The Other Budget Battle
I have to begin today with two apologies. The first is for writing about essentially the same subject for three days in a row. I do realize there are plenty of other things going on right now (European leaders visiting the White House, for one), so to focus solely on the budget process in Congress is a bit limiting. My second apology is for misunderstanding something in my last two columns, which is why I'm writing this one (for clarification).
What I got wrong (through a mistaken assumption on my part) is that there are actually two tracks to the budget battles in Congress right now. I have been conflating them into one, but this is not the case. What the House passed this week is a budget framework for the upcoming fiscal year, which won't start until October. It has nothing to do with this fiscal year at all -- that's the second track (that I missed).
I realized my mistake today when I saw a headline in Politico which read: "Lawmakers Start Work On Yearlong Funding Patch." My confusion stemmed from my assumption that Congress was already working on this, since a deadline is staring them in the face. Apparently not, though:
The Senate's top appropriator said Thursday she has been instructed by the Trump administration and GOP leadership to start prepping a stopgap spending bill to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year.
It's the clearest sign yet that bipartisan negotiations around a 12-bill funding deal are in trouble ahead of the March 14 deadline to avoid a shutdown.
Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) told a small group of reporters Thursday that she was asked to start working on the funding patch -- known as a "continuing resolution," or a CR -- and said in a later interview that it was "one option" being pursued ahead of a looming lapse in funding for federal programs in just over two weeks.
Got that? Even though March 14th is less than three weeks away, they're just starting work on a continuing resolution. This seems to be a prime example of putting the legislative cart before the horse, at least to me. There is no looming deadline to get next year's budget framework passed, but that's what they decided to focus on first.
This is going to be a big fight in Congress, since the continuing resolution is not a "budget reconciliation" bill -- meaning it will have to get 60 votes to survive a Senate filibuster. Democrats are pushing to include in this bill language to rein in President Elon Musk's chainsawing of the federal government -- which Republicans are likely to reject. But now the Republicans want to head in the other direction:
Senior Republicans are seriously exploring how to include cuts made by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency in an upcoming government funding bill -- a move that would skyrocket tensions with Democrats and drastically raise the potential for a government shutdown.
. . .
[T]he idea would be to codify some of the "most egregious" examples of alleged waste that DOGE has identified and incorporate them into a government funding patch through the end of the fiscal year. Republicans would then dare Democrats to vote against the package, lest they be blamed for causing a shutdown come the March 14 deadline.
The strategy, if adopted, could help satisfy conservative hard-liners who are already upset Congress is hurtling toward another short-term spending patch. But it would scramble the politics of the looming shutdown fight considerably, alienating Democrats whose votes are needed to ensure passage given the narrow Republican majorities in both chambers.
This is also not likely to work, since getting seven Democrats to vote for such an idea in the Senate is nothing short of a pipe dream. However, Democrats using the threat of a government shutdown to force a "clean" C.R. (one without codifying Musk's efforts) may not be very effective at all.
What normally happens in a government shutdown is that the public gets frustrated and eventually Congress is forced to pass a budget bill (usually a clean one, on somewhat bipartisan lines). But seriously, would anyone even notice a shutdown right now, in the midst of all the destruction Musk is causing?
That's not as ridiculous an idea as it might first seem. Musk would probably cheer on a shutdown, leading President (In Name Only) Donald Trump to also start cheering, which would strengthen the resolve of the Republicans in Congress. And all of them would be blaming Democrats for the mess, which usually doesn't work -- but who knows what will work in today's chaotic political atmosphere.
To get a resolution passed on time is going to require Congress to move incredibly quickly. If it devolves into a fight over Elon Musk, however, the likelihood of a shutdown happening goes way up. It will be interesting to see this all play out over the next two weeks, because (much to my surprise) the process is only now getting started (and my apologies, again, for the misunderstanding).
-- Chris Weigant
Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant
JL,
his first wife said he did, at a time when she had no apparent cause to be aggrieved, and it's too obscure a text to be easily made up. it's possible he never read it, given his distaste for reading in general. but that's unlikely given how effectively he emulated its strategies.
So, basically, all you have to PROVE that PRESIDENT Trump read this book is that a couple people TOLD you he read it..
And you believe them because you WANT to believe them..
You ALSO have had DOZENS of people TELL you that Biden was (and still is) old and senile and dementia-riddled. You even saw with your own eyes DOZENS and DOZENS of examples of Biden actually acting senile and dementia-riddled..
But you DON'T believe that because you don't WANT to believe it...
You see how the woke progressive Democrat mind works??
You see exactly WHY ya'all lost the election in such a DEFINITIVE and PRESIDENT Trump receives a huge MANDATE way???
Ya'all lost because you refused to accept the FACTS on the ground..
Because the FACTS on the ground were screaming VERY loudly and VERY clearly... There was simply NO WAY that Headboard Harris EVER had a chance of winning the election..
Headboard Harris' own internal polling stated that exact fact...
And NOW you woke progressive Democrats are repeating the exact same mistakes with ya'all's MAKE EVERYTHING ABOUT PRESIDENT Trump plan of "action"...
You people simply NEVER learn... :eyeroll:
so, that makes him very similar to John Gill.
WOW... Because PRESIDENT Trump read ONE BOOK (that you can't actually prove he read) THAT makes PRESIDENT "VERY similar to John Gill"???
If you have to stretch credulity past the breaking point to make your analogy, it should be crystal clear to you that your analogy ain't worth making...
I'm just saying...
And 2010 CW would agree with me...
When the American people see the list of garbage and crop that woke progressive Democrats have wasted American money on:
15 million dollars for Condom Distribution to the Taliban.
$446,700 to promote the expansion of atheism in Nepal.
$1 million to boost French-speaking LGBTQ groups in West and Central Africa.
$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at the southern border.
$20,600 for a drag show in Ecuador.
$47,020 for a transgender opera in Colombia.
$32,000 for an LGBTQ-centered comic book in Peru.
$55,750 for a climate change presentation warning about the impact of climate change in Argentina to be led by female and LGBT journalists.
$3,315,446 for “being LGBTQ in the Caribbean”.
$7,071.58 for a BIPOC speaker series in Canada.
$80,000 for an LGBTQ community center in Bratislava, Slovakia.
$3.2 million to help Tunisian migrants readjust to life in Tunisia after deportation.
$16,500 to foster a “united and equal queer-feminist discourse in Albanian society”.
$10,000 to pressure Lithuanian corporations to promote “DEI values”.
$8,000 to promote DEI among LGBTQ groups in Cyprus.
$1.5 million to promote job opportunities for LGBTQ individuals in Serbia.
$70,884 to create a U.S.-Irish musical to promote DEI in Ireland.
$39,652 to host seminars at the Edinburgh International Book Festival on gender identity and racial equality.
$425,622 to help Indonesian coffee companies become more climate and gender friendly.
THAT is what the American people are going to see that the woke progressive Democrats spent American's hard earned money on...
You see the pattern??
Nothing but retarded woke progressive Democrat bullshit..
It's clear to anyone with more than 2 brain cells to rub together that, if Democrat want to hold out on a C.R. so they can save ^^^^^^^ THAT kind of garbage???
You can bet your bottom dollar that woke progressive Democrats will be blamed for the shut down by patriotic Americans...
This is FACT... More accurately, it's an opinion BASED on the facts, so it might as well be a FACT..
Much like the FACT that Headboard Harris had NO POSSIBLE PATH to win the 2024 election..
You heard it here first... :D
Based on the recent developments at The Washington Post, it appears that the publication is undergoing a significant transformation that may align it more closely with the values championed by PRESIDENT Trump.
Jeff Bezos, the owner of The Washington Post, announced a shift in the opinion section to focus on supporting personal liberties and free markets. This change signals a potential pivot towards a more conservative stance, reminiscent of the editorial approach taken by Fox News, which has been a vocal supporter of PRESIDENT Trump.
The implications of this shift are profound and a welcome sight for America and patriotic Americans. By embracing a more pro-liberty and pro-market perspective, The Washington Post could become a vital platform for voices that resonate with the values of PRESIDENT Trump and his supporters. This is particularly significant in a media landscape that has often been criticized for its liberal bias. As Bezos stated, the current market of ideas and news opinion has underserved these viewpoints, and his intention to fill that void could lead to a more balanced discourse in American journalism.
Of course there will be hysterical whiners and criers who are in catastrophic dread of losing their woke progressive Democrat Water Carrier... Critics of this transformation, including some staff members at The Washington Post, have expressed their discontent, with notable resignations following Bezos's announcement. However, it is essential to recognize that the previous editorial direction of the paper has not always adhered to the highest journalistic standards to put it mildly.. To put it accurately WaPoop gave up journalistic integrity to TAKE PRESIDENT TRUMP AT ANY COST crowd.. For instance, the paper's coverage of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was widely criticized for its inaccuracies and sensationalism. This history raises questions about the credibility of those who oppose the new direction, especially when they remained silent during significant journalistic failures.
The potential alignment of The Washington Post with the values of PRESIDENT Trump could serve to strengthen the voices of patriotic Americans who feel marginalized by mainstream media. As the landscape of media continues to evolve, the emergence of a publication that champions personal liberties and free markets can foster a more inclusive environment for diverse opinions. This shift may also encourage other media outlets to reconsider their editorial policies, leading to a broader acceptance of conservative viewpoints.
To sum things up, the changes at The Washington Post represent a pivotal moment in American journalism. By embracing the principles that PRESIDENT Trump advocates, WaPo (as it will be known) has the opportunity to become a significant player in the media landscape, akin to Fox News. This transformation could ultimately benefit America by promoting a more balanced and patriotic discourse, empowering those who believe in the foundational values of freedom and opportunity. As we witness this evolution, it is crucial for patriotic Americans to support media that aligns with their values and fosters a robust exchange of ideas.
In other words, Americans who really LOVE this country should do their utmost to support this new WaPo/Fox News alignment...
Let's wrest control from the hopeless woke progressive Democrats and Make News Great Again!! :D
Once again... You heard it here first.. :D
The rise of the so-called "Resistance" among the blue and purple-haired woke progressive Democrats is a spectacle that is both laughable and alarming. As protests begin to re-emerge across the country, it seems that these morons, who have spent the last few years wallowing in their own outrage and feces, are dusting off their protest signs and preparing to take to the streets once again. However, their antics reveal a profound ignorance and a disconnection from reality that is hard to ignore.
Take, for instance, the recent protests at Stanford University, where students shouted down conservative speakers, demonstrating not only a lack of respect for free speech but also a complete misunderstanding of the principles that underpin our democracy. These protests are not about justice or equality; they are merely a manifestation of the anger and confusion that defines the woke progressive Democrat Party. Overflow crowds at Bernie Sanders’ rallies may suggest enthusiasm, but they also highlight a troubling trend: a generation of young people who are more interested in virtue signaling than in meaningful dialogue.
The absurdity of these protests is epitomized by the antics of students who seem more focused on crafting catchy slogans than on understanding the issues at hand. One can hardly take seriously a purple haired protester who, while holding a Sharpie, asks her friend for advice on a poster that reads “Dykes for Divestment.” This is not activism; it is a performance art piece that highlights the shallow nature of their convictions. The same goes for the student who, amidst a protest, is more concerned about finding her vape than engaging in the serious discussions that should be taking place.
Moreover, these progressive Democrats are often quick to resort to violence and intimidation, as seen in the recent anti-Israel protests where individuals took over buildings and assaulted others. This behavior is not only unacceptable but also indicative of a broader trend within the woke progressive Democrat Party: a willingness to silence dissenting voices through chaos and aggression and violence.
It is a sad commentary on a generation that has been fed a steady diet of woke progressive propaganda, leading them to believe that their outrage is a form of activism and that their violence is completely justified
As PRESIDENT Trump continues to champion the values of personal liberty and free markets, it is crucial for patriotic Americans to recognize the dangers posed by this radical leftist movement. The blue-haired woke progressive Democrats may be loud, but their actions reveal a profound lack of understanding and a dangerous willingness to disrupt society for their misguided causes. As they prepare to take to the streets once more, let us not forget the importance of standing firm against their antics and supporting the principles that PRESIDENT Trump embodies. The future of America depends on it.
Congrats people.. THIS is your woke progressive Democrat Party in the here and now..
How high of a body count will ya'all accept before condemning these Neo-Fascists???
I am betting ya'all will accept a pretty high body count before speaking up...
:eyeroll:
So, one of the harpies at THE VIEW accused Elon Musk of being PRO-APARTHEID...
Of course, after saying that, she was told she better correct the record fast or else she will be sued for BILLIONS of dollars...
The next day Behar recanted and told the audience that she was full of shit... That she doesn't really know what Musk thinks of Apartheid...
""I'm getting some flack because I said that Musk was pro-apartheid. I don’t really know for sure if he was. He grew up in that time when it was full-blown before the great Nelson Mandela fixed that. He was around at that time — maybe he was, maybe he wasn’t. He might have been a young guy too, so don’t be suing me, OK, Elon?"
-Joy Behar running scared and prostrating herself to Elon Musk
What IS IT about ya'all woke progressive Democrat retards that you spew totally false and inane bullshit and then get indignant when no one with more than 2 brain cells to rub together will take you at your word??
:eyeroll:
The stark contrast between the happiness of conservative women and that of woke progressive Democrat women is a topic that deserves attention. Recent studies reveal that while conservative women find joy in traditional values such as marriage and faith, many woke progressive Democrat women, often characterized by their blue or purple hair, struggle to achieve the same level of satisfaction in life. This disparity raises questions about the choices and lifestyles embraced by these woke progressive women.
One of the most outlandish aspects of woke progressive Democrat culture is the fixation on outward appearances, such as brightly colored hair and eccentric fashion choices. These visual markers often serve as a badge of identity for those who align with progressive ideologies. It also serves their outsized ego that demands attention. Demands to be noticed.. It explains a lot why these woke progressive types turn to "TRANS" ism... It's simply another way to get noticed and try to belong to some group.. ANY group. No matter how self-destructive that group will be
However, it seems that this emphasis on self-expression does not translate into genuine happiness. According to the 2024 American Family Survey, only 12% of woke progressive women report being “completely satisfied” with their lives, compared to 37% of conservative women. This stark difference suggests that the pursuit of happiness among woke progressive Democrat women may be misguided. Only 12% of woke progressive women are completely satisfied with their lives.. No wonder these lusers are shaving their hair and swearing off sex.. NO ONE WANTS THEM for sex!!!
The research conducted by Grant Bailey and Brad Wilcox highlights that conservative women tend to make life choices that foster happiness, such as getting married and attending church regularly. In contrast, many woke progressive Democrat women have distanced themselves from these institutions, which are strongly associated with fulfillment and community. The decline in marriage rates among Democrats—from 80% in 1940 to just 49% today—reflects a broader cultural shift that has left many progressive women feeling isolated and unfulfilled. So they turn to outlandish schemes such as self-mutilation to achieve the fame and acceptance they so need..
Moreover, the recent trend of young woke progressive women reacting hysterically to political events, such as the re-election of PRESIDENT Trump, underscores a troubling emotional volatility. Videos of these women vowing to shave their heads or renounce relationships with men reveal a profound disconnect from reality. Instead of channeling their energy into constructive pursuits, they engage in performative outrage that does little to address their underlying dissatisfaction and is actually self-destructive and destructive to those around them..
The lack of engagement with core American institutions, such as marriage and faith, leaves many woke progressive Democrat women searching for meaning in all the wrong places. Their reliance on social media and fleeting trends, rather than on lasting relationships and community ties, contributes to their unhappiness. As they navigate life with their colorful hair and radical ideologies, they often overlook and totally miss out on the simple joys that come from traditional values.
As you can see, the happiness gap between conservative women and woke progressive Democrat women is not merely a reflection of political ideology but a testament to the choices they make. While conservative women find fulfillment in marriage and faith, many woke progressive women remain trapped in a cycle of discontent, driven by superficial expressions of identity. As they continue to embrace their blue and purple hair, it is essential for them to reconsider the values that truly lead to happiness and fulfillment.
And if that fails, then they will get their attention by shooting up a school and killing kids.. ANYTHING to get the attention they feel is owed them...
And it's the woke progressive Democrats who are to blame for all of this angst..
And, of course, the day wouldn't be complete without the woke progressive Democrat Party's support of the terror group HAMAS... :eyeroll:
The recent events at Barnard College, where masked agitators seized control of a historic academic building in support of Hamas, highlight a troubling connection between the woke progressive Democrat Party and the endorsement of anti-Israel sentiments and violence against jewish students. This incident, marked by violence and intimidation, underscores the alarming trend of woke progressive Democrat activists aligning themselves with extremist ideologies while simultaneously condemning Israel.
On February 26, 2025, a group of keffiyeh-clad protesters stormed Milbank Hall, chanting slogans and demanding the reversal of expulsions for students who had previously disrupted a class on the history of Israel. Their actions included physically assaulting college employees, thereby demonstrating a blatant disregard for the safety and well-being of others.
This behavior is not an isolated incident but rather a reflection of a broader pattern within the woke progressive Democrat movement, which has increasingly embraced radical rhetoric and actions that undermine the very principles of academic freedom and civil discourse.
The protesters' demands, which included the abolition of the disciplinary process at Barnard and a public meeting with college administrators, revealed a disturbing sense of entitlement and a willingness to resort to chaos to achieve their goals.
Sounds JUST LIKE today's woke progressive Democrat Party, eh?? :eyeroll:
Their chants of "Free Palestine" and the graffiti they left behind serve as a stark reminder of how the woke progressive Democrat Party has fostered an environment where anti-Israel sentiment is not only tolerated but encouraged celebrated. This is particularly concerning given the historical context of such rhetoric, which often veers into antisemitism. The LAST time there was this level of jewish Hate, it lead to a little thing called THE HOLOCAUST... :^/
The connection between the masked agitators and the woke progressive Democrat Party's support for Hamas is evident in their tactics and messaging. By aligning themselves with a group that openly advocates for violence against Israel, these protesters are not merely expressing dissent; they are endorsing a narrative that seeks to de-legitimize the jewish state.
This is a dangerous precedent, as it encourages a culture of hostility and division on college campuses, where open dialogue should be encouraged.
Moreover, the response from college administrators, who attempted to engage with the protesters in good faith, was met with hostility and refusal. This refusal to engage in constructive dialogue further illustrates the disconnect between the values of respect and inclusion that educational institutions claim to uphold and the actions of those who claim to represent progressive ideals. The refusal to remove masks and identify themselves speaks volumes about their intentions; they are not interested in dialogue but rather in sowing discord.
Isn't it interesting how the woke progressive Democrats out there attacking people who don't share their ideology bears a MARKED resemblance to the goings on here in Weigantia where that SAME woke progressive Democrats have the exact same reluctance to engage in serious dialogue and attacking people who don't share their ideology here in Weigantia.
As it is out there, so is it in Weigantia... :eyeroll:
The implications of these events extend beyond the walls of Barnard College. They reflect a growing trend within the woke progressive Democrat Party to condone and even support extremist views that undermine democratic values.
Again... JUST LIKE here in Weigantia.....
As the woke progressive Democrat Party continues to distance itself from traditional American principles, it risks alienating a significant portion of the population that values dialogue, respect, and the rule of law.
Which is EXACTLY what we see happening.. More and more people are jumping on the PRESIDENT Trump train and leaving the violent woke progressive Democrats in the dust.. :D
So, to wrap things up.... The actions of the masked agitators at Barnard College serve as a microcosm of the larger issues facing the woke progressive Democrat Party. Their support for Hamas and condemnation of Israel are not just political stances; they represent a fundamental shift towards extremism that threatens the fabric of our society. As these events unfold, it is crucial for all Americans to recognize the dangers posed by this radical ideology and to stand firm in support of democratic values and the right to free expression.
This is ya'all's woke progressive Democrat Party in the here and now, people..
And I know for a fact that at least TWO of ya'all really don't like the way the woke progressive Democrat Party is heading..
Unfortunately, those two aren't doing anything or saying anything to stop it...
And, as the woke progressive Democrats have well-established...
SILENCE IS VIOLENCE
SILENCE GIVES ASSENT
And here we are....
Having said all of the afore, I must give credit where credit is due..
No WaPoop or HuffPoop or NY SLIMES links today...
Just a POLITICO which is still a woke progressive Democrat Water Carrier...
But not so bad as WaPoop, HuffPoop and NY SLIMES...
So... That's progress I 'spose... :D
Good job 2025 CW.... :D
PRESIDENT Trump re-BANS cosplay/trans people from serving in the US military.
Think Corporal Klinger from M*A*S*H*...
The recent developments regarding transgender individuals serving in the U.S. military have reignited a contentious debate about the intersection of mental health and military readiness. The memo issued by the Pentagon, which effectively bans transgender individuals from military service unless they meet stringent criteria, underscores a critical point: being transgender is classified as a mental illness, specifically gender dysphoria. This classification raises significant concerns about the suitability of individuals with mental health conditions for military service.
Gender dysphoria, characterized by a conflict between a person's assigned sex at birth and their experienced gender, can lead to various psychological challenges. The memo states that the policy is designed to uphold high standards of readiness, cohesion, and integrity within the military. It emphasizes that the medical and mental health constraints associated with gender dysphoria are inconsistent with the demands of military service. This perspective aligns with the understanding that individuals experiencing mental health issues may not be fully equipped to handle the rigorous demands of military life, which requires unwavering focus, resilience, and stability.
The policy, reminiscent of the executive order issued by PRESIDENT Trump, mandates that service members must either serve according to their biological sex or obtain a waiver. This approach reflects a commitment to maintaining a cohesive and effective fighting force. The military's primary objective is to ensure operational effectiveness, and allowing individuals with mental health conditions to serve without addressing their underlying issues could compromise that goal.
Woke progressive critics of the ban argue that transgender individuals can perform their duties effectively and that their gender identity should not impact their military service. However, the reality is that mental health conditions, including gender dysphoria, can affect an individual's performance and decision-making abilities. The military's decision to prioritize mental health stability is not an indictment of transgender individuals but rather a recognition of the unique challenges they may face.
Furthermore, the Pentagon's memo highlights the importance of maintaining a clear understanding of biological sex within the military. By recognizing only two immutable sexes—male and female—the policy aims to eliminate confusion and ensure that all service members are held to the same standards. This clarity is essential for fostering unity and discipline within the ranks.
While public opinion has shifted over the years, with a significant portion of Americans supporting the inclusion of transgender individuals in the military, it is crucial to consider the implications of such policies on military effectiveness. The US Military is NOT the place to be performing social justice experiments. The US Military must prioritize its mission and the well-being of its personnel, which includes making difficult decisions about who is best suited for service.
To wrap things up, the Pentagon's decision to restrict transgender individuals from serving in the military is rooted in a commitment to maintaining high standards of readiness and mental health stability.
Recognizing gender dysphoria as a mental illness underscores the need for careful consideration of who is fit for military service. As the debate continues, it is essential to place inclusivity at the bottom of the priority list and have the operational demands of the military, ensuring that all service members can perform their duties effectively and without compromise at the TOP of that priority list..
Transgender = Mentally ill.. This fact is well established despite many bloviations based on woke progressive Democrat "science" to the contrary..
Maybe with further evidence and experiments, this fact that Trans = Mental Illness will change..
But the US Military is NOT the place to perform those social justice experiments...
It's really THAT simple... :D
How can ANYONE who calls themselves an American be against what PRESIDENT Trump and DOGE are doing!??
The recent revelations about the U.S. government's payments to deceased individuals highlight a staggering level of waste and inefficiency that cannot be overlooked. Under the administration of Joe Biden and the woke progressive Democrats, billions and billions of dollars have been squandered on payments to people who are no longer alive. This is not just a minor oversight; it is a glaring example of bureaucratic dysfunction that has persisted for the entirety of the woke progressive Democrat administration.
DOGE's recent post, which showcased a Social Security database indicating that millions of Americans were still listed as "alive" well past the age of 130, sparked outrage and drew attention to a serious issue. While some media outlets attempted to downplay the significance of DOGE's claims, the reality is that the federal government has been aware of this problem for over 15 years. Despite numerous reports from government watchdogs, including a notable one by the late Senator Tom Coburn in 2010, little has been done to rectify the situation.
The numbers are staggering. In just the years 2021 and 2022, nearly $1 billion was sent to deceased individuals. This is not an isolated incident; it is part of a broader pattern of waste that includes improper payments across various federal programs. The Social Security Administration, while flawed, at least has a Death Master File to track deceased individuals. However, the Treasury Department's lack of access to this critical data has allowed checks for heating assistance, housing subsidies, and other benefits to continue flowing to the deceased.
The fact that the Biden administration and the woke progressive Democrats have allowed this situation to persist is inexcusable. It reflects a complete lack of accountability and efficiency within government agencies. While some progress has been made, such as the recent legislation allowing the Treasury access to the Death Master File, the measures taken have been insufficient and poorly implemented.
This ongoing waste of taxpayer dollars is a direct result of bureaucratic incompetence and a failure to prioritize the responsible management of public funds. The American people deserve better than to see their hard-earned money funneled into payments for those who can no longer benefit from them. It is time for Congress to take decisive action to eliminate this waste and ensure that government resources are used effectively and responsibly.
To recap, the billions wasted on payments to deceased individuals under the Biden administration and the woke progressive Democrats is a scandal that must be addressed. The American public deserves transparency and accountability in how their tax dollars are spent.
How ANYONE can get a "MELAKON" out of all that ^^^^ simply shows the complete and utter IGNORANCE of Star Trek by those who buy into the completely and utterly bullshit PATTERNS OF FORCE analogy...
"So say we all....."
I call this one:
WOKE PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT TEARS TASTE SO GOOD IN THE MORNING!!
:D
The recent upheaval at The Washington Post, following Jeff Bezos's announcement of a significant shift in the paper's opinion section, has sent shockwaves through the liberal media landscape. The outcry from liberal pundits, who have dubbed this change a "terrible tragedy," is a delightful reminder of the tears flowing from the woke progressive Democrat camp. Indeed, the taste of their anguish is oh-so-sweet and savory. :D
Bezos's decision to refocus the opinion page on "personal liberties and free markets" has been met with fierce criticism from figures like David Remnick of The New Yorker, who accused him of "kissing the ring" of PRESIDENT Trump. This reaction underscores the deep-seated fear among liberal commentators that their ideological stronghold is being dismantled. The irony is palpable: as they lament the loss of their narrative control, they reveal just how fragile their grip on the media has become. And they only have themselves to blame!! :D
The backlash from former Washington Post editor Marty Baron, who claimed that Bezos is betraying the paper's heritage of free expression, further illustrates the desperation of the woke progressive Democrat camp. Baron’s assertion that only Bezos's viewpoint will be represented is a clear indication that the liberal elite are struggling to adapt to a changing media landscape. Their cries of betrayal are music to the ears of those who have long awaited a more balanced discourse in journalism. Yunno... Some REAL and ACTUAL journalistic integrity.... :D
Moreover, the comments from Axios founder Jim VandeHei, suggesting that Bezos should simply shut down the opinion page if he wants to focus solely on reporting, highlight the absurdity of the woke progressive Democrat response.
The idea that a media outlet should only present one side of the story is antithetical to the very principles of journalism and journalistic integrity. Yet, this is precisely what the woke progressive Democrats have demanded for years.
The tears of the woke progressive Democrat pundits are not just about a shift in editorial policy; they represent a broader fear of losing influence in a world where diversity of opinions are increasingly valued and desired.
As they lament this alleged rise of authoritarianism, they fail to recognize that their own attempts to silence dissenting voices have contributed to the very climate of division they decry. In other words, woke progressive Democrats are whining and crying that what is being done to them is what the woke progressive Democrats have been doing to everyone else for decades..
It ain't no fun when the shoe is on the other foot, eh retarded woke progressive Democrat morons!??
So, to recap.... The upheaval at The Washington Post and the subsequent outcry from woke progressive Democrat commentators serve as a reminder of the fragility and incompatibility with true American values of the woke progressive Democrat narrative.
The taste of their tears is indeed sweet, as it signals a shift towards a more open and honest discourse in journalism.
As the media landscape evolves, it is essential to embrace diverse viewpoints and reject the notion that only one perspective deserves to be heard. The future of journalism depends on it, and the hysterical whinings and cries of the woke progressive Democrats only reinforce the need for change.
One should also take this to heart with how things are going here in Weigantia as well..
Perhaps this shows ya'all (and 2025 CW) how a diversity of viewpoints and opinions are VITAL to the long term survival of ANY media outlet..
Or does Weigantia's Democracy die in darkness???
Hmmmmm???
Perhaps this shows ya'all (and 2025 CW) how a diversity of viewpoints and opinions are VITAL to the long term survival of ANY media outlet..
Or does Weigantia's Democracy die in darkness???
OR....
Or ya'all can take the CAPTAIN RAMSEY approach...
"We're here to PRESERVE democracy. Not to practice it."
-Captain Ramsey, CRIMSON TIDE
Here are some sobering numbers for woke progressive Democrats to go with their toast and orange juice this morning...
6.6%
Percentage of likely Chicago voters who currently view Democratic Mayor Brandon Johnson favorably, listing crime, taxes and inflation as their biggest concerns in an M3 Strategies poll. Chicagoans grade their mayors harshly, but Johnson may set a new low.
21%
Percentage of registered voters who approve of the way congressional Democrats are handling their job, an all-time low in Quinnipiac’s polling. Some woke progressive Democrat activists seized on this as evidence that the party needs to double-down on progressivism and HATE PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!
However.....
45%
Percentage of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents who support a more moderate Democratic Party, up 11 points since 2021, according to Gallup.
And finally.....
58%
Percentage of Democratic registered voters in a Harvard CAPS-Harris poll who think government expenditures are “filled with waste, fraud and inefficiency” rather than are “fair and reasonable” (Republicans: 78%; independents: 75%).
So, what would a logical and rational American make of all these numbers??
Woke progressive Democrats are in a HEAP O TROUBLE... :D
If woke progressive Democrats stay the course with their woke progressive HATE PRESIDENT TRUMP agenda...
Woke progressive Democrats are going to find themselves in a WORLD of hurt....
If woke progressive Democrats CONTINUE to oppose PRESIDENT Trump and DOGE in their streamlining of American governance....
Woke progressive Democrats are going to find themselves in a WORLD of hurt....
So say we all.....
Why Do We Need PRESIDENT Trump and DOGE anyway!!!???
A recent audit revealed that Illinois taxpayers have funded a staggering $1.6 billion in healthcare for illegal immigrants under woke progressive Democrat Governor JB Pritzker's administration highlights the inadequacies of the woke progressive Democrat agenda. This gross mismanagement of taxpayer dollars not only reflects a failure in governance but also underscores the urgent need for a change in leadership—one that PRESIDENT Trump and DOGE can provide.
The audit, requested by GOP legislators, exposed a shocking overspend of over 200% compared to initial budget estimates. State Senate Republican leader John Curran pointed out that the program allowed thousands of individuals to enroll in free healthcare who were not eligible, including U.S. citizens and legal residents. This mismanagement is emblematic of a broader trend within the progressive agenda, which prioritizes inclusivity over fiscal responsibility. The failure to seek federal reimbursement for eligible services further exacerbates the financial burden on Illinois taxpayers, leaving them to foot the bill for a program that should have been better managed.
Pritzker's administration had attempted to HIDE this financial irresponsibility incompetence and malfeasance with tax increases and COVID relief funds, but as federal dollars dwindled, the state faced a significant budget deficit.
Curran's assertion that the state cannot afford to provide free healthcare to working-age individuals is a call to action that resonates with many taxpayers who believe in fiscal responsibility and the importance of contributing to the system rather than relying on it.
Moreover, Pritzker's adversarial stance towards PRESIDENT Trump and his administration has only intensified the challenges facing Illinois. Instead of cooperating with federal efforts to manage immigration and healthcare effectively, Pritzker has chosen to protect illegal immigrants at the expense of taxpayers. This approach not only undermines the rule of law but also places an undue burden on the state's resources.
In contrast, PRESIDENT Trump and DOGE represent a commitment to addressing these issues head-on. Their focus on enforcing immigration laws and prioritizing the needs of American citizens aligns with the values of fiscal responsibility and accountability. By advocating for policies that support working families and ensure that taxpayer dollars are spent wisely, they offer a clear alternative to the mismanagement seen under the current administration.
So... To recap.... the $1.6 billion wasted on healthcare for illegal immigrants in Illinois is a glaring example of the inadequacies of the woke progressive Democrat agenda. It is time for woke progressive Democrats to adopt a PRO AMERICA agenda that prioritizes the needs of taxpayers and upholds the rule of law. PRESIDENT Trump and DOGE are poised to fix these problems and restore fiscal responsibility to our government. The people of Illinois deserve better, and it is time to hold their leaders accountable.
The Trump/America hate agenda that woke progressive Democrats are currently following is NOT tenable and is doomed to failure.. As it has failed over and over and over and over and over again for the past 8 years...
Get on the PRESIDENT Trump train, people... Or get run over by it.. :D
It's THAT simple... :D
Thanks for this. I admit I'm just as confused about the budget process as I was before you cleared up your own misunderstanding!
One thing is clear, I think: there is no way any shutdown or partial shutdown of the federal government this Spring is going to be blamed on the Democrats, by any member of the voting public that isn't a captive of the Trump syndrome. Trump and Musk and the GOP majorities own the government just now, as everybody knows. When and if the government cracks up, everyone knows who the current drivers are.
Genocide Guy,
One thing is clear, I think: there is no way any shutdown or partial shutdown of the federal government this Spring is going to be blamed on the Democrats,
And yet you have ZERO facts to back that claim up..
Whereas, I have PROVEN... with actual FACTS that it WILL be woke progressive Democrats who get blamed...
Or, to put it another way, Genocide Guy...
YOU said there was "no way" PRESIDENT Trump would win the election...
So, this begs the question...
WHY do you think you have even the SMALLEST shred of credibility here???
Hmmmmm???
Trump and Musk and the GOP majorities own the government just now, as everybody knows. When and if the government cracks up, everyone knows who the current drivers are.
And yet, it's woke progressive Democrat recalcitrance that is going to cause any shut down..
So you can bet yer ass that Democrats will be blamed for the shutdown..
You know it.. I know it.. Every other Weigantian knows it...
On another note... You still excited about American "MASS DEATHS" Genocide Guy???
Still "can't wait for the next pandemic"???
It's morons like you that made PRESIDENT Trump's win so awesome and so necessary....
Imagine having woke progressive Democrats who are EXCITED about American "MASS DEATHS" actually in power...
:eyeroll: