouse (if he even exists) use the spouse's position as an LEO to run an illegal and unwarranted background check on me, SOLELY because Russ The Shitty Husband got his ass kicked (and CONTINUES to get his ass kicked) on a political forum..

    Given this FACT, a complaint to the alleged spouse's employer is certainly a proper and understandable response..

    The OTHER takeaway from Russ The Shitty Husband's actions is one of two things..

    Either Russ the Shitty Husband's spouse doesn't really exist..

    Or Russ The Shitty Husband is a complete and utter LUSER that he would ask his spouse to do an illegal and unwarranted background check on someone SOLELY because said someone kicked his ass over and over again in a political forum..

    "These are the facts of the case. And they are undisputed."
    -Captain Smilin Jack Ross, A FEW GOOD MEN

  51. [51] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    34

    What kind of "husband" (if you even ARE a husband) would compromise his spouse by asking said spouse to use his position as a police officer to run an illegal and unwarranted background check on someone...

    I see you are still inventing bullshit that Russ never said or did. Please keep making shit up. In your obvious prattling nonsense, you are exposing your ignorance regarding the entire issue.

    SOLELY because you keep getting yer ass kicked here in Weigantia®

    You seem awfully obsessed with Russ's ass today. I promise you Russ isn't interested.

    Love you, Russ!

    I have been married to a beautiful woman for over FORTY YEARS!!!

    No one cares about your dog... if she even exists.

    I would never even DREAM of compromising her work position by doing something illegal..

    Your easily searchable public records say otherwise.

    I would pity you if you weren't such an asshole and deserve every amount of scorn and ridicule I can pile on you..

    Russ isn't interested in you piling on him. Why don't you go find your dog?

  52. [52] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    35

    What kind of forum is this where illegal "background checks" on commenters by renegade LEOs are allowed and condoned??

    What kind of self-described "cop" doesn't know that arrests, lawsuits, and home foreclosures are easily searchable public records?

    What kind of forum is this where the COMMENTERS of this forum allow and condone such illegal "background checks" with nay a word of protest or condemnation??

    It isn't illegal to search public records. I hereby protest your obvious ignorance of the law and condemn your general stupidity on constant display.

  53. [53] 
    Michale wrote:

    And now Russ The Shitty Husband lies...

    The kind of info you claimed to have would only come from an NCIC check..

    So, you are lying.

    But even if it WAS factually accurate...

    What kind of sick MORON runs a background check on someone JUST because they got their ass kicked in a forum!!???

    So, Russ The Shitty Husband...

    EITHER way, yer one sick asshole..

  54. [54] 
    Michale wrote:

    And the question remains..

    What kind of forum is this where illegal "background checks" on commenters by renegade LEOs are allowed and condoned??

    What kind of forum is this where the COMMENTERS of this forum allow and condone such illegal "background checks" with nay a word of protest or condemnation??

    The silence is deafening..

  55. [55] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    36

    I suppose I should THANK Vick The Moron..

    No one here by that name, but you prattle on and on as if there is; that way, everyone will know what a flaming idiot you are.

    I had actually forgotten about that incident..

    Your memory sucks... like I said, "flaming idiot."

    When Vick The Moron and Russ The Shitty Husband first brought up that quote, I actually felt bad.. I thought to myself that THAT was pretty low for me to do.. I felt bad about it..

    You obviously don't understand the first thing about what you're accusing Russ's husband of doing and are thereby exposing your glaringly obvious ignorance regarding actual policing.

    But then Vick The Moron posts it again with the LINK and I said to myself, I said "Self.. Let's check this out.. Let's see what would prompt me to do something apparently so low.."

    Easy answer. You invented bullshit out of your obvious ignorance and then threatened a real cop with filing an obviously false police report based on your foolishness.

    So, I followed the link and learned the CONTEXT...

    The context was bullshit you made up out of your obvious ignorance.

    Then I realized that what I had said was FULLY AND COMPLETELY justified by Russ The Shitty Husband's actions.. That such a complaint to Russ The Shitty Husband's alleged husband would have been COMPLETELY, UTTERLY, UNEQUIVOCALLY, 1000% JUSTIFIED!!

    Jussie Smollett of Weigantia is too stupid to know how stupid he is.

    So, all of the sudden, the bad I felt about it melted away and I felt completely and utterly VINDICATED!!

    Ignorance will do that to you.

    It's a great feeling to learn that it was Russ The Shitty Husband's actions that prompted that statement from me and that such an action (had I done it at the time) would have been **COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY JUSTIFIED!!!**

    Nope. You invented bullshit and then showed your ignorance regarding actual police work, and Russ and I haven't stopped pointing and laughing at your obvious ignorance of the basics since.

    It's always helpful when stupid people expose themselves for the liars they've always been.

  56. [56] 
    Michale wrote:

    So, we now know that Russ The Shitty Husband is lying about where he got the background check from..

    Regardless of that fact, it says a LOT about Russ The Shitty Husband's insecurity that he actually does a background check because he got his ass kicked in a forum...

  57. [57] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    43

    What a lame attempt at saving face...

    Mike the admitted Man Whore, there is no one here by that name, but I definitely agree your flailing ignorance is on full display and your attempt at saving face is a spectacular fail. In your ignorance regarding the basics of public service, you actually threatened to file a fake police report on an actual police officer, and you're obviously still too ignorant to understand how stupid you were to do that in print. Doubling down on that obvious stupidity makes you look -- well -- doubly stupid.

    But EVERYONE here can recognize it for the lame and useless distraction it tried to be...

    You're claiming to read minds now too; how stupid is that? Rhetorical question.

    Ya just got yer ASS handed to ya, biatch... :D

    You now want to discuss your wife and her behind? No one cares, but Russ will surely be relieved you're no longer obsessing over his.

    You just can't keep up with the Alpha Dog... :D

    Not factually accurate, dog; there are numerous times archived herein where someone here has tossed a stick and watched you run for it.

  58. [58] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Michale,

    I see your age feebled brain can handle neither reading nor math. I wrote: taxi drivers are the most killed by other people per capita. For every 100,000 taxi drivers about double will die at the hand of another person than 100,000 law enforcement officers. There just happens to be about 3.5x as many law enforcement officers in this country than there are taxi drivers. So, again I thank you for proving me right with your link. Nice try laughing boy. Heh...

    As for using current numbers, contrary to your hysteria, police murders actually have gone down consistently since the bad old 70's. Which were even lower than prohibition. The years of prohibition were a really bad time to be a cop. We are on a minor uptick these last two years for felonious deaths, but a massive, massive uptick for overall law enforcement deaths while on duty. Almost double the years before and all due to COVID...

  59. [59] 
    Michale wrote:

    Poor Poor Vick The Moron...

    Flailing around trying to save face..

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  60. [60] 
    Michale wrote:

    Bashi,

    Which doesn't change the FACT that your stat is over 2 years old and is not accurate for the here and now..

    Even Russ The Shitty Husband told you that you were full of kaa kaa

  61. [61] 
    John From Censornati wrote:

    It's way past time for the Big Orange Asset to flee to Russia with his stolen classified documents like Snowden. I understand his reluctance so far. No more Big Macs. The obese, seditious, tax/bank-frauding, money-laundering, traitorous, defaming rapist could still lie and whine on Fake Twitter and Team Putin's bitches, oops I mean trolls, could still puke all over everything else. Trolling is all the GQP cult zombies really want these days anyway. Deathsantis can't match The Short Fingers Ignoramus Show. Too boring. Herschel 2024!

  62. [62] 
    John From Censornati wrote:

    Well, maybe I've overstated their troll love. They also seem to like to be lied to as much as they like lying.

  63. [63] 
    Michale wrote:

    JFC!!! Still as ignorant and spewing nonsense as always..

    Great ta see ya!!! :D

  64. [64] 
    Michale wrote:

    JFC,

    Any facts to support your claims??

    No??

    Of course not.. Ya'all never do

  65. [65] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Michale-

    Which doesn't change the FACT that your stat is over 2 years old and is not accurate for the here and now..

    Still having trouble with math and reading? I did not say where I got my data as I got it from multiple sources including the FBI data base. 2020 had 46 felonious deaths, 2021 had 72 and half the year of 2022 has 20 which is treading to a low year according to this site. But obviously that can change in 6 months...

  66. [66] 
    Michale wrote:

    I did not say where I got my data as I got it from multiple sources

    I already told you where you got your taxi driver data.. First listing in GOOGLE..

    Irregardless, even Russ The Shitty Husband told you that yer full of kaa kaa....

  67. [67] 
    Michale wrote:

    Getting back on topic

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    WaPo, NY Times opinion pieces rip Jan 6. Committee as 'ineffective', 'tedious': Sermon that 'just won't end'

    Both posts claimed the January 6th Committee is not convincing anyone new, just 'preaches to the choir'

    Two Thursday opinion pieces, one from The New York Times and the other from The Washington Post, torched the January 6th Committee as "wholly ineffective," "tedious" and done only for the sake of politics.

    The Washington Post opinion column likened the committee, which concluded it's televised hearings Thursday, to an overlong church sermon still being preached while congregants are thinking about brunch or Sunday football.

    The Times guest essay claimed the committee is not shifting views about former President Donald Trump’s behavior and has acted too partisan to convince people the committee is defending democracy.
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/wapo-ny-times-opinion-pieces-rip-jan-6-committee-ineffective-tedious-sermon-just-wont-end

    BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

    Even Democrat Rags like NY GRIME and WaPoop know that the 6 Jan fictional show is nothing but a Cardassian court!!

    There ya go, Jean Luc... From the mouths of Democrats themselves!!

    the committee is not shifting views about former President Donald Trump’s behavior and has acted too partisan to convince people the committee is defending democracy.

    Cardassian Court to the core!! :D

  68. [68] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Michale-

    I already told you where you got your taxi driver data.. First listing in GOOGLE..

    And again you are wrong.

    But it does bring up an interesting question, you post memorials for police who die of heart attacks or killed in off duty car crashes but not for COVID deaths. Why are you kicking law enforcement officers to the curb just for happening to die due to something that goes against your politics? A bit fair weather there...

  69. [69] 
    Michale wrote:

    And again you are wrong.

    Yea, that's yer claim.. Still no facts to support it..

    Why are you kicking law enforcement officers to the curb just for happening to die due to something that goes against your politics? A bit fair weather there...

    I post ALL of END OF WATCH as relayed to me via an Email List...

    The only ones I haven't posted were ones that occur'ed while I wasn't posting at all...

    Not that you really care about LEOs at all... :eyeroll:

  70. [70] 
    Michale wrote:

    "There are few things as irritating as a preacher who just won’t end his sermon until someone, anyone, finally steps forward to confess and repent, regardless of how far most minds long ago drifted off to thoughts of football, afternoon naps and Sunday dinner.
    That’s what the tedious Jan. 6 committee feels like, with committee members determined to convince everyone, no matter how tired, uninterested or skeptical, that former president Donald Trump is evil incarnate, that his followers are dangerously wayward enablers, and that renouncing them both is the only road to salvation."

    -Gary Abernathy, WaPoop

    BBWWAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    That is REALLY hilarious..

    Basically WaPoop is confirming what I have been saying all year.. :D

  71. [71] 
    Michale wrote:

    "It was not a coup attempt. And even if you believe it was, Mr. Trump was not leading it. For someone supposedly bent on overthrowing the government, Mr. Trump did an awful lot of television-watching and surprisingly little seizing of broadcast centers, mobilizing of commando units and issuing of emergency decrees."
    -Christopher Caldwell, NY GRIME

    Again.. I have been saying this ALL YEAR..

    NY GRIME simply confirms my facts.. :D

    That's GOTTA HURT!! :D

  72. [72] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Michale-

    The fact, FACT or even FACT is I don't use google as a search engine...

    You should check the politics of your email list. COVID has almost doubled the number of police officer deaths, to the tune of a death every two to three days. Very sad. But no more sad than anyone else in society dying under similar circumstances. I neither hate nor worship law enforcement.

  73. [73] 
    ListenWhenYouHear wrote:

    Michale,

    Thanks for posting on here the fact that you did not think of an excuse for your threatening to file a false police report until today. Too bad the excuse is bogus and you once again openly confessed to making the threat to file a false police report.

    Tell me, what information did I claim to know about you that could have only come from running your name through NCIC? We're waiting!?!? Silence. Big shock.

    You want to attack me for supposedly asking my husband to do something that I never asked him to do? This coming from the man putting out ads for sexual partners for his wife. Some husband you are. Wife has to find sexual satisfaction from others because you obviously cannot do the job.

    Also, just curious as to why the FDLE has no record of you ever working in law enforcement in FL? Amazing what simple public records requests will turn up.

  74. [74] 
    Kick wrote:

    ListenWhenYouHear
    49

    Hey sweet friend... I thought surely he'd disappeared, but crap always floats to the surface eventually.

    Heh... fat floats.

    And look at how worked up he gets when we remind him of his crimes. Such anger from this one!

    Anger like that combined with obvious adipose will help slam your arteries shut and give you cardiac issues.

    Did I ever say that Devon ran his name through their system?

    Of course not.

    No, no I didn't because there was no need to have him run Mr. Whorely.

    Exactly right, Russ. Do you know a cop who isn't aware that civil and criminal records are available for free to the public? This is basic stuff as easy as 1-2-3.

    (1) Type in the perp's name in the appropriate box.
    (2) Check the box that claims you are "not a robot."
    (3) Invoke the "Search" button.

    https://apps.stjohnsclerk.com/Benchmark/Home.aspx/Search

    Not exactly rocket science.

    Especially since the tools to get a full background check are available online.

    I know, right!? And easily searchable public record. Foreclosures? Yep. Filed for indigency? Poor Mr. Whore.

    But he still threatened to file the false complaint which our local prosecutor thought was such a shock from someone with his background in law enforcement. Oh wait, he lied about that, too.

    Yes, sir, he did. He claimed he was a cop. Then he claimed he never said he was a cop (it's archived on the forum, of course). So he lied about it and then lied about lying about it.

    Now he's claiming that the agencies where Trump had placed key people into positions of power in the last days of his presidency were actually working against him when they did nothing to stop the insurrectionists from attacking the capital!!!! They let it happen because of their hate for Trump??? Oh, that makes perfect sense...said no one ever.

    They don't care about the facts, Russ. It's so much easier just making shit up. That way they don't have to admit to their "bogus whinings" and being a "yahoo" by their own definition.

    So, that means when some yahoo here whines and complains about cheating and such other bogus whinings.....

    Are you saying you will set them straight in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS and tell them.....

    "Despite what Trump says, this presidential election and count has apparently proceeded with care and precision, transparency and accuracy across the country, in the middle of Pandemic 1 and with record high turnout in many places."

    Enquiring minds want to know.. :D

    ~ Michale the self-described "yahoo"

    [Wednesday, November 4th, 2020 at 10:51]

    Why would they let the person they hate overthrow our election results and remain in power?

    You can't reason with a self-described "yahoo," Russ. They don't give a shit about even the most basic of facts.

    Wow, I guess this is what desperate looks like when you cannot logically defend the actions of the person you worship.

    How would one go about defending the theft of documents and the asinine claim that they were magically declassified by just thinking about it? Trump wouldn't have tried that lame shit with his gullible cult rubes unless he believed they were infinitely stupid on par with a "yahoo."

    How does one defend the loser of an election claiming on election night that he doesn't want anyone finding any more votes so he will go to the Supreme Court and then phoning the Secretary of State of Georgia asking him to find more votes?

    There's no defense for that kind of stupid shit.

    Great to see ya and appreciate the assist, as always. Much love to ya!

    Love you more. :)

  75. [75] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    50

    And, par for the course, Vick The Moron attacks my lovely wife...

    You call yourself a dog and then throw out words like "biatch," and I'm telling you, dumb ass, there's likely not a person in here who doesn't immediately think about the dog's female dog.

    Typical..

    Admitted dog wants to talk about his "biatch," who are we to question the dumb ass dog who keeps invoking her? You got a problem with it, kick the dog's ass... it's that giant thing behind you that resembles your fat face.

    Here is the relevant takeaway from Vick The Moron's And Russ The Shitty Husband's deplorable actions..

    You're an effing repetitive moron who doesn't know that public records are easily searchable online. You're so damn dumb you don't know this and so you invent a load of bullshit and blame Russ for your invented bullshit. That's the takeaway.

    Also, you threatened to file a fake police report on an actual police officer because you're too stupid to understand that your shit is easily searchable public record that no one need buy or ask anyone else to search. It's free to the entire world... even your indigent ass can afford it.

    Given this FACT, a complaint to the alleged spouse's employer is certainly a proper and understandable response..

    Please keep making the asinine claim that your online public records were illegally searched; it lets everyone know exactly what an inveterate poon would claim. Then please file that fake claim of yours on Devon. Everybody will pee their pants laughing at your effing ignorance, and it'll be no less a felony for you to file a fake claim on a real police officer. Idiot.

  76. [76] 
    Kick wrote:

    John From Censornati
    61

    Where the hell have you been?

    Meaning: So great to see you. Awesome post.

  77. [77] 
    Michale wrote:

    And Vick The Moron continues to flail and fail!!

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  78. [78] 
    Michale wrote:

    Opinion The Jan. 6 committee preaches to the choir

    There are few things as irritating as a preacher who just won’t end his sermon until someone, anyone, finally steps forward to confess and repent, regardless of how far most minds long ago drifted off to thoughts of football, afternoon naps and Sunday dinner.

    That’s what the tedious Jan. 6 committee feels like, with committee members determined to convince everyone, no matter how tired, uninterested or skeptical, that former president Donald Trump is evil incarnate, that his followers are dangerously wayward enablers, and that renouncing them both is the only road to salvation. Can we get an amen?

    Most of Thursday’s presentation was a monotonous rehash of what committee members apparently felt was their most damning and convincing details, all leading to the clear political stunt of issuing a subpoena for Trump, which, if it were a serious move, would have been done at the beginning of the hearings, not the end. As law professor Jonathan Turley was quick to point out, the move comes quite late in the game, and Trump will likely never be forced to comply.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/13/jan-6-committee-hearing-politics/

    It's rather ironic...

    Ya'all didn't mention ANYTHING like "a monotonous rehash" and a tedious preacher who won't end their sermon..

    It looks like I called the Cardassian Court that is the 6JC perfectly..

    Nothing but a partisan witch hunt with nay a fact to support ANY of the accusations...

    Ya'all just HAVE to realize how badly ya'all are wrong when the NY GRIME starts sounding EXACTLY like I have been sounding all year!! :D

  79. [79] 
    Michale wrote:

    Ya'all just HAVE to realize how badly ya'all are wrong when the NY GRIME starts sounding EXACTLY like I have been sounding all year!! :D

    Correction.. When WaPoop starts sounding EXACTLY like I have been sounding all year...

    It's hard to keep ya'all Democrat rags straight.. :D

    With a panel of compliant committee members, nary a contrary word was uttered, no challenge raised to any witness testimony, no comment from the panel veered from the preapproved queries and conclusions snaking across the teleprompter. Every hearing was routinely wrapped up with grim-faced pronouncements of guilt and dire warnings that one of the country’s major political parties poses a threat to democracy. Cheney even went so far as to declare in August that witness testimony amounted to “confessions.” What nonsense.

    And THAT describes the Cardassian Court that is the 6JC perfectly..

    NONSENSE... :D

    And ta think ya'all put SOOO much faith in it...

    Ya'all haven't been THAT delusional since ya'all fell for the Russia Collusion Delusion hook line and sinker!! :D

    One would think ya'all would learn your lesson...

    Apparently.. NOT.. :eyeroll:

  80. [80] 
    Michale wrote:

    The Jan. 6 Committee Has Been Almost Wholly Ineffective

    On the other hand, the committee members are pursuing their case in a grandiose and ideological manner, tarring Mr. Trump’s voting base as a bunch of authoritarians and election deniers. Mr. Trump’s machinations and protesters’ misdeeds, it appears, are being used as a pretext for self-appointed guardians of democracy to reorient American politics to their liking. So why would Republicans budge?
    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/13/opinion/january-6-committee-trump.html

    Exactly...

    It's as I said at the start of this farce...

    A Cardassian court where guilt or innocence is irrelevant.. The ONLY reason for the process is to arrive at a pre-determined verdict without regards for law or facts...

    JL, I TOLD you that this was all the 6JC was going to be..

    And I have been vindicated as factually accurate by the 2 biggest Democrat water carriers on the planet..

    WaPoop and NY GRIME...

  81. [81] 
    Michale wrote:

    Nearly 270 public educators were arrested on child sex-related crimes in the U.S. in the first nine months of this year, ranging from grooming to raping underage students.

    An analysis conducted by Fox News Digital found that from Jan. 1 to Sept. 30, at least 269 educators were arrested, which works out to roughly one arrest a day.

    The 269 educators included four principals, two assistant principals, 226 teachers, 20 teachers' aides and 17 substitute teachers.

    At least 199 of the arrests, or 74%, involved alleged crimes against students.
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/at-least-269-k-12-educators-arrested-child-sex-crimes-first-9-months-year

    And THIS is why the Florida Parents Notification Act is a GOOD law...

    It stops these Democrats from grooming children for later sexual or ideological exploitation... It nips their depravations in the bud...

    Thank the gods for Governor DeSantis!!! :D

  82. [82] 
    Michale wrote:

    Raleigh shooting update: North Carolina officials identify victims, including police officer and boy, 16

    North Carolina shooting leaves 5 dead, including off-duty police officer; suspect in custody

    RALEIGH, N.C. — Raleigh, North Carolina, officials on Friday identified the victims of Thursday's mass shooting, who include a 16-year-old boy, a police officer who was on his way to work and a woman who was critically injured just days before her birthday.

    The gunman, a 15-year-old boy, opened fire near the Neuse River Greenway area in Raleigh just after 5 p.m., officials previously said. He was taken into custody about three hours later after he was allegedly "contained" inside a nearby home. The crime scene spanned "over two miles," Raleigh Police Chief Estella D. Patterson said Friday.

    Patterson identified the deceased off-duty police officer as 29-year-old Gabriel Torres, who was on his way to work at the time. She said other victims include James Roger Thompson, 16; Nicole Conners, 52; Susan Karnatz, 49; and Mary Marshall, 35.
    https://www.foxnews.com/us/raleigh-shooting-update-north-carolina-officials-identify-victims-including-police-officer-boy-16

    And more horrible results of the Democrats and their Hate Cops policies...

    I swear, we are not going to be able to get these Democrats out of office fast enough!!!

  83. [83] 
    Michale wrote:

    http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/04/07/on-wisconsin-2/#comment-157144

    Ahhhh.. Those were the days.. If only we could return to that time where CW was still around... Before PTDS took him from us... :(

    It's sad to think that, just 2 months later, Russ The Shitty Husband would be cajoling his alleged spouse to commit a crime and do a background check on me because he kept (and keeps) getting his ass kicked all over Weigantia® by yours truly..

    I would give ANYTHING to have the old Pre-PTDS CW back here again with us...

    ANYTHING...

  84. [84] 
    Michale wrote:

    Who could have POSSIBLY predicted that the Cardassian 6JC would be such a complete and utter let down??

    Oh wait... :D

    Let's hear from the OFFICIAL Weigantia® Objective and Un-Biased News Source..

    Jan 6 Hearings: Is This The "October Surprise" Democrats Are Counting On?
    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2022/10/14/jan_6_hearings_is_this_the_october_surprise_democrats_are_counting_on.html

    Try as they might... Democrats failed. AGAIN...

    The hype of EVERYTHING based on their Trump/America hate... And what happens??? It all fizzles out to NOTHING...

    Again and again and again...

    Democrats *FAIL*....

    That one word sums up EVERYTHING about the Democrats in the here and now..

    FAIL....

    "Failed... Failed... EPIC fail..."
    -NASA Doctor, ARMAGEDDON

  85. [85] 
    Michale wrote:

    And ANOTHER doozy from the Global Warming morons..

    Washington Post article claims climate change fuels 'hate speech' through hotter temperatures

    The report claimed 'researchers fear that there will be an increase in online hate' as global temperatures increase

    Washington Post weather reporter Amudalat Ajasa wrote that researchers are worried that hotter temperatures caused by climate change are spurring a rise in "hate speech."

    In her Thursday report, titled, "Hotter days bring out hotter tempers, research finds," Ajasa cited two studies that show that because of climate change, hotter temperatures are inducing people to engage in "hate speech and hostile behavior."

    Ajasa wrote, "As temperatures around the world increase, scientists have documented large-scale environmental effects — rising sea levels, drought and famine, intense flooding and the disappearance of species. But increasingly, some researchers worry that higher temperatures might also contribute to people behaving badly."
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/washington-post-article-claims-climate-change-fuels-hate-speech-hotter-temperatures

    Get that??

    Global Warming causes hate speech...

    Where do ya'all Democrats FIND these people!??? :eyeroll:

    THESE are the people ya'all want to use to sell ya'all's Global Warming con?? :eyeroll:

  86. [86] 
    Michale wrote:

    TOP FACEBOOK CONSULTANT ADMITS THAT THE METAVERSE IS ABSOLUTELY TERRIBLE

    "THERE'S A BUNCH THAT I'M GRUMPY ABOUT."

    "Last year I said that I'd be disappointed if we weren't having Connect in Horizon this year," said a legless, pixelated Carmack, standing in a digital Horizon Worlds house.

    "This here, this isn't really what I meant," he added. "Me being an avatar on-screen on a video for you is basically the same thing as [just] being on a video."

    Quest Qualms
    In his "unscripted" speech, Carmack voiced his frustrations with the newly-unveiled Quest Pro headset. While it may feature some technological improvements over Meta's Quest 2, which was released exactly two years ago, the battery life is atrocious, and it's wildly expensive.

    The "Doom" creator clearly isn't a fan. "I've always been clear that I'm all about the cost-effective mass-market headsets being the most important thing for us and for the adoption of VR," Carmack said during the event. "And Quest Pro is definitely not that..."
    https://futurism.com/the-byte/facebook-consultant-metaverse-terrible

    DIE, FACEBOOK, DIE!!!!!

    :D

    Karma is coming around for Zuckerburg....

    Cheat in an election, help the bad guys win and Karma comes around and bitch slaps ya to the ground...

    :D

  87. [87] 
    Michale wrote:

    Meta's Shares Are a Hard Sell as Good Old Facebook Days Are Over

    Since Mark Zuckerberg’s announcement a year ago of a name change and strategy overhaul for the owner of Facebook, the stock has wiped out more than half the gain it had seen since its initial public offering a decade ago. That’s cost Meta $600 billion in market value and a spot in the elite club of the US’s 10 biggest companies.

    Analysts predict Meta’s revenue will drop this year for the first time ever, as competition and cooling economies, among other factors, cut into ad sales. User growth at its flagship product, Facebook, has slowed as a younger generation flocks to newer sites like TikTok. Meanwhile, the company is spending billions to realize Zuckerberg’s vision of the metaverse, that still-to-be-realized virtual world where people will work, shop and socialize.

    “There’s so many red flags relative to Meta,” said Matthew Kanterman, director of research at Ball Metaverse Research Partners.
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/metas-shares-hard-sell-good-134257000.html

    Yep, yep... Karma's got a hard on for Facebook and she intends to slap Zuck down HARD!!!!

    Could happen to a more deserving scumbag....

  88. [88] 
    Michale wrote:

    Remember how I have been saying all year that Inflation is going to last well in to 2023..

    And MC was saying Inflation was going to be over by October???

    ya'all remember that?? :D

    WARNING SIGNS: INFLATION TO RISE EVEN MORE NEXT YEAR?

    US Year-Ahead Inflation Views Rise for First Time Since March

    US year-ahead inflation expectations rose in early October for the first time in seven months and the long-term outlook also crept up, a potentially worrisome development for the Federal Reserve as it tries to keep views anchored.

    Consumers expect prices will climb 5.1% over the next year, up from 4.7% in September, according to a survey from the University of Michigan. They see costs rising at an annual rate of 2.9% over the next five to 10 years, a pickup from 2.7%, data Friday showed.
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-ahead-inflation-views-rise-142857780.html

    Well, I am not one to toot my own horn but...

    BEEP BEEP BEEP :D

    MC was wrong and I was factually accurate..

    AGAIN.. :D

  89. [89] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    83

    It's sad to think that, just 2 months later, Russ The Shitty Husband would be cajoling his alleged spouse to commit a crime and do a background check on me because he kept (and keeps) getting his ass kicked all over Weigantia® by yours truly..

    It is not a crime for a police officer to perform a background check, you inveterate effing uneducated hysterical ranting swamp poon; however, it would definitely be a felony for you to file a false report containing that bullshit you invented about a police officer.

    Thank you for continuing to expose your rank ignorance regarding the law and continuing to repeatedly kick no one's ass except your own.

    I would give ANYTHING to have the old Pre-PTDS CW back here again with us...

    ANYTHING...

    CW is very much alive and well; the only thing dead around here is your credibility. Try giving up inventing bullshit... as if you could stop yourself. *laughs*

  90. [90] 
    Michale wrote:

    Fla. to strip licenses of K-3 teachers who discuss gender identity, sexuality

    Florida plans to revoke or suspend the teaching licenses of elementary school educators who teach students about gender identity or sexuality, according to a new rule published by the state’s Department of Education.

    The rule, proposed in August and approved by Education Commissioner Manny Diaz Jr. in September, is intended to enforce a 2021 state law that forbids instruction on gender identity and sexuality for children in kindergarten through third grade. The measure, the Parental Rights in Education Act, is known by opponents as the “don’t say gay” law.

    The Florida Department of Education has done little to publicize its rule on teachers’ licenses. The rule appeared online around the same time that the state was taking damage from Hurricane Ian, which has left more than 100 dead. News of the rule was first reported Tuesday by the newsletter the Progress Report.

    The rule states that any teacher who “intentionally provide[s] classroom instruction” to K-3 students on those two topics will face “revocation or suspension of the individual educator’s certificate, or the other penalties as provided by law.”
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fla-to-strip-licenses-of-k-3-teachers-who-discuss-gender-identity-sexuality/ar-AA12VLOp

    And THAT'S how we do things downtown!!!

    If more states had this law, maybe the stats in comment #81 would not be so damning...

    Democrat teachers need to let kids be kids... NOT bombarding them with ideologically based gender and sexuality issues that even ADULTS have trouble dealing with...

    If Democrats had their way, they would give the kids a pack of smokes, a bottle of whiskey and the keys to the car and send them on their way... :eyeroll:

    I'm just sayin'...

  91. [91] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    87

    Yep, yep... Karma's got a hard on for Facebook and she intends to slap Zuck down HARD!!!!

    But not before she's done slapping down your pathetic ass.

    Could happen to a more deserving scumbag....

    Said the "more deserving scumbag."

  92. [92] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    88

    Remember how I have been saying all year that Inflation is going to last well in to 2023..

    And MC was saying Inflation was going to be over by October???

    Remember how you just make shit up about people and then claim you predicted it?

  93. [93] 
    Michale wrote:

    It is not a crime for a police officer to perform a background check, you inveterate effing uneducated hysterical ranting swamp poon;

    Vick, you moronic ignorant dolt...

    Yes, it IS illegal for a police officer to perform a background check under the circumstances that Russ The Shitty Husband did...

    Hell, it would be illegal if the police officer did it on his own accord, let alone at the behest of someone else..

    Officer Faces Felony Charge For Unauthorized Background Check
    November 12, 2019

    After running a background check without a permissible purpose, a police officer faces a serious criminal charge.

    The Story
    A police officer in Peoria, Arizona stands accused of wrongfully running a background check on a citizen. Allegedly, the officer agreed to look up information about a woman at the request of a friend. This friend was reportedly interested in dating a co-worker but first wanted to know if she has a criminal record.

    The officer allegedly provided a completed background report to his friend. After reviewing, that friend approached the woman he hoped to date and referenced a personal experience which he should not have known. When asked how he got that information, the man shared the story of what happened.

    Soon after, the co-worker called local police and filed a complaint.

    Officers are permitted to run license plates while on active duty, but they are not allowed to run background checks on individuals without cause. The officer who stands accused of running an unauthorized background report faces a class six felony charge. He was placed on administrative leave and later resigned.
    https://tinyurl.com/kkpeaywf

    Are you REALLY that much of a MORON, Vick??

    The circumstances described in the link are the EXACT circumstances that Russ The Shitty Husband used to get his alleged spouse to run a background check on me.. Had I chose to, my complaint would have got Russ's husband FIRED and likely ARRESTED...

    I mean, seriously, Vick.. I knew you were stupid.. I just didn't realize HOW stupid you are!! :eyeroll:

    Now why don't you just get lost.. I have already totally decimated your credibility once today.. Why do you insist on allowing me to do it a second time? :eyeroll:

  94. [94] 
    Michale wrote:

    Well, one thing is certain..

    Vick The Moron is really living up to her name.. :D

    BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  95. [95] 
    Michale wrote:

    Flail, Vick The Moron, Flail!!

    I just love the sound of Vick The Moron flailing all over Wiegantia®...

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  96. [96] 
    Michale wrote:

    After running a background check without a permissible purpose, a police officer faces a serious criminal charge.

    And let me assure you, Vick The Moron..

    Asking a police officer to run a background check on someone because they keep kicking the asker's ass all over the place....

    That's NOT a "permissible reason"...

    I am actually surprised I have to explain this to you..

    No, I am not.. not really.. It's obvious to all of Weigantia® that you are an unfunctional MORON....

    Thank you for proving it to everyone..

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  97. [97] 
    Michale wrote:

    Awwwwww No poor widdle Vick The Moron's feelings are butthurt and she is gonna run away and cry...

    "Begone Foul Wench!!! And pollute this place nevermore!!"

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  98. [98] 
    Michale wrote:

    Speaking of racism...

    Conservatives celebrate Bucs coach Todd Bowles comments smacking down ESPN reporter's race question

    'We coach ball. We don’t look at color,' Bowles said

    Tampa Bay Buccaneers head coach Todd Bowles was praised by conservatives after scolding the media for "making a big deal" about race when a White reporter from ESPN pressed him about diversity.

    "The minute you guys stop making a big deal about it, everybody else will as well," Bowles said.

    Bowles, who is Black, was taking questions from the press on Wednesday ahead of the Buccaneers' upcoming game against the Pittsburgh Steelers. Instead of asking about football, one reporter pointed out that the Steelers also have a Black coach.

    Tampa Bay Buccaneers head coach Todd Bowles was praised after scolding the media for "making a big deal" about race.
    Tampa Bay Buccaneers head coach Todd Bowles was praised after scolding the media for "making a big deal" about race. (AP Photo/Chris O'Meara)

    "You and Mike Tomlin are the few Black head coaches in the league, I wonder what your relationship is like with him and your thoughts on Steve Wilks joining that," a reporter asked. (Wilks was recently named the interim head coach for the Carolina Panthers to become the fourth current Black NFL head coach. Lovie Smith of the Houston Texans is the other.)

    Bowles said he has a very good relationship with Tomlin, but they don’t "look at what color we are" when their teams face off.

    "I have a lot of very good White friends that coach in this league as well, and I don’t think it’s a big deal. As far as us coaching against each other, I think it’s normal. Wilks got an opportunity to do a good job, hopefully he does it, and we coach ball. We don’t look at color," Bowles said.
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/conservatives-celebrate-bucs-coach-todd-bowles-comments-smacking-down-espn-reporters-race-question

    What *IS* it with ya'all's Democrats that they HAVE to make everything about Race??

    You know what kind of people makes EVERYTHING a racial thing??

    Racists.... :eyeroll:

  99. [99] 
    Michale wrote:

    "Begone Foul Wench!!! And pollute this place nevermore!!"

    http://images7.memedroid.com/images/UPLOADED617/5dd89f34560c1.jpeg

    hehehehehehehehehehehehe :D

  100. [100] 
    Michale wrote:

    AND.......

    An even 100 comments!!! :D

    Ta daaaaaaaa

  101. [101] 
    Michale wrote:

    "Let's just think about that one for a moment. And then we'll start again.."
    -Gary Oldman, AIR FORCE ONE

    :D

  102. [102] 
    Michale wrote:

    Uh.... Question...

    US extends COVID public health emergency weeks after Biden declared pandemic 'over'

    Health officials are warning of a winter surge

    The U.S. extended the public health emergency status for the COVID-19 pandemic Thursday, weeks after President Biden's controversial remarks declaring the pandemic was "over."

    The move extends the order through Jan. 11, as health officials warn once more of a winter surge.

    In recent weeks, children have returned to schools, and state and local leaders have loosened or done away with coronavirus-related restrictions.
    https://www.foxnews.com/health/us-extends-covid-public-health-emergency-after-biden-declared-pandemic-over

    Dementia Biden said the pandemic was "over"..

    So why is the CD&GC extending public health emergency status for Covid19???

    Trying to stretch it out to the mid-terms so Democrats can cheat again??? :^/

  103. [103] 
    Michale wrote:

    Fetterman’s wife blasts NBC reporter who noted candidate's 'small talk' issues: Should face 'consequences'

    Fetterman claimed Burns' comments were 'appalling to the entire disability community and I think to journalism'

    The wife of Pennsylvania Democratic Senate candidate John Fetterman ripped NBC journalist Dasha Burns for claiming the candidate had a "difficult" time with small talk prior to their interview, suggesting she should face "consequences."

    Gisele Barreto Fetterman claimed Burns’ statements were a "disservice" to her husband, to the disabled community and to Americans in general.
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/fettermans-wife-blasts-nbc-reporter-noted-candidates-small-talk-issues-should-face-consequences

    So.... Fetterman's wife is confirming that Fetterman is mentally disabled...

    The voters in Pennsylvania should know this..

    This reporter Dasha Burns (and I can't beleive I am saying this) actually did a good service to the people of Pennsylvania..

    Good on her...

  104. [104] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    Hiya, Kick and Bashi,

    Nice to see that you shoot down Jussie Michale. Of course, he's too stupid to know when he just got owned, but at least I can continue to scroll through the boring right-wing BS. After all, it's not incumbent on me to either read nor reply to the pollution, so I don't. No doubt he tried to insult me somewhere along the line but this guy loves Trump so much that whatever else he says he's automatically killed his own credibility.

    Shall I assume that when Weigantia does not comment it's because you're nodding your head, "Yes, that's true?" That's the way that I read and respond to many of CW's columns. Or not respond, as the case may be.

  105. [105] 
    Michale wrote:

    Ahhhh I see that MC is "ignoring" me again..

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Ya see, MC.. There is a factual issue with your "Jussie" claim.. Like ALL Democrats Smollet's was a moron racist who made false reports and caused CPD a WHOLE lot of heartache and problems..

    Myself on the other.. Everything is 1000% factual where facts are stated and even my opinions are backed up 1000% by facts.. Do you know how we know this??

    Because YOU YOURSELF confirmed my LEO bona fides.. And the late CW confirmed my Military bona fides...

    And, of course, there is the FACT that Russ The Shitty Husband and Vick The Moron has absolutely ZERO facts to back up ANY of the claims they have made..

    Funny how that is, eh??

    Not to mention how utterly RIDICULOUS it is for them to even CLAIM they have background checks on me..

    BBBWWHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    I mean, honestly.. How utterly stoopid and moronic is it to even LIE about something like that, eh!! :D

    That shows the mental midgets that they are.. :D I am sure you agree..

    Now, let's look at YOUR claims MC..

    You claimed that Inflation would be over by November..

    Were you lying?? Or just wrong..

    You claimed that Putin would never invade Ukraine.. Were you LYING?? Or just wrong..

    You see, unlike your Weigantia® butthurt buddies, I allow that you might NOT be lying.. I allow that you are simply too stoopid to know...

    So, which is it??

    Are you too stoopid?? Or are you lying???

    Of course, I guess a third option is that you are too stoned to know if yer stoopid or lying.. That is ALWAYS a possibility with you...

    So anyways, this is the part where you run away and hide again til tomorrow when you awaken from yer drugged stupor and wonder if you actually DID frak that goat or were you just dreaming about it..

    Catch ya later, MC... I'll be here.. I'll always be here.. :D

  106. [106] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    93

    Yes, it IS illegal for a police officer to perform a background check under the circumstances that Russ The Shitty Husband did...

    Dumb ass idiot lying sack of putrid bullshit: Since you are the catalyst who made up the bullshit about Russ and him and then posted your intent to harm him/them on this very public forum by threatening to file a false police report on him for something that you pulled out of your fat ass with no proof whatsoever, it would definitely not be illegal for him to do a background check on a man who threatened him and his husband. Remember, you pathetic vomitous mass of effing ignorance, it was you who invented the bullshit and threatened to file a false police report on him.

    Are you REALLY that much of a MORON, Vick??

    Said the dipshit who invented a bunch of false claims about a police officer and then threatened to file a false report on him and even listed the state he lived in in the post... which I'll remind you wasn't effing Arizona. Bad news, asshole, you posting a story about a guy getting his cop friend in Arizona to run a background check on a person he wanted to date does not at all describe the situation archived herein. What is a "Class 6 Felony" in Washington State? Since you're the one using Arizona law as kind of nationwide blueprint: Quick, what is a "Class 6 Felony" in Washington State? *laughs* You daft prick.

    The circumstances described in the link are the EXACT circumstances that Russ The Shitty Husband used to get his alleged spouse to run a background check on me..

    No they most certainly are not, you effing dipshit. As more than one poster has stated: You either don't read or cannot comprehend the shit you post as "proof." Russ did not want to date you and asked his friend the police officer to run a background check on you as happened in the shitty excuse for proof you posted and claimed it to be the "EXACT circumstances." Damn, you are certifiably dumb, and I thank you for proving it.

    You invented a total line of bullshit about Russ and Devon and posted it in a public forum and then threatened to file your false claim against him in Washington State. You made the claim; it's on your fat ass to provide the proof... and we all know you can't because it's just more of your invented prattling bullshit. And not coincidenntally, you made the claim because Russ exposed your lying ass and kicked your fat ass all over Weigantia. So you falsely accused his husband and threatened to commit a felony on a public forum. Why did lie about this? The same reason you make up shit all the time: You were getting your ass kicked.

    Had I chose to, my complaint would have got Russ's husband FIRED and likely ARRESTED...

    Not bloody likely, you effing moronic dipshit! Particularly since (if you will re-read your confession at the link I already posted), it doesn't take a rocket science to figure out who the lying sack of shit actually is and the fact you posted your intent to do harm to him at the exact time Russ was kicking your fat ass all over Weigantia. Do you need "intent" explained to you?

    I mean, seriously, Vick.. I knew you were stupid.. I just didn't realize HOW stupid you are!! :eyeroll:

    Said the asshole who invented a load of bullshit about Russ's husband and then posted his intent on a public forum to file said false claim against him... and at the exact time he was getting his ass kicked by the officer's husband. You need intent explained to you? Intent to injure was what you posted when you invented a false claim about a police officer and then threatened to file it against him... all because he was kicking your ass and exposing your bullshit.

    Now why don't you just get lost..

    Devon and Russ and I are going nowhere. You can threaten us all and file all the false bullshit against us you wish. Russ and I will just be kicking your ass so hard you'll make shit up and threaten to harm us.

    I have already totally decimated your credibility once today.. Why do you insist on allowing me to do it a second time? :eyeroll:

    Jussie Smollett of Weigantia insists he's the victim here!

    Go back and re-read the link Jussie. Russ exposed you for the fake you are (with help from your inveterate ignorance, of course), and you lashed out at Russ and invented a total false story with no facts to support your claim whatsoever and then threatened to harm his husband with your false load of invented drivel and spew.

    Hell, it would be illegal if the police officer did it on his own accord, let alone at the behest of someone else..

    It's not illegal for you to lash out at Russ and all manner of people as evidenced here on multiple occasions when you got your ass kicked by them. It's not even illegal for your pathetic ass to repeatedly beg other posters to kill themselves because you're a ginormous effing pussy who can dish it out but has gossamer thin skin when he gets it right back. But it would definitely be illegal for you to carry out the threat you made toward Russ's husband when he was kicking your ass nine ways to Sunday and you got your knickers in a twist and lashed out at his husband and posted your intent to harm him without a scintilla of proof to back up your bullshit... with the exception of your ginormous bruised fat ass and your posted intent to file your invented bullshit with the intent to harm a police officer.

  107. [107] 
    Michale wrote:

    I propose 2 new rules for Weigantia...

    #1. ANYONE who tries to take a Flame War into real life, like doing BACKGROUND CHECKS on commenters or posting commenters personal and private information for stalking and harassment purposes should be IMMEDIATLY banned from Weigantia®..

    #2 ANYONE who, in the course of a Flame War, drags another commenter's family (including but not limited to wife, kids, grandkids, etc) into the war by way of personal attacks will be given 1 warning for the first offense and a BAN for the 2nd offense..

    In the instance of off-setting violations of these rules, the person(s) who instigated or started the violation(s) shall suffer the punitive action..

    It's a sad state of affairs that such rules must be STATED, as we should all be adult and mature enough to act without having to actually impose such rules..

    But, there are bad actors here who ruin it all for everyone..

    "So say we all"
    -Battlestar Galactica

  108. [108] 
    Michale wrote:

    Vick The Moron,

    BBWWHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    I really touched a nerve when I showed you up for the ignorant moron you are, eh?? :D

    Dumb ass idiot lying sack of putrid bullshit: Since you are the catalyst who made up the bullshit about Russ and him and then posted your intent to harm him/them on this very public forum by threatening to file a false police report on him for something that you pulled out of your fat ass with no proof whatsoever, it would definitely not be illegal for him to do a background check on a man who threatened him and his husband. Remember, you pathetic vomitous mass of effing ignorance, it was you who invented the bullshit and threatened to file a false police report on him.

    None of that is factually accurate..

    Irregardless of THAT, it is completely IRRELEVANT to what YOU claimed...

    YOU said... Here.. I'll quote it for you..

    "It is not a crime for a police officer to perform a background check, you inveterate effing uneducated hysterical ranting swamp poon;"
    -Vick The Moron

    Those are YOUR words, dumbass..

    And *I* proved that you were completely and utterly FULL OF KAA-KAA...

    And EVEN IF any of what you spewed was accurate.. Which it's not..

    I only threatened to report Russ The Shitty Husband's alleged spouse **AFTER** Russ The Shitty Husband claimed he had already had his alleged spouse do the background check...

    So, no matter HOW ya want to spin it, Vick The Moron.. Yer an idiot..

    FIRST for claiming that it's not illegal for a cop to do a background check for personal reasons and Second for getting the sequence of events totally wrong!!

    BBBBWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

    Face reality, Vick The Moron.. I have totally, completely and unequivocally DECIMATED and DESTROYED *ANY* shred of credibility you might have had...

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Run along little moron.. Yer finished here.. :D

  109. [109] 
    Michale wrote:

    Vick The Moron??

    What's that?? Yer too stoopid to understand the FACTS..

    OK, fine.. I'll recap it for you..

    YOU claimed

    "It is not a crime for a police officer to perform a background check, you inveterate effing uneducated hysterical ranting swamp poon;"
    -Vick The Moron

    Those are the EXACT words you used..

    I informed you how FULL OF SHIT you are and provided the FACTS that prove you are full of shit..

    Here, I'll do it again because you seem to be so hysterical you can see straight..

    Officer Faces Felony Charge For Unauthorized Background Check
    November 12, 2019

    After running a background check without a permissible purpose, a police officer faces a serious criminal charge.

    The Story
    A police officer in Peoria, Arizona stands accused of wrongfully running a background check on a citizen. Allegedly, the officer agreed to look up information about a woman at the request of a friend. This friend was reportedly interested in dating a co-worker but first wanted to know if she has a criminal record.

    The officer allegedly provided a completed background report to his friend. After reviewing, that friend approached the woman he hoped to date and referenced a personal experience which he should not have known. When asked how he got that information, the man shared the story of what happened.

    Soon after, the co-worker called local police and filed a complaint.

    Officers are permitted to run license plates while on active duty, but they are not allowed to run background checks on individuals without cause. The officer who stands accused of running an unauthorized background report faces a class six felony charge. He was placed on administrative leave and later resigned.
    https://tinyurl.com/kkpeaywf

    You see how that works you miserable excuse for a human being???

    YOU made a claim.. A completely UNFOUNDED and TOTALLY bullshit claim..

    I told you how full of shit you are and provided the FACTS that PROVE how full of shit you are..

    And that's where we are now..

    YOU have shit-fer-brains and EVERYONE here in Weigantia® LAUGHING at you!!! :D

    BBBBWWHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    "BEGONE WRETCHED WENCH!!! AND POLLUTE THIS PLACE NEVERMORE!!!!

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  110. [110] 
    Michale wrote:

    FLAIL Vick The Moron!!! FLAIL!!!! You impotent pile of human excrement!!! :D

    BBBWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  111. [111] 
    Michale wrote:

    Well, as MUCH FUN as this has been.... And trust me, it's been really REALLY REALLY fun!!!! :D

    It's that time when I spend the evening with my lovely wife of 40+ years...

    And I guess Vick The Moron is going to leave.. She needs some batteries for her boyfriend or something like that...

    I will see everyone bright and early in the AM where we can start the fun ALL over again...

    Just let me leave everyone with this parting note...

    "It is not a crime for a police officer to perform a background check, you inveterate effing uneducated hysterical ranting swamp poon;"
    -Vick The Moron

    Officer Faces Felony Charge For Unauthorized Background Check

    After running a background check without a permissible purpose, a police officer faces a serious criminal charge.
    https://tinyurl.com/kkpeaywf

    BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

  112. [112] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    108

    No one here by that name, you daft prick.

    I really touched a nerve when I showed you up for the ignorant moron you are, eh?? :D

    Yes, you are a touched ignorant moron; thanks for proving it every chance you get.

    YOU said... Here.. I'll quote it for you..

    I don't suffer your pathetic affliction so you're wasting your time quoting me back to me. Furthermore, in the context of what you posted, dumb ass, it is not a crime for a police officer to investigate your ass. You threatening to file a false police report about an actual police officer with zero evidence and threatening online to do harm to him in Washington State where he lives is evidence of a crime. Only a piece of shit would do that, and it would be incumbent on said human excrement to prove his assertion of a crime, and you can't because you have zero evidence. Meanwhile, we definitely do have your intent to file the false claim posted and archived herein. Do you still need intent explained to you? You made the false claim with intent to injure (as posted), and you'll get your fat ass handed to you should you follow up on your threat containing your invented lies. It's not rocket science. Your intent was to do harm, and you fabricated a scenario with no proof in order to do it and then posted your threat. You're not the victim here, Jussie Smollett of Weigantia, you're the lying fabricating inventing asshole, as evidence:

    It's sad to think that, just 2 months later, Russ The Shitty Husband would be cajoling his alleged spouse to commit a crime and do a background check on me because he kept (and keeps) getting his ass kicked all over Weigantia® by yours truly..

    ~ Michale, the lying Jussie Smollet of Weigantia

    Context here is you made the accusation with no proof and then threatened harm to an actual police officer.

    And *I* proved that you were completely and utterly FULL OF KAA-KAA...

    You posted some bullshit about some moron in Arizona who wanted to date someone and had his friend run a background check on that woman and then claimed like an utter fool that it was the "EXACT circumstances" as this case. Epic fail. Russ does not want to date you, and Russ doesn't live in Arizona and you made up the entire spew about Devon so it's incumbent on your lying ass to prove your spew. Please file it after posting your intent to harm Devon and Russ, then whine like a victim when it's your ass sitting in jail for following up on your posted intent to do harm to an actual police officer by (1) lying about him and (2) filing your lies with his employer. Your ass will be the one sitting in jail. Context matters, you daft prick.

    I only threatened to report Russ The Shitty Husband's alleged spouse

    Thank you for admitting you made the threat. It is stipulated you made the threat to harm Devon.

    **AFTER** Russ The Shitty Husband claimed he had already had his alleged spouse do the background check...

    Oh, I see your problem... you definitely threatened to harm Russ's husband as you admitted above; your obvious other problem is that Russ never said Devon ran the background check. Anyone can do that, and only a fool with shit for brains would jump to the conclusion and make the assertion and follow that up with the written admission of their intent to harm a police officer.

    You've already admitted you made the threat; unfortunately for you, you have no proof to back up your lies. Zero.

    You need intent explained?

    That bullshit is the part you invented and constitutes the bullshit lie that would accompany your false police report wherein you accompanied your admitted threat:

    As for his work history.... Michale used to claim he was in law enforcement for almost 25 years...but the truth is that IF he was ever in was a LEO, it was maybe for 2.5 years when he was a MP in the military. And based on the background check that was run on him, if he ever was a LEO it is unlikely that he could have been one for long given his record.

    ~ Russ

    *
    Reading is fundamental. Anyone with a brain cell can take that link I supplied and easily run a background check on your indigent ass, but it would take a special kind of moron to read that paragraph and then make a threat to harm a police officer based on zero proof save your invented bullshit that the police officer performed a background check that anyone with a keyboard could do.

    You admitted you threatened Devon, a police officer; do you still need your written intent to file a false report on a police officer explained further? Rhetorical question. You're not just a fool, you're an illiterate fool who falsely made a threat against a police officer because of your inability to understand simple English words and your modus operandi of inventing bullshit about everyone here.

    So, no matter HOW ya want to spin it, Vick The Moron.. Yer an idiot..

    Nobody here by that name, and no matter how you want to spin it, "yer" the actual illiterate prattling poon who made a false claim based on nothing whatsoever and the moron who admitted he threatened a police officer.

    You and your pathetic ilk are doing an awful lot of assuming and lying and posting your intent to harm police officers and elected officials all over social media and multiple forums all across the Internet.

    Where you go one, you go all: Prison.

  113. [113] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    107

    I propose 2 new rules for Weigantia...

    I propose you take up your bitchy little whine with the author of the blog whom you keep falsely claiming over and over is now deceased. I further propose you eat shit.

    #1. ANYONE who tries to take a Flame War into real life, like doing BACKGROUND CHECKS on commenters or posting commenters personal and private information for stalking and harassment purposes should be IMMEDIATLY banned from Weigantia®..

    I regret to inform you that you cannot control whether or not anyone here does a background check on your pathetic ass. You meet the definition of a commenter who has posted their own personal and private information on this forum on multiple occasions and will not shut your trap about your family. Furthermore, you are the only one on this forum who has threatened an actual police officer with harm based on zero evidence and nothing but your usual made up bullshit. If you cannot stop yourself from lying about people and threatening to file false reports on actual police officers based on your own invented spew, then you can suffer the consequences of your actions for being a complete and utter festering pustule of a commenter always whining about others while you're the main perpetrator and all-around board asshole.

    #2 ANYONE who, in the course of a Flame War, drags another commenter's family (including but not limited to wife, kids, grandkids, etc) into the war by way of personal attacks will be given 1 warning for the first offense and a BAN for the 2nd offense..

    You want cheese with your whine? If you're going to invent bullshit about Russ's family, you can shove your effing rules straight up your fat ass and deal with the blowback you've thusly earned with your lies and threats to file a false report on his husband.

    In the instance of off-setting violations of these rules, the person(s) who instigated or started the violation(s) shall suffer the punitive action..

    Eat shit.

    It's a sad state of affairs that such rules must be STATED, as we should all be adult and mature enough to act without having to actually impose such rules..

    Said the only commenter on the board who routinely posts bullshit and then whines if anyone responds in kind. All you do here is post repetitive spew on top of repetitive spew and then whine like a toddler if anyone responds to your threats.

    So, to recap: You're going to keep dishing out your verbal diarrhea, then you can man up and quit your whining and learn to take it. In conclusion: Eat shit.

  114. [114] 
    Kick wrote:

    MtnCaddy
    104

    Hiya, Kick and Bashi,

    Good evening; nice to "see" you.

    No doubt he tried to insult me somewhere along the line but this guy loves Trump so much that whatever else he says he's automatically killed his own credibility.

    He's an inveterate pathologically lying poon with no credibility whatsoever left to kill.

    Shall I assume that when Weigantia does not comment it's because you're nodding your head, "Yes, that's true?" That's the way that I read and respond to many of CW's columns.

    You are totally on point with your assumption. I am never not here and never not reading; however, I won't always respond, and (like yourself and others) I definitely have been known to skip an inordinate amount of repetitive monotonous mountains of superfluous shit posted by the board's pathologically lying resident poon troll.

    Remember as you scroll past the mountains of prattling pilfered cut-and-paste dung, one can definitely notice a festering pile of manure and pass right over it whilst simultaneously ignoring it; show me anyone who claims otherwise, and I'll show you an uneducated rube full of shit up to his eyeballs and suffering from the obvious affliction of being unable to pass by a pile of shit without eating it.

Comments for this article are closed.