Nothin' To See Here, Folks? Seriously?
In what universe does information about exactly what (and where) American warplanes are targeting, the timing of airstrikes, and what weapons will be used in those airstrikes not qualify as "classified information"? That is a jaw-dropping concept, but that is one of the excuses being lamely trotted out for the massive security breach that recently happened. The secretary of Defense just decided on his own, willy-nilly, that such information was somehow perfectly acceptable to talk about on unsecured systems (possibly even including private, non-governmental phones)? That's without even adding in "with a journalist in on the chat" -- but that is indeed the tack some are attempting to take right now. It's all just no big deal, they insist. Nothin' to see here, folks!
Two of the people who participated in the Signal chat appeared before a Senate committee today, and they both tried to float this excuse, incredulously insisting at first that no classified information was shared on the chat. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard even refused to admit that she had even been on the chat. Later in the hearing, Gabbard and C.I.A. Director John Ratcliffe "added caveats to their answers, saying that no classified information under U.S. intelligence agencies' purview was discussed." They both said that the question of any other information being classified should be asked of the Defense secretary. This is laughably unbelievable.
Any rational human being would consider: "We're going to bomb this target at this particular time with this particular weapon" to be not just classified national security information, but in fact information classified at the highest level of secrecy. It's tough to even imagine anything which would be more secret, in fact. But nobody on that chat ever said a word about this stark fact.
They're trying to claim -- with a straight face -- that this is all a big to-do about nothing, and that such information wasn't really all that secret anyway. Here's one exchange between a Democratic senator and the C.I.A. chief:
By discussing the timing of a military campaign, they were revealing "the time period during which enemy air defenses could target U.S. aircrews flying in enemy airspace," Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Georgia) said.
"I don't know that," Ratcliffe said.
"You do know that," Ossoff countered.
Senator Michael Bennet had another pertinent question for them: "Did you know the president's Middle East advisor was in Moscow on this thread while you were?" So we've got a top presidential advisor chatting about operational war plans on an unsecure phone in Moscow? And somehow that's supposed to not be a big deal? Senator Ron Wyden called for "resignations, starting with the national security advisor and the secretary of Defense."
Astonishingly, Ossoff directly asked Ratcliffe to agree that the whole thing was "a huge mistake, correct?" -- to which Ratcliffe answered: "No."
This is fantasyland, folks. It wasn't a huge mistake? War plans are somehow not highly-classified national security information? The journalist somehow made it all up or is lying? Seriously? "Nothin' to see here, folks..."? One has to wonder what planet these folks are living on.
To state the obvious: anyone who wasn't a presidential toady would have not only been fired immediately, they likely would have been arrested and charged with violating national security laws by now. But because they are all highly-unqualified sycophants, Republicans are trying to get away with just shrugging the whole thing off. A few have expressed some concern, to their credit, but so far no House or Senate committee has announced it will be opening an investigation into this gross security breach at the highest levels.
This shouldn't even be a partisan issue. The egregious disregard for security and the callousness about putting American servicemembers in danger should be obvious on both sides of the aisle. If the Republican Party hadn't turned into a cult of personality, it would.
Democrats are reacting with visceral anger, as they should:
Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the Democratic leader, on Tuesday urged President Trump to immediately fire Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for discussing sensitive details of a pending strike in Yemen in a high-level group Signal chat that included a journalist.
"Pete Hegseth is the most unqualified secretary of defense in American history," Mr. Jeffries wrote in a letter sent to Mr. Trump at the White House, which was obtained by The New York Times. "His continued presence in the top position of leadership at the Pentagon threatens the nation's security and puts our brave men and women in uniform throughout the world in danger."
. . .
Mr. Jeffries, who has previously been highly critical of Mr. Hegseth, told Mr. Trump that he should be "fired immediately."
"The so-called secretary of defense recklessly and casually disclosed highly sensitive war plans -- including the timing of a pending attack, possible strike targets and the weapons to be used -- during an unclassified national security group chat that inexplicably included a reporter," Mr. Jeffries wrote. "His behavior shocks the conscience, risked American lives and likely violated the law."
The loudest calls for heads to roll, though, should come from people who have previously served in uniform -- who know full well what "operational security" is supposed to mean. And who know what breaching that security can mean. Which is why we end today with an excerpt from a column written by David French, who is a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom:
This would be a stunning breach of security. I'm a former Army JAG officer (an Army lawyer). I've helped investigate numerous allegations of classified information spillages, and I've never even heard of anything this egregious -- a secretary of defense intentionally using a civilian messaging app to share sensitive war plans without even apparently noticing a journalist was in the chat.
There is not an officer alive whose career would survive a security breach like that. It would normally result in instant consequences (relief from command, for example) followed by a comprehensive investigation and, potentially, criminal charges.
Federal law makes it a crime when a person -- through gross negligence -- removes information "relating to the national defense" from "its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted or destroyed."
It's way too soon to say whether Hegseth's incompetence is also criminal, but I raise the possibility to demonstrate the sheer magnitude of the reported mistake. A security breach that significant requires a thorough investigation.
. . .
What example has Hegseth set? That he's careless, and when you're careless in the military, people can die. If he had any honor at all, he would resign.
-- Chris Weigant
Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant
I very much appreciate this follow-up on the issue, now that the media and Congress and other commenters have had a day to digest it, and start to ask questions and demand consequences.
But I'm afraid the outrage will produce no actual resignations or even admissions of error (don't say guilt) from this Republican administration.
As you say, they are all toadies, and the head toad probably doesn't even understand what happened. As I understand it, someone had to brief the president to approve this attack, and that staffer said privately that T. showed no comprehension of who the Houtis were or why we would attack them now rather than at any other time.
That's not the kind of chief executive who's going to listen to public opinion or resort to common sense and patriotism when his toadies have stumbled into a mess like this.
In what universe does information about exactly what (and where) American warplanes are targeting, the timing of airstrikes, and what weapons will be used in those airstrikes not qualify as "classified information"?
I actually know the answer to this one, and so (I believe) do you:
The MAGA Universe where unicorns fart rainbows and pixies frolic in the meadow.
coming from a president who stole 17 boxes full of classified documents to use as conversation pieces with his golf buddies, of course it's not a big deal.
Later in the hearing, Gabbard and C.I.A. Director John Ratcliffe "added caveats to their answers, saying that no classified information under U.S. intelligence agencies' purview was discussed."
They're trying to claim -- with a straight face -- that this is all a big to-do about nothing, and that such information wasn't really all that secret anyway.
And here is what our allies hear every time they collectively repeat and amplify these hysterical claims like groupthink morons stuck on stupid: You cannot trust these amateurish gaslighting hysterical clowns with signals intelligence... so don't.
It's classic DARVO: Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender, and it's the same manipulative tactic used by perpetrators of fraud and abuse to deflect blame and responsibility for their own actions. In simpler terms, it's gaslighting. Same old bullshit, different day.
The White House has acknowledged mistakes were made. It's just totally asinine for anyone to pretend it hasn't because you just look infinitely stupid while the cameras are recording it for all posterity. Let the goon squad keep admitting their intent and prattling on and on while the cameras are rolling.
I definitely see chainsaws, Melakon referring to Social Security as a "Ponzi scheme" (his words) and gaslighting groupthink unqualified morons coming to multiple political ads near most of us.
*laughs* Maybe the obviously unqualified dipshit does not know what that is. Or maybe he cannot stop himself from fabricating the obvious propaganda bullshit because he lied for a living over on Fox News? Maybe both.
Regardless, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that a Fox Newsian weekend anchor who has been described by multiple of his network colleagues as a functional alcoholic isn't qualified to hold the position of SECDEF. Duh.
Elect a criminal, get a crime scene.
Appoint clowns, expect a circus.
The loudest calls for heads to roll, though, should come from people who have previously served in uniform -- who know full well what "operational security" is supposed to mean. And who know what breaching that security can mean.
Exactly. Totally. Absolutely. And I would simply like to add the following for everyone to keep firmly in mind:
Anyone who claims to have been in the military EVER at any time in their life who attempts to gaslight you with the hysterical idea that somehow you have a problem because you don't understand the absolute festering pile of Trumpian con artist flaming bullshit with which they're attempting to snow you... KNOW THIS: They aren't insulting your intelligence, they are exposing the dearth of their own and the depths of their subservience to demonstrable ignorance.
The semantic games they are attempting to play now go far beyond hysterical:
* "Those weren't 'war plans'... they were 'attack plans.'"
* "Nothing was classified."
* "But the Pentagon said."
Trump's press secretaries have the easiest job, don't they? Just claim they will always be truthful (echoing Trump's "I will never lie to you" BS) and then lie, lie, lie repeatedly and pretend like everyone who doesn't believe your demonstrable con artist propaganda bullshit are the actual confused people. *laughs*
The current rhetorical bullshit has to be the dumbest line of defense I've ever heard (qualifier) so far. There is still obviously plenty of time for far crazier ignorance to follow. "War plans" is a very broad term; it includes operational plans, logistical plans, defensive plans, strategic plans, and (of course) effing "attack plans," and anyone who claims otherwise is absolutely clueless and/or obviously believes you are.
I do have to disagree with Trump's press secretary, Karoline, though, the text of the unsecured Signal chat and now admitted "attack plans" was obviously "surprise party plans" with missiles for candles. The real story here, according to Karoline, is "Joe Biden." Oh, Karoline, you pathetic little liar; anyone with two brain cells to rub together can obviously see the "real story here" is Hunter Biden's laptop. Duh.
/sarcasm off
So here's hoping the Trumpian goon squad of unqualified clowns and former Fox News anchors keep opining the absolute gaslighting drivel and rubbish they are spewing on repeat while cameras are rolling and recording for all posterity and while the world is definitely listening, pointing, and laughing at the Trumpian cult of sniveling, cowardly, ignorant, subservient: Mindless American Gullible Airheads.
Are ya'all over your hysterical bullshit yet??
BBBWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Did anyone notice how Goldberg has changed his story?? Anyone notice what missing from the CURRENT story that was in the original claim??
First what was discussed was "top secret"...
THEN what was discussed became "classified"...
NOW the story is what was discussed is, ALL OF THE SUDDEN, "sensitive"...
And YOU people are STILL buying into the bullshit!! :D
BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Also, did ya'all notice how Goldberg CLAIMED that an undercover CIA operative's identity was exposed??
We NOW come to find out that the "operative" was actually NOT a CIA undercover agent, but was, in fact, CIA Director Ratcliffe's Chief Of Staff..
BBBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
And another thing..
Goldberg claimed that "war plans" were put on this chat..
Goldberg claimed that they were "TOP SECRET" plans and his releasing them would damage National Security..
But then Goldberg changes his mind and releases the "war plans"..
"War Plans" that include ZERO Names... ZERO Targets.... ZERO Unit Designations... ZERO Sources... ZERO Methods... and ZERO classified information..
And YOU frakin' retards fell for it HOOK LINE and SINKER!!!!
BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Just when you think that brain dead Democrats couldn't get MORE retarded, they up and prove ya wrong by being even MORE retarded and gullible!!!
BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You morons BOUGHT this load of garbage from the ATLANTIC!!!
Ya'all brain dead MORONS DESERVE all the ridicule that will come ya'all's way...
When are you people going to learn!??
You CAN'T beat PRESIDENT Trump... Not when he has a MANDATE from the American voters!! :D
But, by all means... Continue to try... It's amusing as hell!! :D
Dig that hole deeper and deeper!! I frakin' DARE you!!! :D
When it comes to the military, you people are completely and utterly CLUELESS...
Probably because none of you have ever served in the US Military..
You morons are COMPLETELY and UTTERLY ***IGNORANT*** of what's what in the military..
So, please... Just shut the fuck up about the military.. People will think yer retards...
But THAT is much better than opening yer yaps and removing ALL doubt that ya'all are, indeed, morons!!
:eyeroll:
You dare us? With what? A bunch of page long heavily edited copy and paste hack jobs? Oh, No! My finger will be so tired...
So your big defense is a bunch of ad hominems and assertions backed up by a big fat nothing. That's pathetic even for you...
This reminds me of the time during PRESIDENT Trump 1.0 where NY SLIMES printed a letter from "ANONYMOUS" who claimed to be a high level PRESIDENT Trump advisor and who claimed all sorts of bullshit..
Ya'all fell for THAT one HOOK, LINE and SINKER as well..
It turned out that "ANONYMOUS" was some State Department Janitor or some such..
BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You retards are SOOO filled with TRUMP/AMERICA hate and ruled by your PTDS, ya'all will latch on to ANY claim no matter HOW much bullshit is spewed...
And PRESIDENT Trump keeps slamming you retards into the ground OVER and OVER again!!
How much bullshit will you people slurp up before you realize that yer being played!!!???
The brain dead Democrat Party hasn't learned a SINGLE lesson from the 2024 election where their lawfare operations handed PRESIDENT Trump a HUGE win...
The actions of the brain dead Democrat Party in recent years have reached a level of hypocrisy that is both alarming and disheartening. Their continued reliance on lawfare and judge shopping is not just an UN-AMERICAN operation, it is a blatant admission of their lack of popular support and a desperate attempt to undermine a duly elected PRESIDENT Trump. The irony is palpable: while they accuse PRESIDENT Trump of being a “threat to democracy,” it is their own actions that pose a far greater risk to the democratic process.
In the wake of the 2024 election, where President Trump emerged victorious by a HUGE landslide, one would expect the Democrats to reflect on their strategies and reconsider their approach. Instead, they have doubled and TRIPLED down on their utterly retarded lawfare tactics, believing that they can manipulate the judicial system to achieve their political goals.
This is not just a failure to learn from past mistakes; it is a refusal to acknowledge the will of the American people. The brain dead Democrats’ obsession with judge shopping —seeking out sympathetic judges to block Trump’s policies— reveals their unwillingness to engage in the democratic process. They would rather circumvent the will of the electorate through legal loopholes than face the reality of their defeat.
The brain dead Democrats’ hypocrisy is further highlighted by their own historical actions. When they claimed that democracy would be in peril if PRESIDENT Trump won, they conveniently ignored the fact that they themselves would be the ones creating that peril. The party that once celebrated executive action under President Odumbo now seeks to undermine PRESIDENT Trump’s presidency at every turn, using the courts as a weapon. This is not just a political strategy; it is a fundamental betrayal of the principles of democracy.
Take, for example, the brain dead Democrats’ attempts to block PRESIDENT Trump’s military policies regarding mentally ill Americans suffering from the mental illness of gender dysphoria. By forum shopping for judges who will issue nationwide injunctions, they are effectively stymying PRESIDENT Trump's ability to implement policies that he believes are crucial for military readiness. This tactic is not only disingenuous but also detrimental to the very institutions they claim to protect. The military should not be dictated by the whims of a few unelected judges who are more concerned with political correctness than with national security.
Moreover, the brain dead Democrats’ relentless lawsuits against PRESIDENT Trump’s immigration policies reveal their true priorities. While Trump’s agenda to deport violent criminals and gang members is widely supported by the American public, the brain Democrats have chosen to fight tooth and nail to keep these individuals in the country.
Get that!?? RETARDED Democrats are FIGHTING to keep murderers and rapists and druggies and terrorists IN!!!! How utterly retarded is that!!???
This is not just a legal battle; it is a complete and utter failure of ANY morality whatsoever. The party that claims to champion the rights of the marginalized is, in reality, prioritizing the rights of murderers and rapists and druggies and terrorists over the safety of law-abiding American citizens.
So, children.. If you weren't so brain-damaged, what would you have learned???
The brain dead Democrat Party’s continued lawfare and judge shopping are not just tactics; they are a reflection of their failure to accept the outcome of the 2024 election. Their blatant and unequivocal hypocrisy is evident in their actions, as they scream about threats to democracy while actively working to undermine it.
If they truly cared about the democratic process, they would engage with the electorate rather than resorting to legal maneuvers that only serve to highlight their desperation. The American people have spoken, and it is time for the brain dead retarded Democrats to listen and learn from their defeat, rather than continuing down a path of obstruction and hypocrisy.
SILENCE GIVES ASSENT....
Release every single word of it without skipping a single one. Since multiple of the clowns have now stated (many of them under oath and subject to prosecution) that nothing was classified, then by all means necessary, publish the entire chat.
-Victoria Troll
Goldberg DID release every word of it..
And guess what!!?
NONE of it was ANYTHING like Goldberg claimed it was!!!
BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
NONE of it was classified!!!
NONE of it had ANY info on ANY undercover operative..
BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
**ALL** of Goldberg's claims were NOTHING but complete and utter BULLSHIT!!!
It wouldn't surprise me a single bit if ALL of this was planned by the PRESIDENT Trump team to completely and unequivocally EMBARRASS a known Trump/America hater..
If so, it worked like a charm!!
ALL OF YOU MORONS fell for it!!!
BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I just LOVE how fucking GULLIBLE you morons are!!!
You'll believe ANYTHING!!!!!
BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
SILENCE GIVES ASSENT!!!
:D
Seriously, people..
WHAT will it take for ya'all to admit that ya'all moron Democrats have LOST the country??
I mean... Look at the FACTS...
Yer brain dead Democrat Party got TOTALLY killed in the Electoral Vote..
Yer brain dead Democrat Party got totally CREAMED in the Popular Vote by MILLIONS of votes!!
And yet... Ya'all are so BRAIN DEAD, you STILL believe that the American voter is on yer side!!???
BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
What would it take for ya'all to say, "Yunno what?? We're wrong.. We're totally and completely WRONG about everything.."
Or are ya'all such RETARDED fanatics in the brain dead Democrat Party cult that NOTHING that could happen would change your fanatical minds...
Which is it???
So, given the circumstances, I watched STAR TREK DEEP SPACE NINE, IN THE PALE MOONLIGHT... Awesome episode!!
Of course, THAT lead to me watching UNTHINKABLE with Samuel L Jackson and Carrie Moss...
What an AWESOME movie that is!!! Totally puts forth why DEMOCRATS are **ALWAYS** losing against PRESIDENT Trump....
Brain dead Democrats are more concerned about their ideological agenda than they are about the country...
And THAT is why they ALWAYS lose in the end...
Watch UNTHINKABLE... You'll see...
It's really funny how you brain dead Democrats get all hysterical about this supposed innocent mistake..
Yet you totally IGNORE how Basement Biden frak'ed up Afghanistan so bad that 13 brave American troops were killed..
You brain dead morons' priorities are SEVERELY out of whack!!!
The recent uproar surrounding the PRESIDENT Trump administration's Signal group chat fiasco has provided Democrats with an opportunity to gloat about perceived incompetence. However, this reaction is not only hypocritical but also distracts from the far more significant blunders committed by the Biden administration. While the Signal incident certainly raises concerns about national security protocols, it pales in comparison to the catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan that left American soldiers and countless Afghan civilians in peril.
Democrats seem all too eager to point fingers at the PRESIDENT Trump team, reveling in the sensationalized narrative that portrays them as bumbling and reckless. Yet, it is essential to recognize that the mistakes made in the Signal chat, while serious, do not carry the same weight as the Biden administration's failures. The chaotic exit from Afghanistan resulted in a humanitarian crisis and a loss of American lives, yet this monumental blunder has been largely brushed aside by the very same Democrats who are now quick to criticize Trump.
The Signal incident involved a group chat where national security officials discussed military plans, inadvertently including a journalist. While this was a significant error, it is crucial to note that the planning for the airstrikes had already been completed before the journalist was added to the conversation. The airstrikes themselves were successful in targeting Houthi rebels, a necessary action given their threats in the region. In contrast, the Biden administration's handling of Afghanistan was marked by chaos and tragedy, leading to a complete collapse of order and safety.
Moreover, the Democrats' outrage over the Signal chat seems misplaced when considering the broader context of national security. The Biden administration has faced numerous challenges, including rising tensions with adversaries and a lack of coherent foreign policy. Yet, instead of addressing these pressing issues, Democrats choose to focus on a relatively minor misstep by the Trump administration, revealing their partisan bias.
It is time for Democrats to acknowledge the gravity of their own administration's failures rather than deflecting attention onto the Trump team. The Signal story, while deserving of scrutiny, should not overshadow the far more critical issues at hand. The American public deserves a government that prioritizes national security and learns from past mistakes, rather than one that engages in petty political games.
So, what have you brain dead children learned??
While the PRESIDENT Trump administration must take responsibility for its errors, Democrats should not ignore the significant blunders of the Biden administration. The focus should be on ensuring that national security is handled with the utmost care, rather than indulging in partisan sniping that ultimately distracts from the real issues facing our country.
In short. Retarded Democrats have NO moral or ethical foundation to point fingers at the PRESIDENT Trump administration..
Clean up yer own shit first, morons...
SILENCE GIVES ASSENT....
Another theory is it was another ANONYMOUS type janitor who wanted to embarrass the PRESIDENT Trump administration.
He (or she) sabotaged the chat by inviting the Trump/America hating moron, Goldberg...
It SOUNDS plausible...
A Trump/America hater tries something and it totally blows back on brain dead Democrats!! :D
Here is Democrat Mark Penn's theory...
Seriously
You think that Jeffrey Goldberg got added to a high-level national security conversation by chance? Maybe you thought Covid was from the wet market and not from the lab that was right there and contained Covid-like viruses.
The chance that this was done by an operative looking to embarrass the administration is about 90 per cent. The chance someone added him because they were looking for another Jeffrey is about 10 per cent.
This was a security breach but most likely one by a partisan trying to undermine the administration than by the participants on the chain. I’m not a conspiracy theorist — I just play the odds and the odds it was an innocent mistake are low and deliberate act are high. Of course, though, I’m waiting for the final answer.
Regardless of how it happened, brain dead retarded Democrats are looking worse and worse!!! :D
BashiBazouk
8
You dare us? With what?
His usual urination and defecation, and then after that I would wager he'll naturally resume the hunching and crotch sniffing of his master, Hair Dick Tater. All rather predictable and definitely archived.
A bunch of page long heavily edited copy and paste hack jobs? Oh, No! My finger will be so tired...
Heh.
So your big defense is a bunch of ad hominems and assertions backed up by a big fat nothing. That's pathetic even for you...
The Trumpian crotch sniffers and clowns are definitely not coming across as intelligent as they appear to believe they are. Check out Pete Hegseth making a total fool of himself. That ridiculous spin of his doesn't match the facts... not by a long shot multiplied by a thousand. History will judge this unqualified lying daft moron very harshly.
This one is NOT rocket science: Hegseth shared the classified plans in extraordinary detail a full two hours before the scheduled start of the bombing of Houthi positions, and anyone telling you otherwise is lying to you. I would wager should there be an investigation of the issue, you will find that information on a document that is clearly marked classified, and you will obviously now find it all over the Internet with the asinine and laughable claims that it was never classified.
The exact times that American aircraft are taking off for Yemen is obviously classified information; anyone who tells you otherwise is lying. Pete Hegseth put the exact timing and sequencing of the mission into an unclassified commercial text app and also revealed the type of aircraft that would be used to conduct the strikes multiple hours before the mission took place. That is classified.
So, as I said before, our allies (and enemies for that matter) are hearing on repetitive loop from our leadership that information like that isn't classified. So why on Earth would they continue to share signals intelligence and classified information with the United States under the current conditions? Rhetorical question.
Watching STAR TREK Deep Space Nine some more...
TRIALS AND TRIBBLE-LATIONS...
Chief O'Brien says "Look how Kirk is letting that security officer handle the Klingon." during the Scotty/Korax exchange from the old TOS episode...
I find it IMPOSSIBLE to believe that Chief O'Brien would not recognize *THE* most famous Chief Engineer in Starfleet history...
That's just WRONG...
But, of course.. Since ya'all are completely and utterly IGNORANT of what Star Trek is all about... Ya'all don't see the blooper..
SILENCE GIVES ASSENT....
So much for Victoria Troll's bullshit claims that she doesn't read my comments!!!
BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
Guess yer full of shit like yer Tamper Monkey script, eh Victoria Troll!!!????
BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
That "gender gap" is looking wicked in 2024; don't be surprised if not a single pollster had a 10-point gender gap factored into their calculations and therefore underestimated the Harris vote. You should also not be surprised if the amount of Republicans voting for Democrats was also underestimated by pollsters. I would wager the Independent vote will also favor Harris.
Women are going to decide this election. :)
-Victoria Troll
Yep....
EVERYONE can believe Victoria Troll's comments!!!
BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
INDEPENDENTS WILL FAVOR HARRIS!!!!
BBBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
What a retard Victoria Troll is!!! :D
At this point, there are millions of votes already cast, and patterns are emerging. For instance, there's always a gender gap between the number of women voters versus men voters, but I would wager there isn't a single poll in all those plethora of polls that is accurately reflecting the actual size. I also don't think the polling formulas are reflecting accurately the number of crossover votes of what I will refer to as the "Harris Republicans."
-Victoria Troll
Hay Victoria.. Where did all those "Harris Republicans" go!!???
BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I guess they ALL voted for PRESIDENT Trump!!! :D
Oh ANOTHER gem from Victoria Troll!! :D
As I have stated many times, Trump has an uppermost ceiling of around/between 46% to 47%, and that has been the case for a long time and has not changed one scintilla.
-Victoria Troll
Looks like you were TOTALLY full of SHIT, Victoria Troll!!
Not only did PRESIDENT Trump sweep *ALL* of the SWING States...
PRESIDENT Trump **WON THE POPULAR VOTE BY MILLIONS OF VOTES**!!!!!
As is PROVEN beyond ANY doubt, Victoria Troll..
You are COMPLETELY and UTTERLY full of shit!!!
The FACTS prove this beyond ANY doubt!!! :D
however, it is highly unlikely that Trump will win the popular vote.
-Victoria Troll
What a retarded MORON Victoria Troll is!!! :D
Aww right, I am done for the night..
Can't wait to see what new hysterical bullshit ya'all come up with next!! :D
Love it when ya'all are ALWAYS losing to PRESIDENT Trump!!! :D
Check out Pete Hegseth making a total fool of himself. That ridiculous spin of his doesn't match the facts... not by a long shot multiplied by a thousand. History will judge this unqualified lying daft moron very harshly.
Hegseth continues to embarrass himself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk4lU0rHOhw
He claims to have been providing mission updates in "real time" and "nothing was classified" when he was definitely providing classified information hours before the mission, and others on the Signal chat provide BDA .
Meanwhile, quoting Donald Trump regarding same:
The Trumpian crotch sniffers and clowns are definitely not coming across as intelligent as they appear to believe they are. Check out Pete Hegseth making a total fool of himself. That ridiculous spin of his doesn't match the facts... not by a long shot multiplied by a thousand. History will judge this unqualified lying daft moron very harshly.
Edited my [16] to add link wherein Pete Hegseth -- a veteran who damn well knows better -- continues to gaslight America and makes a fool out of himself and the troops that he's tasked to serve. It also leads me to wonder if any of those troops given the chance will have the cojones (testicles) to ask him why he outright fabricated multiple lies about what is and is not obvious classified information. America's credibility around the world is being destroyed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk4lU0rHOhw
Hegseth's "warrior ethos" is to gaslight, obstruct, lie, blame others, deflect blame, and deny responsibility, and believe me when I tell you this BS will earn him scant respect from the troops he is obligated and sworn to serve.
I would definitely like to be a fly on the wall (figure of speech) when a soldier asks him: "All due respect, sir, you know that the details of timing and weapons descriptions of a planned attack are classified and the resultant BDA is classified, and you know full well it was included on that Signal chat. I request explanation, sir."
I do not know how Pete Hegseth could face a single troop after he knows damn well how he's gaslighting this issue, and he obviously knows the men and women who've ever served and are serving now know he's full of shit up to his eyeballs.
Our troops who put their lives on the line deserve so much better than this obviously lying sack of shit.