ChrisWeigant.com

The Amorality Of The Republican Party

[ Posted Thursday, January 23rd, 2025 – 16:54 UTC ]

It's been clear for a while that the Republican Party has become completely amoral. Their partisanship has become more important to them than any quaint notions of right or wrong. To them, right versus left is all that matters.

Republicans now refuse to condemn pretty much anything that any other Republican does -- no matter how amoral -- starting at the top with President Donald Trump. The GOP has claimed for decades that they are the "law and order" party, but that all goes out the window when Trump pardons hundreds of people who assaulted police officers. Supporting cops is less important than supporting a fellow Republican. Morals are conveniently set aside whenever necessary.

I was reminded of this right after watching Trump's inauguration, when it was revealed that he had failed to put his hand on the two Bibles his wife held up beside him. Imagine the outcry from the right if Barack Obama had done such a thing when he was getting sworn in! But it was barely mentioned afterwards, since partisanship is far more important than moral outrage (which Republicans would indeed have shown if Obama had been the one to do it).

Some new shocking evidence of Republican amorality was just uncovered by the Washington Post today, in a story titled: "Johnson Aide Discouraged Hutchison Subpoena Over Concerns About Lawmakers' 'Sexual Texts'."

House Republicans have been trying to use Cassidy Hutchinson as some sort of leverage to get to Liz Cheney -- all of which is now a moot point (since Cheney was pardoned by Joe Biden on his way out the door). They set up an investigatory committee to come up with some sort of scandal they could use against the House January 6th Committee that Cheney served on, but so far this has been unsuccessful. The head of this new committee, Representative Barry Loudermilk, apparently had the idea of subpoenaing Hutchinson to force her to produce electronic communications and/or to testify in front of his committee. But it seems there was a problem with this plan, as the Post explains:

An aide to Mike Johnson advised the House speaker's Republican colleagues against subpoenaing former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson as part of their investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack in an effort to prevent the release of sexually explicit texts that lawmakers sent her, according to written correspondence reviewed by The Washington Post and a person familiar with the effort.

The aide intervened last June, citing concerns that a subpoena could expose the texts, according to the correspondence and the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk candidly about private conversations. Johnson revived the investigation this week as part of an effort by President Donald Trump and his allies to seek retribution against perceived political enemies, including those who investigated his role in the Capitol attack.

. . .

[A] Johnson aide told [Representative Barry] Loudermilk's staff that multiple colleagues had raised concerns with the speaker's office about the potential for public disclosure of "sexual texts from members who were trying to engage in sexual favors" with Hutchinson, according to correspondence produced at the time that detailed the conversation. Separately, a member of Johnson's staff told Loudermilk aides that Hutchinson could "potentially reveal embarrassing information," according to an email reviewed by The Post.

. . .

The Washington Post reviewed documentation reflecting the speaker's office's concern ahead of the June meeting between him and Loudermilk that corroborated the account of the person familiar with the effort to prevent the texts' release, but has not seen the purported sexually explicit messages. Nor has The Post identified who sent them or determined whether Hutchinson responded.

Got all of that? "Multiple... members... were trying to engage in sexual favors" with a woman who had been a witness in a congressional investigation. They sent "sexually explicit texts" to her. So it wasn't just Matt Gaetz, in other words, or some other equally-amoral House Republican, it was more than one of them.

Let that sink in for a moment.

This, from the party who championed the "moral majority," and who decried "moral relativism" (when it was being used in Bill Clinton's defense), and who has generally tried to position themselves as paragons of morality for the past half-century or so.

You'll note too that neither the speaker, his aide, or apparently anyone else reacted to this news by demanding a full investigation or a referral to the Ethics Committee or any other action which could have uncovered the scandalous and amoral behavior. Instead, the sole concern was covering it all up.

As the Post noted, the texts have so far not been made public. This leaves open the question of what exactly was offered -- not the "sexual favors," but any possible quid pro quo offered in exchange for them. Which would, if true, be a pretty blatant attempt at witness-tampering.

House Speaker Mike Johnson presents himself as a very pious, God-fearing man. That's his public persona. But this is impossible to reconcile with what the Post just reported. Members of Congress trying to exchange sexual favors with a committee witness (in exchange for what?) is clearly wrong. It may even be illegal. But Johnson helped bury the issue by warning Loudermilk of the problem before any subpoena was issued which might have publicly exposed this wrongdoing. He is thus complicit in the effort -- a co-conspirator after the fact.

Sadly, this story will likely not make much of a splash in the political media. There are so many other amoral things going on during Trump's first week that it will likely just end up as a footnote to it all. Right and wrong are no longer operative concepts to the Republican Party. As long as it is a fellow Republican, anything can be excused. Which is moral relativism taken to its extreme, really. And which is why it's pretty obvious that the Republican Party has become completely amoral.

-- Chris Weigant

 

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant

 

45 Comments on “The Amorality Of The Republican Party”

  1. [1] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Not surprising. Empty G threatened to release all the dirt if the Gaetz report was released:

    “Yes..all the ethics reports and claims including the one I filed,” Greene wrote on X. “All your sexual harassment and assault claims that were secretly settled paying off victims with tax payer money.”

    “The entire Jeffrey Epstein files, tapes, recordings, witness interviews, but not just those, there’s more, Epstein wasn’t/isn’t the only asset,” she added. “If we’re going to dance, let’s all dance in the sunlight. I’ll make sure we do.”

    I guess she chickened out once a fellow republican had a little "talk" with her...

  2. [2] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    amoral politicians? you don't say...

  3. [3] 
    John M from Ct. wrote:

    I don't dispute your point that the GOP has been going south on the morality and ethics front in the past 10 years or so, especially in the years of Trump's ultimately amoral ascent.

    But I think you ought to note explicitly that, as you say, the Republicans "championed" and "positioned" themselves as the moral majority, in the post-Sixties years - but as was clear to any observer, they were almost as hypocritical about it then as they are now.

    Remember Bob Bauman (R-Maryland) being picked up for same-sex soliciting in 1980? Remember Newt Gingrich's cheating on his first and second wives with the women who would become his second and third wives, in the 1990s? Remember Rudy Guiliani's serial affairs, especially when he told his wife in 2000 that he was divorcing her in favor of his current girlfriend, via the medium of a press conference?

    Not that Democrats are paragons, of course not. It's that, as you say, the Republicans somehow have claimed to be so, long before Trump arrived, and have proved not to be paragons in actual, real, life for a long, long time now.

  4. [4] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Are there any moral leaders left in America?

  5. [5] 
    Kick wrote:

    "Multiple... members... were trying to engage in sexual favors" with a woman who had been a witness in a congressional investigation. They sent "sexually explicit texts" to her. So it wasn't just Matt Gaetz, in other words, or some other equally-amoral House Republican, it was more than one of them.

    Gaetz immediately sprang to mind for me also since Cassidy Hutchinson had testified that Gaetz and several GOP lawmakers had asked her/Meadows repeatedly for pardons, particularly quite a number who had attended a strategy meeting at the White House on December 21, 2020, wherein they discussed how to overturn the 2020 election:

    Brian Babin (TX)
    Andy Biggs (AZ)
    Mo Brooks (AL)
    Matt Gaetz (FL)
    Louie Gohmert (TX)
    Paul Gosar (AZ)
    Andy Harris (MD)
    Jody Hice (GA)
    Jim Jordan (OH)
    Scott Perry (PA)
    Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA) Not sworn in until January 2021

    Those who sought pardons who attended the strategy meeting to overturn the election held at the White House by Trump, Giuliani, Eastman, etc. are highlighted in bold. In addition, Jim Jordan also had reportedly repeatedly asked about pardons for members of Congress although reportedly not specifically asking for himself personally.

    I wouldn't hesitate to wager this involves Gaetz and some of these clowns.

  6. [6] 
    Kick wrote:

    They set up an investigatory committee to come up with some sort of scandal they could use against the House January 6th Committee that Cheney served on, but so far this has been unsuccessful. The head of this new committee, Representative Barry Loudermilk, apparently had the idea of subpoenaing Hutchinson to force her to produce electronic communications and/or to testify in front of his committee.

    Please, Grand Old Perverts, keep investigating the events of January 6, 2021, in service to Donald Trump and his attempt at whitewashing and revisionist history, and thank God there isn't hours and hours of audiotape and miles and miles of videotape documenting the facts. Oh, wait.

  7. [7] 
    Michale wrote:

    Oh please... :eyeroll:

    Democrats have absolutely ZERO moral foundation to point to anyone else's alleged amorality...

    Between most of you people here (one of the Weigantian Trolls tried to extort me into silence, threatening to release "secrets" from my past if I didn't change my posting habits. I laughed in her face..) and Democrats out there (who gave this country the KKK and Jim Crow) you people have absolutely ZERO moral, ethical or legal authority to complain about anyone elses' alleged amorality...

    :epic eyeroll:

    And once again, all of ya'all's subjective reality comes from WaPoop..

    Why is that??

    Another question.. What are ya gonna quote from when WaPoop becomes the Washington Post and becomes a cheerleader for PRESIDENT Trump and America?? :eyeroll:

    Face reality people.. Yer living in PRESIDENT Trump's America now...

  8. [8] 
    Michale wrote:

    Liz,

    Remember how we were talking before about Biden's legacy..

    And I said his legacy was set in stone and will not be changed from being the senile dementia-riddled fool that his presidency showed the world??

    Apparently, James Carville agrees with me.. :D

    James Carville says nobody wants to hear from Biden anymore

    Carville has attacked the former president for staying in the 2024 race too long

    Democratic strategist James Carville hopes that former President Joe Biden can help his party by getting out of the way, since "no one wants to hear from" him anymore.

    "Well, this is the kind of truth of where we are.
    We all know Biden. Actually, you and I know him personally. And I think it’s fair to say that we’re long-time, at some level, admirers of Joe Biden. What he’s done to himself is, no one wants to hear from this guy anymore, OK?
    Just go to your condo in Rehoboth and stay there. And that’s not because we’re bad people, or we’re mean people. It was all his doing, all his doing, this entire thing.
    And this kind of petty back and forth, ‘Oh I would have beat Trump,’ and no one fucking believes that at all. Then fighting with Jill Biden and Alexandra Pelosi.
    Biden is one of the most tragic stories of American politics in my lifetime. Any future role he plays in the future would be a negative one.
    "I would say to Biden, 'Look, guy, you had a noble career. Your last act was terrible. Just get out of the way. The party’s moving on. I mean, they’re really moving on. It is very sad, but that is just where we are.'
    He created this himself. He had nobody to blame but himself."

    -James Carville

    Basement Biden's legacy is set in stone.. He won't be able to do ANYTHING to change...

    If ONLY someone had said he should NOT run for POTUS, that he should leave politics on a high note...

    If ONLY someone had said that...

    Oh wait.. Someone DID say that!!

    I hate being right all the time... :D

  9. [9] 
    Michale wrote:

    And to the morons who STILL believe that Wong applies to the Birthright Citizenship part of the 14th Amendment.

    As usual, the FACTS and OBJECTIVE REALITY proves you .... wong... :D

    Wong's parents were LEGAL permanent residents of the US...

    We are not talking about legal permanent US residents in this case..

    We are talking about ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT CRIMINALS..

    THAT is the distinction that is the ONLY relevant point..

    Why are ya'all so askeered to let the courts decide??

    Because ya'all KNOW your legal arguments are completely BASELESS and have absolutely NO LEGAL FOUNDATION whatsoever...

    As with EVERYTHING ya'all spew, it's full of kaa-kaa...

    The ONLY precedent cases that has any REAL relevance here are the Slaughter-House cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 1872 and the Elk v. Wilkins case 112 U.S. 94, 1884..

    In THOSE cases, it was well established that the qualifying phrase, "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," excludes citizens of foreign countries born in the U.S.

    The law is on PRESIDENT Trump's side..

    Oh sure, you hysterically claim "The SCOTUS is not going to reverse blaa blaa years of precedent blaa blaaa blaa"

    Funny thing is, that's the EXACT same claim ya made about Roe V Wade...

    Remind me again.. How did THAT work out for ya'all???

    :D

    I won't even HAVE to remind ya'all how utterly WRONG ya'all were about Headboard Harris actually having a CHANCE to win the election and how wrong ya'all were about how quickly the election would be decided...

    Or all the other times/things ya'all have been wrong about...

    My best advice to ya'all would be to get used to being wrong.. Get used to losing..

    Cuz it's going to be happening time and time and time and time and time again for ya'all.. :D

    This is the OBJECTIVE REALITY people..

    Yer living in PRESIDENT Trump's America now...

    Love it or leave it... :D

  10. [10] 
    Michale wrote:

    Their partisanship has become more important to them than any quaint notions of right or wrong.

    Once again.. Democrats accusing Republicans of what Democrats themselves are guilty of.. :eyeroll:

    As to the rest, it all comes from WaPoop which means it's all bullshit and not worth wasting my time on..

    :D

  11. [11] 
    Michale wrote:

    Hay.. Moron Democrats???

    Where is all that Global Warming you said was going to destroy the planet???

    'Life-threatening' cold weather to expand southward across the nation, impacting 235 million

    The coldest air so far this winter will grip the Central and Eastern states much of this week, plunging temperatures below zero for an extended period of time for some cities.

    The relentless and bitterly cold air is on track to return in earnest across a wide swath of the nation this week. Residents from the northern Plains to even the Gulf Coast will have noticeably cooler conditions through midweek, with some forecast to experience downright dangerous temperatures.

    While many consider the persistent cold weather quite a nuisance, there may be more serious implications from the cold for farmers, certain businesses and even energy suppliers.

    We had up to a foot of snow in some places here in FL!!

    Global Warming??

    The country could use a little of ya'all's "Global Warming" right now...

    BBBBBBWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

    Democrats being hysterically WRONG.... AGAIN.... :D

  12. [12] 
    Michale wrote:

    "How are people grappling with the speed of change in DC?? I think it depends who the people in question are. If they're the people who have been ruling Washington with the same dreary bipartisan ideology that has kept the United States in this state of inertia and on the wrong track, according to most people, those people are petrified as they've been of Trump for so long. You're seeing the reasons why the establishment has both hated and feared Trump, because he doesn't abide by the bipartisan consensus in Washington that has kept this country on that wrong track, according to most voters.

    But if you're the people who actually exercised your democratic right and voted for Donald Trump because you knew Washington wasn't working and you wanted someone to go in and break it and actually do so with great speed and assertiveness and not be constrained by these artificial rules they create to safeguard the status quo, then I think you're very happy. It's really the first time I've seen an election where a candidate stands up and makes a whole slew of promises about what they're going to do once they win, and then they win and they actually get into office and start doing exactly what they said they were going to do. That should be the norm, but it's really the first time I've seen it in at least decades.

    The reason the Democrat elites are upset is not because he's taking decisive action. We have a very strong presidency in the United States that has only grown in power.

    You can debate that, but that's the reality of what it is. What the Democrats are angry about and upset about is not that he's using it, but that he's using it for the purposes that he said he would use it for when running, namely to place America first, to stop worrying so much about what elites in European capitals and in Paris and in London and in Berlin think, but instead to start thinking about what's best for the United States, even if that means breaking rules, even if it means zooming into Davos and chiding publicly Jamie Dimon and the CEO of the Bank of America for what they're doing. These are the kinds of things they've been so worried about because these are the things that are effective.
    -Glenn Greenwald

    Remember how ya'all Democrats used to LOVE Glenn Greenwald??? How ya'all swore by his claims and pronouncements??

    Right up until the time he stopped saying what ya'all wanted to hear...

    NOW GG is public enemy #1... :eyeroll:

    Hypocrisy. It's not a bug in Democrat programming. It's a feature.

  13. [13] 
    Michale wrote:

    Liz,

    We also talked about the fraud that was committed in the 2020 election.. Fraud that you claim you don't believe in..

    Here are the facts that PROVE fraud...

    Lest you have any doubts, two ex-Politico reporters just confirmed how far the media went to protect Joe Biden prior to the 2020 presidential election.

    Axios’ Mark Caputo and Puck’s Tara Palmeri revealed that Politico intentionally killed or resisted negative stories about Biden and his son — citing, for instance, its limited coverage of The Post’s election-eve scoop on Hunter Biden’s laptop.

    “Politico did that terrible, ill-fated headline: 51 intelligence agents, or former intelligence agents, say that the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation
    Turns out that story itself was closer to disinformation, because the Hunter Biden laptop appeared to be true.
    I told my editors that I needed to write about the Hunter Biden laptop but I was instructed, per orders from 'on high' at Politico, NOT to write about the laptop. I was told 'Don’t write about the laptop. Don’t talk about the laptop. Don’t tweet about the laptop.'
    We also had a story about Hunter Biden and a 2019 on a tax lien he got for his Burisma income. But THAT story was also killed by the editors. And they gave no explanation.”
    -Axios Reporter (and former POLITICO REPORTER) Mark Caputo

    If this fraud wasn't committed by Big Media and Big Tech as they conspired to kill the Hunter Biden, a full 17% of voters would have switched their vote to President Trump..

    The FACTS... The OBJECTIVE REALITY is clear...

    Basement Biden's "win" was the result of Democrat fraud..

    NO OTHER explanation fits the facts...

  14. [14] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    The bitter old troll follows his bitter old fool...

    Most of Trump's first hundred executive orders are straight from project 2025. That thing he knew nothing about and thought was too extreme. Did Trump lie? Is the sky blue and water wet?

  15. [15] 
    Michale wrote:

    Border encounters drop sharply as Trump launches crackdown on illegal immigration

    President Donald Trump signed a number of border security measures on Monday

    The U.S. southern border has seen a sharp drop in illegal immigrant encounters in the first days of the Trump administration, compared to the final few days of the Biden administration, multiple Department of Homeland Security sources tell Fox News Digital.

    The number of Border Patrol encounters at the southern border in the first three days of the Trump administration is 35% lower than the final three days of the Biden administration, the sources said. The numbers do not include encounters at the northern border, or encounters at ports of entry by Customs and Border Protection's (CBP) Office of Field Operations.

    Thar's a new sheriff in town...

    And he is cleaning up America!!! :D

    Thank the gods for PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!

    This is why all the Weigantian pussies want to the ability to block me..

    They can't handle the facts... They can't handle the OBJECTIVE REALITY.. They just want to sit in their echo chambers, all ignorant and moronic and not be exposed to the FACTS and the OBJECTIVE REALITY of the here and now... :D

    "Whatta bunch of pussies!!"
    -Tommy Lee Jones, UNDER SEIGE

    :D

  16. [16] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    No, they want the ability to block you because of your misinformed view that he who posts the most wins. That and having to scroll by lots of unattributed dumb right wing opinion pieces...

  17. [17] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    They can't handle the facts... They can't handle the OBJECTIVE REALITY.. They just want to sit in their echo chambers, all ignorant and moronic and not be exposed to the FACTS and the OBJECTIVE REALITY of the here and now... :D

    A perfect description of yourself, as has been proven many times by many posters here...

  18. [18] 
    Michale wrote:

    The three hills that Democrats will (and SHOULD!!) die on!! :D

    By Ruy Teixeira

    The left isn’t dead yet. But it’s getting there.

    1. Immigration/border security/deportations. Outside of the economy, no issue hurt the Democrats more in 2024 than immigration. And the laxness on border security and quasi-open borders policy that resulted in massive waves of illegal immigration was very much a priority and product of the left. You’d think they’d be rushing to correct that mistake. Nah.

    Take the Laken Riley Act which just passed Congress. Laken Riley was the Georgia nursing student who was murdered by illegal Venezuelan immigrant Jose Ibarra (recall that Biden, under pressure from the left, apologized for referring to illegal immigrant Ibarra as “illegal” as opposed to the approved nomenclature of “undocumented”). The legislation named after her provides for the detention of illegal immigrants charged with theft-related crimes, assault on a police office or acts causing death or bodily harm to an individual. Just 12 Democrats in the Senate and 46 Democrats in the House were willing to vote for the Laken Riley Act, with the left, heavily concentrated in blue states, conspicuous by its absence.

    Outside of Congress, left reaction was predictable and vitriolic. Sarah Dohl, chief campaigns officer of the movement organizing group Indivisible had this to say:

    Spineless. That’s the only word for the..Senate Democrats who handed MAGA Republicans a gift they didn’t deserve…The Laken Riley Act is a racist, xenophobic attack on immigrants that shreds constitutional rights and hands power to extremists like [Texas attorney general] Ken Paxton to hijack federal immigration policy. It’s not just cruel—it’s a train wreck of chaos and bad faith. And yet, Senate Democrats caved.

    And that’s just the Laken Riley Act! That Act is merely the opener for a variety of Trump administration moves to drastically tighten up border security and deport many of the illegal immigrants who are currently here, focusing initially on those with criminal records. The left will oppose all these moves, with appropriately inflammatory rhetoric, despite their general popularity. Indeed, deporting those illegals with criminal records is stunningly popular; a new New York Times poll finds 87 percent overall support for deporting such illegal immigrants including overwhelming support among surprising groups like Democrats (83 percent) and Hispanics (85 percent).

    The simple fact of the matter is that it is impossible to solve the illegal immigration problem without changing the incentive structure for prospective immigrants by: (a) making it much tougher to enter the U.S. illegally, and (b) making it much tougher to stay in the country once you are here illegally. The public understands this while the left evidently does not or (more plausibly) just does not want to solve the problem. They are determined to die on this hill and die they will, perhaps dragging the rest of the Democratic Party down with them.

    By all means, Democrats...

    This is a GREAT HILL for ya'all to die on... :D

  19. [19] 
    Michale wrote:

    Number 2 of a really REALLY great hill for Democrats to die on!!! :D

    2. Identity politics/equity/”trans rights.” The contemporary left is deeply invested in these issues and shows little sign of backing down or compromising on any of them. Take the statement of Ben Wikler, the left’s favorite candidate for chair of the Democratic National Committee:

    We unite our coalition by making sure everyone’s at the table.

    As DNC Chair our leadership team will lift up our full coalition—Blacks, Latino, Native, AANHPI, LGBTQ. Youth, Interfaith, Ethnic, Rural, Veteran and Disability representation.

    This does not seem like the statement of someone even willing to entertain the idea that identity politics is past its sell-by date. Or consider that it is Trump, not anyone on the left, who ringingly called for unrestricted free speech and for a society that is “colorblind and merit-based.” That’s because all these principles have become right-coded in the last period of time and are therefore verboten for anyone on the left to endorse. That’s crazy! As Jeff Maurer memorably puts it, these statements by Trump

    ... hurt not because I disagree, but because I can’t believe that the left has fucked things up so badly that free speech, color blindness, and meritocracy are now issues that the right feels they own. In fact, those issues are so right-coded that they made the list of Things To Throw In Democrats’ Faces At The Inauguration Speech. A little more than a decade ago, those were bedrock liberal ideals. How did we screw this up?

    That wasn’t the only challenge in Trump’s inauguration speech to left shibboleths and there are even more in his spate of executive orders. The left is inclined to fight each and every one of them because they believe history is on their side. But is it? I am doubtful the median working-class voter is going to greet the demise of DEI programs in their workplace, public institutions, or community with anything but delight.

    Nor will they miss the pronoun police, the insistence that trans-identified biological boys should be able to play girls sports or the easy availability of “gender-affirming care” (e.g., puberty blockers, hormones, surgery) for minors. The Times poll mentioned earlier found that 80 percent of working-class (non-college) respondents opposed transgender birth males playing in women’s sports and 75 percent opposed allowing puberty blockers and hormone therapy to be prescribed for anyone under 18.

    For all that, only two (2!) House Democrats—both conservative Hispanic Democrats from Texas—could find the wherewithal to vote for The Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act which would prohibit the participation of biological men and boys in women’s and girls sports. Even Massachusetts Democratic representative Seth Moulton, who had raised questions about having biological boys in girls sports, did not vote for the bill presumably because of pressure from the left (they viciously attacked him for being a “Nazi”, transphobe, etc, etc.)

    The left is determined to die on this hill and is willing to call out their army of enforcers to defend it. But the clear shift in public sentiment against their agenda makes defeat far more likely than victory here. Meanwhile, Democrats’ ability to adapt and move to the center on these issues will be seriously compromised while the left is busy dying on that hill.

    ANOTHER GREAT hill for Democrats to die on!!! :D By all means, Dims... Avail yerselves of the opportunity!! :D

  20. [20] 
    Michale wrote:

    And finally, the most FINEST hill for Democrats to die on.. Many of which have already done so! :D

    GLOBAL WARMING!!!

    It was 37 degrees here in FL at 1400hrs...

    And DEMOCRATS are hysterical about Global Warming!!!!

    BBBBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    3. Climate catastrophism/renewables uber alles/net zero. Trump has thrown down the gauntlet to the left on climate and energy issues. In his speech and in his executive orders he has made clear his intention to untether domestic energy production from regulatory and permitting obstacles and de-emphasize Biden administration policies centered around renewables and electric vehicles. He promises energy abundance and low energy prices. The left hates this but the fact of the matter is that such an approach is far closer to what the public wants—especially what the working class wants—than the left’s quasi-religious commitment to a rapid renewables-based clean energy transition.

    This can be easily seen by reviewing public opinion data on climate and energy issues. Here’s a refresher:

    A recent YouGov survey designed by myself and Roger Pielke found that, by 74 percent to 26 percent, working-class voters prefer an energy approach that uses a mix of energy sources including oil, coal, and natural gas along with renewables to an approach that seeks to phase out the use of oil, coal, and natural gas completely.

    In terms of the energy they consume, cost and reliability are way, way more important to working-class voters than possible effects on the climate. Given four choices, 41 percent of these voters said the cost of the energy they use was most important to them and 35 percent said the availability of power when they need it was most important. Just 17 percent thought the effect on climate of their energy consumption was most important and 6 percent selected the effect on U.S. energy security.

    In terms of proposals to mitigate the effects of climate change, getting to “net zero” as quickly as possible is relatively unimportant to working-class voters. Asked to consider proposals to reduce the effects of global climate change, these voters were least likely to say “getting the U.S. to net zero carbon emissions as quickly as possible” was very important to them personally (26 percent), fewer than said “limiting the burden of regulations on business” was very important (33 percent). Working-class voters were most likely by far to say keeping consumer costs low (66 percent) and increasing jobs and economic growth (60 percent) were very important aspects of climate mitigation proposals.

    Consistent with many other surveys, the YouGov survey found that climate change as an issue has very low salience to working-class voters. Voters were asked to evaluate a list of 18 issue areas and rate their priority for the president and Congress to address in the coming year. As a “top priority,” dealing with global climate change ranked 16th out of these 18 areas among working-class voters, well behind strengthening the national economy, fighting inflation, defending the country from terrorist attacks, and keeping Social Security financially sound—and also behind reducing health care costs, dealing with immigration, improving the educational system, keeping energy costs low, reducing the budget deficit, reducing crime, improving how the political system works, improving the job situation, strengthening the military, dealing with the problems of poor people, and dealing with drug addiction. The climate issue only ranked above global trade and issues around race.

    Finally, by 30 points (59 to 29 percent) working-class voters flat-out favor more domestic production of fossil fuels like oil and gas. But only 15 percent of these voters are aware that the Biden administration increased oil production on federal lands. However, when informed that the U.S. has, in fact, increased domestic production of oil and gas in the last several years, they are delighted. Almost three-quarters (73 percent) of working-class voters said “this is a positive development, which brings good jobs for U.S. workers, ensures our energy supply and helps the U.S. support our allies who need similar resources” compared to 27 percent who thought “this is a negative development, which brings more pollution, climate change, and continued reliance on fossil fuels.”

    In short, Trump is likely to shore up his base, rather than lose support, with his energy proposals. Meanwhile, the usual suspects on the left have already denounced his moves as undercutting the sacred quest to stop climate change, lining the pockets of evil fossil fuel companies and even (somehow) raising grocery prices. This hill, too, is evidently one they are willing to die on rather than compromise in any way on what is likely to be an extremely popular quest for energy abundance. And here too the left is likely to be decisively defeated as they expend vast amounts of money and effort defending the indefensible and kneecapping the ability of their party to come up with an alternative that can actually compete with Trump and his party.

    Such is the nature of today’s left—divorced from the working class but intimately connected to the leftist strongholds of the professional class. The latter connection has kept them blissfully unaware of how far outside of the public opinion mainstream their current commitments are and therefore how quickly the hills they are defending could be overrun. That’s happening right now but the left seems determined to fight on to the bitter end.

    This is a MOST EXCELLENT hill for ALL Democrats to die on!!! Please, PLEASE Democrats... Die on this hill...

    America and the world will thank you... :D

    There ya'all have it, Weigantians.. THREE awesomely great hills for Democrats to die on...

    And what's hilarious?? NO ONE will miss them!!! :D

  21. [21] 
    Kick wrote:

    extort me into silence, threatening to release "secrets" from my past if I didn't change my posting habits.

    Lies.

    A poster simply said if you continue to post your invented bullshit, they would post facts about you. You were neither threatened even a scintilla nor extorted or even asked to be silent. You were simply played like the fool you'd proven yourself to be.

    I laughed in her face..

    This blog is archived, and you most definitely and assuredly did not laugh. You totally lost your shit and haven't stopped whining about it since. You whined and moaned. After whining like a toddler and eventually leaving the blog, you subsequently returned and attempted to institute your own set of promulgated rules that everyone else on the blog must follow. You kept right on inventing fake quotes and bullshit that never happened. You posted multiple times on this blog that a poster should kill themselves. Archived. You threatened another poster to file a false police report on a family member based on lies you had invented. Illegal and also archived. I could go on.

    To sum it all up: You got played. You then freaked the total fuck out and obviously still butthurt after all these years.

    You're not a victim; you're a lying effing troll who got played... and so very easily.

    In conclusion: Cry more.

    The whining and troll tears should definitely be archived for all posterity.

  22. [22] 
    Kick wrote:

    BashiBazouk
    14

    The bitter old troll follows his bitter old fool...

    In the bitter old troll's defense, when your head is jammed so far up into someone's else ass, you are by definition up their behind and therefore a follower.

    Most of Trump's first hundred executive orders are straight from project 2025.

    Russell Vought.

    That thing he knew nothing about and thought was too extreme. Did Trump lie? Is the sky blue and water wet?

    Rhetorical questions. My favorite. :)

  23. [23] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    It was 37 degrees here in FL at 1400hrs...

    You still haven't figured out the difference between weather and climate I see...

    3. is just stupid. The top 4 states for wind power generation are all red. A lot of conservative business men are making money with wind generation but because Scotland let wind generators be built within view of his golf course, all must suffer. What a demented vengeful old idiot.

  24. [24] 
    Michale wrote:

    }}}}extort me into silence, threatening to release "secrets" from my past if I didn't change my posting habits.{{{{

    Lies.

    Nope.. Completely and factually accurate as JL will confirm..

    I can understand why you are so ashamed of your actions...

    But they ARE your actions..

    This is documented FACT...

    I laughed in her face..

    This blog is archived, and you most definitely and assuredly did not laugh. You totally lost your shit and haven't stopped whining about it since. You whined and moaned.

    So, after claiming you DIDN'T do it, then you admit that you DID do it..

    BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

    Face the reality, Victoria Troll... You lied and cheated and stalked me and it all blew up in your face..

    I am STILL here and STILL posting and you are STILL wrong about everything!!!

    BBBBBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  25. [25] 
    Kick wrote:

    BashiBazouk
    23

    Yes, sir, exactly correct... final ruling circa 2015.

    Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers

    https://supremecourt.uk/uploads/uksc_2015_0160_judgment_ba20d7d843.pdf

    TLDR: The UK Lords declared Trump the loser of his final appeal where he was the ginormous and bigly bitter loser at the hands of the Scottish Ministers and still butthurt about wind farms after all these years.

  26. [26] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    24

    Nope.. Completely and factually accurate as JL will confirm..

    Help me, JL! Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

    You're so full of shit. *laughs*

  27. [27] 
    Michale wrote:

    The Astonishing First Week of the Second Trump Term
    by Josh Hammer
    Reprinted With Permission

    The civilizational inflection point in our cold civil war happened sometime between Donald Trump's second inaugural address on Monday and the end of his new presidency's second day on Tuesday. At some indeterminate moment between Monday's soaring midday speech, in which the first nonconsecutive two-term president in over 130 years artfully took a sledgehammer to the entire Obama-Biden era legacy without so much as uttering the men's names, and Tuesday's epochal executive order coming as close as legally possible to banning wokeism throughout the republic, the war ended. And as with the English capturing New Amsterdam from Peter Stuyvesant and the Dutch centuries prior, it happened without firing a single shot.

    The maestro of Mar-a-Lago is known to fancy the Village People hit "Y.M.C.A.," but perhaps the more apropos tune to blast at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue this week is Queen's anthem "We Are the Champions."

    Let's take a step back.

    Barack Obama, a Chicago radical in the Saul Alinsky/Bill Ayers mold, declared war on America during his 2008 presidential campaign. We know he declared war because he more or less said it: He vowed on Feb. 19, 2008, to "fundamentally transform America," and one does not seek to "fundamentally transform" that which he loves and seeks to conserve. If that Freudian slip was our cold civil war's Fort Sumter, then Obama's presidency that followed was the extended opening campaign. Indeed, Obama did "fundamentally transform" America: He passed the nation's largest new entitlement program since the Great Society, maligned cops and soured race relations, helped constitutionalize same-sex marriage, realigned our Middle East interests toward the fanatical Iranian regime, and more.

    The first Trump presidency was, in many ways, the American people's reaction to the rise of the woke Obama-era Democratic Party. The first Trump administration, for all its occasional internal dysfunction, brought a welcome course correction back toward normalcy and sanity: The economy was revving, the border was secure, and there were no new foreign wars. The tweets may have been a bit "mean," for the pearl-clutchers who care about such things, but on an objective basis, things were really going quite well. That is, until the Wuhan virus arrived, St. George Floyd the Martyr had his fateful traffic encounter with Derek Chauvin, and the "Great Awokening" kicked into lightspeed.

    Joe Biden won a questionable election and proceeded to weaponize COVID-19 vaccines, the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol jamboree, race, religion and so much more to finish the job once and for all against the Americans Obama so aptly demeaned as "bitter" clingers and Hillary Clinton ridiculed as "deplorables." The Biden presidency, which saw both a vice president and a Supreme Court justice selected solely due to their status as "women of color," embodied Peak Woke. And true to their antebellum race-centric partisan forebears, race-centric Biden-era "DEI" Democrats fought hard -- a four-year-long Pickett's Charge.

    But it's now all over. Trump won America's cold civil war by adapting an old Reaganite mantra from the days of the actual Cold War against the Soviet Union. The Gipper proclaimed his bold Cold War strategy, differentiating himself from Henry Kissinger and the detente crowd, with this memorable line: "We win and they lose." It is hardly an exaggeration to say that mentality, and that national policy, won the Cold War.

    At some point during his four years in the political wilderness -- perhaps around the time Biden and Jack Smith tried to incarcerate him, or perhaps around the time an assassin came within millimeters of murdering him on national television -- Trump decided to adapt Ronald Reagan's succinct victory formulation. The result? This astonishing first week of the second Trump term.

    The apotheosis -- the coup de grace for the woke beast -- was Trump's bombshell Tuesday evening executive order, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity." In one fell swoop, Trump purged the crux of wokeism -- the neo-Marxist dichotomy of dueling "oppressed" and "oppressor" classes euphemistically known as so-called "diversity, equity and inclusion" -- from American public and private life.

    Diversity-crats from the deep state to the Fortune 100 boardroom to the Ivy League all now face the same reality: Get out before it's too late. Get out before the lawsuits start. Get out before Trump reprises his old "The Apprentice" TV role and yells, "You're fired!"

    And so the mass resignations have commenced. They will only accelerate from here. It's all over. Hallelujah!

    In his 1951 farewell address to Congress, Douglas MacArthur said that "in war, there is no substitute for victory." Maybe it's time for Trump to add a bust of MacArthur in the Oval Office, right next to the recently returned bust of Winston Churchill. Like the 45th and 47th president, those two men know a thing or two about winning.

    You people need to come to grips with reality...

    PRESIDENT Trump won...

    AMERICA won...

    Ya'all LOST... Ya'all are LUSERS....

    And ya'all will CONTINUE to be LUSERS until you get on the PRESIDENT Trump train or the PRESIDENT Trump train runs you over.. :D

  28. [28] 
    Michale wrote:

    A LOT of people in the world want to have a word with Faux Fauchi....

    President Trump terminates Dr Fauci's taxpayer-funded security detail

    Trump revokes security detail for Fauci

    Dr. Anthony Fauci had security provided by taxpayers due to threats received as the government's top COVID-19 official

    And now it will be EASIER to have that word with Faux Fauchi...

    Couldn't happen to a more deserving scumbag...

    It will be interesting to learn about all the crimes that Faux Fauchi committed..

    And Faux Fauchi can't even claim 5th Amendment protections!!! :D

  29. [29] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Ah yes, Dr Fauci. He got in the way of Trump killing hundreds of thousands of Americans. How many will Trump kill this time? He has already shuttered White House Office of Pandemic Preparedness, again, because that worked so well last time...f'n demented old fool.

  30. [30] 
    Michale wrote:

    It's truly AMAZING to see the comment section here in Weigantia from 2016......

    chrisweigant.com/2016/11/08/get-out-and-vote/#comments

    ...... and compare it to the comments section from 2024...

    chrisweigant.com/2024/11/05/the-hill-we-climb/#comments

    A dismal pall was over the 2024 comments, eh??

    Maybe because ya'all already knew what was gonna happen because I told ya'all?? :D

  31. [31] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Michale,

    Now do the same time 2012 vs 2020...

  32. [32] 
    Michale wrote:

    TARGET is joining the long LONG list of big corporations who are scrapping their WOKE bona fides!! :D

    Woke is dead, people!!!

    LONG LIVE MAGA!!!

    :D

  33. [33] 
    Michale wrote:

    Charlamagne poses an interesting question to Democrats..

    "What if President Trump does a great job??"

    What will ya'all do if PRESIDENT Trump is the second coming of JFK???

    What will ya'all do if PRESIDENT Trump brings about as new America renaissance and a great America utopia??

    I know EXACTLY what ya'all will do..

    With the exception of Liz and JL, ya'all will go batshit hysterical with PTDS and Trump/America hate...

    Even more so than ya'all already ARE batshit hysterical crazy with PTDS and Trump/America hate...

    :eyeroll:

  34. [34] 
    Michale wrote:

    Shades of LOGAN'S RUN!! :D

    Mississippi bill would pay bounty hunters to catch undocumented immigrants

    A Mississippi district attorney proposed new legislation Wednesday to pay bounty hunters a reward for helping to deport immigrants in the country illegally.

    DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton announced his support for House Bill 1484, authored by state Rep. Justin Keen (R), which would create the Illegal Alien Certified Bounty Hunter Program.

    Keen and Barton suggested offering a $1,000 reward to registered bounty hunters for each successful deportation they help facilitate, which would be funded by the general assembly and administered by the state treasurer, according to a press release from his office.
    https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/5105368-mississippi-bill-would-pay-bounty-hunters-to-catch-undocumented-immigrants/

    What I tell ya!??

    A new America renaissance!!!

    An American utopia!!! :D

  35. [35] 
    Michale wrote:

    WATCH: Democrat state senator handcuffed after refusing to show driver's license at traffic stop

    Oklahoma State Sen. Regina Goodwin was pulled over after police said she ran stop signs in Tulsa
    https://www.foxnews.com/us/watch-democrat-state-senator-handcuffed-after-refusing-show-drivers-license-traffic-stop

    What *IS* it about moron Democrats who think that obeying the lawful orders of police is optional??

    :eyeroll:

  36. [36] 
    Kick wrote:

    What will ya'all do if PRESIDENT Trump is the second coming of JFK???

    I will watch his funeral on television.

  37. [37] 
    Michale wrote:

    Hoping for the death of the President..

    Yea, that's about the answer I expected from Victoria Troll...

    :eyeroll:

    She's one of the ones who were bummed that the scumbag Thomas Crooks missed..

    Figgers...

  38. [38] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Shades of LOGAN'S RUN!! :D

    Jack booted thug gets sent on mission to wipe out a bunch of undesirables from an AI like computer that controls society. Finds out the computer is lying and brings down the authoritarian rule freeing everyone. And who just announced an AI initiative called star something? Hey, if it means the downfall of Trump and MAGA I could get behind this timeline...Heh.

  39. [39] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    BBBBBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    i may not be fully up to date on my movie tropes, but I'm pretty sure that line is generally not said by the good-guy.

    as to all the other flame war stuff, i honestly don't remember who said what to whom, if i ever knew. I'm just not interested in being involved.

  40. [40] 
    Kick wrote:

    Michale
    37

    Hoping for the death of the President..

    Lies OR complete and utter failure at comprehension and inability to connect simple dots. I answered Charlamagne's question, and I feel quite certain Charlamagne would easily understand the answer. You, on the other hand, have proven your ignorance yet again... not that there was any need at this point, obviously.

    If Trump is the "second coming of JFK," it implies he'll follow in JFK's footsteps... which ceased to exist in Dallas, TX, and Americans watched his funeral on television. Simple history.

    I wish/hope for no bodily harm or unfortunate ending toward any POTUS, regardless of Party, and never have.

    Yea, that's about the answer I expected from Victoria Troll...

    The trollish ignorance you constantly display with your inability to connect dots is stunning in its consistency, and your ever-present prattling lies never cease to expose your total inbred and inherent incomprehension.

    :eyeroll:

    Keep rolling your eyes, maybe you find a brain back there.

    She's one of the ones who were bummed that the scumbag Thomas Crooks missed..

    Lie.

    Figgers...

    It would be great if you had the ability to "figger." I've seen no discernible evidence that you posses even a scintilla.

  41. [41] 
    Michale wrote:

    JL,

    i may not be fully up to date on my movie tropes, but I'm pretty sure that line is generally not said by the good-guy.

    Which line would that be??

    as to all the other flame war stuff, i honestly don't remember who said what to whom, if i ever knew. I'm just not interested in being involved.

    Yea, I figured as much.. Denying the objective reality is your go-to these days.. Your move to the dark-side is complete... :^/

    max nichts... I know it happened, you know it happened, Victoria Troll knows it happened..

    Good enough for me... :D

  42. [42] 
    Michale wrote:

    Hurricane Helene survivors describe ‘a lot of relief’ after meeting with Trump

    Of course they would experience relief..

    After being scroo'ed over and forgotten by the Basement Biden/Headboard Harris administration, ANY help from PRESIDENT Trump is going to be a godsend...

    What IS it about Democrats that they hate patriotic Americans???

    :eyeroll:

  43. [43] 
    Michale wrote:

    What IS it about Democrats that they are so frakin' intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them??? :eyeroll:

    Elon is Hitler? Liberals regress to cancel culture to compensate for their loss.

    Rather than debate Elon Musk and Donald Trump in good faith or engage them in civil discourse, Democrats have resorted to what they do best: name-calling in an attempt to 'cancel' those they dislike.

    If you can’t beat them, call them Hitler.

    That seems to be the progressive ploy du jour. Democrats are nursing their wounds after a resounding defeat in November by resorting to playground bullying tactics.

    Case in point: At a post-inauguration celebration rally Monday, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk gave a very enthusiastic speech during which he made an awkward gesture that, taken out of context, looked a bit like a “fascist salute” – at least that’s what liberals want you to believe.

    No doubt, you’ve seen the photo, as it’s been plastered everywhere the past few days.

    Musk, a billionaire who campaigned for President Donald Trump and is a close adviser, has garnered the hatred of the left because he’s rich and because he supports a man whom they despise.
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2025/01/23/musk-salute-fascist-democrats-cancel-culture/77845518007/

    This comes from a normally Democrat water carrier...

    Looks like Dims are losing more and more propaganda sites!!!

    The Democrat Party doesn't DESERVE to exist... They are Anti-America in everything they are and everything they do..

  44. [44] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    ANY help from PRESIDENT Trump is going to be a godsend...

    Like getting rid of FEMA and leaving it to the states? That kind of help?

  45. [45] 
    Kick wrote:

    Which line would that be??

    The line he quoted, you effin' illiterate moron troll.

    max nichts... I know it happened, you know it happened, Victoria Troll knows it happened..

    It's "macht nichts," you effin' illiterate moron troll.

    It's archived for all posterity. You got your ass played and are still whining like a snowflake about it all these years later. It's complete and total terminal butthurt coming from you for years and years and on full display.

    Staying on the topic of amorality of the GOP: Congratulations. You happen to be the first trolling right-wingnut child-grooming anal felching swinger who submitted an advertisement to whore out his "lovely wife" and "kids" that I've ever seen:

    https://alt.swingers.narkive.com/iimKOUXv/come-swing-with-us

    It's like y'all GOP gutter filth took a look at "Bubba" Clinton and said "hold our beers."

Comments for this article are closed.