ChrisWeigant.com

Please support ChrisWeigant.com this
holiday season!

Democratic National Convention (Day Three)

[ Posted Thursday, August 22nd, 2024 – 16:21 UTC ]

The Democratic National Convention has truly been a blowout affair, building each day to an even-more-impressive frenzy, sparked by speaker after enthusiastic speaker, each seeming to bring the levels of excitement inside the arena to new heights. Last night was a continuation of this building sense of joy. A third Democratic president, Bill Clinton, appeared (following Joe Biden on the first night and Barack Obama on the second) -- but (rather astonishingly) he was actually not the biggest star of the evening.

If you didn't catch any of it last night, my advice would be to make sure you watch two key speeches -- Tim Walz accepting the nomination for vice president, and Oprah Winfrey being Oprah Winfrey. To me, at least, these were the highest of the high points of the evening.

As many have already commented, this is shaping up to be "the vibe election." Pundits can complain about the candidates (on both sides) not focusing on policy, but this largely misses the point. People are being drawn to politics because of how it makes them feel, not their candidate's stance on the economy. And the difference between the two parties on the vibe front couldn't be starker.

Democrats, all week long, have been having fun. This ineffable quality was missing when Joe Biden ran in 2020, and was somewhat present (although different) when Hillary Clinton made her run in 2016. But neither Biden nor Clinton sparked the kind of joyful positive energy that is currently on display every night in Chicago. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz have managed to put an entirely new face on their party, and their "happy warrior" vibe certainly seems to be winning over a whole lot of hearts and minds.

Meanwhile, the vibe from Donald Trump hasn't changed a bit. It's still just as dark and gloomy and vindictive as ever. So the real question in this election is whether joy can beat darkness. Being somewhat of an eternal optimist, I am personally hoping it can.

Last night's theme was officially: "A fight for our freedoms," and it highlighted an incredible sea-change in how Democrats talk about things and campaign. They have recaptured the term "freedom" from the Republicans, since it is now the Republicans who want the government to have a say in all kinds of aspects of people's lives. This has allowed Democrats to stand strongly for the concept of freedom, which was on display last night in many ways, from pre-produced videos to statements from the stage. Dana Nessel, the attorney general of Michigan, stole another theme from Republicans with her words to the Supreme Court: "You can pry this wedding band from my cold, dead, gay hand." Tim Walz, of course, has the best line on the subject: "Mind your own damn business!" That's a campaign slogan for the ages if there ever was one.

The subject matter shifted throughout the night, starting fairly early on with an emphasis on the southern border. Democrats had been seen as vulnerable on the issue, but speaker after speaker leaned in to the actual truth of the matter -- a bipartisan bill was negotiated in the Senate with some of the most conservative Republicans, but then Trump intentionally tanked the effort because he wanted to campaign on it rather than solve the problem. It remains to be seen how effective this effort will be, but it is a valid point to make.

After a short detour into talking about January 6th, for no particular reason we then got Stevie Wonder, who said a few words and then performed "Higher Ground." That's a hard act to follow, but Keenan Thompson did his best. Thompson continued a bit that several speakers have already used, with a giant prop. Each speaker shows the crowd a huge book with "Project 2025" on the cover, and then itemizes all the horrific things the Republicans have in store if Trump wins. This is an effective tool, since all each speaker has to do is quote from the book (complete with page reference) to show America how extreme the other side has truly gotten.

Mindy Kaling was the official celebrity host of the evening, and she told a heartwarming story about cooking with Kamala Harris. The first speaker of the 9:00 hour (Eastern) was House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. Jeffries is an effective orator, and he got the crowd going several times during his appearance. His funniest line was: "Donald Trump is like an old boyfriend who you broke up with... who just won't go away." For good measure, he then quoted Taylor Swift.

Now, forgive us, but we have to take a little detour here. There is a rumor making the rounds that Taylor Swift might just appear on stage tonight. I have no idea whether this is just wishful thinking or not, but I did take the time to look up her tour schedule to find out that she just finished (on Tuesday) the European leg of her "Eras" megatour. Meaning she's got no concert dates until October. Meaning she would indeed be free to show up tonight. But whether this happens or not, if Taylor Swift does actually endorse Kamala Harris at any point, it would mean adding an absolute army of younger voters to the electoral mix. So whether it happens tonight or at any time leading up to Election Day, it would certainly be a huge boost for the Harris/Walz ticket.

But back to Chicago. Bill Clinton took the stage (rather early, I thought) and gave a heartfelt address. As he pointed out, he just turned 78 years old, so his speaking style has gotten a little slower and a little less energetic, but it was still fun to watch. Before the advent of Barack Obama, Clinton was the best orator the Democratic Party had seen in a long while, which people tend to forget (Bill Clinton was kind of sidelined for a while during the "MeToo" era, for obvious reasons).

Clinton got off a few funny lines. He pointed out that Kamala had worked at McDonald's as a young woman, getting a laugh by predicting: "She will break my record as the president who spent the most time at McDonald's."

He also ripped into Donald Trump in various ways, pointing out that Trump is all about "me, myself, and I." Later he invited people not to "count the lies" when Trump speaks, but instead "count the I's." Clinton spoke for all of us when he stated that even though Barack Obama had called Clinton the "Explainer-in-Chief," that he was completely bewildered by Trump's continued reference to "the late, great Hannibal Lecter" -- "I've thought about it and thought about it and I don't know what to say!"

Clinton did show his Explainer-in-Chief chops, by trotting out one astonishing statistic. Since the end of the Cold War, 51 million new jobs have been created in America, Clinton informed us. And -- he swore he checked and checked, but it was true! -- the score stands at: "Democratic presidents, 50 million jobs; Republican presidents 1 million." So much for the whole "Republicans are better on the economy" nonsense, eh?

Clinton ended with a great new label that hopefully will start to get used a lot: "We need Kamala Harris, the president of joy, to lead us!" As a nice touch, he was played off the stage to his old campaign song: "Don't Stop (Thinkin' About Tomorrow)."

Bill Clinton, like a lot of the speakers at the Democratic National Convention, is also a hard act to follow, but former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did a pretty bang-up job of it. She started with a shoutout to her roots ("Hello Maryland!") and got the crowd to roar several times. Again with a nod to Baltimore, she quoted from the National Anthem after ripping into Trump for the events of January 6th. On the morning of January 7th, Pelosi stated: "We gave proof through the night that our flag was still there."

The energy level ebbed a little, after Pelosi was done, although I did enjoy the video of clips of Kamala Harris questioning people like Bill Barr and Jeff Sessions in Senate committee hearings. A lot of people have forgotten how effective a prosecutor she can be, but I for one have not -- I truly look forward to the presidential candidate debate between her and Trump, because I fully expect her to absolutely take Trump apart.

After a string of short speeches, Amanda Gorman took the stage and read a poem. There is no one alive who has a better speaking style and rhythm, and her poetry is always incredibly inspirational. But she was merely an appetizer for another speaker with her own distinctive style.

As a surprise guest, Oprah Winfrey then took the stage. She fired the crowd up beyond what anyone else had done that night, in classic Oprah style. She's no stranger to inspirational messages either, as she quoted John Lewis: "No matter what ship our ancestors arrived on, we are all in the same boat now." She defined what it means to be an American in a neighborly way -- if you saw someone's house on fire, you wouldn't stop to consider whether the people inside shared your political viewpoint or not, you'd try to save them. And if a childless cat lady lived there: "We try to get that cat out too!"

The crowd loved it. Oprah touched on many Democratic issues, but the most poignant was her telling the story of the "New Orleans Four" -- four 6-year-old Black girls who desegregated a school, where all the White parents pulled their kids out (leaving an empty building) and where the windows of the classroom the four girls sat in had to be covered up "to protect their six-year-old bodies from snipers." She then tied this in to Kamala Harris, nine years later, integrating the schools of Berkeley, California.

Oprah knows how to expertly play a crowd, and she was absolutely on fire last night. She grounded the end of her speech in basic decency: "Values and character matter most of all, in leadership and in life," and: "Decency and respect are on the ballot in 2024," and: "Let us choose optimism over cynicism because that's the best."

She built it all up to the point where she deployed her patented "Oprah voice," finishing with: "Let us choose JO-OOO-OOOO-YYY!... Let us choose KAMALA HAA-AAA-AAA-RRRRIS!"

The place exploded in emotional excitement. I've long said it -- Oprah Winfrey could have been president any time she chose, over the last few decades. The Oval Office could have been hers in a heartbeat. She proved this once again, last night.

Oprah, of course, is an impossible act to follow, and Maryland Governor Wes Moore was kind of a step down (although he did do a good job of working the crowd, to be fair). Then we got Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar doing their best to keep the excitement going.

Finally (finally!) we got to the main event. A former student of Tim Walz began the introduction, and invited his state-champion high school football team out onto stage with him (which was an excellent touch). Then we got an introductory video, and finally "Coach Walz" appeared on stage.

I call him that not so much for the football players who helped introduce him, but because what we then got was essentially a halftime locker-room pep talk. He even went into the details of the defense he ran to win that championship, for good measure.

Walz is, at heart, a decent guy. He just radiates decency. He is the quintessential Midwestern Dad, Coach, and Teacher -- all rolled into one. "Never underestimate a public school teacher" was exactly the sort of thing you'd expect Walz to say, and he did not disappoint. He spoke of his record as governor, when he brought free breakfasts and lunches to all of Minnesota's schoolchildren. "While other states were banning books from their schools," Walz said, "we were banishing hunger from ours."

And of course, he deployed the best campaign slogan of the entire election, his signature: "We've got a golden rule: Mind your own damn business!"

His theme throughout the entire speech was "Freedom," and what it means to Democrats as opposed to how Republicans use the term. But it was the part at the end that truly tore the roof off the place. As I said, we all got Coach's pep talk: "It's the fourth quarter. We're down a field goal. But we're on offense and we've got the ball. We're driving down the field. And, boy, do we have the right team!" He followed this up with a rousing: "There'll be time to sleep when you're dead -- we're going to leave it all on the field!" He finished with a flourish: "When we fight?" The crowd roared back: "WE WIN!!!"

In a particularly fitting coda, he was played off the stage by Neil Young's "Rockin' In The Free World."

To use a rather hopeful sports metaphor myself: "Game over, man! I mean, like, game over!"

-- Chris Weigant

 

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant

 

18 Comments on “Democratic National Convention (Day Three)”

  1. [1] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    I'm certainly hopeful, but at the moment I don't know if I can bring myself to be joyful. there's just this horrendous sense of foreboding. maybe. maybe. somehow I just don't feel it.

  2. [2] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    at least, not yet.

  3. [3] 
    Mezzomamma wrote:

    I know what you mean, poet, being joyful seems like tempting fate. But hope seems to be recovering.

  4. [4] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    Okay, so which untapped voting block has Trump attracted since November, 2020? Trump was pulling 80 to 85% during the primaries and that means 15 to 20% of Republicans reject Trump even after Haley dropped out.

    Independents? Trump made it clear on J6 that only his primary victory should count, not the general election. Independents would be voting their rights away. Women? Yeah, right. BIPOCs and the queer community**? Suuure.

    You guys are worrying about nothing. Landslide for Kamala is way more likely that Trump slips in somehow.

    **As opposed to the vanilla comunity

  5. [5] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    I mean, would any of you people rather be in Trump’s position?

  6. [6] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @caddy,

    that's an interestingly phrased question. Donald definitely hasn't taken advantage of kamala's policy inexperience, instead falling into sinkholes of racism and misogyny. if I had the chance to quantum leap into one or the other (attractiveness issues notwithstanding), Donald would absolutely be in a better position to win. if he were to suddenly stop acting like a total jackass, there are a LOT of conservative types who would get on board, while his MAGA devotees would presume that he was just acting.

    Kamala has a tighter needle to thread and a broader coalition to corral. she's done splendidly so far, but all it takes is one big slip-up for her to lose momentum and not end up winning. the aftermath of biden's debate shows just how fickle the liberal coalition actually is.

  7. [7] 
    John From Censornati wrote:

    78 year old convicted felon and dipshit Fat Donny decided to attack Coach Walz on his failing, fake Twitter thing last night.

    Walz was an ASSISTANT Coach, not a COACH.

    Short Fingers showed just what an out-of-touch ignoramus he really is in just 8 words. Aside from the fact that the word coach is right there in the title of ASSISTANT coach, he also demonstrates that his know-nothingness extends to sports for all to see.

    It's fun watching Republicans cede love of country and football to the Dems for their weird and unrelatable Dear Leader.

  8. [8] 
    John From Censornati wrote:

    [5] No way. He's a loser.

  9. [9] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    poet
    6

    if I had the chance to quantum leap into one or the other (attractiveness issues notwithstanding), Donald would absolutely be in a better position to win. if he were to suddenly stop acting like a total jackass, there are a LOT of conservative types who would get on board, while his MAGA devotees would presume that he was just acting.

    Yes, of course! [smacking my own head] I totally forgot about the part where this exact same 2020 coalition tallied 74 million votes! Nobody has ever seen those kind of numbers for an incumbent President!

    Poet I’m glad I’m not the only Weigantian here who secretly cannot accept the “fact” that Joe Effing Biden got 81 million votes.

    Oh yeah, you’re joking about Trump getting a personality transplant, right? Elon Musk hasn’t figured that out just yet. Otherwise he would finally have a decent personality himself

  10. [10] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    Donald definitely hasn't taken advantage of kamala's policy inexperience…

    Trump doesn’t have any policies whatsoever and the MSM doesn’t even try to ask him policy related questions. Harris the Veep, Senator of California and State AG before that is famous for evisceration. Trump’s foreign policies are loving Putin and fully legal bribes.

    I fear that this presents symptoms of the dreaded Democratic hand wringing syndrome.

  11. [11] 
    John From Censornati wrote:

    [10] You and your Dems had better be worried. Big Orange has pivoted to policy now that the DNC is over. Just a little while ago, he posted this bombshell announcement on his failing, fake Twitter thing:

    My Administration will be great for women and their reproductive rights.

  12. [12] 
    Mezzomamma wrote:

    The fear at the back of my mind is that Kamala, like Hillary, could win the popular vote and yet lose the Electoral College.

    There are people in places like Arizona trying to ensure that, through vote suppression and other means.

  13. [13] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    poet
    6

    Kamala has a tighter needle to thread and a broader coalition to corral. she's done splendidly so far, but all it takes is one big slip-up for her to lose momentum and not end up winning. the aftermath of biden's debate shows just how fickle the liberal coalition actually is.

    More incorrect Conventional Wisdom, here.

    Kamala has multiple paths to win the Electoral College aka the only race that matters. DonOLD has a very narrow path to victory and lots of things have to break his way just like in 2016.

    Have you watched Trump in action lately? The guy is not 2016 nor even 2020 Trump and he’s not all there. So just what could Kamala do to get enough people to jump ship to Trump? Trump never hit 50% approval.

    Do you mean the fickle liberal coalition that rallied to Biden’s side in 2020? The one that showed up election after election since 2018? They’re not going to vote Democrat they’ll stay home or maybe even vote Trump?

    Biden’s age became a manufactured or not issue in his first year and then he looked old and feeble and not able to fight. The calls for Joe to step aside were only a sprinkling in the weeks after. Joe read the writing on the wall and cemented his reputation for all time and pulled the plug. And this fickle liberal coalition jumped aboard the Kamala bandwagon along with all corners of the party.

    If that’s fickle support I’d love to see what strong support looks like.

    Politics in Murica doesn’t with like it used to, Brother. Trump sucks but he changed what people expect to hear from politicians. He made reading the fine print a necessity and deeds not just words a new creed.

  14. [14] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    It might not happen mainly because of the woman thing but I see a potential Goldwater-level beat down on the horizon.

  15. [15] 
    John From Censornati wrote:

    Sensing that he's Losing, Fat Donny may just turn the weirdness up to 11 by hiring the man with the Worm-eaten Brain who carts animal carcasses around in his car for no good reason. Keep you fingers crossed for RFK Jr.

  16. [16] 
    John From Censornati wrote:

    RFK Jr sounds loony as hell reading that script that Short Fingers wrote for him. Like a C-SPAN caller.

  17. [17] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @jfc,
    don't be silly, Donald never wrote anything in his life. certainly somebody wrote rfkj's speech, maybe a maga devotee, maybe not. which is essentially the same question i posed.

  18. [18] 
    Kick wrote:

    nypoet22
    6

    Donald definitely hasn't taken advantage of kamala's policy inexperience, instead falling into sinkholes of racism and misogyny.

    Policy inexperience!? As opposed to who? Donald Trump!?

    Also, sinkholes are caused by water erosion; Trump's holes are manmade wherein Donald cannot stop himself from digging. Big difference.

Comments for this article are closed.