ChrisWeigant.com

Friday Talking Points -- Tariff Whiplash

[ Posted Friday, March 7th, 2025 – 18:57 UTC ]

While the biggest political spectacle of the week was the president's big speech to Congress, the biggest political news of the week was actually the American economy reacting to Donald Trump's on-again-off-again, now-you-see-them-now-you-don't tariffs. The whiplash began at the start of the week and hasn't fully subsided yet. Taken together with all of Trump's other disruptive wrecking balls, economists are now starting to talk about the possibility of an upcoming "Trump recession."

Where to begin? Well, Congress has one week to pass some sort of continuing resolution to fund the government, or there will be a shutdown at the end of next week. The chances of them averting disaster are really anyone's guess, especially considering they're going to need some Democratic support to do it. Both President Elon Musk and President (In Name Only) Donald Trump have expressed support for government shutdowns in the past, so it's not likely there will be much pressure from the White House to avoid one.

The Atlanta Federal Reserve downgraded its first-quarter economic prediction sharply, moving their forecast from 2.3 percent positive growth (their prediction on February 19th) to an updated negative 2.8 percent contraction. So how is the administration preparing the public for a possible economic downturn? In what can only be called "Marie Antoinette fashion," sadly.

The secretary of Agriculture took the cake (pun intended) with her answer for consumers angry about the high price of eggs: "Let them raise chickens." Well, no, she didn't actually say that, but what she did say was certainly in that vein: "People are sort of looking around thinking, 'Wow, well maybe I can get a chicken in my backyard,' and it's awesome."

The secretary of the Treasury, meanwhile, informed the public that "access to cheap goods is not the essence of the American Dream." He brushed off the possibility of prices rising for everything with: "We could get a one-time price adjustment." Easy for you to say....

Trump's lawyer Alina Habba, when asked about the thousands upon thousands of veterans who have been summarily fired by Musk, played the "blame the victim" card, saying: "Perhaps they're not fit to have a job at this moment, or [they are] not willing to come to work." So much for all that honoring-their-service hokum, right?

More veterans are on the chopping block as well, as Musk is planning to fire over 80,000 workers at the Veterans Administration. No word on how many of them will be newly-unemployed veterans, but no matter if they have previously served in uniform or not, that is going to make the V.A. a lot harder to access and a lot less efficient for the veterans who depend on it.

So what is the Trump administration's plan to get prices back down? There is no plan:

On his first day in office, President Donald Trump pointedly signed an "emergency" executive order directing agencies to take steps to reduce the cost of living and requiring his top economic adviser to report back on the progress within 30 days.

Forty-four days later, the White House said there is no formal report, just conversations between Trump and National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett.

Meanwhile, Trump still cannot figure out what he even wants to do with all his various tariff threats. He instituted a 25-percent tariff on products from Mexico and Canada this week, and the stock market immediately went into a nose-dive. Trump then seemed to realize how bad an idea it was and announced he was going to postpone first the tariffs on automobiles and auto parts -- and then followed this up by announcing he was basically kidding and he was postponing all the tariffs on Canada and Mexico for another month. This coincides with when his announced "reciprocal tariffs" on the entire rest of the world will begin, so the first week in April looks like it'll be just as much of a rollercoaster ride as last week was.

Perhaps the best comment we heard on all of this came from George Conway, who reacted to Trump's incomprehensible actions with: "What an incredibly incompetent clown. Maybe he should have thought about the (patently obvious) effect of tariffs on the auto industry before imposing them? He's like a monkey on a keyboard."

Let's review a few basics, shall we? Tariffs are a tax. They make things more expensive for the American consumer. Prices go up. When the other countries inevitably retaliate, it hits American farmers and plenty of other industries very hard, as they completely lose foreign markets they have come to rely upon. When prices go up across the board, inflation goes up for everyone. When the economy slows (due to higher prices and increasing inflation), Wall Street gets nervous, companies stop hiring (exacerbating all the firings of government employees), the stock market falls, and the entire economy can sink into a recession. And in keeping with his love of slapping his name on everything, America will come to know it as: "The Trump Recession." Or maybe even "The Trump Depression," for that matter.

In non-economic news, Team Trump continues to flail around on many other fronts as well. On a quest to remove any governmental honor or even mention of anyone who is not straight, White, and cisgender male, the Pentagon scrubbed photos of the bomber that dropped the first atomic bomb on Japan at the end of World War II. Why would they do such a thing? Because (you cannot make this stuff up, folks) the name of the plane was the "Enola Gay." This hearkens back to the culture war over the word that was fought 20 years ago, when a Christian news site's auto-replace function changed a wire-service story about Olympic sprinter Tyson Gay so that the headline wound up reading: "Homosexual Eases Into 100 Final At Olympic Trials." At least they were just attempting to Bowdlerize words for their audience -- Team Trump wants to send all such things entirely down the memory hole. This is after the Air Force had to earlier reverse a decision (after public outcry) which scrubbed any mention of the Tuskegee Airmen from a training course (in their crusade against "diversity" being honored in any way).

Elon Musk continues to chainsaw his way through the federal workforce, not caring a whit what essential jobs the people being fired were actually performing. This has resulted in mass firings at the National Weather Service and NOAA (because who cares where that hurricane really is headed, right? Just ask Trump, he'll draw a line on a map and show you!), an announcement that the government was selling over 400 buildings, including National Park visitors' centers and museums as well as core departmental headquarters. The list was then reduced before being yanked off the website entirely. Musk lied about restoring funding to prevent the Ebola virus too, just for good measure. The figures on his own website which purport to show the bazillions in savings he has achieved are so riddled with errors that it has become nothing more than a joke.

What else? Bowing to conspiracy theorists, the attorney general touted a big release of the "Epstein files," but it turns out it was a total dud, consisting of nothing more than documents which had been released years ago. Maybe Pam Bondi has (gasp!) become co-opted by the coverup!

The head spokesman at the Health and Human Services Department quit after just two weeks on the job, because he was disgusted with his boss Robert F. Kennedy Junior's handling of the spreading outbreak of measles happing in Texas. Oh, and measles vaccine supplies are low, too. So what could possibly go wrong with any of that?

Team Trump is floating an answer to any bad numbers that arise in the G.D.P. statistics: let's just change the way we calculate them! There! Problem solved!

Congress is also considering using this tactic, to make the $5 trillion in deficit spending that will happen if they extend the tax cuts this year completely disappear! You just cannot make this stuff up -- they really are going to try to sell that one to the public: "Nothing to see here, folks, this all won't cost a dime!" Meanwhile, the C.B.O. reported that it will be absolutely impossible for the House Republicans to follow the budget blueprint they have already passed without massive cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, the Children's Health Insurance Program, or some combination of all three.

Speaking of inconvenient numbers, Trump is reportedly not happy with the deportation efforts so far, which is understandable since the first monthly number he charted was actually below what Joe Biden managed last year. Ooops!

Well, that's about as much of a weekly review as we can stomach this week, so we'll just move right along to the awards section....

 

Most Impressive Democrat Of The Week

We have to at least award an Honorable Mention to New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy, who this week signed a law which will forever kill the "party machine" ballot design in his state. This has been an ongoing effort, and when you read about what it all meant, it's pretty laughably archaic -- back to the era when party bosses dictated who got a chance to even compete for votes. In any case, it is now consigned to the history books, as it should have been a long time ago.

We also have one Honorable Mention for best quote in reaction to Trump's speech to Congress this week, for Representative Jasmine Crockett, who when asked immediately after the speech what advice she would give to the president, responded: "I would tell him to grow a spine and stop being Putin's ho."

And we definitely have a Honorable Mention award for freshman Senator Elissa Slotkin, who delivered the official response speech to the president, from a town in Michigan. She hit all the right notes without a single gaffe or cringeworthy moment, which is enough of an achievement on its own to deserve an award (given the track record of response speeches over the past decade or so). But we wrote about this earlier this week, so we'll just mention it in passing here.

Quite obviously, the Most Impressive Democrat Of The Week this week was Representative Al Green, who loudly interrupted Trump's speech mere minutes after it began, to take serious exception to Trump's claim of having a huge mandate from the American people (he didn't even crack 50 percent of the total vote, after all). Green protested with: "You have no mandate to cut Medicaid!" and would not sit down and be quiet, which forced the speaker to have the House sergeant-at-arms escort him off the floor.

This earned Green the admiration of many Democrats (as well as a few other things, which we'll get to in a moment), but this wasn't universal. Some might even argue he should be considered for our "disappointing" award instead, since he sank to the level of the likes of Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert. But as far as we're concerned the whole "decorum" boat sailed a long time ago for these speeches, and it was certainly the most effective protest tactic of the evening, so we decided it was worthy of the MIDOTW award. It certainly was historic, that's for sure....

[Congratulate Representative Al Green on his House contact page, to let him know you appreciate his efforts.]

 

Most Disappointing Democrat Of The Week

Where to begin?

[Sigh.]

It's not exactly "disappointing," more like "face-palm-inducing," but we have to at least mention a video made by a few House Democratic women that tried to plug into the meme of "video game stuff," but it just turned out completely and utterly cringeworthy. We can't even go into the details, so you'll have to check it out on your own, if you really want to see it.

But back to the big speech. All the other protest efforts from Democrats during the speech were pretty laughably ineffective, we have to say. From wearing pink (for a reason that had to be explained) to holding up little auction-bidding paddles with slogans (too small to be read by television shots of the crowd, for the most part), most of the Democratic response fell pretty flat.

We'd even have to agree with many Democrats who expressed one particular sentiment after the speech this week, and hand at least a (Dis-)Honorable Mention award to "all the other Democrats in the chamber who did not immediately stand up and follow Al Green out the door, in solidarity." Now that would have been a strong protest! And it would have made for some great television too....

More specifically, we have to award individual (Dis-)Honorable Mention awards to the 10 House Democrats who actually voted with the Republicans to censure Al Green. And, lest we be remiss, we should also award an Honorable Mention to the crowd of dozens of Democrats who stood in the well of the House floor while Green was officially being censured (after the vote) and sang "We Shall Overcome" in solidarity. The House is now considering a vote to kick Green off all his committee assignments, which only goes to show where supporting this sort of thing winds up.

But this week's Most Disappointing Democrat Of The Week goes to California Governor Gavin Newsom. Newsom apparently just launched a new podcast. He had on (as his very first guest) rightwing podcaster Charlie Kirk, but that's not why he's getting the award.

Newsom, when Kirk brought up the subject of transgender athletes participating in school sports, agreed with Kirk when he pointed out the issue was hurting Democrats by responding: "We're getting crushed by it. Crushed."

He also agreed that Kamala Harris was hurt by a Republican ad that highlighted her support for taxpayer-funded gender transition care for immigrants and federal prisoners:

"She didn't even react to it, which was even more devastating," [California Governor Gavin] Newsom said, suggesting upward of 90 percent of Americans disagreed with Harris' position. "Then you had the video [of Kamala Harris] as a validator. Brutal," Newsom added. "It was a great ad."

But what really raised eyebrows was his framing of the whole issue: "I think it's an issue of fairness, I completely agree with you on that. It is an issue of fairness -- it's deeply unfair. I am not wrestling with the fairness issue. I totally agree with you." He then went on to talk about how he had four children of his own and how he and his wife had been involved with sports in college: "I revere sports, so the issue of fairness is completely legit," Newsom said. "And I saw that -- the last couple years, boy did I [see] how you guys were able to weaponize that issue at another level."

He tried to soften all this with some words of compassion, to his credit:

Newsom insisted, however, that the conversation couldn't be just about fairness. Transgender people, he noted, face high rates of suicide, anxiety and depression.

"That's easy to call out -- the unfairness of that," he said. "But there's also humility and grace. The way people talk down to vulnerable communities is an issue that I have a hard time with, as well."

But apparently he's also been moving behind the scenes to try to convince his fellow Democrats in the state's legislature not to put pro-trans-sports bills on his desk.

Now, we want to be clear here. We decided to give Newsom the MDDOTW award for a reason, but the reason is not "we are in complete disagreement with him." We have even argued that Democrats who hold his belief should be welcomed and accepted into the "big tent" of the Democratic Party.

We instead decided on the award for two big reasons. The first is that, just by sheer volume, Newsom annoyed more Democrats this week (both inside and outside California) than anybody else, really. And the second is that this runs counter to Newsom's political persona in a big way. Which makes the whole thing look like nothing short of pandering or triangulating.

Gavin Newsom has his eyes on the White House. This is no secret. He won't admit it yet, but it's about as obvious as can be. And this entire episode smacks of nothing more than trying to manufacture his own "Sister Souljah moment."

And here's the thing: he might be right to do so. His chances of getting elected nationally probably will improve because of it. But that doesn't detract from the calculated nature of it.

Gavin Newsom entered the national stage of American politics in February of 2004. At that time, the gay marriage issue was raging. The highest court in Massachusetts had ruled a few months prior that gay marriage was indeed constitutional in the state, but they delayed implementation of their ruling until May, to allow the state legislature to react. Newsom -- then mayor of San Francisco -- became the first elected official in the country to approve issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. He was an absolute pioneer, in other words. This was fully eleven years before the Supreme Court ruled in favor of marriage equality for all.

In doing so, Newsom became an icon of the gay rights movement. Which is precisely why his new position on transgender sports in schools is so disappointing to so many people, who saw it as a betrayal (or worse).

As we said, for us the jury's still really out on whether Newsom's "Sister Souljah moment" will pay political dividends for him or not. But we have to acknowledge the feelings his new stance sparked in many Democrats and award him the Most Disappointing Democrat Of The Week nonetheless.

[Contact California Governor Gavin Newsom on his official contact page, to let him know what you think of his actions.]

 

Friday Talking Points

Volume 786 (3/7/25)

We have to begin today by mourning the loss of the website FiveThirtyEight. Its corporate owner pulled the plug this week. It's been sort of heading downwards ever since Nate Silver left, to be sure, but it was a milestone of putting the raw numbers in front of the public so it was easy to track how the political polling was going. Perhaps it is emblematic of the decline of polling in general, but we still have to admit we're sorry to see it go.

Our talking points are kind of a mixed bag this week, leaning heavily on the economy (because it is such a weak point for Trump). But we do have two at the end to show that the spirit of protest is still out there, just to make everyone smile.

 

1
   99 Minutes Hate

Handy for any Democrat who is asked about Trump's speech to Congress.

"You know, in the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, Big Brother forced everyone to sit and watch a video they called 'Two Minutes Hate,' full of propaganda about the regime's supposed enemies. My response to Trump's speech was that at least they only had to watch two minutes of hate -- we had to sit through ninety-nine minutes of it Tuesday night."

 

2
   The Trump Recession

Make the title stick. Use it often.

"You know, most recessions hit while politicians and the president are trying to avoid them. But we could be headed for one now that will be unique, because this one will be caused by the president. If the American economy goes through a downturn, it will definitely deserve the label 'The Trump Recession'."

 

3
   Trump has no plan

Again, hit them hard. Because they don't.

"Remember when Trump was campaigning and he promised everyone he'd bring all the prices down 'starting on Day One'? Remember that? And then he fudged it and told everyone he was going to direct all his departments to report back to him in 30 days, and a wonderful plan to bring prices down would be announced? Well, we're heading towards two months in, and they still have no plan. None. They are not doing anything to bring prices down. In fact, everything they're doing is causing prices to go even further up. Yet another example of Trump making big sweeping promises he has no idea how to keep."

 

4
   Don't lose your head, Marie....

We just personally would love it if everyone started using this line, that's all.

"Did you hear what Trump's secretary of Agriculture had to offer as advice for consumers getting hit hard by the outrageous price of eggs these days? She said we should all get chickens and raise them in our backyards. No, really! That was her advice. 'Let them raise chickens.' Either that or go to the grocery store and pay a fortune to buy a dozen, I guess."

 

5
   Why does Trump hate veterans so much?

This one is causing a lot of worry among Republicans, so drive the point home.

"President Elon Musk has been on a tear, firing all the veterans who have twice dedicated themselves to public service, by working for the government in all kinds of different jobs. Musk doesn't care, and neither does Trump. Veterans have been smeared by false accusations that they aren't doing their jobs or don't show up to work, which is about what you'd expect from 'Cadet Bone Spurs' Trump. And they've announced plans to fire eighty thousand people who now work for the Veterans Administration. This means veterans seeking medical care or other VA services are going to have to wait a whole lot longer and get a whole lot worse service. So I would ask my Republican colleagues: Why does Trump hate veterans so much?"

 

6
   Stand up for science!

Finally, some good news to end on.

"Today, hundreds of people protested at the Lincoln Memorial and other places across the country to 'Stand Up for Science!' The American people are not happy with Trump's 'war on science' and it's about time somebody protested what is going on. As a former National Institutes of Health director who recently resigned his position put it at the rally: 'Moving Fast And Breaking Things might be an appropriate mantra for Silicon Valley... Let's go with: First, Do No Harm' instead. As a sign at the rally put it: AMERICA IS GREAT BECAUSE OF SCIENCE."

 

7
   Go ski in Russia!

And finally, leave it to the good people of Vermont to make their voices heard. Right after Vice President JD Vance bullied the leader of Ukraine in the Oval Office, Vance decided to take a little vacation and go skiing in Vermont. He was met with roads and ski slopes lined with people protesting. Here are some of the best protest signs people created to let him know what they thought of him:

Vance is a traitor -- go ski in Russia

Some hurled some ski-specific insults:

Vance skis in jeans

Or some Vermont-specific ridicule:

Vance uses fake syrup

Vermonters are known for their sense of humor, obviously:

J.D. Vance puts his cast iron skillet in the dishwasher

The best ones however, were on businesses. One had a sign out front saying:

Vance? We thought Elon was VP

But the best one was a big sign at a resort saying simply:

Sorry VP -- sold out

-- Chris Weigant

 

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant

Cross-posted at: Democratic Underground

 

115 Comments on “Friday Talking Points -- Tariff Whiplash”

  1. [1] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Quite obviously, the Most Impressive Democrat Of The Week this week was Representative Al Green, who loudly interrupted Trump's speech mere minutes after it began, to take serious exception to Trump's claim of having a huge mandate from the American people (he didn't even crack 50 percent of the total vote, after all).

    What does winning 50% of the total vote have to do with winning a US presidential election in decisive fashion?

    Trump won the popular vote, did he not? I mean, he got more votes than any other candidate and, as I understand it, he was the first Republican candidate to do that in a long while.

    Didn't he also win all of the battleground states?

    And, what about the gains he made across most voting blocks?

    So, he may not have cracked the 50% threshold of total votes cast but he can, indeed, boast of a huge mandate.

  2. [2] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    Now then, Elizabeth. You wrote,


    I am not being pessimistic nor defeatist when I say that I don't believe that Ukraine will be capable of securing all of Ukraine or that the Russians will be forced to withdraw from all of Ukraine - that is just being realistic and clear-eyed about what is happening on the ground and what is possible in terms of a deal to end this war.

    Once again you utterly ignore anything whatsoever to do with the Russian economic ability to sustain this [100 casualties to gain a meter] war effort. When ducking this critical aspect of the situation you are failing to engage. So if the economic side is irrelevant why not tell the class why you think that is so?

    And kindly share your sources that the Ukrainian Peace proposal of <bRussia get the fuck out! has changed since 2014, namely Peace will happen when you get the fuck out!

    And how Zelenskyy wouldn’t be overthrown if he settled for anything less. Unless you don’t think Ukrainians should have any say.

  3. [3] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    What CW wrote or didn’t write is irrelevant. Either engage or kindly stop demonstrating your ignorance. I don’t bother with cho’mo because it’s all stupid. I engage with you because you are not. Except for the appeasement thing.

  4. [4] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @caddy,

    michale is not stupid, he just has a radically different worldview from you (or me for that matter), and some challenges in reading comprehension. so i'll give you the same advice i gave him; how you speak of others shouldn't depend on how they speak of you.

    JL

  5. [5] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    So, he may not have cracked the 50% threshold of total votes cast but he can, indeed, boast of a huge mandate. Huh?

  6. [6] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    Kindly share the names of the mandates that, say, actually win the popular vote. I thought “huge” was about as big as they come.

  7. [7] 
    italyrusty wrote:

    Good one, Chris!
    'because who cares where that hurricane really is headed, right? Just ask Trump, he'll draw a line on a map and show you!'

    It SHOULD HAVE been a Talking Point, too!

  8. [8] 
    italyrusty wrote:

    I read the headlines about the Newsom-Kirk kerfuffle. Newsom definitely deserves a dishonorable mention, but for doing a podcast at all!

    In the age of social media memes, why would anyone who has aspirations on the national level willingly let his mouth run, just begging for "go viral" gaffes? Doesn't the governor have a PR team? Did they think this would help Newsom "connect with the kids" or - even worse - "moderate his image"?

    And, hey, I guess CA is an irrelevant state where NOTHING needs the governor's attention, right?

  9. [9] 
    italyrusty wrote:

    "Can't afford eggs? Lay your own!"

    I hope that the Democrats continue to hammer the GOP about "the price of eggs" - and, according to my media sources their disappearance from grocery stores.

    The Secretary of Agriculture's absurd ideas about solving this problem also provide additional opportunities to highlight how INEPT AND UNQUALIFIED his Cabinet is: "Loyalty First!"

    'Rollins has co-founded and helmed the America First Policy Institute think tank, which played an influential role in the transition and has been referred to as Trump’s White House in waiting. ... Rollins, who grew up on a farm, is a surprise pick for the role, with less experience in agriculture policy than those on Trump’s shortlist."
    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/23/trump-loyalist-brooke-rollins-usda-secretary-surprise-nomination-00191391

  10. [10] 
    italyrusty wrote:

    Trump can claim 'having a huge mandate from the American people' because the GOP-controlled legislature is currently as hollow as that of the USSR.

    I hope the Democrats will continue to point out that the spineless Republicans in Congress are sitting silently by -or- even offering paper-thin defenses to the interest of their own constituents. "Loyalty First!"

  11. [11] 
    italyrusty wrote:

    What a difference a year makes!

    'To say Joe Biden "did not disappoint" is a vast understatement. Because Biden absolutely knocked it out of the park. He was not just energetic but downright feisty, from the minute he started speaking through the very end of his speech....After watching that speech, it is now impossible to believe the rightwing caricature of him. He absolutely blew it to smithereens.'
    https://www.chrisweigant.com/2024/03/08/biden-knocks-it-out-of-the-park/

  12. [12] 
    italyrusty wrote:

    Here's a terrific talking point, included in an email from Senator Gallego.

    '"No more in-person town halls, NRCC tells House Republicans.
    I’m going into rural Arizona, deep red parts of my state, and holding “Save Medicaid” town halls. I’m showing up. I’m doing it because cuts like these are reckless, they’re dangerous, and we’ve got to stop them. If Republicans won’t show up on their own home turf, I will.'

  13. [13] 
    Michale wrote:

    Well, THIS is a first for a long long LONG time..

    2025 CW agreed with EVERY ONE of my comments from yesterday regarding how utterly and completely brain dead woke progressive Democrats failed at PRESIDENT Trump's speech!! :D

    That hasn't happened since 2010 CW was still around! :D

    99 Minutes Hate
    Handy for any Democrat who is asked about Trump's speech to Congress.

    You have yet to point out any aspects of HATE from PRESIDENT Trump's speech... Why is that??

    Because the FACTS clearly show that ALL the hate came from the brain dead woke progressive Democrats...

    Just sayin'... :D

    The rest is just boiler plate non-factual woke progressive propaganda that is not worthy of my time..

  14. [14] 
    Michale wrote:

    Liz,

    What does winning 50% of the total vote have to do with winning a US presidential election in decisive fashion?

    Trump won the popular vote, did he not? I mean, he got more votes than any other candidate and, as I understand it, he was the first Republican candidate to do that in a long while.

    Didn't he also win all of the battleground states?

    And, what about the gains he made across most voting blocks?

    So, he may not have cracked the 50% threshold of total votes cast but he can, indeed, boast of a huge mandate.

    Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. And yes again.

    That's the problem with woke progressive Democrats in the here and now..

    They simply CANNOT accept the facts and the objective reality..

    AMERICA is behind PRESIDENT Trump..

    Totally.. Unequivocally.. Without reservation..

    Until such time as woke progressive Democrats understand and acknowledge this fact.

    They will remain lost in the wilderness..

  15. [15] 
    Michale wrote:

    Dishonorably Discharged Druggie Child Rapist,

    Let's face reality son..

    You don't engage with me because you CAN'T..

    You don't engage with me because, intellectually, I wipe the floor with you each and every time..

    THAT is why you have to resort to jail inmate name-calling instead of actually talking about facts and reality...

    You don't engage with me because the LAST time you engaged with me, you said PRESIDENT Trump was NOT going to win the election and you said that PRESIDENT Trump was going to prison..

    THAT is why you don't engage with me, Dishonorably Discharged Druggie Child Rapist..

    Because I have ALWAYS PROVEN you to be completely and utterly wrong... About EVERYTHING

    "These are the facts of the case. And they are undisputed."
    -Captain Smilin' Jack Ross, A FEW GOOD MEN

  16. [16] 
    Michale wrote:

    In light of todays commentary, this bears repeating.. :D

    OK, things are really getting bad for brain dead Democrats..

    Democrats lost Musk...

    Democrats lost Zuckerburg…

    Democrats lost Bezos...

    Democrats are losing WaPo…

    AND NOW Democrats are losing.... GAVIN NEWSOME!!!????

    This perfect piece comes from Democrat Water Carrier POLITICO..

    The political landscape for Democrats has reached a new low, evidenced by the shocking shift of California Governor Gavin Newsom, a once staunch advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, breaking ranks with his party on the contentious issue of transgender athletes in sports. In a recent podcast with conservative figure Charlie Kirk, Newsom stated, “I think it’s an issue of fairness... it’s deeply unfair.” This statement is not just a minor deviation; it signals a significant ideological rift within the Democratic Party, showcasing their struggle to maintain a coherent stance on critical issues.

    Newsom’s comments reflect a growing concern among Democrats that they are losing ground on key social issues. He candidly admitted, “We’re getting crushed on it. Crushed. Crushed.” This admission is a stark reminder of how out of touch the brain dead woke progressive Democrats have become with mainstream American sentiments. By aligning himself with conservative viewpoints, Newsom is not only distancing himself from the party’s base but also positioning himself as a potential candidate for the 2028 presidential race, indicating a strategic pivot that could resonate with a broader electorate.

    The irony is palpable: a governor who once defied state law to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples is now echoing Republican concerns about fairness in sports. This shift is emblematic of the Democrats’ broader identity crisis, as they grapple with the implications of their progressive policies. Newsom’s willingness to engage with conservative figures like Kirk and his critique of Vice President Kamala Harris’ stance on gender transition-related medical care for detained immigrants further illustrate the party’s internal fractures.

    As Newsom navigates this treacherous political terrain, it’s clear that the Democrats are at risk of losing not just their grip on power but also their identity. The fact that a prominent Democratic figure feels compelled to align with Republican rhetoric underscores the urgency for the party to reassess its strategies. If they continue down this path of ideological confusion, they may find themselves not only losing Newsom but also alienating a significant portion of the electorate. The Democrats must confront the reality that their current approach is failing, or they risk becoming irrelevant in the ever-evolving political landscape

  17. [17] 
    Michale wrote:

    I mean, seriously, people..

    What would it take for you woke progressive Democrats to concede that ya'all are WRONG on the trans/sports issue??

    Here ya'all have the POSTER CHILD for LGBQTABCXYZEIEIO community telling ya'all that ya'all are WRONG on the trans/sports issue..

    Here ya'all have the almighty GOD of the LGBQABCXYZEIEIO community telling ya'all that ya'all are WRONG on the trans/sports issue..

    If yer almighty GOD comes down from yon high and tells ya'all that ya'all are wrong on the trans/sports issue and ya'all say the HE is wrong???

    Isn't that a hint and a half for yer asses that it's YA'ALL who have a screw loose!??

    JL, help me out here..

    What's the word for a group that refuses to accept the FACTS and refuses to accept the objective reality and still clings to a false notion that they are correct on an issue..

    What's that word that describes such a group?? Cuz all I can come up with is Woke Progressive Democrat Party....

    :eyeroll:

  18. [18] 
    Michale wrote:

    I mean, seriously people...

    http://mfccfl.us/backup.jpg

    You woke progressive Democrats are WRONG on this issue..

    What ELSE are ya'all wrong about that you refuse to even see!??

    Hmmmmm??

  19. [19] 
    Michale wrote:

    The White House posted it's OWN CHOOSE YOUR FIGHTER video...

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1897787569603002817

    Guess which one is better?? :D

    We'll ask CNN.

    "I am not accustomed to helping your party do anything. But let me give you some advice. This was the dumbest thing I've ever seen. And if you read the comments today, lord have mercy."
    -Scott Jennings, CNN

    Ya'all REALLY have to wonder about the brain dead aspects of the brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party when they are putting out garbage like THEIR CHOOSE YOUR FIGHTER and calling it viable political strategy...

    Eh?? :eyeroll:

  20. [20] 
    Michale wrote:

    The fact that ya'all chose AL GREEN as ya'all's Most Impressive Democrat???

    http://mfccfl.us/AlGreen.jpg

    …. ALSO says a LOT about the brain dead Woke Progressive Democrat Party, eh??

    I remember when ya'all condemned Joe Wilson for being disrespectful to Odumbo…

    Hypocrisy. It's not a bug in Democrat programming. It's a feature."

    Truer words were never spoken..

  21. [21] 
    Michale wrote:

    Let's hear directly from a life long Democrat who was actually at PRESIDENT Trump's speech the other night..

    The Democratic Party is failing the American people in profound ways, as evidenced by the disillusionment expressed by former lifelong Democrat Joseph Knowles. During PRESIDENT Trump’s recent address to Congress, Knowles articulated his disappointment with the party, stating, “I made a damn good choice of not voting for Democrats anymore.”

    Mr Knowles' sentiments reflect a growing sentiment among many who feel abandoned by a party that claims to represent the working class but has become increasingly out of touch with everyday patriotic Americans.

    Mr. Knowles highlighted a particularly telling moment during the address when PRESIDENT Trump honored a 13-year-old brain cancer survivor and the mother of a murder victim. While the majority of the audience stood in support, many Democrats remained seated, holding signs that read "FALSE," "NO king!" and "MUSK STEALS." This behavior exemplifies the woke progressive Democrats' priorities, which seem to be more focused on partisan theatrics than on honoring human lives. Knowles remarked, “You know what? That just shows you how out-of-touch they are,”

    ANYONE with more than two brain cells in their head and has NO hate or bigotry in their hearts would understand the SIMPLE fact that the loss of life transcends political affiliation.

    Apparently, woke progressive Democrats have too few brain cells in their heads and their hearts are full of NOTHING but hatred, intolerance and bigotry..

    Polling data supports Mr. Knowles’ observations, with a Quinnipiac University poll revealing that 68% of respondents DISAPPROVE of how congressional Democrats are handling their responsibilities.

    ALMOST THREE QUARTERS of Americans don't like how woke progressive Democrats are doing things.. That should be a hint and a half for woke progressive Democrats!

    But we're seeing the same ignorance and the same STAY THE COURSE attitude that woke progressive had BEFORE the 2024 rout that gave PRESIDENT Trump and the GOP a HUGE mandate to fix America..

    This disapproval is not merely a reflection of policy disagreements but a broader indictment of the party’s failure to connect with the very constituents they claim to serve. Mr Knowles pointed out that the Democrats have shown their "true colors," prioritizing their hate America woke agenda over the needs of the American people.

    Moreover, Mr Knowles criticized his "union brothers" who continue to blame PRESIDENT Trump for their job losses, despite the fact that these issues predate his presidency. He noted, “Their priorities are not aligned with ours anymore,” indicating a growing awareness among working-class individuals that the woke progressive Democrats are failing to advocate for the interests of patriotic American voters...

    As Mr Knowles concluded, “I’m gone forever,” expressing his resolve to leave the Democratic Party behind. His experience serves as a wake-up call for the Democrats, who must recognize that their current trajectory is alienating the very voters they need to succeed. If they continue to prioritize partisan politics over the humanity of the American people, they risk losing not just elections but their relevance in the political landscape altogether. The time has come for the woke progressive Democrats to reassess their values and reconnect with the working class, or they will continue to face the consequences of their failures.

    Those consequences being tens of millions of Mr Knowles'es who will continue to leave the woke progressive Democrat Party behind..

    The logic is as impeccable as it is factually accurate..

  22. [22] 
    Michale wrote:

    I can ALWAYS tell when I have you people on the ropes and ya'all are TOTALLY devestated by my arguments..

    Ya'all get REALLY REALLY quiet.. :D

  23. [23] 
    Michale wrote:

    As far as the tariff issue goes, there are 2 points that you people are missing..

    #1. PRESIDENT Trump is using the THREATS of tariffs to get other countries to comply with America's demands..

    And, as the FACTS clearly show, it's working.. PRESIDENT Trump has been able to get countries like Canada and Mexico to bend the knee to America..

    #2. You people LOVED tariffs when it was Odumbo and Biden imposing tariffs. So, why whine and cry and hysterically stamp your feet when PRESIDENT Trump imposes tariffs??

    Hypocrisy. It's not a bug in Democrat programming. It's a feature

  24. [24] 
    Michale wrote:

    JL,

    michale is not stupid, he just has a radically different worldview from you (or me for that matter), and some challenges in reading comprehension.

    I have no issues with reading comprehension. I simply point out that your own words usually prove MY points for me.. :D I use your own words in ways that you do not intend and it is very annoying to you.. :D

    You are correct though.. It IS challenging to use your own words against ya'all..

    But ya'all DO give me a lot of help in that regard..

    ; how you speak of others shouldn't depend on how they speak of you.

    I disagree.. Treating others how they treat me is the backbone of my presence here...

    As evidenced by the fact that I HAVE had very good discussions with even the Dishonorably Discharged Druggie Child Rapist..

    When he comments with sincere arguments and actually says something nice about me, I respond in kind.. His compliments of my lovely wife is a perfect example of that amongst many other examples..

    When he is stoned and resorts to jail inmate slang (you gave yourself away as an inmate with that, Caddy... :D) I respond in kind...

    When I worked the road, I HATED to write tickets.. It was nothing but paperwork for me.. But if someone I pulled over was an asshole?? They were guaranteed to get a ticket...

    I see nothing wrong with taking a person's behavior and attitude into account when I deal with them

    "To those who would be our friends, you will find no better or more faithful friend than the United States. To those would do harm or make war on us?? We can be faithful to that as well."
    -President Jack Ryan, EXECUTIVE ORDERS

  25. [25] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    You people LOVED tariffs when it was Odumbo and Biden imposing tariffs.

    what kind of rubbish are you talking now? no president has imposed significant tariffs since the 1960s, and that was just a one-off by Lyndon Johnson. the last time the strategy was attempted on any sort of scale goes back to the great depression, and that's not exactly a coincidence.

    JL

  26. [26] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    i mean, tariffs didn't exactly CAUSE the great depression, but they sure as heck didn't help.

  27. [27] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    What's the word for a group that refuses to accept the FACTS and refuses to accept the objective reality and still clings to a false notion that they are correct on an issue..

    conservative

  28. [28] 
    Michale wrote:

    JL,

    what kind of rubbish are you talking now? no president has imposed significant tariffs since the 1960s,

    Not factually accurate.

    In September 2009, President Obama directed the imposition for three years of additional tariffs to stop a harmful surge of imports of Chinese tires for passenger cars and light trucks. The surge caused production of U.S. tires to drop, domestic tire plants to close, and Americans to lose their jobs. Acting on behalf of American manufacturers and workers, President Obama invoked a law that had never before been used to give the United States the right under WTO rules to address harm caused by imports from China. USTR successfully defended China’s WTO challenge to the President’s action, resulting in WTO findings that rejected China’s challenge in its entirety.

    In 2011, the United States successfully defended, for the first time ever in the WTO, a trade safeguard to stop disruption of our domestic market, which upheld President Obama's decision to impose tariffs on Chinese tires.
    ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/fact-sheets/2015/january/fact-sheet-obama-administration%E2%80%99s

    Biden Administration Ratchets Up Tariffs on Chinese Goods
    The administration moved to block off a popular tariff-free path for Chinese apparel coming into the United States, and added stiff levies on electric vehicles, solar panels and other products.

    nytimes.com/2024/09/13/us/politics/biden-tariffs-chinese-goods-clothing.html

    See!?? No reading comprehension challenge here... :D

    }}}}}What's the word for a group that refuses to accept the FACTS and refuses to accept the objective reality and still clings to a false notion that they are correct on an issue..{{{{{{{

    conservative

    And yet, the FACTS clearly PROVE beyond ANY doubt that it's the brain dead woke progressive Democrats who refuses to accept the FACTS and it's the woke progressive Democrats who refuses to accept the objective reality of the here and now...

    Looks like you have a new concept to define, eh? :D

    Seriously? You can't concede that woke progressive Democrats are WRONG on the trans/sports issue??

  29. [29] 
    John M from Ct. wrote:

    Elizabeth on [1] and MtnCaddy [5-6],

    I tend to agree with Rep. Green and MTC here. Every president who wins election in the popular vote claims a "mandate", as in "the people have spoken, and I will now do what they elected me to do."
    Fine. But in politics, the so-called presidential election mandate is socially constructed: that is, it only works to the degree that people think it can. In fact, if the president also commands large majorities in the Congress, the 'mandate' suddenly becomes a practical thing - legislation can be passed at the beginning of the new administration. Without an effective Congress, the presidential 'mandate' is perceived as being much weaker, more like a sales pitch than an actual tool of political power.

    In history, just about every presidential 'mandate' - the perception that he is entitled to govern as he wishes because he has undoubted popular support - fades within about six months of actual governing. The election is over, the president is in office, and he begins to encounter the problems of real life in trying accomplish his goals.

    Now in this Republican president's case, there is no doubt he won the popular vote, which other recent Republican presidents (including himself in 2016) have failed to do. BUT, at the same time it is also true that he failed to win even 50% of the public's votes - something many other presidents have easily accomplished starting with Biden and Obama. He has a technical majority in the House, but it is so slim and conflicted that no one believes it will ever pass substantial legislation other than tax cuts for the wealthy. That is not what candidate Trump campaigned on, and it is not what his slim majority of voters want him to do. Polls confirm that his winning vote came from dissatisfaction with the economy and to some degree exhaustion with Biden-Harris presidency.

    So following all this, we might say the president has a very slim mandate, to improve the economy and reverse some liberal trends in federal governance.

    But does he, as he so repeatedly claims, have a "huge mandate"? Not at all, not by any reckoning. And does his mandate, of whatever size, include the public expectation that he will defund and eliminate Medicaid? Not at all, not by any reckoning - as Rep. Green so loudly and publicly reminded us all.

  30. [30] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    I have no issues with reading comprehension. I simply point out that your own words usually prove MY points for me.. :D I use your own words in ways that you do not intend and it is very annoying to you.. :D

    the first part of that, were we to withdraw the benefit of the doubt and presume that you actually do understand, is garden variety sophism (fallacious argument used to deliberately deceive, and in your case not particularly well).

    intentionally misconstruing someone else's arguments to get on their nerves is what the modern vernacular refers to as trolling. just to be clear, unlike CW and pretty much everyone else here save liz perhaps, i'm not calling you a troll. but that's the behavior you've defined in the quote above.

    JL

  31. [31] 
    Michale wrote:

    intentionally misconstruing someone else's arguments to get on their nerves is what the modern vernacular refers to as trolling.

    But I DON'T intentionally misconstrue your words to get on your nerves. I do it to show you that your OWN arguments prove my point for me..

    The fact that it gets on yer nerves is simply.....

    "Sauce for the goose."
    -Captain Spock, STAR TREK II

    :D

    just to be clear, unlike CW and pretty much everyone else here save liz perhaps, i'm not calling you a troll

    Thank you. Although I knew you weren't saying that, it's welcome that you made the distinction.. :D

  32. [32] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Not factually accurate.

    Not factually relevant.

    Most presidents toy with specific directed tariffs. Huge difference from blanket tariffs. Ask Kentucky how they are feeling about it...

    It's working so well the Trump administration is moving from the campaign promise to bring down food prices on day one to Pivoting to No Pain, No Gain as Economic Message.

    It's like they have no idea what they are doing. Dumbasses...

  33. [33] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    i was unaware that Biden had proposed targeted tariffs. not a great idea, but not a big deal. great depression era tariffs are still a terrible idea, even as a bluff.

  34. [34] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    4

    Stupid is as stupid does.

    FOREST GUMP

  35. [35] 
    Michale wrote:

    JL,

    At least you didn't flail around with the old "well... THAT'S different" BS...

    Safe to say that MANY Democrat Presidents imposed tariffs.. This is fact..

    Now, if you want to argue that using tariff's are ill-advised, then I would (obviously) ask if you made the same argument against Odumbo or Biden..

    I am betting you didn't.. :D

    Be that as it may, I don't have the economic chops enough to say whether you are wrong or right so it's not an argument to get into..

    I WILL say that, so far, the facts clearly prove that the THREAT of tariffs seems to have worked out very well for America and PRESIDENT Trump....

    But making the case that tariffs are wrong and a Democrat President would NEVER impose tariffs is not a case that can be factually supported..

    Moving on... :D

    Caddy,

    Stupid is as stupid does.

    FOREST GUMP

    That would be FORREST GUMP... Which simply proves the argument. :D

  36. [36] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    4

    But seriously, poet, I automatically scroll through cho’mo because he is obviously (to me alone in Weigantia, I guess) a nothing-more-and-nothing-less troll. What does he bring to the table? Take your time — I’ll wait.

    What’s the point of feeding any troll? What does it accomplish besides rousing the terrible wrath of Queen of Snark — Hosanna, Queen of Snark!

  37. [37] 
    Michale wrote:

    Disgusting Dishonorably Discharged Druggie Child Rapist,

    Do you comprehend the irony of practically EVERY POST you make is bragging how you are "ignoring" me??

    We had a guy like you named KEVIN.. He wasn't a scumbag dishonorably discharged druggie child rapist like you are, but EVERY post he made was bragging how he was "ignoring" me..

    You DO realize that, by bragging how you are "ignoring" me is not really ignoring me, right???

    You DO realize how utterly moronic and brain dead you are, right??

    :eyeroll:

    Even Genocide Guy does a better job of "ignoring" me than you do. And even HE can't help but post about me now and again..

  38. [38] 
    John M from Ct. wrote:

    MtnCaddy [36]
    You are not alone. The quick-scrolling finger, it tires, but quick-scroll it must.

  39. [39] 
    Michale wrote:

    And right on cue, Genocide Guy is "ignoring" me again. :D

    You guys realize how COMICAL ya'all sound!? :D

  40. [40] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Not half as comical as foaming at the mouth insult guy. Maybe get a rabies test?

  41. [41] 
    Michale wrote:

    The recent behavior of the Democrats during PRESIDENT Trump’s address to Congress was nothing short of appalling, particularly in their complete insensitivity to a young cancer survivor. When PRESIDENT Trump honored 13-year-old Devarjaye “DJ” Daniel, a brave boy who has fought brain cancer, the Democrats chose to remain seated, stone-faced, and indifferent. This moment was not just a chance to celebrate a child’s triumph; it was an opportunity for the party to show humanity and compassion. Instead, they opted for a display of partisanship that was sickening, shocking and utterly disheartening.

    As Michigan autoworker Joseph Knowles (see above) pointed out, the Democrats have become “out-of-touch” with the very people they claim to represent. Their refusal to stand for DJ and other victims honored during the speech illustrates a troubling trend: they prioritize their disdain for PRESIDENT Trump over basic human decency. Mr Knowles rightly noted, “These are human lives” emphasizing that the loss of life transcends (or at least SHOULD transcend) political affiliation. Yet, the brain dead woke progressive Democrats chose to highlight their own selfish and greedy political interests with signs reading "FALSE" and "NO king!" rather than acknowledging the emotional weight of the moment.

    This insensitivity is not just a failure of decorum; it reflects a deeper issue within the woke progressive Democrat Party. Their inability to connect with the American people is leading to a significant decline in approval ratings. A Quinnipiac poll revealed that 68% of respondents disapprove of how congressional Democrats are handling their responsibilities. This disconnect is evident in their actions, as they seem more focused on performative protests than on addressing the needs of their constituents.

    In a time when compassion and unity are needed, the Democrats have shown themselves to be increasingly irrelevant. Their refusal to honor a child who has bravely battled cancer is a stark reminder of how far they have strayed from their core values. If they continue down this path of insensitivity and partisanship, they risk losing not just elections but their very identity as a party that claims to care for the American people.

    In short, woke progressive Democrats need to change...

    But they won't change as long as sycophants like (most) everyone here approve and cheer on their actions.

    As long as people like (most of) ya'all think that all that is needed is MORE Trump/America hate and PTDS and Democrats will be fine, the Party will be forever lost in the wilderness...

    Which is just fine with me.. :D Gives me a LOT more to gloat about.. :D

  42. [42] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    You know what was really "sickening, shocking and utterly disheartening"? Cancelling the funding for pediatric cancer research and recovery. But sure harp on virtue signaling...

    I would think "compassion" would be trying to find a cure and helping with recovery and treatment rather than cut the crap out of every budget in sight so the rich can have more tax cuts...

    We all know who really hates America around here.

  43. [43] 
    Michale wrote:

    Remember how brain dead woke progressive Democrats whined and cried hysterically about their ridiculous border legislation??

    Hysterically screamed "WE HAVE TO HAVE THE LEGISLATION OF THE BORDER CANNOT BE CONTROLLED!!!"

    And in just SIX WEEKS under PRESIDENT illegal border crossings are down NINETY FOUR PERCENT!!!!

    As usual, brain dead woke progressive Democrats are full of kaa kaa!!!

    The ongoing crisis at the southern U.S. border had reached alarming levels, and the brain dead Democrat Party's failure to take decisive action was nothing short of a dereliction of duty.

    Under Biden's administration, illegal immigration surged to unprecedented heights, a situation that could have been avoided had brain dead Democrats chosen to prioritize border security. The bullshit brain dead Democrat narrative that new legislation was necessary to address this crisis has been thoroughly debunked, revealing it as a convenient excuse for inaction.

    In a recent address to Congress, former President Trump highlighted a critical truth: the border crisis was a policy choice made by the Democrats.

    “The media and our friends in the Democrat Party kept saying we needed new legislation, we must have legislation to secure the border. But it turned out that all we really needed was a new president.”
    -PRESIDENT Trump

    This assertion is supported by the stark contrast in illegal immigration statistics before and after Trump’s return to office. Within just six weeks, illegal immigration plummeted to just SIX PERCENT of previous levels under Biden, demonstrating that effective border control does not require new laws but rather the enforcement of existing ones.

    The brain dead woke progressive Democrats, alongside some brain dead Republicans, pushed for a $118 billion bipartisan bill that was touted as the solution to the border crisis. This bill, however, was fundamentally flawed. It would have allowed approximately 2 million illegal immigrants to enter the country annually, effectively creating an open-border regime. The bill's proponents, including Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and Democrat Leader Chuck Schumer, framed it as a necessary measure to stem the tide of illegal immigration. Yet, as the details emerged, it became clear that this was merely a thinly veiled attempt to placate Republican lawmakers while simultaneously securing more funding for Ukraine.

    The Democrats’ insistence on the need for new legislation to address the border crisis was completely disingenuous and without factual basis. In December 2023, a staggering 300,000 illegal immigrants were apprehended in a single month, a record that underscores the severity of the situation. The Biden administration's policies, which rescinded many of the effective measures implemented by PRESIDENT Trump, directly contributed to this crisis. The brain dead woke progressive Democrats had the power to act but chose instead to allow the situation to deteriorate.

    Moreover, the argument that the Lankford bill was the only viable solution to the border crisis was complete and utter kaa kaa. As noted by critics, including PRESIDENT Trump himself, any reform that permitted millions of illegal crossings before triggering a border shutdown was tantamount to endorsing an open borders policy. The brain dead woke progressive Democrats, in their quest for political gain, have perpetuated a narrative that blames Republicans for the border crisis, despite their own complicity in creating the conditions that led to it.

    The recent data from February, which shows illegal immigration levels at their lowest this century, serves as a testament to the effectiveness of PRESIDENTTrump's policies. By reinstating measures such as “Remain in Mexico” and ending Biden’s open-border initiatives, Trump has demonstrated that the crisis can be managed without new legislation. The brain dead Democrats’ failure to act decisively and their reliance on legislative excuses have only exacerbated the situation.

    So let's recap, children..

    The Democrat Party's inaction on border control is a glaring failure of leadership. Their insistence on the need for new legislation to address a crisis they themselves allowed to fester is not only disingenuous but also detrimental to the security of our nation. As we move forward, it is imperative to hold the Democrats accountable for their choices and demand effective border policies that prioritize the safety and security of American citizens.

    Brain dead woke progressive Democrats simply CANNOT be trusted to have ANY political power..

    It's a good thing for this country that the Democrat Party is lost in the wilderness and likely will be for the remainder of my life time..

  44. [44] 
    Michale wrote:

    So, JL...

    Let's discuss the issue of trans cosplayers in women's sports..

    Do you agree with Gavin Newsom???

  45. [45] 
    Michale wrote:

    Moron woke progressive Democrat plays the race card.

    What a SHOCK!!! :eyeroll:

    The recent comments by Rep. Al Green, who attributed his censure for disrupting President Trump's speech to "invidious discrimination," exemplify a troubling trend among Democrats: the constant invocation of race to explain away personal accountability. This pattern not only undermines genuine discussions about racism but also trivializes the experiences of those who have faced real discrimination.

    Green's assertion that he was treated unfairly compared to his colleagues, such as Reps. Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Taylor Greene, is a classic example of how Democrats often resort to race as a shield against criticism. Instead of acknowledging his disruptive behavior, Green deflects responsibility by claiming racial bias. This tactic is not only disingenuous but also harmful, as it dilutes the seriousness of actual instances of racism.

    False claims of racism can be more damaging than real racism itself. They create division and foster resentment, undermining the credibility of those who genuinely fight against discrimination. When Democrats like Green make unfounded accusations, they risk alienating potential allies and detracting from the real issues that need to be addressed.

    Moreover, the narrative that brain dead woke progressive Democrats perpetuate—that any criticism or consequence faced by a minority politician is inherently rooted in racism—ignores the complexities of individual actions and accountability. It sends a message that personal behavior can be excused or overlooked if one can invoke the specter of racism, which is not only unfair but also counterproductive to the fight for equality.

    So kids, let's recap.. Brain dead woke progressive Democrats' tendency to frame every issue through the lens of race, especially when there are no facts to support such claims, is a disservice to the very cause they claim to champion. It is essential to hold individuals accountable for their actions, regardless of their race, and to reserve discussions of racism for situations where it is genuinely warranted.

  46. [46] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    I've now been personally impacted by the Trump Tariff Whiplash. I work for a German Ladies Wear company with retail locations across the globe. In Canada, we have free-standing store locations inside malls but most of our retail space is rented inside Canada's oldest retailer, the Hudson's Bay Company, started by Royal Proclamation in 1670, a couple hundred years before Canada was a country.

    In recent years the Hudson's Bay has come under hard times, primarily through bad management while my company has thrived in this department store setting. Our sales transactions are processed through the Bay cash register and in lieu of rent, the Bay takes a percentage of our sales and reinburses us the rest. However, as has become normal practice for a struggling Hudson's Bay over the last many years, instead of holding back a percentage of our sales, they have been keeping ALL of our sales since August 2024. This has forced us to "work to rule" inside our Bay locations and lay off our part-time staff twice in the last six months.

    Our CEO worked with the Bay to come to an agreed upon schedule for repayment and then, of course, the Bay went into non-compliance and just this week came the second round of layoffs for our part-time staff.

    The Bay has been trying to finalize a deal that would see their suppliers, vendors and licensees (like us) paid in full. However, these negotiations fell apart in the wake of all of the Trump Tariff Whiplash and the Bay will be filing for creditor protection on Monday to avoid bankruptcy and to allow for restructuring.

    Thanks a lot Trump and America - what a great friend and ally you are ... NOT!

    Wish us all luck, eh!

  47. [47] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    sorry to hear about it liz. broad, sweeping tariffs (or even the threat of broad, sweeping tariffs) are a terrible policy.

  48. [48] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Not to mention the treat to make Canada the 51st state. It's going to take a lot after Trump is out to earn that trust back...

  49. [49] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    loved that last type-o. what a treat.

  50. [50] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Yeah, it's a treat, alright. Hehehehehehehehehe

  51. [51] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    I was joking about Canada becoming the 51st state long before the notion entered the president's head, right here in the pages of these comments sections. Because I wanted to make it easier to travel and perhaps even live in Hawai'i. A girl can dream.

    But, Trump is not joking about this. He is literally trying to weaken our economy to make the takeover easier.

  52. [52] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    US Ends Support for Ukrainian F-16s

    What a deeply stupid move. Deactivating jamming capabilities tells the rest of the world that American weapon systems can't be trusted. Why buy them if critical features can be turned off on the whim of a dumbass? Make America great by killing off another industry...

  53. [53] 
    Michale wrote:

    Liz,

    I've now been personally impacted by the Trump Tariff Whiplash. I work for a German Ladies Wear company with retail locations across the globe. In Canada, we have free-standing store locations inside malls but most of our retail space is rented inside Canada's oldest retailer, the Hudson's Bay Company, started by Royal Proclamation in 1670, a couple hundred years before Canada was a country.

    In recent years the Hudson's Bay has come under hard times, primarily through bad management while my company has thrived in this department store setting. Our sales transactions are processed through the Bay cash register and in lieu of rent, the Bay takes a percentage of our sales and reinburses us the rest. However, as has become normal practice for a struggling Hudson's Bay over the last many years, instead of holding back a percentage of our sales, they have been keeping ALL of our sales since August 2024. This has forced us to "work to rule" inside our Bay locations and lay off our part-time staff twice in the last six months.

    Since it's bad management by the Canadian company and what occurred started 6 months ago....

    I am at a loss to find PRESIDENT Trump's culpability here...

    Shouldn't the blame lay with Hudson's Bay due to their bad management??

    Thanks a lot Trump and America - what a great friend and ally you are ... NOT!

    Blaming America and PRESIDENT Trump for the "bad management" of Hudson's Bay seems a bit un-serious..

    Should PRESIDENT Trump be blamed for The Black Plague and Chernobyl as well??

    PRESIDENT Trump was hired to look after AMERICA'S interests first and foremost..

    Once cannot blame PRESIDENT Trump for doing what he was hired to do..

    I'm just sayin'...

  54. [54] 
    Michale wrote:

    A LOT of the blame belongs to Trudeau and not to PRESIDENT Trump..

  55. [55] 
    Michale wrote:

    Once again, the question must be asked..

    Where was all ya'all's consternation when Odumbo and Biden were imposing tariffs??

    The facts would indicate that ya'all LOVE tariffs.. As long as it's a DEMOCRAT POTUS who is imposing them..

    eh??

  56. [56] 
    Michale wrote:

    "Well, yes, but I used to be on the other side, you know, helping to craft the State of the Union from the Democratic side of President Clinton. And we knew when we were going to make the Republicans, you know, clap with us and they would. And I just think the idea of the Democrats thinking they could sit there through this and not not kind of be part of the process.

    And people not showing up at all. Look, Trump is a duly elected president in a, you know, in a joint session speech. Everybody should be there.

    Everybody should be polite. They'll get their opportunities to, you know, do their thing. And look, you know, it's a reality that the person giving the speech has a double barreled shotgun and the person giving the response has a pop gun.

    And but Trump, that was probably his best, you know, I think his best speech ever, really. And I think the emotional power of the examples and the stories that he told. And I'm looking at some of the poll numbers, you know, coming back on it was was very strong.

    And the Democrats look silly and Democratic numbers are really tanking. They are at the lowest point that I have ever seen the Democratic Party since maybe, you know, the days that it lost 49 states."
    -Democrat Strategist Mark Penn

    Once again, ANOTHER Democrat pointing out how badly the woke progressive Democrat Party is doing...

    Lemme ask ya'all something??

    What would it take for ya'all to concede that the woke progressive Democrat Party is WRONG??

    I mean, you have a DEMOCRATS' Democrat Gavin Newsom telling you the Democrat Party is wrong..

    And ya'all refuse to accept that and ya'all ATTACK Newsom!!

    So... Serious question here..

    What would have to happen for ya'all to stand up and say "Yep... It's factually accurate.. The woke progressive Democrat Party is completely whacked.. Lost in the wilderness til further notice..."

    Can ANYTHING happen that would cause ya'all to do this??

    No??

    Congrats.. Ya'all just conceded that ya'all are part of a cult....

    "Thank you for your co-operation..."
    -Black Widow, THE AVENGERS

  57. [57] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Where was all ya'all's consternation when Odumbo and Biden were imposing tariffs??

    Tell us that you don't understand the difference between targeted and blanket tariffs...

  58. [58] 
    Michale wrote:

    Looks like woke progressive Democrat water carriers are dropping like flies.. :D

    The recent announcement regarding the closure of FiveThirtyEight (538) is a stark reminder of the ongoing turmoil within the woke progressive Democrat media industry, particularly as Disney and ABC News Group continue to downsize.

    The decision to shut down 538, a site renowned for its woke progressive water carrying and it's political analysis and polling data, is part of a larger trend of layoffs that have plagued major woke progressive media outlets. Disney's reported cut of 200 positions across its ABC News Group and Disney Entertainment Networks is indicative of a significant shift in how these organizations are operating amidst financial pressures and political losses.

    The consolidation of ABC's news magazine shows, such as 20/20 and Nightline, into a single program further highlights the drastic measures being taken to streamline operations. This not only results in job losses but also indicates that diversity solely for diversity's sake are no longer crucial in today’s media landscape.

    The closure of 538, which has seen its workforce shrink from 35 to just 15 employees over the past two years, underscores the losses faced by ideology-driven journalism in an era where such woke progressive insights are more and more dying a quiet death.

    Moreover, the recent shakeup at MSNBC, which included the firing of Joy Reid and her production team, reflects a broader strategy of bringing facts and objective reality into the mix, as opposed to hysterical woke progressive ideology. This is affecting many prominent woke progressive figures in the industry. Reid's exit, alongside the decision to cut ties with Telemundo, signals a shift in programming priorities to the objective reality that woke no longer sells. This will leave audiences without the woke progressive content that these platforms once provided. And that is a good thing. Maybe FACTS and reality will become the norm instead of hysterical bigotry and intolerance..

    As the woke progressive media landscape continues to evolve and grow into something that the American people can actually rely on, the loss of woke progressive platforms like 538 and the firing of established woke progressives like Joy Reid indicates that the future of journalism is turning to a commitment to providing comprehensive and FACTUAL political coverage without the activism that has been associated with woke progressive media to date.

    The industry must navigate these challenges carefully to ensure that FACTUAL insights and FACTUAL perspectives become the overriding factors in today's media..

    The goal here is to take news and "facts" out of the realm of entertainment and to have media report just the facts and let the American viewer make their own determinations. As opposed to having hysterical woke progressive news anchors telling viewers what to think...

    For me, personally... I think it's about damn time...

  59. [59] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Is this your 13 year old cancer survivor feel good story: Trump honored a cancer survivor. The boy's doctors now face his budget cuts.

    Cool the boy survived but fuck the rest of them...

  60. [60] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    The goal here is to take news and "facts" out of the realm of entertainment and to have media report just the facts and let the American viewer make their own determinations.

    Complete hypocrisy from a FoxNews copy and paster...

  61. [61] 
    Michale wrote:

    Ahhhhhh…

    Biden Tariffs Odumbo Tariffs GOOD..

    PRESIDENT Trump Tariffs BAD..

    LIES and Tariffs are GREAT... As long as they are DEMOCRAT LIES and tariffs...

    :eyeroll:

    I wish you people could take a step back from yerselves and see how completely and utterly WHACKED you sound..

    Ya'all (NEN) are so filled with hate and bigotry and intolerance you simply can't even see how utterly off the reservation ya'all are...

  62. [62] 
    Michale wrote:

    Actually, THAT information came from woke progressive Democrat Water Carrier ABC NEWS...

    I know.. I know...

    You never let FACTS dissuade you from yer woke progressive Democrat hysteria...

    :eyeroll:

  63. [63] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    The art of the steal?

    Nobody should trust anything Trump proposes. Would Trump do anything different if he is a Russian asset?

    A difference which makes no difference is no difference.

    -Spock

  64. [64] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Biden Tariffs Odumbo Tariffs GOOD..

    PRESIDENT Trump Tariffs BAD..

    Targeted tariffs: used by most presidents regardless of party.

    Blanket tariffs: used by power hungry dumbasses.

  65. [65] 
    Michale wrote:

    The Democrat Party is currently embroiled in a significant ideological civil war, one that could determine its future direction and electoral viability.

    As the party grapples with the tensions between its progressive wing and traditional moderates, the stakes have never been higher. While the GOP is unified under Donald Trump’s leadership, the woke Democrats are facing a critical crossroads, with voters completely disillusioned by the party's leftward shift.

    Recent events have highlighted the growing discontent among voters, even in the party's urban strongholds. The backlash against progressive policies in cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia signals a potential shift back to more moderate governance. The defeat of progressive figures, such as former district attorney Chesa Boudin, illustrates a clear rejection of the "progressive" dogmas that have dominated the party's narrative. This pushback is not just a fleeting trend; it reflects a broader desire among constituents for pragmatic solutions to pressing issues like crime and economic stability.

    The Democratic National Committee's recent leadership election showcased an obsession with race and gender, which many party veterans, like Ruy Teixeira, criticized as disconnected from the everyday concerns of voters. This fixation on identity politics has alienated moderate Democrats who are more focused on economic growth and law enforcement. The party's leadership, now under Ken Martin, seems to be doubling down on these progressive ideologies, which could further distance them from the patriotic electorate.

    Moreover, the party's failure to address economic concerns, particularly in light of Bidenomics failures and rising inflation, has led to a loss of support from key demographics, including working-class minorities. As the party continues to embrace ultra-woke policies, it risks losing the very voters it needs to regain power. The growing conservatism among immigrant communities and the dissatisfaction with progressive policies could signal a significant shift in voter allegiance.

    As the 2028 presidential election approaches, the Democrats must confront these internal divisions. The rise of moderate candidates, such as Daniel Lurie in San Francisco and potential challengers like confirmed sexual assaulter Andrew Cuomo in New York, suggests that there is a hunger for a return to centrist policies. If the party fails to recalibrate its message and address the economic realities facing voters, the woke progressive Democrat Party may find itself increasingly marginalized in a political landscape that is shifting towards AMERICA FIRST policies.

    So, let's recap kids.. The woke progressive Democrat Party's civil war is not just an internal struggle; it is a critical juncture that could define its relevance in American politics for the next generation..

    To emerge victorious, the Party must find a way to unite its factions, prioritize the concerns of everyday Americans, and offer a credible alternative to both the progressive left and the MAGA movement. The future of the party depends on it.

    And, since we KNOW for a FACT that Democrats will never give up it's woke progressive bent, it's safe to say that the Democrat Party will not be a viable Party for at LEAST a couple decades..

  66. [66] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Michale,

    I think I made it pretty clear why the Hudson's Bay Company finds itself in the dire straits it is in - poor management and a lack of investment in its stores, over the last 25 years.

    However, the restructuring process now underway has been made infinitely more difficult in the present economic environment than it would otherwise have been because your president is trying - any and every way he can - to control the entire North American continent and he is quite willing to destroy Canada's (and Mexico's) economy to do it. And, if you're okay with that, then we may have nothing left to say to each other.

  67. [67] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Oh, and none of the blame belongs to PM Trudeau.

  68. [68] 
    Michale wrote:

    Liz,

    I think I made it pretty clear why the Hudson's Bay Company finds itself in the dire straits it is in - poor management and a lack of investment in its stores, over the last 25 years.

    Yes.. Which has nothing to do with PRESIDENT Trump...

    However, the restructuring process now underway has been made infinitely more difficult in the present economic environment than it would otherwise have been because your president is trying - any and every way he can - to control the entire North American continent and he is quite willing to destroy Canada's (and Mexico's) economy to do it.

    PRESIDENT Trump is putting America's interests before the interests of Mexico and Canada..

    Which is EXACTLY what he was hired to do..

    I am failing to see the issue here.. I mean, I can understand why you are upset...

    But let's be real here... Should an American President put Canada's interests first???

    Would Canada's leader (such as he is) put America's interests before Canada's??

    Of course not.. And NO ONE would expect him to..

    Oh, and none of the blame belongs to PM Trudeau.

    Oh come now.. You yourself has gone on with very long comments about how bad Trudeau is and all the mistakes Trudeau made..

    It's why the Canada government put in a vote of NO CONFIDENCE for Trudeau.... THAT'S why Trudeau is on his way out..

    Trudeau scroo'ed da pooch and you Canadians are paying the price for crappy leadership..

    Ironically enough, we Americans were in the same boat.. We paid the price for crappy leadership..

    Fortunately us Americans saw that error of that and changed course..

    If Canada follows our example, BOTH countries will be better off..

    Wouldn't you say??

  69. [69] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Ironically enough, we Americans were in the same boat.. We paid the price for crappy leadership..

    You mean we are paying the price for crappy leadership. The economy was a lot better with the previous guy...

  70. [70] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    I’m sorry to hear about this Liz. Kindly remember that more than 50% of Murican voters did NOT vote for Trump and more of us are waking up as Trump’s destructiveness affects everybody not just the Libs. There’s a lot of buyer’s remorse in the red states.

    Trump is a Russian more-than-asset he’s Putin’s Bitch. I’ve been saying this back in his first term and nobody reacted to my unthinkable theory. Now, it’s obvious to the whole world outside of the MAGAts crowd.

    Trump just gave Daddy Vladdy the best two months the Russia has had in decades.

  71. [71] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    We are a nation full of racist morons and now we’re reaping the results. America just couldn’t pull the trigger on a black woman whose party did an enviable job cleaning up after the latest Republican economic fiasco.

  72. [72] 
    Michale wrote:

    What IS it about racist brain dead woke progressive Democrat morons that they have to make EVERYTHING about race..

    Even when there are absolutely ZERO facts to support the claim that race had to do with ANYTHING...???

    You know what kind of people ALWAYS claim racism???

    Racists.... :eyeroll:

  73. [73] 
    Michale wrote:

    Which isn't surprising since it was the Democrat Party who gave this country the KKK and Jim Crow...

    And, in the here and now wants to bring back segregation in schools...

    :eyeroll:

  74. [74] 
    Michale wrote:

    What would it take for you woke progressive Democrats to concede that ya'all are WRONG on the trans/sports issue??

    Here ya'all have the POSTER CHILD for LGBQTABCXYZEIEIO community telling ya'all that ya'all are WRONG on the trans/sports issue..

    Here ya'all have the almighty GOD of the LGBQABCXYZEIEIO community telling ya'all that ya'all are WRONG on the trans/sports issue..

    If yer almighty GOD comes down from yon high and tells ya'all that ya'all are wrong on the trans/sports issue and ya'all say the HE is wrong???

    Isn't that a hint and a half for yer asses that it's YA'ALL who have a screw loose!??

    No takers, eh??

    Color me shocked.. :eyeroll:

    There are none so blind as those who will not see...

  75. [75] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Yes, we get it, you can't defend your bozo president so you have to retreat to your safe spaces.

    Why would your guy (who ever is in charge) cut so deeply in to the national parks when they Bring in so much money to local communities?

    It's like they have no idea what they are doing...

  76. [76] 
    ListenWhenYouHear wrote:

    Michale,

    Dishonorably Discharged Druggie Child Rapist

    Should someone who is a self-admitted Daughter-Incest-Childhood-Killing (DICK) Rapist really be playing the name-calling card??? You are a DICK Rapist who bragged about felching your daughter while pushing your “Incest is BEST!” lifestyle! Don’t you think people deserve to know that the person who is calling them “child rapists” is actually a literal DICK Child Rapist?!? You might want to rethink all of your name-calling on here. Your bosses at the E911 Call Center would not approve of employees making such comments on message boards.

    Of course they also wouldn't approve of an employee threatening to file false police complaints against officers that their employee has never had contact with. What’s worse — Hiring someone who threatens to intentionally file false police complaints against innocent police officers? — OR — Hiring someone stupid enough to make the threats online on a website that archives all messages posted?!?! All because you were mad that I was pointing out the lies you had posted on here.

    What do you think defense attorneys will do if they discover someone with your history of dishonesty working at a call center? Every call you take will be questioned and could potentially lead to criminals getting off because of your choices! Hey, go ahead and claim one more time to having worked as law enforcement for 25 years when you never worked in law enforcement! You might as well go out with a bang…if you are actually working as an E911 operator. You have a long recorded history of lying about your work experience that makes it unlikely that you are working in anything to do with law enforcement — last week you claimed you and your dog just got accepted to train to work as a K9 unit! You are senior citizen who weighs well over 300lbs. who would not make it one single day at the Academy!

    You are nothing but a SAD, PATHETIC, LIAR! Those are the FACTS!

  77. [77] 
    Michale wrote:

    And Russ Troll shows up, makes one bullshit post about me and then runs away and hides again.. :D

    Such a sadly pathetic person.. :D

  78. [78] 
    ListenWhenYouHear wrote:

    National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) President Charlie Baker said in January that 10 athletes out of 510,000 competing at the collegiate level publicly identify as transgender.

    10 out of 510,000 competing athletes identify as transgender! TEN!!! Thank God that you are so dedicated to addressing this pressing issue! DO YOU honestly think that THIS is what Trump should be focused on right now?!? Those ten transgender athletes were where the President’s attention was needed most? It is only a story because Trump needed something to distract people from paying attention to the absolute crap he is doing. And Trump has to be thanking his lucky stars that he has idiots like you who are dumb enough to believe anything that he says!

    Earlier in the week, you wrote:

    During PRESIDENT Trump's recent address, the coldness displayed by brain dead woke progressive Democrats towards Payton McNabb was nothing short of shocking. McNabb, a 19-year-old former volleyball player, suffered severe injuries—including a concussion, brain bleed, and permanent whiplash—after being injured by a female cosplaying male athlete who participated in girls sports in 2022.

    So when a batter pops a flyball to right field and the right fielder — bored and not paying to the game — gets bonked on the head by the ball, YOU BLAME the BATTER for causing the injury??? McNabb was caught on video standing flat-footed and not in the proper position to block the spike. Are you supposed to keep your arms by your side if you are trying to block the spike? McNabb sure seems to think that is the way to do it!

    And you said that she ”suffered severe injuries—including a concussion, brain bleed, and permanent whiplash“. Concussions are never great, but she was in the ICU how many days because of her injuries? Ten days? Two days? Was she released to go home after being seen by the doctor? “Brain bleed” sounds bad, but it is really only a scarier way to describe a bruise in order to get more sympathy! And I laughed when I read she suffers from “permanent whiplash”! How is she able to always avoid being photographed wearing a neckbrace that one suffering from “permanent whiplash” would surely have to rely on to get through their day? McNabb used her hurting herself to get out of having to play volleyball anymore.

    Then Trump honored DJ Daniel, a young boy battling brain cancer who dreams of becoming a police officer. Funny that they never explained what else they were celebrating when they drew attention to DJ’s battle with cancer. I guess firing all of the researchers seeking a cure for DJ’s brain cancer was not going to go over with the public as well as they first hoped. I hate to point it out, but it is obvious that the only reason DJ was chosen was that he was a DEI choice!

  79. [79] 
    Michale wrote:

    I think I saw Russ Troll in a few of these videos.. :D

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUO94UjQrV4

  80. [80] 
    ListenWhenYouHear wrote:

    And Russ Troll shows up, makes one bullshit post about me and then runs away and hides again.. :D

    Oh, look! Wrong again! And point to anything that I said that isn't true…you cannot because it is ALL TRUE! You are a POS who bragged about his incestuous relationship with his children. A real DICK child rapist!

  81. [81] 
    Michale wrote:

    Russ Troll,

    Oh, look! Wrong again! And point to anything that I said that isn't true…

    It's ALL not factually accurate..

    The entire comment from start to finish is nothing but Trump/America hating and PTDS driven bullshit..

    Which is what we have come to expect from the Weigantian Trolls..

    Nothing but hate, bigotry, intolerance and bullshit..

  82. [82] 
    Michale wrote:

    The woke progressive Democrats Party's transformation over the past decade is striking, particularly highlighted during the June 2019 MSNBC debate when all ten candidates, including prominent figures like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, raised their hands to support healthcare for undocumented immigrants. This moment encapsulated a significant shift leftward, moving away from the centrist principles that once defined the party, especially during the Clinton era.

    The roots of this hysterical Hate-America radicalism can be traced back to the Obama administration, where the rhetoric of "fundamentally transforming" America resonated deeply with supporters. This transformation was not merely ideological; it involved a systematic politicization of government agencies, leading to unprecedented actions against political opponents, notably during the PRESIDENT Trump campaign. The use of the Steele dossier by the FBI to justify surveillance on Trump’s campaign exemplified a troubling precedent of political weaponization.

    As the Trump presidency unfolded, Democrats' tactics evolved into a relentless pursuit of impeachment, first through the Mueller investigation and later through the Ukraine scandal. The narrative surrounding Hunter Biden's laptop and the subsequent disinformation letter signed by intelligence officials further illustrated the party's willingness to manipulate information for political gain.

    Fast forward to recent events, the Democrats' behavior during PRESIDENT Trump's address to Congress showcased a party in disarray, more focused on theatrics than governance. Their internal divisions reveal a lack of coherent strategy beyond a singular focus on opposing PRESIDENT Trump. This raises a critical question: can the woke progressive Democrat Party still be considered a mainstream political entity???

    Or has it devolved into simply a collection of radical and hysterical factions?

    The answer to anyone with more than 2 brain cells to rub together is clear..

    Due to it's hysterical hatred and bigotry and intolerance, today's brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party is nothing but a loose cohesion of disparate haters and bigots with no real leadership and no real plan other than Trump/America hate and PTDS...

    "These are the facts of the case. And they are undisputed."
    -Captain Smilin' Jack Ross, A FEW GOOD MEN

  83. [83] 
    Elizabeth Miller wrote:

    Michale,

    Oh come now.. You yourself has gone on with very long comments about how bad Trudeau is and all the mistakes Trudeau made..

    Are you going senile? I have made no such comments, not here and not anywhere else, ever.

  84. [84] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    DICK Rapist, eh? Okay, although cho’mo is technically accurate.

  85. [85] 
    Mezzomamma wrote:

    Off topic, has Weedy stopped working for anyone else? If so, on all browsers?

  86. [86] 
    Mezzomamma wrote:

    Checking the script, several lines are now marked "eslint; no-undef- '$' not defined'". Is there a fix?

  87. [87] 
    Kick wrote:

    nypoet22
    4

    @caddy,

    michale is not stupid,

    MtnCaddy didn't call the poster "stupid." He said he didn't engage with him because "it's all stupid." He's obviously referring to the repetitive trolling routine, and he's right, it's stupid. If it wasn't stupid, there'd obviously be absolutely no reason whatsoever for the blog's author to question his readers whether or not they would like a blocking feature and the vast majority of them to reply in the affirmative.

    so i'll give you the same advice i gave him; how you speak of others shouldn't depend on how they speak of you.

    How anyone speaks of a trolling routine shouldn't draw an admonishment from anyone else... because it's definitely stupid and infinitely worthy of a block feature.

  88. [88] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @kick,

    it wasn't an admonishment by any stretch, just advice.

    good advice costs nothing and it's worth the price
    ~alan Sherman- good advice

  89. [89] 
    MyVoice wrote:

    [86] Mezzomamma

    Yes, Mezzomamma, there's a fix, at least on Chrome. I haven't tried anything else. Download Tampermonkey BETA from the Chrome store, then copy and paste the script in there. No script changes needed; at least at this time. Disable Tampermonkey and enable both Tampermonkey BETA and the script and you should be back in business.

  90. [90] 
    MyVoice wrote:

    [86] Mezzomamma

    Mezzomamma, you can try this first and let me know whether it works. Open the script in original Tampermonkey and put this in as the very first line:

    /* globals jQuery, $ */

    Chrome has made it known that the original Tampermonkey won't be available much longer, so you might want to move to Tampermonkey BETA now. I've already removed it from Chrome, which is why I haven't tested this.

  91. [91] 
    Michale wrote:

    Liz,

    Are you going senile? I have made no such comments, not here and not anywhere else, ever.

    I coulda swore you posted how bad Trudeau was when he slogged down to Mar-a-lago to bend the knee and grovel to PRESIDENT Trump..

    No matter.. It's not really relevant to the original comment...

    Suffice it to say that PRESIDENT Trump is doing what the vast majority of American voters hired him to do..

    Take care of Americans..

    It's a shame you got caught up in that, but you can't really blame PRESIDENT Trump for doing what he was hired to do..

    It'll get better for ya'all Canadians, eh?? If ya'all elect your own Trump, then Canadians will get the support they deserve...

  92. [92] 
    Michale wrote:

    And once again, the dishonorably discharged druggie child rapist took the needle out of his are to rant with his normal stoned incoherence..

    Okay, although cho’mo is technically accurate.

    This is EXACTLY the problem with brain dead woke progressive Democrats. ESPECIALLY dishonorably discharged druggie child rapist brain dead woke progressive Democrats..

    They believe that their hysterical bullshit is actually factually accurate..

    I am calling you out, dishonorably discharged druggie child rapist...

    Prove your bullshit claim with facts or shut the fuck up..

    My bet is you are too stoopid to do either...

    Put up or shut up, fuckface...

    Your silence will PROVE how totally full of shit you really are..

  93. [93] 
    Michale wrote:

    Why all the hassles with a script, people??

    Weren't you supposed to be getting a block feature?? :D

  94. [94] 
    Michale wrote:

    And here is ANOTHER Democrats' Democrat telling you people that yer brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party is.. well... brain dead.. :D This comes to us from CNN...

    The current state of the brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party is nothing short of dismal, marking its weakest and most destroyed position since the Reagan-Bush era, as highlighted by CNN political analyst Ron Brownstein. The party is floundering, struggling to find a coherent message or strategy to regain the trust of the American public. With internal debates about whether to fight on multiple fronts or focus solely on economic issues, it’s clear that Democrats are at a crossroads, and unfortunately, they seem to be heading in the wrong direction. Perpetually...

    Brownstein's analysis underscores the brain dead woke progressive Democrats' failure to effectively counter the GOP's budget proposals, which would ehance the viability of crucial programs like Medicaid and Medicare. Instead of presenting a united front, Democratic lawmakers have resorted to chaotic protests during significant events, such as President Trump's address to Congress. This lack of coordination and focus has not only alienated potential supporters but has also drawn criticism from within their very own ranks, further highlighting their inconsequentiality in the current political landscape.

    The brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party's complete and utter impotence at capitalizing on the GOP's alleged unpopular budget cuts is a glaring oversight. But when yer brain dead, like the woke progressive Democrat Party is brain dead, they miss opportunities all across the board.

    While Brownstein suggests that linking these cuts to the party's messaging could be their best chance for a comeback in 2025, it remains to be seen if they can rally around this strategy effectively. But, of course, they can't rally around anything. The dismal strategy of the brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party revolves around pink outfits, cringe super hero videos and ping pong paddles.. :eyeroll:

    In a time when decisive action and clear messaging are the ONLY viable options, the brain dead woke progressive Democrats appear to be lost in a quagmire of indecision and disarray... stupidity and hysterical BS.

    Their current trajectory suggests that they are not just weak but utterly inconsequential and completely without ANY level of competence whatsoever. The brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party has utterly failed to present a viable alternative to the American people.

    And, since the brain dead Party hasn't a CLUE how to do anything else but Trump/America hate and PTDS, it's a guarantee that the brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party will remain irrelevant in the political discourse for decades to come.

  95. [95] 
    Michale wrote:

    And lets hear from CNN again... :D

    The current state of the brain dead woke progressive Democrats is nothing short of a disaster, as highlighted by CNN's Van Jones, who candidly stated that the party is "screwed." With an approval rating plummeting to a mere 31% following the election of PRESIDENT Trump, it’s clear that the Democrats are trapped in a nightmare of their own making. Jones pointed out the internal strife within the party, caught between establishment members and the more radical progressives, with no clear path forward out of the wilderness.

    Jones's observations reveal a brain dead party that is desperately trying to defend a broken status quo that the American voters have completely and utterly rejected. Instead of offering a compelling vision for the future, the brain dead woke progressive Democrats have resorted to alienating the very voters they need to win back.

    By labeling dissenters as sexist, racist, and transphobic, they have created a toxic environment that repels potential supporters. As Jones aptly noted, "defending a broken status quo and offending most of the country" is not a winning strategy. And yet, that is the ONLY "strategy" that the brain dead Party can come up with! It's MIND-BOGGLING!!!

    The fallout from this internal chaos is evident, as seen in the backlash against Democratic Rep. Al Green for his disruptive behavior during PRESIDENT Trump’s address to Congress. An overwhelming 80% of respondents in a CNN poll deemed Green's actions totally abysmal and unacceptable, further illustrating the disconnect between the brain dead woke progressive Democrats and the American people. Even within their ranks, there are signs of discontent, with reports of reprimands for disruptive behavior among party members.

    OK Kids, let's recap.. The brain dead woke progressive Democrats are in an impossible situation, struggling to achieve even the smallest shred of relevance in a political landscape that has totally and unequivocally turned against them.

    Look at the facts, people.. Brain Dead Democrat Party has a **THIRTY ONE PERCENT*** approval rating..

    Dumbass Al Green, the brain dead moron that ya'all cheered and celebrated??? ***EIGHTY PERCENT*** of Americans said dumbass Al Green was totally wrong in his actions..

    Ya'all just HAVE to acknowledge all these bona fide FACTS that PROVE the brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party is dying an ignoble death..

    Unless brain dead woke progressive Democrats can find a way to unify and present a coherent message that resonates with the public (and EVERYONE here *KNOWS* they can't, the brain dead woke progressive Democrat will remain a ragtag impotent collection of America hating weirdos for at least the rest of my life.

    SILENCE GIVES ASSENT
    -Democrats

  96. [96] 
    Michale wrote:

    Ya'all claim that PRESIDENT Trump's tariffs are bad. At the same time ya'all LOVED Biden's and Odumbo's tariffs. :eyeroll:

    Now let's hear from the UNIONS and how THEY feel about tariffs...

    Ya'all remember UNIONS, right?? Those stalwart Democrat supporters who got thrown under the bus by the very Democrats they supported and went all in for PRESIDENT Trump?? Yea.. THOSE unions..

    This comes from ABC News.. It's amazing how I have such differing sources, which allows me to get the REAL facts instead of relying on the bullshit from just 2 or 3 Democrat propaganda sites..

    The support for PRESIDENT Trump from unions, particularly the United Auto Workers (UAW), highlights a significant shift in the labor landscape. UAW President Shawn Fain recently defended Trump's tariffs on Canada and Mexico, emphasizing their necessity in addressing the ongoing crisis in American jobs. Fain's assertion that the international trade system is "broken" resonates with many workers who have witnessed the devastating effects of free trade agreements like NAFTA, which he blames for the loss of millions of jobs over the past three decades.

    In an interview on ABC News' "This Week," Fain stated, "Tariffs are an attempt to stop the bleeding from the hemorrhaging of jobs in America." This perspective underscores the urgency felt by union leaders as they seek to protect American jobs from the relentless pressures of globalization. While tariffs may not be the ultimate solution, Fain argues they are a crucial step in reversing the damage done by previous trade policies.

    The UAW's backing of Trump's tariffs reflects a broader recognition that the North American auto industry is intricately linked across borders. The potential implementation of a 25% tariff on auto imports could significantly impact production costs and consumer prices. While this may raise prices for vehicles—up to $12,000 for electric vehicles—it is seen as a necessary measure to ensure the survival of American manufacturing jobs.

    As PRESIDENT Trump continues to navigate the complexities of trade relations, the support from unions like the UAW signals a growing acknowledgment that protecting American jobs must take precedence over the potential short-term economic repercussions of tariffs. This alignment between labor and Trump’s policies could reshape the future of American manufacturing and trade.

    Looks like the brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party has lost the unions for good.. :D

    SILENCE GIVES ASSENT
    -Democrats

  97. [97] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    Trump is doing what the vast majority of American voters hired him to do.

    49.8% isn't a majority at all, much less a vast one. the correct term is plurality. and even within that plurality, most Trump voters did not ask for nor expect the president to "take care of" them by starting a trade war with Canada.

    JL

  98. [98] 
    Michale wrote:

    Since we have heard from bunch of Democrat Water Carriers, let's see what is being reported by the Functional Government Initiative and the Center for Renewing America...

    The Biden administration's aggressive push for DEI initiatives has resulted in a staggering financial burden on American taxpayers, with over $1 trillion spent on these bullshit programs. A recent study by the Functional Government Initiative and the Center for Renewing America reveals the extensive infusion of DEI policies across 24 federal agencies, highlighting a troubling trend that prioritizes ideology over effective governance.

    Get that people?? Basement Biden and Headboard Harris were ignoring competence and just looking to check off DEI boxes... Not too surprising since checking DEI boxes was how Headboard Harris got her job. :eyeroll:

    From the Defense Department's integration of "environmental/economic justice tools" to FEMA's focus on embedding equity in emergency management, the Biden administration has systematically redirected resources to promote moronic DEI principles. This approach, initiated by Executive Order 13985 on his first day in office, mandated a government-wide commitment to advancing equity and racial justice. However, the consequences of this directive have been detrimental, leading to excessive spending on initiatives that many Americans view as unnecessary and divisive.

    The report outlines that of the 460 identified programs, a significant number are dedicated solely to DEI, with many more incorporating these principles to varying degrees. This pervasive focus on DEI not only diverts critical resources from essential government functions but also fosters a culture of division rather than unity. As Roderick Law from the Center for Renewing America aptly stated, "The nature of DEI is both divisive and anti-American."

    It raises the question: why should these controversial ideologies be forced upon vital sectors like the military, commerce, or environmental protection?

    The PRESIDENT Trump administration has recognized the urgent need to eliminate DEI from the federal bureaucracy, prioritizing meritocracy and effective governance over ideological agendas. As the study suggests, a thorough audit of government programs is essential to dismantle the DEI framework that has infiltrated our institutions. It is time for Congress and RESPNSIBLE leaders (that means no brain dead Democrats) to take action, ensuring that taxpayer dollars are spent on initiatives that truly benefit the American people, rather than on divisive, unnecessary and bullsht DEI-related expenditures.

    SILENCE GIVES ASSENT
    -Democrats

  99. [99] 
    Michale wrote:

    most Trump voters did not ask for nor expect the president to "take care of" them by starting a trade war with Canada.

    So.. you know what TRUMP VOTERS think about these things?? :D

    I find that simply not believable.. :D

  100. [100] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @m
    I can't force you to wrap your head around the fact that I have close friends who voted for your guy. believe it or don't, makes little difference to the way anybody thinks, except perhaps me regarding you.
    JL

  101. [101] 
    Michale wrote:

    The brain dead woke progressive Democrats are floundering in a chaotic abyss, utterly devoid of a coherent message or plan. Their current state resembles that of frightened, isolated creatures, desperately clinging to outdated ideologies while alienating the very voters they need to survive.

    As John Kass aptly points out, their fixation on anti-Trump rhetoric has devolved into a bizarre spectacle, with pundits like Chris Matthews resorting to absurd comparisons that only serve to highlight their disarray and their lack of coherent argument.

    Instead of addressing pressing issues, the Democrats have chosen to engage in immature performative antics, such as their childish protests during PRESIDENT Trump’s Congressional address. Their refusal to support common-sense policies, like protecting women’s sports from biological males, showcases their moral bankruptcy and detachment from objective reality. This is not the party of common sense. This is a brain dead Party that has become a platform for radical ideologies that prioritize performance over substance, ideology and identity over merit and competence.

    Moreover, the brain dead Democrats' open borders policy (such as it was) has led to increased crime and fatalities in cities, further alienating constituents.

    As Senator John Fetterman lamented, the Democrats have become like a blaring car alarm. Ignored and irrelevant. With their contempt for American values and their failure to present a viable alternative, the brain dead woke progressive Democrats are well progressed on the path to self-destruction.

    Unless they can shed their radical agenda and reconnect with the American people, they risk remaining a marginalized force in politics, forever trapped in a hell of their own making.

    SILENCE GIVES ASSENT
    -Democrats

  102. [102] 
    Michale wrote:

    JL,

    I can't force you to wrap your head around the fact that I have close friends who voted for your guy. believe it or don't, makes little difference to the way anybody thinks, except perhaps me regarding you.

    Why did they vote for PRESIDENT Trump if they didn't want him to put America first??

    I just find it hard to believe that you claim they voted for PRESIDENT Trump but don't support his AMERICA FIRST actions..

    I don't understand how ANY PRESIDENT Trump supporters would want the president to put the welfare of CANADIANS before the welfare of AMERICANS..

    What you are telling me of your friends does not jibe with the objective reality..

    You see??

    Let me ask you this..

    Did they vote *FOR* Trump?? Or did they vote AGAINST Headboard Harris because she was an obvious moron...

    It would be so much more believable if I could hear from these friends directly..

    You ask me to take what you're saying on faith..

    Would YOU take anything I say just on faith?? I don't think you would...

    So, we're at an impasse in that regard..

    I get it.. I really do.. I have several friends that are deputies and make MY PRESIDENT Trump support look subtle by comparison..

    But I wouldn't want them to come on here and see all the disgusting and perverted posts from the likes of the dishonorably discharged druggie child rapist and Russ troll who is obsessed with incest and only posts about me..

    So I see where you are coming from.. I wouldn't want to expose MY friends to the likes of Victoria Troll, Russ Troll and the dishonorably discharged druggie child rapist...

    But without the ability to cross-examine your friends to get to the facts.... Taking what you say on faith is asking a lot..

    I mean, I took a LOT based on faith from 2010 CW... Look where that got me... Lost the best 'net friend I ever had...

    :^/

  103. [103] 
    Mezzomamma wrote:

    MyVoice, no luck with changing the first line or installing the beta version, but I'll see what a restart does.

  104. [104] 
    Mezzomamma wrote:

    MyVoice, no change with a restart. With the new first line, would that go on line 1, or after line 1 'user script'?

  105. [105] 
    Michale wrote:

    Mezzo,

    Just wait for the BLOCK feature.. I am SURE it's just around the corner.. :D

    OR...

    Or you could actually engage and have a discussion about opinions that you don't necessarily agree with..

    Ach, what am I thinking.. That's not the Democrat Party way anymore.. The Democrat Party way is to live in a bubble filled with nothing but Trump/America hate and PTDS...

    "That last statement WAS rational"
    -Commander Spock, WHOM GODS DESTROY

  106. [106] 
    Mezzomamma wrote:

    It's only running on Edge for me, but that's better than nothing.

  107. [107] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    over $1 trillion spent

    Functional Government Initiative, which has almost no internet presence and Center for Renewing America headed by a christian nationalist. Sounds sketchy to me...

  108. [108] 
    MyVoice wrote:

    [106] Mezzomamma

    That line should go before the user script line.

    Hmm, no issues for me on the BETA. If you'll describe any feedback you get from the fail, I'll try to troubleshoot it

  109. [109] 
    Michale wrote:

    I find it hilarious in the extreme that people supposedly tolerant Democrats are going to so much effort simply because they don't want to read somebody else's opinion when all they need to do is not read the opinion.

    That is extremely hilarious to me.

  110. [110] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Almost as hilarious as how much it seems to bother you...

  111. [111] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    No kidding, Bashi. I wonder if cho’mo is still wasting keystrokes on me. Hope it’s a lot! The maybe dozen comments I’ve read by accident this year just confirms that it’s just more of the same — nothing to see, folks [yawn].

    I may start using my left forefinger to scroll so I get a more balanced finger workout.

  112. [112] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    It has been mostly meme gloat lately. Silly considering what's going on in the real world...

  113. [113] 
    John M from Ct. wrote:

    MTC on [111]
    I like the idea of switching fingers for troll-scrolling to balance the sheer fatigue. Thanks!

  114. [114] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    Yet welcome. I prefer more holistic, whole body approach. ;)

  115. [115] 
    Kick wrote:

    nypoet22
    88

    it wasn't an admonishment by any stretch, just advice.

    Lots of advice is definitely delivered via an admonishment. Your advice was delivered after you corrected what you thought was one poster calling another poster "stupid" when he was describing his posting style in a dead-on-accurate fashion.

    But okay, you definitely have a right to admonish people. I'll concede that.

    good advice costs nothing and it's worth the price
    ~alan Sherman- good advice

    Sentences begin with capital letters and end with periods. Proper names are also capitalized as well as names of published works. This "good advice" stuff is contagious. :)

Comments for this article are closed.