Afterthoughts
As we all contemplate another four years of Donald Trump, the second-guessing and finger-pointing has already begun. Maybe things would have been different if Joe Biden had decided, on his own, to live up to his pledge of being a transitional president by announcing he would not run for a second term. Maybe things would have been different if he had finished his campaign -- he beat Trump once, right? Maybe there should have been a real contest to see which Democrat should run instead of Biden. Maybe Kamala Harris wasn't the best candidate. Maybe Democrats should have gone with a more traditional (White male, in other words) candidate. Maybe she should have picked someone else to be on the ticket with her. There will be plenty of time to anguish over all of these and more (anguish is what Democrats do best, after all).
In the end, though, the American people wanted Trump, so we're all in for another rollercoaster ride for the next four years. Or less -- I find myself wondering how long it will take JD Vance to convince a majority of Trump's cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment, so Vance can take over. Early 2026, perhaps? Wouldn't surprise me in the least.
Trump has promised many things to many people, a lot of them to happen on "Day One." He won't follow through on most of them, but I doubt many of his supporters will care. He certainly didn't follow through on many of the promises he made in his first term, but it never really seemed to matter that much to them. Trump's not really about policy, he's all about entertainment value above all else, and he was entertaining enough for his followers last time around.
We will enter a period of Republican excess, that much seems certain. They seem destined to overreach in their ambitions, and will likely do things that turn out to be wildly unpopular. Such is the nature of politics.
During Trump's first term, we were spared from the worst of his impulses by two things. First, he actually did have a few "adults in the room" who would explain why Trump's flights of fancy were very bad ideas. And the second was his own incompetence. Trump doesn't have a lot of follow-through. He gets mad, throws a tantrum, and then forgets about it. In his second term, however, there won't be any adults left in the room -- Trump will hire people solely on how loyal they are to him. They will likely do whatever he asks them to, without question. They certainly won't push back on him, they'll fall all over themselves to do his every bidding. So all we've got left as a check is Trump's incompetence -- which seems to be growing worse as time goes on. But it's a thin reed to cling to, admittedly.
The scariest thing is that the Supreme Court has already ruled that Trump cannot be held accountable for any "official acts." This green light is incredibly frightening. Trump is impulsive enough already, and now he knows ahead of time that he's never going to have to answer for any of it. And all he's got to do is to label everything "official acts," which I fully expect him to make the most of.
The only thing that there is to look forward to is the fact that Trump will enter office as a lame duck. He cannot run for president again, ever. The only way to change this is to pass a constitutional amendment, which is simply not going to happen. So at most, we've only got four more years of Trump to get through.
Personally, I'm going to try to keep away from the blame game. Could Harris have run a better campaign? Possibly. Would another candidate have made a difference? That's possible too. But then again maybe not. The American political landscape is so tribal now that it's hard to break through -- the polling barely shifted during the entire election, no matter what happened. The people who supported Trump were not ready to be talked out of doing so, to be blunt. The people who didn't were never going to suddenly get behind Trump. Politics isn't just tribal in American now, it is almost perfectly balanced. Occasionally Republicans gain an edge (as they just did) and occasionally Democrats gain an edge, but it's going to be a while before any politician can truly "unify" America behind them.
It's going to be a very long four years, and the Republican overreach is going to become unbearable, but at this point there's just no avoiding it. America may go through some fundamental changes and morph into something unrecognizable. That possibility has never really been a concern before now, but Trump has so completely taken over the Republican Party that it's doubtful any of them will stand up to anything he proposes, no matter how destructive it happens to be.
The thing about having a "strongman" leader is that they never accept any blame if things don't turn out as rosy as they promise. A new scapegoat will be trotted out instead, to distract the public from any gross failures. And Donald Trump is a master of distraction, we've already seen that in his first term. So although he's made sweeping promises to fix everything on Day One, when that doesn't turn out to be the case, he'll stage some center-ring spectacle to divert everyone's attention. Or he'll just lie and say everything is better than it ever was, all evidence to the contrary.
That's exactly what America voted for, and it is what America is going to get.
-- Chris Weigant
Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant
He won't follow through on most of them,
Assumes facts not in evidence...
The scariest thing is that the Supreme Court has already ruled that Trump cannot be held accountable for any "official acts."
Which has ALWAYS been the case.. That's why Odumbo wasn't prosecuted for murder when he killed American citizens without a trial..
EVERY POTUS has enjoyed absolute immunity for official acts.. It was an unspoken rule..
Don't get bitchy because Democrats were so drunk with PTDS and Trump/America Hate that the forced the SCOTUS to actually codify the unspoken rule into law..
Personally, I'm going to try to keep away from the blame game. Could Harris have run a better campaign? Possibly.
Oh Puuulllleeeeeessseeeee…
Was WWII a bad thing for the jewish people?? Possibly
See how both statements sound the same?? :eyeroll:
That's exactly what America voted for, and it is what America is going to get.
I am heartened to hear you accepting the will of the people..
I honestly thought it could go either way...
It's good that Democrats are going to work with Adolph Hitler, a man who is, according to Democrats, a fascist...
It must be nice to have such er... uh... flexible ideals and principles, eh?? :D
JL,
I just hope there isn't another major national emergency, because Donald has already proven that he does not know how to handle one.
{{cough, cough}} HELENE {{cough}}{{cough}}
Further, it's only because of President Trump and OPERATION WARP SPEED that we ended the WORLD WIDE pandemic quickly...
Finally, it was DEMOCRAT incompetence and fear-mongering that destroyed our economy for a virus that had a 98.5 survival rate..
Something about glass houses and stones comes to mind..
Lemme know about those donations.. I gotta wait til payday..
So.....
What's ya'all's opinion on Democrats' lawfare operations???
Personally, I think they should admit defeat and apologized to all involved..
This is an object lesson against fascism..
Don't use the courts and a twisted fascist version of the law to try and settle political scores and interjecting election campaigning by other means..
It's a process that ultimately backfires..
Would Democrats have won if they had simply killed the lawfare operations in it their infancies???
Quite possibly.
Chris,
Maybe things would have been different if Joe Biden had decided, on his own, to live up to his pledge of being a transitional president by announcing he would not run for a second term.
What!? Did Biden ever intimate in the slightest way that he intended only to be a one-term president? Who defined transitional president to mean a one-term president?
That sounds like a classic case of avoiding any responsibility, whatsoever, for forcing him out of office in the despicable way that was done.
In the end, though, the American people wanted Trump, so we're all in for another rollercoaster ride for the next four years.
I hope Democrats, inside and outside of the beltway establishment, understand just WHY the American people wanted Trump. It's really not that hard to figure out. Why Dems were trounced in 2024 is not rocket science, in other words.
Or less -- I find myself wondering how long it will take JD Vance to convince a majority of Trump's cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment, so Vance can take over. Early 2026, perhaps? Wouldn't surprise me in the least.
Wow. After 4 years of this sort of talk about Trump, it all rings decidedly hollow.
Dems would be better spending their time on what they need to do to regain the trust of the American people. Because that is the only way they start winning critical elections again.
In the wake of this presidential election one of the things that Dems should be focused on is all aspects of the massive gender divide among Democrats and Republicans.
Republicans are winning the male vote but this is happening largely on style rather than on policy. Whereas Democrats support policies that are pro-male but they don't talk about those policies like that. The infrastructure bill, for example, produced a lot of good paying jobs for men but Dems did little to focus on that.
Being pro-male doesn't mean you can't be pro-female, too. Democrats have to figure out how to do both and how to talk about it.
Trump has attracted the male vote by his very style of masculinity and focus on male grievance. Dems have really done nothing to counter this and they lost a lot of the female vote, too.
There is an interesting piece in Politico about all of this:
How to win male voters without harming women